Armstrong (PA) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Armstrong (PA) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Armstrong (PA)
22,887
Total Investors in Armstrong (PA)
5,805
Investor Owned SFR in Armstrong (PA)
4,605(20.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,407
SFR Owned
4,080
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
398
SFR Owned
566
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,605 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Armstrong County, showing strong Q4 net buying
Landlords own 4,605 SFR properties in Armstrong County, representing 20.1% of the market, with individual investors holding 88.6%. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.5% of investor-owned SFR, while institutional presence is minimal. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 52 properties at a 15.4% discount to homeowners and were net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio, contrasting with institutional investors who were net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 4,605 SFR properties, with individuals owning 88.6% of the portfolio.
Of all landlord-owned SFR properties, 98.0% (4,512 properties) are rented, indicating a strong rental focus. Cash transactions for acquisition are substantial, representing 82.8% (3,814 properties) of landlord holdings compared to 17.2% (791 properties) that are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secure 15.4% discount in Q4, paying $29,598 less than homeowners.
The landlord discount varied significantly quarter-over-quarter, from a high of 26.6% ($52,758) in Q2 2025 to a low of 2.3% ($4,512) in Q3 2025, indicating volatile market conditions and varying negotiation leverage. While recent quarter data for landlord property purchases explicitly shows 0 properties, the recorded average prices and discounts against homeowners suggest underlying market activity or pricing models. The available data does not differentiate acquisition prices between individual and company landlords.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords comprised 23.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% from mom-and-pop investors.
All 52 landlord purchases in Q4 2025 were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 78.8% (41 properties) of these acquisitions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4, signaling a minimal to non-existent presence in new acquisitions for Armstrong County.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of investor-owned SFR, dwarfing institutional presence.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone constitute the largest segment, holding 77.5% (3,681 properties) of the total investor-owned portfolio, affirming their critical role in the local rental market. Specific acquisition price variations by tier and historical price trends were not available in the provided data for comparison.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in 11-20 property portfolios, controlling 91.7% in this tier.
Individual investors dominate the smaller tiers, holding 93.0% of single-property portfolios and 82.0% of 3-5 property portfolios. However, by the 6-10 property tier, companies constitute a substantial 47.0% of ownership, indicating a significant shift from individual control. Data for specific acquisition price differences between individual and company buyers within each tier was not available.
Geographic Distribution
PA-Armstrong-16201 leads with 925 investor-owned properties, 16.6% of its market.
PA-Armstrong-15682 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 83.3%, though specific property count data is not provided for this zip code. Three zip codes, including PA-Armstrong-16201, PA-Armstrong-16226 (501 properties, 18.4% rate), and PA-Armstrong-15613 (363 properties, 21.1% rate), form the top tier by investor-owned property count.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, while institutions remain net sellers.
All landlords collectively maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2025 (259 buys vs 60 sells) and 2024 (315 buys vs 58 sells), consistently acquiring significantly more properties than they sold. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in both Year 2025 (1 buy vs 6 sells) and Year 2024 (4 buys vs 12 sells), indicating a strategic divestment trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords account for 22.9% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pops driving all activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 59 transactions at an average price of $164,830. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for all 72 landlord transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) had no Q4 transaction activity. The highest inter-landlord purchase percentage came from the 3-5 property tier at 28.6% (2 of 7 transactions).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 4,605 SFR properties, with individuals owning 88.6% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Armstrong County own a significant 4,605 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, comprising 20.1% of the entire SFR market, highlighting the investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 4,080 properties, which accounts for 88.6% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, company landlords own only 566 properties, representing just 12.3% of the portfolio, challenging narratives of corporate landlord takeover.

The landlord portfolio demonstrates a strong rental focus, with 4,512 properties (98.0%) designated as rented, confirming that the vast majority of investor-owned SFR in this county serve as rental housing.

Cash acquisitions are the prevailing method among landlords, with 3,814 properties (82.8%) purchased outright. This significantly outweighs financed properties, which stand at 791 (17.2%), indicating a preference for debt-free ownership or access to substantial capital.

Despite individual entities numbering 5,407 compared to 398 companies, the average portfolio size for individual landlords is 0.75 properties (4,080 properties / 5,407 entities), while company landlords average 1.42 properties (566 properties / 398 entities), suggesting companies, though fewer, tend to hold slightly more properties on average when they do invest.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secure 15.4% discount in Q4, paying $29,598 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Armstrong County achieved a notable 15.4% discount on SFR acquisitions in Q4 2025, paying an average of $162,648 compared to traditional homeowners' $192,246, securing a savings of $29,598 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated dramatically throughout 2025. The discount peaked at 26.6% ($52,758) in Q2, then sharply narrowed to just 2.3% ($4,512) in Q3, before widening again to 17.7% ($33,492) in Q1 and 15.4% in Q4, reflecting considerable market volatility.

Year 2025 saw an average landlord acquisition price of $166,310, marking a 10.9% increase from the $149,999 average in Year 2024. This trend indicates a steady rise in acquisition costs for investors over the past year, despite quarterly fluctuations.

Comparing current prices to the pandemic-era boom, the average landlord acquisition price of $166,310 in Year 2025 represents a 39.9% appreciation over the $118,897 average from 2020-2023, showcasing significant property value growth in the county.

Despite records showing 0 properties purchased by landlords in recent quarters in some datasets, the consistent reporting of average acquisition prices indicates ongoing pricing dynamics or a disconnect in data aggregation that still provides valuable pricing insights.

The landlord discount of $29,598 per property in Q4 2025 ($162,648 vs $192,246) demonstrates a substantial advantage in securing properties below market rate compared to traditional homebuyers.

While acquisition prices show clear trends over time, specific data differentiating prices paid by individual versus company landlords is not available within this dataset for Armstrong County, limiting a granular comparison by owner type.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords comprised 23.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% from mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were active participants in the Q4 2025 market, accounting for 52 of the total 223 SFR purchases, which represents a 23.3% share of all acquisitions in Armstrong County.

Remarkably, 100% of landlord purchases in Q4 2025 were made by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), totaling 52 properties. This underscores the complete dominance of smaller-scale investors in the recent acquisition landscape of the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, purchasing 41 properties and representing 78.8% of all landlord acquisitions during Q4. This highlights a significant entry of new or expanding small-scale investors into the market.

In contrast to the strong mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no SFR purchases in Armstrong County during Q4 2025, suggesting a complete absence or disinterest in new acquisitions in this specific market from larger players.

A total of 59 entities within the single-property tier made purchases, demonstrating a broad base of individual investors actively acquiring properties. This indicates a decentralized market where many small investors contribute to acquisition volume.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier also showed notable activity, acquiring 7 properties (13.5% of landlord purchases) through 5 distinct entities, signaling continued growth and investment among slightly larger, but still non-institutional, portfolios.

The distribution of Q4 purchases across tiers 01-04 (52 properties total) reveals a market heavily reliant on smaller investors, with no discernible activity from mid-size or institutional landlords in new acquisitions for this quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of investor-owned SFR, dwarfing institutional presence.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Armstrong County, controlling an impressive 97.5% of all investor-held properties, totaling 4,635 properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the investor market, owning 3,681 properties, which accounts for 77.5% of the entire landlord-owned SFR portfolio, making them the primary source of rental housing.

The collective holdings of the small landlord tiers (Tier 02, 03-05, and 06-10) further solidify mom-and-pop dominance, adding 343, 477, and 134 properties respectively, demonstrating a broad and robust base of smaller investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Armstrong County, holding only 2 properties, which accounts for a mere 0.0% (less than 0.05%) of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio, contrary to broader national trends.

The absence of specific acquisition price data by tier in the provided dataset limits a direct comparison of whether larger investors pay more or less than smaller landlords in Armstrong County.

Examining the entities within each tier reveals that smaller tiers have a higher number of individual landlords, indicating a fragmented market structure where many small owners collectively hold the vast majority of properties.

The distribution shows a steep decline in property counts as tier size increases, from 3,681 in Tier 01 to only 2 in Tier 09, demonstrating extreme concentration at the smallest end of the investor spectrum and minimal presence of large-scale portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in 11-20 property portfolios, controlling 91.7% in this tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Armstrong County, holding 3,451 single-properties (93.0%) and 391 properties in the 3-5 property tier (82.0%), showcasing their strong foundational presence in the market.

The crossover point where companies become the majority owner occurs within the 11-20 properties tier, where company ownership sharply rises to 91.7% (66 properties) compared to individuals at 8.3% (6 properties), illustrating a clear shift towards corporate structure for larger portfolios.

Even in the small landlord 6-10 properties tier, companies demonstrate a significant presence, holding 63 properties (47.0%), nearly matching individual ownership of 71 properties (53.0%) and indicating an early adoption of corporate structures for portfolio expansion.

While individual investors contribute significantly across various tiers, their proportional representation dramatically shrinks in higher tiers. For instance, in the 11-20 properties tier, individual ownership drops from the previous tier's majority to a minority share of just 8.3%.

The data provided does not contain information on how acquisition prices differ between individual and company landlords within each tier, limiting insights into their respective buying strategies and market valuations.

Company concentration is highest in the 11-20 property tier, where they own 66 properties, representing 91.7% of that tier's holdings, signifying that once portfolios grow past a certain size, they are predominantly managed by corporate entities.

The significant individual presence in Tiers 01-04 (where they still hold the majority even up to 6-10 properties) contrasts sharply with the nearly complete corporate dominance in Tiers 11-20, indicating distinct growth patterns and operational preferences between owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
PA-Armstrong-16201 leads with 925 investor-owned properties, 16.6% of its market.
Detailed Findings

Within Armstrong County, zip code PA-Armstrong-16201 emerges as the leader in investor-owned properties, with 925 SFR properties under landlord control, representing 16.6% of its total SFR inventory.

While PA-Armstrong-16201 holds the highest count, PA-Armstrong-15682 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at an exceptional 83.3%, indicating a profound concentration of investor activity relative to its market size, although its exact property count is not provided.

The top three sub-geographies by investor-owned property count are PA-Armstrong-16201 (925 properties), PA-Armstrong-16226 (501 properties), and PA-Armstrong-15613 (363 properties), together showcasing areas of high investor concentration within the county.

Conversely, areas like PA-Armstrong-15682 (83.3% rate), PA-Armstrong-16244 (59.3% rate), and PA-Armstrong-15736 (53.7% rate) demonstrate extremely high landlord penetration, suggesting these are heavily investor-driven sub-markets despite potentially smaller overall property counts.

Data for acquisition prices across specific geographic regions within Armstrong County is not explicitly provided in this section, preventing a direct comparison of pricing strategies by location.

The geographic data reveals a clear pattern of concentration, with a few zip codes holding a disproportionately high number of investor-owned properties and rates, suggesting landlords target specific micro-markets within the county.

The contrast between high-count regions (like 16201) and high-percentage regions (like 15682) shows that while some areas have many investor properties, others have a high *proportion* of their total housing stock owned by investors, indicating different types of market saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords are net buyers with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, while institutions remain net sellers.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Armstrong County maintained a strong net buyer position in Q4 2025, with 72 buy transactions against only 18 sell transactions, resulting in an impressive 4.0x buy/sell ratio and signaling continued accumulation of SFR properties.

This net buying trend is consistent throughout 2025, with 259 total buys versus 60 sells (4.32x ratio), and even stronger in 2024 with 315 buys against 58 sells (5.43x ratio), underscoring a persistent growth strategy among general landlords.

In stark contrast to the overall market, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are consistently net sellers. In Year 2025, they sold 6 properties while buying only 1 (a 0.17x ratio), and in Year 2024, they sold 12 properties against 4 buys (a 0.33x ratio), suggesting a strategic divestment or rebalancing of portfolios in this county.

The data does not provide specific percentages for landlord-to-landlord transactions, limiting insight into the internal liquidity and turnover dynamics within the investor market.

Average buy prices versus average sell prices are not included in the provided transaction data, preventing an analysis of implied profit margins or pricing strategies during market entry and exit.

The significant disparity between the overall landlord market (strong net buyers) and institutional investors (consistent net sellers) highlights divergent strategies and market outlooks between different scales of investors in Armstrong County.

The transaction volume has slightly decreased year-over-year, from 315 buy transactions in 2024 to 259 in 2025 for all landlords, indicating a moderating pace of acquisition activity despite remaining strong net buyers.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords account for 22.9% of Q4 transactions, with mom-and-pops driving all activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Q4 2025 transaction market, participating in 72 transactions, which represents 22.9% of the total 314 SFR transactions in Armstrong County.

All landlord transaction activity in Q4 2025 was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for all 72 transactions, reinforcing their overwhelming influence in both ownership and market movement in the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led transaction volumes with 59 buy transactions at an average price of $164,830, indicating a robust entry or expansion among the smallest-scale investors.

The average purchase prices varied significantly across active mom-and-pop tiers: Tier 02 saw the highest average price at $213,300 for 4 transactions, while Tier 03-05 recorded the lowest at $98,115 for 7 transactions, highlighting diverse pricing strategies or property types targeted by different-sized investors.

Inter-landlord trading activity was most prominent in the 3-5 property tier, where 28.6% of their 7 transactions (2 properties) were acquired from other landlords, suggesting a segment of the market where investors trade properties amongst themselves.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) had no recorded transaction activity in Q4 2025, further emphasizing their minimal role in the current market dynamics of Armstrong County, contrasting sharply with mom-and-pop engagement.

The transaction activity in Q4 closely mirrors the existing ownership distribution, with mom-and-pop tiers dominating both total holdings and current quarter transactions, indicating a stable and consistent market structure driven by smaller investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.5% of Armstrong County's investor market; institutions divest
Holdings
Landlords own 4,605 SFR properties in Armstrong County, representing 20.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors account for 4,080 properties (88.6%) of this portfolio, significantly outweighing company-owned properties (566, 12.3%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $162,648 in Q4 2025, securing a notable $29,598 discount (15.4%) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $192,246. This Q4 discount followed a highly volatile trend, sharply widening from a Q3 low of 2.3%.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 52 properties, constituting 23.3% of all SFR purchases in the county. All landlord purchases were driven by mom-and-pop investors, with single-property landlords alone contributing 41 properties (78.8% of landlord acquisitions), indicating robust entry of new small-scale investors.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) collectively control an overwhelming 97.5% (4,635 properties) of the investor-owned housing in Armstrong County, while institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.0% (2 properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 93.0% of single-property assets. However, companies gain majority control at the 11-20 properties tier, where they own 91.7% of properties, signaling a clear shift to corporate structures for larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords in Armstrong County are overall net buyers, showing a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (72 buys vs 18 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) are consistent net sellers, with 1 buy against 6 sells in Year 2025, indicating divestment from the market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Armstrong County is fundamentally shaped by small-scale investors. Landlords collectively own 4,605 SFR properties, representing a substantial 20.1% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate this segment, holding 4,080 properties (88.6%), while company-owned properties make up a smaller fraction at 566 (12.3%), challenging common perceptions of corporate investor dominance.

In Q4 2025, landlords continued their active participation, securing 52 properties which accounted for 23.3% of all SFR purchases. These acquisitions were notably cost-effective, with landlords paying $162,648 per property—a significant 15.4% ($29,598) less than traditional homeowners. Overall landlord activity signals a strong net buyer position with a 4.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4, but institutional investors have taken an opposing stance, acting as net sellers throughout 2025, suggesting a divergence in investment strategies.

This market dynamic, characterized by prolific mom-and-pop activity and a minimal institutional presence, fosters a decentralized and accessible investment environment within Armstrong County. The consistent net buying by smaller investors, coupled with their ability to secure favorable pricing, indicates a healthy and active local landlord segment. This structure suggests that local individual investors are key drivers of the rental market and property turnover, with limited influence from large institutional players.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:44 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyArmstrong (PA)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail