Jefferson (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (OR)
4,980
Total Investors in Jefferson (OR)
1,959
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (OR)
1,380(27.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,725
SFR Owned
1,219
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
234
SFR Owned
261
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,380 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County; Q4 Acquisition Activity Low
Landlords in Jefferson County, OR, own 1,380 SFR properties, representing 27.7% of the total market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, comprising 88.3% of investor-owned properties, while companies hold 18.9%. Despite reporting zero transactions, Q4 2025 saw landlords with a calculated average acquisition price of $337,930, 11.3% less than homeowners, contrasting with previous quarters where landlords paid a premium. Landlords remain net buyers, though Q4 purchases were limited to 9 properties, almost entirely by mom-and-pop investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Jefferson County landlords own 1,380 SFR properties; individual investors comprise 88.3% of holdings.
A significant 99.2% (1,369) of these investor-owned SFR properties are rented, indicating a strong rental market focus. Furthermore, 65.1% (898 properties) of landlord holdings are cash purchases, while 34.9% (482 properties) are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords had a reported average acquisition price of $337,930 in Q4 2025, 11.3% less than homeowners, despite no recorded purchases.
Landlord pricing in Jefferson County notably shifted in Q4 2025, showing an 11.3% discount ($43,059) compared to homeowners, a stark contrast to Q1-Q3 2025 where landlords consistently paid premiums ranging from 8.8% to 17.4%. However, these Q4 figures are based on zero recorded landlord acquisitions, making the price comparison less representative of actual market activity.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 17.6% of Q4 SFR purchases in Jefferson County, acquiring 9 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 purchases, securing 8 properties, representing 88.9% of all landlord acquisitions. Notably, 10 new single-property landlords entered the market in Q4, acquiring 7 properties, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Jefferson County.
Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% of the investor-owned market, with just 1 property. Detailed acquisition prices by tier and historical evolution data were not available for analysis in this section.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Jefferson County, with no company majority in listed tiers.
Even in the 'small landlord' tier (6-10 properties), individual investors own 68.8% compared to companies at 31.2%. The crossover point where companies might become majority owners is not present within the provided tier data, nor are specific acquisition prices by owner type or tier-specific growth patterns.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 97741 leads Jefferson County with 679 investor-owned properties; 97711 has a 100% investor ownership rate.
The top 5 zip codes by investor-owned count collectively hold 1,378 properties. Regions like 97711 and 97759 exhibit full (100.0%) investor ownership, highlighting highly concentrated areas, while 97734 shows significant activity in both count (347 properties) and rate (40.7%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Jefferson County are consistently net buyers, with a buy/sell ratio of 12.0 in Q4 2025.
Landlord buying activity has consistently outpaced selling throughout 2025, with 12 purchases against 1 sale in Q4, and 72 purchases against 12 sales for the entire year. Information on percentage of transactions from other landlords, average buy/sell prices, and institutional transaction patterns is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 15.4% of Q4 2025 transactions in Jefferson County, with mom-and-pop investors dominating.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 11 of the 12 landlord transactions. Notably, all tiers reported 0.0% of properties bought from other landlords, indicating external market sourcing. Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average price at $359,626, while larger (Tier 101-1000) investors secured properties at significantly lower prices, averaging $167,200.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Jefferson County landlords own 1,380 SFR properties; individual investors comprise 88.3% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

In Jefferson County, OR, landlords collectively own 1,380 SFR properties, representing a substantial 27.7% of the entire SFR market of 4,980 properties, highlighting the significant role of investors in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned sector, accounting for 1,219 properties or 88.3% of all investor-owned SFR, far surpassing the 261 properties (18.9%) held by companies. This pattern reveals that the vast majority of rental housing in the county is managed by smaller-scale, individual landlords rather than large corporate entities.

The landlord market in Jefferson County is characterized by a high degree of rental focus, with 1,369 of 1,380 (99.2%) investor-owned SFR properties classified as rented. This indicates that nearly all investor acquisitions are geared towards generating rental income.

A significant majority of investor-owned properties, 898 (65.1%), were acquired with cash, demonstrating a strong preference for unencumbered assets or a market accessible to buyers with substantial liquid capital. The remaining 482 properties (34.9%) are financed.

The sheer volume of individual landlords, totaling 1,725 entities, dwarfs company landlords, who number only 234. This 7.37-to-1 ratio underscores the prevalence of individual ownership and management across the rental property landscape in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords had a reported average acquisition price of $337,930 in Q4 2025, 11.3% less than homeowners, despite no recorded purchases.
Detailed Findings

Despite no recorded landlord property acquisitions in Q4 2025, the calculated average acquisition price for landlords stood at $337,930. This price represented an 11.3% discount, or $43,059 less than traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $380,989 during the same period.

This Q4 pricing trend represents a significant reversal from earlier in 2025, where landlords consistently paid a premium over homeowners. In Q3, landlords paid $479,748 (17.4% premium); in Q2, $460,100 (8.8% premium); and in Q1, $471,049 (12.7% premium) compared to homeowner prices.

The reported average landlord acquisition price for the entirety of Year 2025 was $447,645, higher than Year 2024's average of $432,486, despite zero recorded transactions for both periods. This suggests a general upward trajectory in average asking prices over the year, even without actual purchase data.

Comparing the average landlord acquisition price from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) at $382,484 to the Year 2025 average of $447,645 suggests a substantial 17.0% price appreciation, though these figures are not supported by actual purchase counts for these periods in this specific geography.

The absence of recorded landlord acquisitions across all timeframes provided (Q4 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, and 2020-2023) indicates a significant slowdown or complete halt in landlord buying activity in Jefferson County, OR, making any price averages for these periods theoretical rather than actual market reflections.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 17.6% of Q4 SFR purchases in Jefferson County, acquiring 9 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jefferson County, OR, made 9 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, constituting 17.6% of the total 51 SFR purchases in the market. This indicates a relatively modest but consistent presence of investors in the quarter's buying activity.

The market saw a notable influx of new, small-scale investors, with 10 distinct entities entering as single-property landlords (Tier 01) by acquiring 7 properties in Q4. This highlights the ongoing entry of individuals into the rental market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were overwhelmingly the most active investor segment in Q4 2025, responsible for 8 out of the 9 landlord purchases, or 88.9% of total landlord activity. This signifies that smaller investors are driving the current acquisition landscape in the county.

The largest active tier for Q4 purchases was the single-property landlord (Tier 01), which accounted for 77.8% of all landlord acquisitions. Following this, both small landlords (Tier 3-5) and large landlords (Tier 101-1000) each contributed 1 property, representing 11.1% of landlord purchases respectively.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Jefferson County during Q4 2025, aligning with the trend of smaller landlords dominating acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Jefferson County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01 through 04 (1-10 properties), collectively control an overwhelming 98.4% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Jefferson County. This group holds 1,416 properties out of a total of 1,439 investor-owned SFR properties, making them the foundational backbone of the rental market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) is the most dominant, owning 1,173 properties, which accounts for 81.5% of all investor-owned SFR. This concentration highlights the prevalence of first-time or very small-scale investors in the county.

In contrast to the significant mom-and-pop presence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal share, owning just 1 property, which represents a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR. This defies the common narrative of institutional takeover, at least in Jefferson County.

The tier distribution reveals a steep drop-off in property counts as portfolio size increases; after Tier 01, the two-property tier holds 117 properties (8.1%), and the 3-5 property tier holds 110 properties (7.6%). This pattern indicates that very few landlords scale beyond a handful of properties.

Average acquisition prices by tier and the evolution of tier distribution over time are not available in the provided data, precluding insights into whether larger investors pay more or less or how market structure has changed historically.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all landlord tiers in Jefferson County, with no company majority in listed tiers.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all analyzed landlord tiers in Jefferson County. For single-property landlords (Tier 01), individuals own 85.9% (1,057 properties) compared to companies at 14.1% (174 properties), illustrating that even new or minimal portfolios are predominantly individually held.

This individual dominance persists across larger small-landlord tiers. In the two-property tier (Tier 02), individuals hold 78.0% (96 properties) versus companies at 22.0% (27 properties).

For small landlords with 3-5 properties, individuals comprise 71.4% (85 properties) of ownership, while companies account for 28.6% (34 properties). This trend continues into the 6-10 property tier, where individuals still own 68.8% (11 properties) of properties, significantly more than companies at 31.2% (5 properties).

Based on the provided data, a crossover point where companies become the majority owners over individuals is not observed within any of the listed tiers, suggesting that individual ownership is deeply entrenched across the small to mid-size landlord spectrum in Jefferson County.

Data regarding individual versus company acquisition prices within each tier, or specific growth patterns by owner type (all-time vs. Q4), is not available, limiting insights into differential buying strategies or market entry trends between these owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 97741 leads Jefferson County with 679 investor-owned properties; 97711 has a 100% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

OR-Jefferson-97741 is the leading sub-geography in Jefferson County by investor-owned property count, with 679 properties, representing 23.4% of its total SFR market. This zip code shows the highest concentration of investor holdings.

Following closely, OR-Jefferson-97734 has 347 investor-owned properties, and OR-Jefferson-97760 has 191 properties, further highlighting the geographic concentration of investor activity within specific zip codes of the county.

In terms of investor ownership rate, OR-Jefferson-97711 and OR-Jefferson-97759 stand out with an extraordinary 100.0% of their SFR properties being investor-owned. This indicates extremely specialized or niche markets entirely dominated by investors.

Several zip codes appear on both the top 5 lists for investor-owned count and percentage, such as OR-Jefferson-97730 (160 properties, 66.4% rate) and OR-Jefferson-97734 (347 properties, 40.7% rate). This indicates that areas with a high number of investor-owned properties often also have a high rate of investor penetration.

Conversely, while not explicitly detailed, the concentration in top regions implies that other sub-geographies within Jefferson County have considerably lower investor activity and ownership rates, revealing a stark geographic disparity in investor focus.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords in Jefferson County are consistently net buyers, with a buy/sell ratio of 12.0 in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Jefferson County, OR, have consistently maintained a strong net buyer position throughout 2025. In Q4 2025, they acquired 12 properties while selling only 1, resulting in a robust net gain of 11 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 12.0.

This net buying trend is not isolated to Q4, as Q3 saw 21 buys against 5 sells (net 16), and Q2 recorded 16 buys against 2 sells (net 14). This sustained activity indicates a continued accumulation strategy by landlords in the county.

For the entirety of 2025, landlords acquired 72 properties while selling 12, yielding a net gain of 60 properties and an annual buy/sell ratio of 6.0. This demonstrates a significant expansion of landlord portfolios over the year.

Comparing 2025 to 2024, annual purchases decreased slightly from 94 properties in 2024 to 72 in 2025, with sales also decreasing from 17 to 12, suggesting a general slowdown in transaction volume while the net buyer trend persists.

Crucially, data regarding the percentage of buy transactions from other landlords, average buy versus sell prices, and any transaction patterns specific to institutional investors (1000+ tier) is not provided, limiting insights into inter-landlord trading and profitability margins.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 15.4% of Q4 2025 transactions in Jefferson County, with mom-and-pop investors dominating.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Jefferson County were involved in 12 transactions, representing 15.4% of the total 78 SFR transactions during the quarter. This indicates a measurable, albeit not dominant, presence of investors in the market's overall transaction volume.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were responsible for 11 out of the 12 landlord transactions, showcasing their continued overwhelming activity in the acquisition market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions during this quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded the highest average purchase price at $359,626 for their 10 transactions. In stark contrast, larger landlords (Tier 101-1000) acquired their single property at a significantly lower average price of $167,200, representing a $192,426 price difference from Tier 01. Small landlords (Tier 3-5) purchased at an average of $291,703.

Across all landlord tiers active in Q4, zero properties (0.0%) were reported as bought from other landlords. This indicates that landlord acquisitions primarily originate from traditional homeowners or non-landlord sellers rather than through inter-landlord trading.

The concentration of transactions among smaller landlords (Tier 01-04 with 11 transactions) mirrors their ownership distribution, reinforcing their critical role in both the standing inventory and ongoing market activity within Jefferson County.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Solidify Dominance in Jefferson County Amidst Limited Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords in Jefferson County, OR, own 1,380 SFR properties, representing 27.7% of the total 4,980 SFR market. Individual investors own 1,219 properties, comprising 88.3% of investor-owned SFR, while companies own 261 properties, accounting for 18.9%.
Pricing
Landlords had a reported average acquisition price of $337,930 in Q4 2025, which was 11.3% ($43,059) less than traditional homeowners who paid $380,989. This discount contrasts sharply with Q1-Q3 2025, when landlords paid premiums, though Q4 landlord pricing is based on zero recorded transactions for the period.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 9 properties, accounting for 17.6% of all SFR sales. Notably, 10 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entered the market, acquiring 7 properties, signifying new individual investor interest.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.4% of investor-owned SFR in Jefferson County. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% of the market, with only 1 property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all landlord tiers in Jefferson County, consistently holding majority ownership, with no tier exhibiting a company majority. For example, individual investors own 85.9% of properties in the single-property tier.
Transactions
Landlords in Jefferson County are strong net buyers with a 12.0 buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (12 buys vs 1 sell). However, institutional investors showed no transaction activity for the entire year 2025, suggesting a non-existent or absent presence in recent market movements.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Jefferson County, OR, is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords. These smaller investors control an impressive 98.4% of the 1,439 investor-owned SFR properties in the county, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 81.5%. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who hold a negligible 0.1% of the market. Overall, landlords own 1,380 SFR properties, representing 27.7% of the total SFR market, indicating a significant and sustained investor presence rooted in individual ownership.

Landlord acquisition activity in Q4 2025 was notably low, with only 9 properties purchased, yet it contributed 17.6% to the total SFR sales in the county. While reported average landlord acquisition prices in Q4 stood at $337,930, representing an 11.3% discount to homeowners, this figure is derived from zero recorded transactions, necessitating caution in interpretation. Throughout 2025, landlords consistently remained net buyers, accumulating 72 properties against 12 sales. The market also saw the entry of 10 new single-property landlords in Q4, demonstrating continued small-scale investor interest.

The data clearly illustrates that the housing market in Jefferson County, OR, is not experiencing institutional investor encroachment. Instead, it is sustained by a robust base of individual landlords who are actively accumulating properties, primarily from non-landlord sellers, and are willing to pay competitive prices. The pervasive individual ownership across all tiers highlights a localized, entrepreneur-driven rental market, fostering diversity in ownership and challenging broader national narratives of corporate dominance. This pattern suggests a stable, locally-influenced rental supply landscape for the foreseeable future.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:30 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJefferson (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords