Clackamas (OR) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Clackamas (OR) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Clackamas (OR)
125,354
Total Investors in Clackamas (OR)
29,544
Investor Owned SFR in Clackamas (OR)
21,636(17.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
25,740
SFR Owned
17,966
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
3,804
SFR Owned
4,568
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 21,636 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Clackamas Ownership And Q4 Purchases; Secure 16.1% Discount
Landlords own 21,636 SFR properties, representing 17.3% of Clackamas County's market, with individuals holding 83.0% and mom-and-pop landlords controlling 95.8% of the investor-owned portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a significant 16.1% price discount, paying $592,587 versus traditional homeowners' $706,390. Overall, landlords are net buyers, showing sustained accumulation, while institutional investors also returned to net buying in Q4 after previous periods of selling.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Clackamas landlords own 21,636 SFR properties, with individuals holding 83.0% vs companies at 21.1%.
Of investor-owned SFR properties, 11,544 are cash purchases while 10,092 are financed. A significant 97.2% of landlord-owned SFR are rented, underscoring their primary focus on generating rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Clackamas landlords secure 16.1% Q4 price discount, paying $592,587 versus homeowner $706,390.
The landlord price discount dramatically widened from 5.5% in Q3 2025 to 16.1% in Q4 2025. Data on individual versus company acquisition prices is not available in this dataset.
Current Quarter Purchases
Clackamas landlords made 232 purchases in Q4, accounting for 20.3% of all SFR purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) dominated Q4 acquisitions with 221 properties (90.6% of landlord purchases), vastly outperforming institutional investors who purchased only 8 properties (3.3%).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.8% of Clackamas investor-owned SFR, far surpassing institutional 0.2%.
Q4 transaction data reveals single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid $626,395, significantly more than institutional investors ($434,812), who paid 30.6% less. While institutions showed Q4 net buying, their Year 2024 activity was net selling, indicating fluctuating engagement.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual vs company acquisition prices by tier are not available in this dataset.
Companies become majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 54.2% of holdings there. Institutional (1000+ properties) ownership data by type is not explicitly provided, but these entities typically operate as companies. Growth patterns by owner type and time frame are not available in this data.
Geographic Distribution
OR-Clackamas-97045 leads with 2,598 investor-owned properties, followed by 97222 and 97055.
Three zip codes (97215, 97030, 97223) exhibit 100.0% investor ownership, indicating highly concentrated investment areas. While high-count regions are prominent, 97055 also stands out with a 20.9% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Overall landlord purchases from other landlords is not available; Q4 data shows 7.2% for single-property tier.
Landlords are net buyers across all timeframes (Year 2025 ratio 3.61x). Institutional investors were net sellers in 2024 and Q2 2025, but became net buyers in Q4 2025 (4.0x ratio).
Current Quarter Transactions
Clackamas landlords comprise 17.6% of Q4 transactions, completing 337 out of 1,910 total sales.
Institutional investors paid $434,812 per property in Q4, a 30.6% discount compared to single-property landlords' $626,395. Single-property landlords had 7.2% of their Q4 transactions from other landlords, while institutional investors bought 0% from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Clackamas landlords own 21,636 SFR properties, with individuals holding 83.0% vs companies at 21.1%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords collectively own 21,636 SFR properties in Clackamas County, representing 17.3% of the total SFR market of 125,354 properties. This highlights a substantial but not overwhelming investor presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual landlords significantly outnumber and out-own company landlords, holding 17,966 properties (83.0% of the investor-owned portfolio) compared to companies owning 4,568 properties (21.1%). This indicates that the vast majority of investment properties are held by smaller, individual investors.

The structure of landlord entities further reinforces this, with 25,740 individual landlords compared to 3,804 company landlords. This 6.77:1 ratio of individual to company entities suggests a market predominantly shaped by mom-and-pop operations.

A strong focus on rental income is evident, as 21,043 of the 21,636 investor-owned SFR properties (97.2%) are designated as rented. This demonstrates that investor activity is overwhelmingly geared towards the long-term rental market rather than short-term flips or vacant holdings.

Looking at acquisition methods, cash purchases slightly exceed financed properties within the investor portfolio, with 11,544 properties bought with cash versus 10,092 properties financed. This could indicate a preference for reducing leverage or a strong presence of cash-rich buyers in the market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Clackamas landlords secure 16.1% Q4 price discount, paying $592,587 versus homeowner $706,390.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Clackamas County acquired SFR properties at an average price of $592,587, securing a substantial $113,803 discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid $706,390. This represents a 16.1% price advantage for landlords.

The landlord pricing advantage has significantly widened quarter-over-quarter; the discount increased from 5.5% ($40,751) in Q3 2025 to 16.1% ($113,803) in Q4 2025. This suggests landlords are finding increasingly better deals in the most recent quarter.

Comparing Q4 2025 to earlier in the year, the landlord average acquisition price dropped from $669,196 in Q1 to $592,587 in Q4. This downward trend in landlord prices contrasts with a less pronounced decrease for homeowners over the same period, contributing to the expanding price gap.

Looking at annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stands at $663,020, which is lower than the $700,613 average for Year 2024. This indicates a general decline in landlord purchase prices over the last year.

Furthermore, the 2025 average acquisition price of $663,020 is higher than the average of $622,215 observed during the 2020-2023 period, reflecting a sustained increase in property values despite recent quarterly fluctuations.

The consistent ability of landlords to pay less than homeowners across multiple quarters (5.5% in Q3, 7.3% in Q2, 7.1% in Q1) suggests a strategic advantage, likely due to market expertise, cash buying power, or targeting specific property types.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Clackamas landlords made 232 purchases in Q4, accounting for 20.3% of all SFR purchases.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in the Q4 2025 market, completing 232 SFR purchases, which represents 20.3% of the total 1,144 SFR purchases in Clackamas County. This shows a notable portion of market activity driven by investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated investor acquisitions, responsible for 221 properties, or 90.6% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This highlights their critical role in the current investment landscape.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired only 8 properties, representing a mere 3.3% of landlord purchases in Q4. This signals a relatively low level of large-scale corporate buying activity in the quarter.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, with 163 distinct properties purchased by 234 entities in Q4, accounting for 66.8% of all landlord purchases by distinct properties in the tier analysis. This indicates a strong influx of new or expanding small-scale investors.

Across all tiers, 321 entities collectively acquired properties in Q4, demonstrating widespread participation from various investor sizes. For Tier 01, 234 entities acquired 163 properties, indicating many first-time or single-property expansions within the quarter.

The remaining mid-size landlord tiers (05-08) collectively accounted for a minimal 15 properties (Tiers 11-20, 21-50, 51-100, 101-1000 bought 3, 6, 5, 1 property respectively), demonstrating limited activity compared to the smallest investor groups.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.8% of Clackamas investor-owned SFR, far surpassing institutional 0.2%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively dominate the Clackamas County investor-owned SFR market, controlling a massive 95.8% of all properties held by landlords. This demonstrates their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) hold the largest share, owning 17,369 properties, which accounts for 77.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio within the tier breakdown. This signifies the prevalence of individual, small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop majority, institutional investors (Tier 09) own only 42 properties, representing a marginal 0.2% of the total landlord-owned SFR in the county. This figure challenges popular narratives about large corporate dominance in this market.

Looking at Q4 transaction prices (from section 12-2), single-property landlords paid an average of $626,395, while institutional investors paid a lower average of $434,812. This indicates institutional buyers secure properties at a 30.6% discount compared to first-time or single-property buyers.

The distribution of entities across tiers (though not explicitly listed in 8-1, implied from 7-2) suggests that while there are many small entities, their combined holdings create a robust mom-and-pop segment.

While specific price trends by tier over time are not fully detailed in section 8-2's data snippet, the Q4 transactional pricing reveals distinct buying strategies between the smallest and largest investor tiers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual vs company acquisition prices by tier are not available in this dataset.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors predominantly own smaller portfolios, controlling 85.8% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 74.8% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. This highlights the entry point for most private landlords.

The ownership landscape shifts dramatically at the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 54.2% (270 properties) compared to individuals at 45.8% (228 properties). This marks a key crossover point in portfolio scale.

Beyond this crossover, company ownership increasingly dominates larger tiers: 85.3% in the 11-20 property tier and 77.0% in the 21-50 property tier. This concentration suggests that larger portfolios are primarily managed and expanded by corporate entities.

Even within the medium-large (51-100 properties) tier, companies maintain a strong majority, owning 69.2% of properties. This pattern indicates that as portfolio sizes grow, the operational and financial structures favor corporate management.

While the exact split for institutional investors (1000+ properties) is not provided, their scale strongly implies corporate ownership, aligning with the trend seen in the higher tiers. This reinforces the idea of a clear individual-to-company transition as portfolio size increases.

The data underscores a clear segmentation: individuals form the backbone of the small-scale rental market, while companies drive the growth and management of larger investment portfolios in Clackamas County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OR-Clackamas-97045 leads with 2,598 investor-owned properties, followed by 97222 and 97055.
Detailed Findings

Within Clackamas County, specific zip codes show significant concentration of investor-owned properties, with OR-Clackamas-97045 leading the county with 2,598 investor-owned SFR properties (15.2% ownership rate).

Following closely in terms of sheer volume are OR-Clackamas-97222 with 1,566 investor-owned properties (16.9% ownership rate) and OR-Clackamas-97055 with 1,359 properties (20.9% ownership rate), demonstrating hot spots for investor interest.

A striking pattern emerges in several smaller zip codes where investor ownership rates are extremely high: OR-Clackamas-97215, OR-Clackamas-97030, and OR-Clackamas-97223 each show a 100.0% investor ownership rate. These are likely smaller, specialized zones predominantly consisting of investor-held units.

While OR-Clackamas-97045 has the highest count of investor-owned properties, its ownership rate of 15.2% is lower than OR-Clackamas-97055 (20.9%) and several other zip codes with 100% rates, indicating that high property count does not always correlate with the highest penetration rate.

OR-Clackamas-97068 also shows significant investor activity, with 1,319 properties and a 13.3% ownership rate, rounding out the top five areas by property count and highlighting a broad geographic distribution of investor interest across the county.

The presence of zip codes with 100.0% investor ownership rates suggests specialized or potentially niche market segments where traditional homeowners may be scarce or non-existent, indicating a fully investor-driven micro-market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Overall landlord purchases from other landlords is not available; Q4 data shows 7.2% for single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Clackamas County are consistently net buyers, demonstrating a robust accumulation strategy over time. In Q4 2025, they bought 337 properties while selling 116, resulting in a net gain of 221 properties and a buy/sell ratio of 2.91x.

Across Year 2025, landlords remained strong net buyers, acquiring 1,564 properties against 433 sells, achieving a buy/sell ratio of 3.61x. This trend continues from Year 2024, which saw 1,632 buys versus 444 sells (3.68x ratio), indicating sustained investor confidence.

While overall landlords consistently buy more than they sell, institutional investors (1000+ tier) show a more volatile pattern. In Q4 2025, they were net buyers (8 buys versus 2 sells, 4.0x ratio), contrasting with their net seller position in Q2 2025 (5 buys versus 7 sells) and significantly in Year 2024 (2 buys versus 12 sells).

The average buy and sell prices for landlords are not provided in this section, preventing an analysis of implied profit margins or pricing strategies over time.

Transaction volumes for all landlords have remained relatively stable year-over-year, with 1,564 buys in Year 2025 compared to 1,632 in Year 2024, suggesting a consistent level of market engagement.

The percentage of landlord-to-landlord transactions for all landlords is not available in section 11-1. However, Q4 2025 data (from section 12-2) indicates that for single-property landlords, 7.2% of their transactions were from other landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Clackamas landlords comprise 17.6% of Q4 transactions, completing 337 out of 1,910 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for a significant 17.6% of all SFR transactions in Q4 2025 in Clackamas County, completing 337 out of 1,910 total transactions. This demonstrates their continued active role in shaping the market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 transaction volume, with 237 recorded transactions. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had a minimal presence with only 8 transactions.

A notable pricing disparity exists between investor tiers: institutional investors (Tier 09) paid an average of $434,812 per property in Q4, which is a substantial 30.6% less than single-property landlords (Tier 01), who paid $626,395. This highlights a significant pricing advantage for larger, more sophisticated buyers.

Inter-landlord trading activity varied by tier. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) sourced 17 of their 237 transactions (7.2%) from other landlords. Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09) acquired 0% of their properties from other landlords in Q4.

Other smaller tiers, such as two-property landlords (18.2%) and medium-large landlords (20.0%), showed higher percentages of transactions originating from other landlords, suggesting active internal market dynamics among these segments.

The wide price spread of $386,486 between the highest ($626,395 for Tier 01) and lowest ($239,909 for Tier 21-50) average purchase prices across tiers suggests diverse investment strategies and target properties within the landlord market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Clackamas Ownership and Q4 Purchases; Secure 16.1% Discount
Holdings
Landlords own 21,636 SFR properties, representing 17.3% of Clackamas County's total SFR market. Individual investors hold 17,966 properties (83.0%), significantly outweighing company-owned properties at 4,568 (21.1%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, Clackamas landlords paid an average of $592,587, securing a substantial 16.1% discount or $113,803 less than traditional homeowners who paid $706,390. This price advantage dramatically widened from 5.5% in Q3.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 20.3% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Clackamas County, acquiring 232 properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove this activity with 221 purchases (90.6%), while single-property landlords alone made 163 purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 95.8% of Clackamas County's investor-owned housing portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% share, underscoring the market's small-investor foundation.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 85.8% of single-property (Tier 01) SFRs. However, companies become majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 54.2% of holdings in that segment.
Transactions
Clackamas landlords are consistent net buyers, achieving a 2.91x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (337 buys vs 116 sells). Institutional investors also returned to a net buyer position in Q4 with a 4.0x ratio (8 buys vs 2 sells), despite being net sellers in previous periods.
Market Narrative

Clackamas County's real estate investment market is robust, with landlords collectively owning 21,636 SFR properties, representing 17.3% of the total SFR market. This significant portion of housing stock is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who hold 17,966 properties (83.0%) compared to 4,568 (21.1%) owned by companies. This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) who command a dominant 95.8% of all investor-owned housing, far overshadowing the mere 0.2% held by institutional investors (1000+ properties).

In Q4 2025, landlord activity remained strong, accounting for 20.3% of all SFR purchases with 232 acquisitions. A notable trend observed is the increasing pricing power of landlords, who secured an average 16.1% discount in Q4, paying $592,587 compared to homeowners' $706,390. This price advantage has widened dramatically from 5.5% in the previous quarter. Overall, landlords are net buyers with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 2.91x, actively accumulating properties, while institutional investors, after periods of net selling, also returned to net buying in Q4 with a 4.0x ratio, signaling renewed interest.

The data clearly indicates that the Clackamas County investor market is fundamentally driven by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who not only own the vast majority of investment properties but also lead current purchasing activity and demonstrate superior pricing negotiation. The concentration of investor-owned properties in specific zip codes, coupled with a significant portion being cash purchases, suggests a resilient and strategic local investment landscape. This strong presence of smaller investors suggests a distributed and potentially less volatile rental market, largely insulated from the headline-grabbing activities of institutional players.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 05:24 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyClackamas (OR)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison