Deschutes (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Deschutes (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Deschutes (OR)
73,157
Total Investors in Deschutes (OR)
29,044
Investor Owned SFR in Deschutes (OR)
21,020(28.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
24,807
SFR Owned
17,043
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
4,237
SFR Owned
5,162
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 21,020 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Deschutes County Landlords Drive Market Activity, Paying Premiums Amid Mom-and-Pop Dominance
Investors in Deschutes County own 21,020 SFR properties, representing 28.7% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding a dominant 81.1%. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 30.3% of all SFR purchases, often paying a significant premium over traditional homeowners, while maintaining a strong net buyer position.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Dominate Deschutes County SFR Holdings with 81.1% Share
Of the 21,020 investor-owned SFR properties, a substantial 98.7% are rented, underscoring their primary use as rental income properties. Cash purchases account for 56.5% of holdings (11,878 properties), while 43.5% (9,142 properties) are financed, indicating a balanced use of capital.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Deschutes County Landlords Paid 9.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Q4 2025
The average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 was $818,411, a $68,027 premium over traditional homeowners who paid $750,384. This premium has fluctuated significantly, from a high of 15.8% in Q3 2025 ($120,581 difference) to 5.0% in Q2 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Captured 30.3% of All Q4 SFR Purchases in Deschutes County
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) collectively purchased 240 properties, comprising 98.8% of landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025. The single-property tier (Tier 01) alone accounted for 201 purchases by 309 active entities, showing robust entry-level investor activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.4% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) account for 79.0% of all investor-owned properties, totaling 17,218 homes. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a negligible 0.0% of the market (1 property), indicating virtually no large-scale corporate ownership footprint in Deschutes County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners Beyond the 5-Property Threshold in Deschutes County
While individual investors own 81.7% of single-property portfolios, companies take majority control starting at the 6-10 property tier (57.5% company-owned). Companies show highest concentration in the 21-50 property tier, holding 99.2% of those properties.
Geographic Distribution
OR-Deschutes-97707 Leads in Both Investor Ownership Count and Rate
Zip Code 97707 has the highest investor ownership rate at 61.4%, with 3,708 landlord-owned properties. Zip Code 97702 leads in total landlord-owned properties with 3,924, representing a 22.4% ownership rate, highlighting varied regional investor focus within Deschutes County.
Historical Transactions
Deschutes County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 7.14x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Landlords acquired 364 properties while selling 51 in Q4, signaling robust accumulation. The buy/sell ratio has surged from 3.92x in 2024 to 5.12x in 2025, and peaked in Q4, reflecting increasing investor confidence and expansion.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 27.2% of All Q4 Transactions in Deschutes County
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) conducted 98.9% of all landlord transactions, totaling 360 activities. Institutional investors (Tier 09) transacted only 1 property, paying $617,768, which is 22.1% less than single-property (Tier 01) buyers' average of $792,889.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate Deschutes County SFR Holdings with 81.1% Share
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the primary owners of investor-held SFR properties in Deschutes County, holding 17,043 properties, which accounts for a substantial 81.1% of the total 21,020 investor-owned portfolio. Companies own 5,162 properties, representing 24.6% of the portfolio, indicating some co-ownership or classification overlap.

The vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 20,748 or 98.7%, are rented, solidifying the market's focus on providing non-owner-occupied rental housing. This high rental rate suggests a robust and active rental market in the county.

The financial structure of investor portfolios in Deschutes County shows 11,878 properties (56.5%) were acquired with cash, while 9,142 properties (43.5%) are financed. This balance suggests a diversified approach to property acquisition, utilizing both cash reserves and leverage.

There are significantly more individual landlords (24,807 entities) than company landlords (4,237 entities) in the county. This ratio of nearly 5.85 individual landlords for every company landlord further reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local investor landscape.

Comparing entity counts to property counts reveals individual landlords average 0.69 properties per entity (17,043 properties / 24,807 entities), while company landlords average 1.22 properties per entity (5,162 properties / 4,237 entities). This indicates that while individuals are more numerous, companies tend to hold slightly larger portfolios on average, aligning with expectations of scaling operations.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Deschutes County Landlords Paid 9.1% Premium Over Homeowners in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Contrary to national trends, landlords in Deschutes County consistently paid a premium for SFR properties compared to traditional homeowners in 2025. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $818,411, a 9.1% premium or $68,027 more than homeowners who paid $750,384.

The price premium landlords pay has shown significant quarter-over-quarter volatility. It peaked at an astounding 15.8% ($120,581) in Q3 2025, dropped to 5.0% ($40,037) in Q2, and held at 5.3% ($41,026) in Q1. This variability suggests dynamic market conditions where investor demand and strategy lead to differing premium levels.

The consistent payment of a premium by landlords could signal strong confidence in the rental market's future returns or reflect a willingness to outbid homeowners for specific, high-value investment properties. This contrasts sharply with general assumptions that investors seek discounts.

Despite the lack of detailed property counts in the acquisition pricing data for specific timeframes, the existence of these price differences highlights distinct purchasing motivations and financial capacities between investor and homeowner buyer segments in Deschutes County.

The significant $120,581 premium in Q3, representing a 15.8% increase over homeowner prices, stands out as an aggressive period of landlord acquisition. While moderating in Q4, the continued premium indicates landlords are still willing to pay above market rates set by owner-occupiers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Captured 30.3% of All Q4 SFR Purchases in Deschutes County
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Deschutes County SFR market during Q4 2025, accounting for 237 of the 782 total SFR purchases, which represents a substantial 30.3% market share. This indicates a strong and active investor presence in the quarter's buying landscape.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord purchasing activity originated from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who acquired a combined 240 properties. This accounts for an overwhelming 98.8% of all landlord purchases, underscoring their dominance in current market acquisitions.

The single-property tier (Tier 01), representing new or first-time landlords, was particularly active, acquiring 201 properties through 309 distinct entities. This suggests a continued influx of small-scale investors entering the Deschutes County rental market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a mere 0.4% of total landlord acquisitions. This highlights a minimal presence of large-scale corporate buyers in the county's recent purchasing activity.

The distribution of Q4 purchases by tier demonstrates a clear inverse relationship between portfolio size and purchasing volume, with smaller landlords being significantly more active. The combined mid-size landlord tiers (51-100 and 101-1000 properties) each recorded only 1 purchase in the quarter, indicating limited acquisition by larger, non-institutional investors as well.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.4% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), are the overwhelming force in Deschutes County's investor-owned SFR market, controlling 21,320 properties or 97.4% of the total investor portfolio. This dominance challenges any narrative of institutional takeover.

The market is heavily reliant on single-property owners, with Tier 01 alone accounting for 17,218 properties, which is 79.0% of all investor-owned SFR. This highlights the significant role of first-time and very small-scale landlords in providing rental housing.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minimal presence in Deschutes County, owning just 1 property, which rounds to an almost imperceptible 0.0% of the total investor-owned SFR. This confirms that large corporate landlords are not a significant factor in the local housing supply.

The tier distribution reveals a steep drop-off in property counts as portfolio size increases; while single-property owners hold 17,218 properties, the next largest tier (two-property) holds only 2,033 properties, highlighting a fragmented market with a long tail of small-scale investors.

With no specific tier-based acquisition pricing data available for all timeframes, it's challenging to assess how pricing strategies vary across different investor tiers. However, the ownership concentration strongly suggests that the market dynamics are driven by the investment decisions of numerous small landlords rather than a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners Beyond the 5-Property Threshold in Deschutes County
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 81.7% of single-property (Tier 01) SFR and 71.5% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios. This reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' characteristic of the initial stages of investor entry and growth.

A clear crossover point occurs between the 3-5 property tier and the 6-10 property tier where companies become the majority owners. Individuals own 65.2% of 3-5 property portfolios, but their share drops to 42.5% in the 6-10 property tier, while companies take 57.5%.

Companies exhibit their highest concentration in the larger mid-size tiers, particularly the 21-50 property tier, where they own a near-complete 99.2% of properties. Similarly, in the 51-100 property tier, companies control 99.4% of holdings, signaling a distinct shift to corporate structures for scaling portfolios.

The contrasting ownership patterns highlight different growth strategies: individuals typically begin with one or two properties and gradually expand, whereas companies enter at a larger scale or transition to corporate structures as their portfolios grow beyond a handful of properties.

The absence of specific pricing data by owner type within tiers prevents a direct comparison of individual vs. company acquisition prices. However, the ownership distribution by tier strongly suggests distinct investment behaviors and scaling pathways between individual and corporate entities in the Deschutes County market.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Deschutes-97707 Leads in Both Investor Ownership Count and Rate
Detailed Findings

Within Deschutes County, Zip Code 97707 exhibits the highest concentration of investor-owned properties by percentage, with an impressive 61.4% of its SFR housing stock owned by landlords. This indicates a highly penetrated market for rental properties in this specific area.

While 97707 leads in rate, Zip Code 97702 has the highest absolute count of investor-owned properties, totaling 3,924, with an ownership rate of 22.4%. This suggests a larger overall housing market with a significant, though not majority, portion held by investors.

Three zip codes appear on both the top 5 by count and top 5 by percentage lists (97707, 97703, and 97701 if expanded), revealing areas where investor activity is both numerically significant and constitutes a high proportion of the local housing market. These areas are key hubs for rental properties within the county.

Zip Codes 97759 (43.8%) and 97739 (39.9%) also show exceptionally high investor ownership rates, indicating smaller markets where a substantial portion of the housing is dedicated to rental purposes, even if their total property counts aren't the highest.

The variation in landlord ownership rates, ranging from 61.4% in 97707 to 22.4% in 97702 and 97756 (which are still substantial), implies diverse investment environments within Deschutes County. This suggests that investors target different sub-geographies based on varying rental demand, property values, or market saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Deschutes County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 7.14x Buy/Sell Ratio in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Deschutes County are unequivocally net buyers, demonstrating strong accumulation in the Q4 2025 with a buy/sell ratio of 7.14x. They completed 364 buy transactions versus only 51 sell transactions, indicating a significant expansion of their portfolios.

This trend of net buying has been consistent throughout 2025, with a buy/sell ratio of 5.12x for the entire year (1,624 buys vs 317 sells). This figure is an increase from 2024, which saw a 3.92x ratio (1,712 buys vs 437 sells), highlighting accelerating investor growth.

The Q4 buy/sell ratio of 7.14x marks the highest quarterly ratio in 2025, surpassing Q3's 5.38x (452 buys vs 84 sells) and Q2's 4.13x (413 buys vs 100 sells). This suggests a strong finish to the year for landlord acquisitions.

The lack of data on institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions prevents a comparative analysis of their buying and selling behavior. However, the overall landlord activity strongly points to a market where investors are actively acquiring and holding properties, rather than divesting.

The consistent pattern of significantly more buys than sells across multiple timeframes signals a healthy and expanding investor market in Deschutes County. This sustained demand from landlords is a key driver of market activity and property absorption.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 27.2% of All Q4 Transactions in Deschutes County
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 364 transactions during Q4 2025, comprising 27.2% of the total 1,337 SFR transactions in Deschutes County. This indicates that a substantial portion of market activity involved investor buying and selling.

The vast majority of landlord transactions, 360 or 98.9%, were attributed to mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04). This highlights that small-scale investors are the primary drivers of transaction volume within the landlord segment.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) engaged in only 1 transaction during Q4, reinforcing their minimal presence in the current local market. This single institutional transaction had an average purchase price of $617,768.

A notable price difference emerges between investor tiers: institutional investors (Tier 09) paid an average of $617,768, which is 22.1% less than the $792,889 average paid by single-property (Tier 01) landlords. This suggests that larger entities might be targeting different property types or leveraging negotiation power.

Inter-landlord trading was relatively low in Q4 2025, with only 6.4% of single-property transactions (20 of 312) and 3.8% of two-property transactions (1 of 26) involving a sale from another landlord. This indicates that most landlord purchases are from non-landlord sellers rather than internal market churn.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Deschutes County Landlords Lead Market Activity, Consistently Net Buyers Despite Premiums
Holdings
Landlords in Deschutes County own 21,020 SFR properties, representing 28.7% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold a dominant 17,043 properties (81.1%), while companies own 5,162 properties (24.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $818,411 in Q4, a $68,027 (9.1%) premium over traditional homeowners ($750,384). This premium has been inconsistent, reaching a high of 15.8% in Q3.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 237 properties, comprising 30.3% of all SFR sales in Deschutes County. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 98.8% of these acquisitions, with 201 properties bought by 309 single-property entities.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.4% of investor-owned housing in Deschutes County, totaling 21,320 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.0% (1 property).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 81.7% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. However, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (57.5% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords in Deschutes County are robust net buyers, achieving a 7.14x buy/sell ratio in Q4 with 364 buys versus 51 sells. Institutional investor transaction data is not available for this period.
Market Narrative

The Deschutes County, Oregon, housing market is significantly influenced by real estate investors, who collectively own 21,020 SFR properties, making up 28.7% of the county's total SFR inventory. This investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual landlords, who possess 81.1% of these holdings (17,043 properties), vastly outpacing company ownership at 24.6% (5,162 properties). The pervasive 'mom-and-pop' structure is further highlighted by the fact that landlords owning 1-10 properties control an astonishing 97.4% of all investor-owned housing, effectively marginalizing institutional players who hold a mere 0.0%.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 demonstrates strong and active engagement, with landlords securing 30.3% of all SFR purchases in Deschutes County. Unlike broader market trends, landlords in this county consistently paid a premium, averaging $818,411 in Q4—a 9.1% or $68,027 increase over traditional homeowner prices, though this premium has fluctuated significantly quarter-over-quarter. Transaction data confirms landlords are aggressive net buyers, evidenced by a 7.14x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (364 buys vs. 51 sells), signaling continued portfolio expansion. This sustained buying activity, primarily driven by small-scale investors, underscores a confident and growing landlord segment.

The pronounced dominance of individual, small-scale investors, combined with their active purchasing and willingness to pay premiums, suggests a buoyant rental market within Deschutes County. These insights challenge the narrative of institutional corporate landlord control, instead revealing a fragmented market heavily reliant on local, often first-time, investors. The strong net buyer position of landlords indicates a continued belief in the long-term value and rental income potential of SFR properties in the region, driving both market activity and potentially influencing housing affordability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyDeschutes (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison