Clatsop (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clatsop (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clatsop (OR)
15,760
Total Investors in Clatsop (OR)
10,085
Investor Owned SFR in Clatsop (OR)
7,072(44.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
8,517
SFR Owned
6,179
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,568
SFR Owned
1,560
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,072 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Clatsop County Landlords Pay Premium, Dominated by Mom-and-Pops with High Cash Holdings
Clatsop County sees significant investor activity, with landlords owning 7,072 SFR properties, representing 44.9% of the market. Mom-and-pop landlords control a vast 99.0% of this portfolio. Notably, landlords consistently pay a premium for properties, averaging 18.4% more than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Clatsop County sees high investor penetration with 7,072 SFRs owned, 87.4% by individuals.
A striking 74.0% of investor-owned properties are cash purchases, totaling 5,230 properties, indicating low reliance on financing. Nearly all investor properties (99.2%) are rented, confirming a strong rental focus in the market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Clatsop landlords paid a significant $107,489 premium (18.4%) over homeowners in Q4.
Landlords consistently paid more than homeowners throughout 2025, with premiums ranging from 18.4% in Q4 to a peak of 42.9% in Q1. This trend challenges the common narrative of landlords acquiring properties at a discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords seized 39.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, a substantial market share.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove Q4 purchases, acquiring 81 properties, representing 97.6% of all landlord purchases. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4, highlighting the local market's reliance on smaller investors.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.0% of investor-owned SFR, eclipsing institutions at 0.0%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone comprise 75.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties. The near-total dominance by mom-and-pop landlords indicates a decentralized and community-driven investor market with virtually no institutional presence.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier in Clatsop County.
Individual investors retain significant majority control in smaller portfolios (Tier 01-05), but their dominance is challenged in mid-size tiers. The 11-20 property tier shows a surprising temporary reversion to individual majority (51.9% vs 48.1%) before companies regain control at 21-50 properties.
Geographic Distribution
OR-Clatsop-97138 (Seaside) leads with 3,211 investor-owned SFR properties.
OR-Clatsop-97110 (Cannon Beach area) exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 85.9%, followed by 97102 (Arch Cape) at 75.6%. This indicates concentrated investor interest in specific coastal communities within Clatsop County.
Historical Transactions
Clatsop landlords are strong net buyers with a 15.38x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords purchased 123 properties and sold only 8 in Q4, marking an intensification of net buying activity compared to earlier quarters. Institutional investors, despite their minimal presence, were balanced with 1 buy and 1 sell in Q3 2025, but were net buyers for the year with 2 buys and 1 sell.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 41.3% of all Q4 transactions in Clatsop County.
Single-property (Tier 01) buyers acquired properties at the highest average price of $666,955, while institutional investors (Tier 09) paid significantly less at $420,250. This reveals a substantial 37.0% price discount for institutional purchases compared to mom-and-pop single-property buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Clatsop County sees high investor penetration with 7,072 SFRs owned, 87.4% by individuals.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Clatsop County hold a substantial portfolio of 7,072 SFR properties, making up 44.9% of the total SFR market – a high rate of investor penetration.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 6,179 properties, which accounts for 87.4% of all investor-owned SFRs. In contrast, companies own 1,560 properties, representing 22.1% of the investor-owned portfolio, with some properties potentially having mixed ownership.

The market shows a strong preference for cash transactions among investors, with 5,230 (74.0%) of properties being cash purchases, significantly outpacing financed properties at 1,842 (26.0%). This highlights a robust, liquid investor market.

A vast majority of investor-owned properties, 7,016 (99.2%) of the 7,072 SFRs, are designated as rented, confirming that investors are actively deploying these properties as rental units rather than holding them vacant or for immediate resale.

By entity count, individual landlords far outnumber companies, with 8,517 individual landlords (84.5%) compared to 1,568 company landlords (15.5%), indicating that the investor landscape is largely driven by smaller-scale, non-corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Clatsop landlords paid a significant $107,489 premium (18.4%) over homeowners in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to typical market trends, landlords in Clatsop County consistently paid a premium over traditional homeowners for SFR properties throughout 2025. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired properties for an average of $692,532, which is $107,489 (18.4%) more than the homeowner average of $585,043.

This premium has been a persistent trend, peaking in Q1 2025 where landlords paid $753,373, an astounding $226,112 (42.9%) more than homeowners. While the Q4 premium of 18.4% is lower than Q1, it still represents a substantial difference.

The premium paid by landlords varied across the year, from 42.9% in Q1 to 30.7% in Q3 ($701,176 vs $536,568), demonstrating a fluctuating but always present higher cost for investor acquisitions in this market.

This sustained higher acquisition cost for landlords suggests unique market dynamics in Clatsop County, potentially indicating strong demand for specific property types, competitive bidding, or properties with higher intrinsic value for rental income that homeowners might not prioritize.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords seized 39.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, a substantial market share.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, capturing a significant 39.0% of all SFR purchases in Clatsop County, acquiring 73 properties out of a total of 187 transactions.

The Q4 purchasing activity was almost exclusively driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who accounted for 81 properties purchased, representing a commanding 97.6% of all landlord acquisitions during the quarter. This underscores their crucial role in the local real estate market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led the charge within the mom-and-pop segment, acquiring 57 properties. A notable 90 entities were active in this tier, suggesting a strong influx of new or expanding small-scale investors.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Q4, with 0 properties acquired. This indicates a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying activity in Clatsop County for the quarter.

The distribution of Q4 activity also shows that even within mom-and-pop, larger segments like Tier 02 (two-property owners) acquired 14 properties and Tier 03-05 (small landlords) acquired 10 properties, demonstrating broad-based participation from smaller entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.0% of investor-owned SFR, eclipsing institutions at 0.0%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) hold an overwhelming majority of investor-owned SFR properties in Clatsop County, controlling 7,477 properties, which translates to a substantial 99.0% of the market. This highlights the decentralized nature of investor ownership.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, owning 5,669 properties, representing 75.1% of the total investor-owned SFR. This significant concentration in the smallest tier emphasizes the prevalence of individual, entry-level investors.

The combined share of Tiers 01 and 02 (single and two-property owners) accounts for 89.7% of the total investor-owned portfolio, owning 5,669 and 1,102 properties respectively, solidifying the market's reliance on very small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Clatsop County, owning only 3 properties, which rounds to 0.0% of the investor-owned market, contradicting any notion of corporate landlord dominance here.

Even mid-size landlords (Tier 05-08, 11-1000 properties) collectively own only a small fraction, with 73 properties or 1.0% of the market, reinforcing that investor activity is primarily driven by smaller portfolios.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier in Clatsop County.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, a clear shift occurs where companies begin to take majority ownership. In the 'Small landlord' tier (6-10 properties), companies become the dominant owner type, holding 45 properties (52.3%) compared to individuals' 41 properties (47.7%).

This crossover point is not entirely linear, as individuals surprisingly reclaim a slight majority in the 'Small-medium' tier (11-20 properties), owning 28 properties (51.9%) against companies' 26 properties (48.1%), before companies decisively take over larger tiers.

In the 'Small-medium' tier (21-50 properties), company ownership becomes highly concentrated, with companies owning 9 properties (81.8%) compared to individuals' 2 properties (18.2%), indicating a clear corporate preference for larger portfolio scales.

For the smallest portfolios, individual investors maintain strong control: in the single-property (Tier 01) tier, individuals own 5,013 properties (81.5%), and in the two-property (Tier 02) tier, they own 881 properties (77.9%), demonstrating their foundational role in the market.

The data reveals a transition where the majority of individual investors are found in smaller holdings, while companies progressively gain share and outright dominance as portfolio size increases beyond ten properties, signaling different investment strategies by owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Clatsop-97138 (Seaside) leads with 3,211 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Clatsop County is highly concentrated geographically, with OR-Clatsop-97138 (Seaside) leading significantly by volume, holding 3,211 investor-owned properties and an ownership rate of 57.7%.

Beyond sheer volume, certain zip codes demonstrate exceptionally high investor penetration rates. OR-Clatsop-97110 (Cannon Beach area) has an astounding 85.9% of its SFR properties investor-owned, making it the top region by percentage.

Other areas with very high investor ownership rates include OR-Clatsop-97102 (Arch Cape) at 75.6% and OR-Clatsop-97145 at 75.0%, suggesting these coastal locales are highly desirable for real estate investment.

The top 5 regions by investor-owned property count – 97138, 97110, 97103, 97146, and 97102 – together account for a vast majority of the county's investor holdings, pointing to clear geographic preferences for investment.

The strong correlation between high property counts and high ownership rates in areas like 97110 and 97102 indicates that these regions are saturated with investor activity, likely driving market dynamics and potentially contributing to the premium landlords pay.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Clatsop landlords are strong net buyers with a 15.38x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clatsop County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating an extremely high buy-to-sell ratio of 15.38x in Q4 2025, with 123 properties purchased against only 8 sold. This indicates strong accumulation and low divestment activity.

This robust net buying trend has been consistent throughout 2025, with quarterly buy/sell ratios remaining high: 9.43x in Q3 (132 buys vs 14 sells) and 10.42x in Q2 (125 buys vs 12 sells), signaling a sustained period of portfolio expansion for landlords.

Overall for 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status with 457 properties purchased versus 46 sold, resulting in a net increase of 411 properties, reinforcing a long-term strategy of growth.

In contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed a balanced position in Q3 2025 with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating neither significant accumulation nor divestment during that specific quarter. For the full year 2025, institutions were slight net buyers with 2 buys vs 1 sell.

The year-over-year comparison also highlights sustained buying, with 2024 showing 490 buys vs 50 sells (9.8x ratio), indicating that 2025 Q4's high ratio of 15.38x represents an acceleration of buying relative to selling compared to the previous year and earlier quarters.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 41.3% of all Q4 transactions in Clatsop County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for a substantial portion of Q4 transactions in Clatsop County, participating in 123 of 298 total transactions, representing a strong 41.3% market share during the quarter.

The vast majority of Q4 landlord transactions were driven by mom-and-pop tiers, with Single-property (Tier 01) leading with 90 transactions. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were involved in only 1 transaction.

A significant price disparity is evident across investor tiers: Single-property (Tier 01) landlords paid the highest average acquisition price at $666,955, while institutional investors (Tier 09) secured properties at a considerably lower average of $420,250.

This pricing difference means institutional investors paid 37.0% less than mom-and-pop single-property buyers in Q4, highlighting a potential advantage for larger entities in finding or negotiating deals, or acquiring different property types.

Inter-landlord trading activity was minimal in Q4, with only 6 (6.7%) of Tier 01 transactions coming from other landlords, and 0% for all other tiers. This indicates that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-landlord sellers rather than cycling properties among themselves, suggesting a healthy influx of new inventory.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Clatsop Landlords Dominated by Mom-and-Pops, Paying Premium Amidst Strong Net Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 7,072 SFR properties in Clatsop County, representing a significant 44.9% of the market. Individual investors hold the vast majority at 6,179 properties (87.4%), while companies own 1,560 (22.1%), with some overlap in ownership.
Pricing
Landlords consistently paid higher prices than traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, securing properties at an average of $692,532 – a substantial $107,489 (18.4%) premium compared to homeowners' $585,043.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 73 properties, accounting for a notable 39.0% of all SFR sales. This activity was heavily led by new or expanding single-property landlords, with 90 entities active in the Tier 01 segment.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the Clatsop County investor market, owning 99.0% of investor-held SFR properties, while institutional investors (1000+) hold a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, but companies emerge as majority owners in the 6-10 property tier and significantly increase their concentration in portfolios of 21-50 properties and above.
Transactions
All landlords are robust net buyers in Clatsop County, exhibiting an extremely high 15.38x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (123 buys vs 8 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed balanced activity in Q3 2025 (1 buy vs 1 sell) and were net buyers for the year with 2 buys and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

Clatsop County's real estate investment landscape is characterized by its high investor penetration and overwhelming dominance by small-scale landlords. A significant 44.9% of all SFR properties in the county, totaling 7,072 units, are investor-owned. This market is primarily driven by individual investors, who account for 87.4% of investor-owned properties and 84.5% of all landlord entities. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exert near-total control, holding 99.0% of all investor-owned SFRs, rendering institutional investor presence virtually non-existent at 0.0%.

Investor behavior in Clatsop County deviates from national trends, with landlords consistently paying a premium for properties. In Q4 2025, landlords paid 18.4% more than traditional homeowners, averaging $692,532 per property. Landlords were highly active, capturing 39.0% of all Q4 SFR purchases, with single-property entities making a strong entry. They are also aggressive net buyers, evidenced by an exceptional 15.38x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4. Larger investors, however, show a significant pricing advantage, with institutional buyers paying 37.0% less than single-property landlords for their acquisitions.

This unique market profile, defined by high mom-and-pop ownership, significant cash purchases (74.0% of investor holdings), and landlords consistently paying a premium, signals a robust and highly competitive investment environment in Clatsop County. The heavy concentration of investor activity in specific zip codes, coupled with strong net buying, suggests sustained demand for rental properties, potentially impacting affordability and market access for traditional homeowners in this coastal region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:23 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyClatsop (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail