Lake (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lake (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lake (OR)
2,211
Total Investors in Lake (OR)
1,279
Investor Owned SFR in Lake (OR)
1,121(50.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,194
SFR Owned
1,019
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
85
SFR Owned
106
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,121 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Lake County Sees High Small Landlord Dominance, Minimal Recent Acquisitions, and Strong Net Buying
Lake County's SFR market is significantly shaped by investors, owning 1,121 properties (50.7% of total SFR), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.7% and no institutional presence. Despite landlords being consistent net buyers (6.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025), recent distinct acquisition activity has been extremely low across most quarters, including a single landlord purchase in Q4 2025 at $120,000.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Dominate 90.9% of Lake County's 1,121 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Nearly all investor-owned properties are rented (1,111 properties). While 91.5% of individual landlord properties are cash-owned, companies exclusively hold 100% of their 106 properties in cash, financing none.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord Acquisition Activity Minimal in Lake County with Single Q4 Purchase at $120,000.
Landlord distinct acquisitions reported as 0 properties for most of 2024 and 2025, making price trend analysis challenging. Historical data from Q3 2025 showed an implied 32.4% landlord discount ($148,100 vs $219,190 for homeowners), but this was also based on zero distinct landlord acquisitions reported.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Drove 100.0% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Lake County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for all Q4 landlord purchases, securing 1 property, with a single new entity entering the market as a Tier 01 buyer. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchasing activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.7% of Lake County's Investor-Owned Housing.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) lead with 71.3% of holdings (833 properties), establishing them as the backbone of the market. There is no recorded market share for institutional investors (Tier 09) in Lake County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers in Lake County, Companies Never Reach Majority Ownership.
Individuals hold 91.6% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios and 100.0% in Tiers 05 and 06. The highest company concentration occurs in Tier 03 (3-5 properties), where they own 17 properties (17.7%).
Geographic Distribution
OR-Lake-97630 Leads Lake County with 572 Investor-Owned Properties.
OR-Lake-97620 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, indicating a market entirely composed of rental properties. OR-Lake-97636 and OR-Lake-97641 are prominent in both high count and high percentage rankings, signaling concentrated investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Lake County Landlords Are Consistent Net Buyers, with a 6.5x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025.
Landlords showed strong accumulation, with 26 buys versus 4 sells in 2025, and an even higher 14.0x ratio in Q3 2025 (14 buys vs 1 sell). No transactional data is recorded for institutional investors in Lake County.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of Lake County's Q4 2025 SFR Transactions.
The single Q4 transaction was made by a Tier 01 (single-property) landlord at an average purchase price of $120,000, and notably, it was not purchased from another landlord (0.0% inter-landlord). No institutional transaction activity was recorded for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate 90.9% of Lake County's 1,121 Investor-Owned SFR Properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lake County, Oregon, control a substantial 1,121 SFR properties, representing 50.7% of the county's total SFR market. This high investor penetration underscores a significant portion of the housing stock dedicated to rental purposes.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 1,019 properties, which accounts for 90.9% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, company-owned properties are limited to 106, representing just 9.5% of the total investor portfolio.

A vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 1,111 properties, are rented, indicating a strong focus on generating rental income within the portfolio. All 1,121 investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied, reinforcing their role as rental assets.

The financing strategies differ significantly between owner types: all 106 company-owned properties are held entirely in cash, with zero financed properties. Conversely, individual landlords utilize financing for 83 properties (8.1% of their portfolio), but also predominantly rely on cash, holding 932 properties with no debt.

By entity count, individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of approximately 14:1, with 1,194 individual landlords compared to just 85 company landlords. This highlights the market's fragmentation among numerous smaller-scale investors rather than a few large entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord Acquisition Activity Minimal in Lake County with Single Q4 Purchase at $120,000.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity for distinct SFR properties in Lake County has been remarkably low across multiple recent timeframes. According to detailed acquisition records, landlords purchased 0 properties in Q4 2025, Q4 2024, the entirety of Year 2025, Year 2024, and the 2020-2023 period, indicating a widespread pause in new portfolio expansion by existing landlords.

Despite the general lack of distinct acquisitions reported in core pricing datasets, a singular landlord purchase did occur in Q4 2025 at an average price of $120,000. Homeowner acquisition data for Q4 2025 is unavailable for comparison, limiting direct Q4 price gap analysis.

When looking at earlier quarters, where again 0 distinct landlord properties were acquired, implied landlord prices showed significant volatility against homeowners. In Q3 2025, the implied landlord price was $148,100, a $71,090 (32.4%) discount compared to homeowners at $219,190. However, in Q2 2025, the implied landlord price of $256,000 represented a $38,289 (17.6%) premium over homeowners at $217,711, and a $59,730 (26.7%) premium in Q1 2025 at $283,063 versus homeowners at $223,333.

The extreme fluctuations from discount to premium in earlier 2025 quarters, coupled with the absence of distinct landlord acquisitions in the core pricing data for those periods, highlight the inherent challenges in establishing a consistent landlord pricing trend for Lake County.

The available data does not allow for a reliable comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company landlords in Lake County, nor does it support an assessment of price appreciation from the pandemic era to Q4 due to the minimal recorded distinct acquisition activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Drove 100.0% of Q4 2025 SFR Purchases in Lake County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the sole purchasers of Single Family Residential (SFR) properties in Lake County during Q4 2025, acquiring 1 property and accounting for 100.0% of all SFR purchases in the quarter. This indicates that landlord activity was the only recorded buying force in this period.

All Q4 landlord purchases were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), representing 100.0% of their activity. This reinforces the dominance of smaller investors in the local market's current purchasing landscape.

Specifically, a single-property landlord (Tier 01) was the only active tier, acquiring 1 property through 1 entity. This points to the entry of a new, small-scale investor into the Lake County market, rather than expansion by existing larger portfolios.

In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no purchasing activity whatsoever in Q4 2025, holding a 0.0% share of landlord purchases. This highlights the absence of large-scale corporate investment in Lake County for the quarter.

The acquisition of 1 property by 1 entity in Tier 01 means the average properties per entity for Q4 activity was 1.0, further emphasizing the new, single-property entrant model for this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 98.7% of Lake County's Investor-Owned Housing.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned housing market in Lake County, controlling a staggering 98.7% of all such properties. This equates to 1,153 properties across these smaller portfolio tiers, significantly outstripping larger investor groups.

The largest share of this market belongs to single-property landlords (Tier 01), who own 833 properties, representing 71.3% of the total landlord-owned SFRs. This concentration signifies that individual, first-time, or small-scale investors are the primary force in Lake County's rental market.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal share, with Tier 05 (11-20 properties) owning 15 properties (1.3%) and Tier 06 (21-50 properties) owning just 1 property (0.1%). This indicates a sharp drop-off in activity beyond the smallest portfolio sizes.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no recorded presence in Lake County's investor market, controlling 0.0% of properties. This starkly contrasts with narratives of institutional dominance often seen in larger markets, emphasizing the local, independent nature of this county's landlord landscape.

In terms of market structure, Tier 01 has 833 entities for 833 properties, averaging 1.0 property per entity, while Tier 04 has 6 entities for 44 properties, averaging 7.3 properties per entity. This progression shows how a few entities accumulate more properties within the mom-and-pop spectrum.

Information regarding how acquisition prices vary by tier is not available in the provided data, preventing an analysis of pricing strategies across different investor sizes.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers in Lake County, Companies Never Reach Majority Ownership.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a commanding presence across all portfolio tiers in Lake County, consistently holding the majority of properties. Notably, companies never achieve majority ownership in any tier where data is available, underscoring the market's individual-driven nature.

For single-property landlords (Tier 01), individuals own 766 properties (91.6%), significantly outpacing companies, who own just 70 properties (8.4%). This pattern of individual dominance extends to all smaller tiers.

The highest concentration of company ownership is observed in Tier 03 (3-5 properties), where companies own 17 properties, representing 17.7% of that tier. However, individuals still hold the majority with 79 properties (82.3%).

In the slightly larger Tier 04 (6-10 properties), individuals own 37 properties (84.1%) compared to companies with 7 properties (15.9%). Beyond Tier 04, Tiers 05 (11-20 properties) and 06 (21-50 properties) are exclusively owned by individuals at 100.0%.

This distribution reveals that while companies participate in the market, their role is largely complementary and never surpasses individual ownership at any scale within Lake County.

Specific acquisition pricing data by owner type within each tier is not available, precluding a comparison of pricing strategies between individual and company landlords at different portfolio sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Lake-97630 Leads Lake County with 572 Investor-Owned Properties.
Detailed Findings

In Lake County, Oregon, the zip code OR-Lake-97630 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 572. This represents 38.3% of the SFR market in that specific area, highlighting its significant contribution to the county's overall investor portfolio.

Following OR-Lake-97630, OR-Lake-97641 and OR-Lake-97636 are also key hubs for investor activity, holding 264 properties (78.3% rate) and 90 properties (88.2% rate), respectively. These top sub-geographies demonstrate a clear geographic concentration of investor holdings within the county.

Shifting focus to investor ownership rates, OR-Lake-97620 exhibits the highest percentage, with a remarkable 100.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This signals a unique market where all residential properties serve as rentals or non-owner-occupied assets.

OR-Lake-97635 and OR-Lake-97636 follow closely in terms of penetration, with 93.9% and 88.2% investor ownership rates respectively. These high percentages indicate areas where investor activity profoundly shapes the local housing market dynamics.

A strong correlation exists between regions with high investor property counts and high ownership percentages, as evidenced by OR-Lake-97636 and OR-Lake-97641 appearing in both top 5 lists. This indicates that investors are both numerous and deeply embedded in these particular zip codes.

While total SFR inventory can be calculated from provided rates and landlord properties, specific data for the lowest investor ownership rates and average acquisition prices by sub-geography are not available in the provided dataset.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Lake County Landlords Are Consistent Net Buyers, with a 6.5x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lake County consistently demonstrate a strong net buyer position across recent timeframes, indicating an active strategy of portfolio expansion. In 2025, they completed 26 buy transactions against only 4 sell transactions, resulting in a robust 6.5x buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 22 properties.

This net accumulation trend is further highlighted by Q3 2025 activity, where landlords bought 14 properties and sold only 1, achieving an impressive 14.0x buy-to-sell ratio. This suggests a period of particularly aggressive acquisition relative to divestment.

Looking back, Year 2024 also saw significant net buying, with 25 buy transactions and 5 sell transactions, yielding a 5.0x buy-to-sell ratio and a net addition of 20 properties. This pattern across multiple years signifies a sustained growth strategy among Lake County landlords.

Despite the overall landlord activity, there is no recorded transactional data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Lake County. This suggests that large-scale corporate entities are either absent from this market or their activity is negligible, reinforcing the dominance of smaller, individual investors.

Information regarding the percentage of transactions between landlords (inter-landlord activity) and average buy-to-sell price comparisons for historical periods is not available in the provided data, limiting insights into market liquidity and implied profit margins from these transactions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of Lake County's Q4 2025 SFR Transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were the exclusive participants in Lake County's SFR transaction market during Q4 2025, accounting for 100.0% of the total 1 transaction recorded. This indicates that any market movement in the quarter was driven solely by landlord activity.

Transaction volume was concentrated entirely within the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01), which executed 1 transaction. All other investor tiers, including institutional investors (Tier 09), recorded no transaction activity in Q4 2025, highlighting the hyper-local and small-scale nature of current market movement.

The average purchase price for the single Tier 01 transaction was $120,000. With no other tiers showing activity, it is not possible to determine a price spread between the highest and lowest tier or compare pricing strategies across investor sizes for Q4.

The Q4 transaction shows no inter-landlord trading activity; the single Tier 01 property purchased was not acquired from another landlord, registering 0.0% for 'Bought From Landlords'. This suggests new properties are entering the rental market from non-landlord sellers.

The dominance of Tier 01 in Q4 transactions (100.0%) aligns with its substantial share in overall ownership (71.3%), indicating that the smallest investors are not only the foundation of the market but also the primary drivers of its limited recent activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Lake County SFR Market: 50.7% Investor-Owned, Led by Small Landlords with Limited New Acquisitions
Holdings
Landlords own 1,121 SFR properties in Lake County, representing 50.7% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,019 (90.9%) and companies owning 106 (9.5%).
Pricing
Landlord acquisition data for Lake County is highly limited; a single Q4 2025 landlord purchase was recorded at $120,000. Historical data, though sparse, showed volatile price gaps compared to homeowners, including a 32.4% discount in Q3 2025 (on 0 properties).
Activity
Landlords made 100.0% of the Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Lake County, totaling 1 property, with a single new mom-and-pop landlord (Tier 01) entering the market and dominating all Q4 activity.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate Lake County's investor market, controlling 98.7% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 90.9% of all landlord-owned properties and maintain majority ownership across all portfolio tiers in Lake County, with companies never exceeding 17.7% ownership in any tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Lake County are consistent net buyers, with a 6.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (26 buys vs 4 sells), although only 1 landlord transaction occurred in Q4 2025; institutional investors show no recorded transaction activity.
Market Narrative

Lake County, Oregon, presents a distinct Single Family Residential (SFR) market profile, with a substantial 50.7% of its total SFR properties, or 1,121 units, owned by investors. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 98.7% of all investor-owned housing. Individual investors account for 1,019 properties (90.9%), while company ownership is marginal at 106 properties (9.5%). A striking characteristic is the complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties), highlighting a fragmented market driven by small-scale, local participants.

Despite this significant investor penetration, recent distinct acquisition activity has been minimal across several quarters, with most periods in 2024 and 2025 showing zero landlord purchases. The Q4 2025 saw only a single landlord acquisition at $120,000, with no homeowner data available for comparison. Historically, when activity did occur, landlord pricing against homeowners showed extreme volatility. However, looking at overall transaction patterns for Lake County, landlords have consistently been net buyers, accumulating 26 properties against 4 sells in 2025, yielding a strong 6.5x buy-to-sell ratio, with no recorded institutional transactions.

The Lake County market signals a highly localized, long-term holding strategy, predominantly by individual investors, with limited recent expansion. The lack of institutional presence and the overwhelming mom-and-pop dominance challenge broader market narratives of corporate takeovers. This dynamic implies a stable rental market driven by smaller-scale investors, rather than rapid turnover or large-scale portfolio adjustments, underscoring the resilience and local character of the Lake County housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:32 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLake (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail