Tillman (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tillman (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tillman (OK)
2,975
Total Investors in Tillman (OK)
1,181
Investor Owned SFR in Tillman (OK)
913(30.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,118
SFR Owned
838
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
63
SFR Owned
82
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 913 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Tillman County, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts Amidst Low Activity
Individual landlords control 91.8% of Tillman County's 913 investor-owned SFR properties, comprising 30.7% of the total SFR market. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly command 97.5% of investor holdings, dwarfing the 0.2% institutional share. In Q4, landlords were minimal buyers, acquiring just 2 properties at an average of $29,000, a significant 78.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $131,657.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own an overwhelming 91.8% of Tillman County's 913 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A dominant 98.1% of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, primarily acquired through cash (88.4%) rather than financing (11.6%). Individual landlords account for 94.7% of all landlord entities in the county, totaling 1,118 distinct individuals.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an exceptional 78.0% discount on Q4 purchases, paying $29,000 vs. homeowners at $131,657.
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 were $29,000, significantly lower than the $131,657 paid by traditional homeowners, reflecting a substantial $102,657 discount. The landlord discount has varied drastically, from 78.0% in Q4 to 33.9% in Q3, indicating highly opportunistic or inconsistent purchasing patterns.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 11.1% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% of activity driven by single-property landlords.
Of the 18 total SFR purchases in Q4, landlords acquired 2 properties, all of which were by single-property landlords (Tier 01). Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4 2025 in Tillman County.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Tillman County, controlling 97.5% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the backbone of the market, holding 78.7% of all investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 750 units. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% share, owning just 2 properties. No pricing data by tier is available to assess whether larger investors pay more or less per property in this specific geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate tiers up to 5 properties, with companies achieving majority at 11-20 properties.
Individual investors hold 94.3% of single-property portfolios, while companies reach a 50.0% share in the 6-10 property tier and become the majority (71.4%) in the 11-20 property tier. Institutional properties (1000+ tier) are entirely company-owned (no data provided on individual ownership for this tier) but represent only 2 properties.
Geographic Distribution
OK-Tillman-73542 leads with 556 investor-owned properties and a 29.6% investor ownership rate.
OK-Tillman-73570 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 38.1% (166 properties), while OK-Tillman-73555 has an even higher rate of 52.2%, though its property count is not provided. Geographic concentration is evident, with only a few zip codes accounting for the majority of investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Tillman County landlords are significant net buyers with a 12.33x buy/sell ratio in 2025, but institutional data is unavailable.
Landlords purchased 37 properties and sold 3 in 2025, maintaining a strong net buyer position. The buy/sell ratio has varied, from 17:1 in Q3 2025 to 6.625:1 in 2024, consistently indicating accumulation. There is no historical transaction data available for institutional investors (1000+ tier).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 12.5% of Q4 transactions, with all activity from single-property owners at an average price of $29,000.
Of the 24 total Q4 transactions, landlords were involved in 3. All landlord transactions came from single-property (Tier 01) investors, with no inter-landlord trading observed in this tier (0.0% bought from landlords). Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions in Q4.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own an overwhelming 91.8% of Tillman County's 913 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape in Tillman County, holding 838 of the 913 investor-owned SFR properties, which translates to a commanding 91.8% share. This stark contrast highlights a market primarily shaped by local, private ownership rather than large corporate entities, which account for only 82 properties (9.0%).

The rental market is robustly supported by these landlords, with 896 properties (98.1% of investor-owned SFR) currently rented. This signals a highly rental-focused investment strategy, underscoring the vital role these properties play in the local housing supply.

A significant portion of investor acquisitions are made with cash, accounting for 807 properties (88.4% of landlord-owned holdings). This indicates strong financial liquidity among investors and potentially less reliance on traditional financing compared to the 106 (11.6%) financed properties.

The sheer number of individual landlords, totaling 1,118 entities, compared to just 63 company landlords, emphasizes the deeply fragmented and accessible nature of the local investment market. This ratio of nearly 17.7 individuals for every company investor defies national trends often skewed towards corporate narratives.

Despite the concentration of holdings in rented properties, the low number of financed properties (106) suggests that landlords in Tillman County may be less susceptible to interest rate fluctuations, prioritizing cash purchases for their portfolios. This strategy could offer greater stability in volatile economic conditions.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an exceptional 78.0% discount on Q4 purchases, paying $29,000 vs. homeowners at $131,657.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Tillman County demonstrated highly opportunistic buying in Q4 2025, acquiring properties at an average price of $29,000, an exceptional 78.0% discount compared to the $131,657 average paid by traditional homeowners. This significant price disparity, amounting to a $102,657 saving per property, suggests landlords are targeting specific, lower-priced segments of the market.

The landlord-homeowner price gap exhibited considerable volatility throughout 2025. While Q4 saw a dramatic 78.0% discount, Q3 2025 purchases only garnered a 33.9% discount ($57,176 vs $86,533), and Q2 showed a 76.9% discount ($34,500 vs $149,213). This inconsistency underscores that landlord buying is not uniform but highly dependent on available inventory and market conditions in specific quarters.

The average acquisition prices for landlords fluctuated significantly across quarters in 2025, from a low of $29,000 in Q4 to a high of $65,125 in Q1, and $57,176 in Q3. These variations, particularly when juxtaposed with homeowner prices, reflect a strategic focus on distressed or undervalued assets by landlords in this market.

Given the dramatic price difference, it's evident that landlords in Tillman County possess a distinct advantage in identifying and securing properties at significantly lower price points than the broader market. This could be attributed to specialized sourcing, cash buying power, or targeting properties requiring substantial renovation.

The historical data for landlord acquisition volume shows 0 properties across all listed timeframes (Q4, Q3, Q2, Q1 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, Years 2020-2023) in the acquisition pricing summary. This suggests an extremely low volume of recorded acquisitions within the specific dataset used for price aggregation, indicating either data sparsity or highly selective purchasing. However, other sections confirm 2 landlord purchases in Q4.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 11.1% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% of activity driven by single-property landlords.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a focused but small segment of the Q4 2025 SFR purchase market in Tillman County, acquiring 2 properties out of a total of 18 SFR purchases. This translates to an 11.1% share, indicating that the vast majority of sales went to other types of buyers, including traditional homeowners.

The Q4 landlord purchasing activity was exclusively dominated by new or single-property landlords (Tier 01), who accounted for all 2 properties purchased. This points to a grassroots entry into the investment market, with smaller investors being the primary drivers of recent landlord acquisitions.

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), collectively made 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This reinforces their critical role in replenishing and expanding the local rental housing stock, with no recorded activity from larger mid-size or institutional investors.

Despite the 2 properties purchased by Tier 01 landlords, the data indicates 3 entities were active in this tier. This suggests that some entities might be new to the landlord classification but didn't necessarily close a purchase in Q4 or it highlights the fragmented nature of new entrant activity.

The complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 2025, with 0 properties acquired, signifies that large-scale corporate buying is not a factor in Tillman County's recent real estate investment landscape, further emphasizing the mom-and-pop driven market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Tillman County, controlling 97.5% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert near-total control over the investor-owned SFR market in Tillman County, commanding an astounding 97.5% of all such properties. This concentration showcases the local, small-scale nature of real estate investment in this area.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are held by single-property landlords (Tier 01), who alone own 750 properties, representing 78.7% of the total landlord portfolio. This indicates a highly accessible market for first-time or casual investors, forming the foundational layer of the rental supply.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, maintain a negligible presence in Tillman County, holding only 2 properties, which accounts for a mere 0.2% of the total landlord-owned SFR. This starkly contrasts with narratives of institutional dominance in larger, more liquid markets.

The distribution of ownership rapidly declines after Tier 01, with two-property landlords (Tier 02) holding 73 properties (7.7%) and small landlords (3-5 properties, Tier 03) owning 88 properties (9.2%). This steep drop-off underscores that most investors in Tillman County remain at the lower end of the portfolio size spectrum.

While no specific pricing data by tier is provided for Tillman County, the overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop investors suggests that the market dynamics are likely influenced more by individual investment strategies and local conditions than by large institutional buying power.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate tiers up to 5 properties, with companies achieving majority at 11-20 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the undisputed leaders in the smaller landlord tiers in Tillman County, owning 94.3% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios and 92.0% of 3-5 property (Tier 03) portfolios. This demonstrates a clear preference and capability for individuals to enter and manage smaller-scale real estate investments.

The crossover point where company ownership begins to equal individual ownership occurs in the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where both individual and company entities hold an equal 9 properties, each representing 50.0% of this tier's properties. This tier marks the transition towards more corporate-structured investment.

Beyond the 6-10 property tier, companies rapidly become the dominant owner type, taking a significant majority with 71.4% of properties in the small-medium (11-20 properties) tier. This indicates that larger portfolios are primarily assembled and managed by company entities, likely due to operational scale and capital requirements.

Despite companies taking a majority in larger tiers, the relatively small number of properties in these higher tiers (e.g., 21 properties in Tier 11-20, 1 property in Tier 51-100) suggests that the overall impact of company ownership on the total market remains limited compared to the pervasive individual presence in the smaller tiers.

The institutional tier (1000+ properties), though comprising only 2 properties in Tillman County, is exclusively company-owned. This highlights that while institutional presence is minimal, any large-scale ownership is entirely corporate in nature, aligning with typical operational structures of such large investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OK-Tillman-73542 leads with 556 investor-owned properties and a 29.6% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

The 73542 zip code in Tillman County is the clear leader in investor-owned properties, holding 556 units, which represents a substantial 29.6% investor ownership rate within that specific area. This concentration underscores its significance as a hotspot for real estate investment in the county.

While 73542 leads in total count, the 73555 zip code exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at an impressive 52.2%, suggesting that over half of the SFR properties in this area are landlord-owned. This high penetration indicates a strong rental market or a community heavily influenced by investment activity.

Another notable sub-geography is 73570, which ranks high in both property count (166 properties) and investor ownership rate (38.1%). Its consistent appearance in both top lists signals a well-established and attractive area for landlords looking to acquire rental properties.

The analysis of geographic distribution reveals a concentrated pattern of investor activity within Tillman County, with the top 3 visible zip codes (73542, 73570, 73546) accounting for 846 investor-owned properties. This indicates that landlord portfolios are not spread evenly but clustered in specific, presumably more lucrative, sub-markets.

The presence of 'nan' values for some zip codes like 73552 and 73553 implies data limitations or extremely low investor activity in those areas, preventing a complete comparative analysis across all sub-geographies within Tillman County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Tillman County landlords are significant net buyers with a 12.33x buy/sell ratio in 2025, but institutional data is unavailable.
Detailed Findings

Overall, landlords in Tillman County are robust net buyers, consistently accumulating properties over time. In Year 2025, they purchased 37 properties while selling only 3, resulting in an impressive buy-to-sell ratio of 12.33x, showcasing a strong growth-oriented investment strategy.

The trend of net buying is consistent across recent periods; in Q3 2025, landlords bought 17 properties versus 1 sale, and in Q2 2025, they bought 12 properties against 1 sale. This continuous pattern indicates a stable market where landlords are actively expanding their portfolios rather than divesting.

Comparing annual activity, landlords maintained a healthy net buyer position in Year 2024 as well, with 53 purchases against 8 sales, yielding a 6.625x buy-to-sell ratio. This suggests a sustained, long-term strategy of property accumulation that predates the current year.

Unfortunately, no historical transaction data is available for institutional investors (1000+ tier) for Tillman County. This data gap prevents an assessment of whether larger entities are also actively buying, divesting, or remaining static within this market.

The strong net buying activity implies that landlords perceive Tillman County as a favorable market for investment, potentially due to stable rental demand, favorable property values, or attractive returns, contributing to the expansion of the local rental housing supply.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 12.5% of Q4 transactions, with all activity from single-property owners at an average price of $29,000.
Detailed Findings

Landlords participated in a modest 12.5% of all SFR transactions in Tillman County during Q4 2025, accounting for 3 out of 24 total transactions. This indicates that the majority of market activity involves non-landlord buyers and sellers, consistent with a predominantly homeowner-driven transaction landscape.

The entirety of landlord transaction activity in Q4 came from single-property investors (Tier 01), who completed all 3 transactions. This highlights that market fluidity among landlords in this quarter was exclusively driven by smaller, potentially new, entrants or those adding their first property.

The average purchase price for Tier 01 landlord transactions in Q4 was $29,000. This price point, consistent with the overall landlord average from Section 6, reinforces the strategy of acquiring lower-priced properties by individual investors in Tillman County.

Notably, there was no reported inter-landlord trading activity for Tier 01 in Q4, with 0.0% of properties bought from other landlords. This suggests that the few landlord purchases made were sourced from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers, rather than through portfolio adjustments among existing investors.

Similar to purchase data, institutional investors (Tier 09) were completely absent from Q4 transaction activity, recording 0 transactions. This further solidifies the view of Tillman County as a market where large-scale corporate entities have minimal transactional footprint, leaving the field open for smaller investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Tillman County's Rental Market Reliant on Mom-and-Pop Landlords, Securing Deep Discounts Amidst Limited Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 913 SFR properties, representing 30.7% of the total SFR market in Tillman County. Individual investors hold 838 properties (91.8%) compared to companies owning 82 properties (9.0%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $29,000 in Q4, securing a significant 78.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $131,657.
Activity
Landlords made only 2 purchases in Q4, accounting for 11.1% of all SFR sales, with 100% of these transactions originating from new or single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities).
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 97.5% of investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.2% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 94.3% of single-property assets, but companies achieve majority control in portfolios of 11-20 properties (71.4% company-owned).
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 12.33x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (37 buys vs 3 sells). However, there is no transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in Tillman County.
Market Narrative

Tillman County's real estate investment landscape is fundamentally shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 97.5% of the 913 investor-owned SFR properties. This represents a substantial 30.7% of the total SFR market in the county, with individual investors owning 91.8% of these assets. The market is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 78.7% of the total landlord portfolio, contrasting sharply with the negligible 0.2% share held by institutional investors. This structure underscores a deeply localized and accessible investment environment, defying broader national narratives of corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by highly opportunistic, albeit limited, purchasing. Landlords acquired only 2 properties, comprising 11.1% of all SFR sales, and notably secured an exceptional 78.0% discount, paying an average of $29,000 compared to homeowners' $131,657. This significant price gap highlights landlords' ability to target lower-priced segments. Transactionally, landlords are consistent net buyers, with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 12.33x (37 buys vs. 3 sells), reflecting a strategy of accumulation. All Q4 landlord transactions were driven by single-property investors, with no inter-landlord trading observed, suggesting acquisitions from non-landlord sellers.

The Tillman County market exhibits a unique dynamic where small-scale, individual investors are the primary engine of the rental housing supply. The absence of significant institutional activity and the prevalence of cash purchases suggest a resilient, locally-driven market less exposed to national capital flows and financing fluctuations. This makes Tillman County a strong example of a market where local entrepreneurialism rather than institutional capital dictates the evolution of the single-family rental sector, providing critical housing stability in the region.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:25 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTillman (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail