Pushmataha (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pushmataha (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pushmataha (OK)
2,160
Total Investors in Pushmataha (OK)
599
Investor Owned SFR in Pushmataha (OK)
631(29.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
552
SFR Owned
571
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
47
SFR Owned
60
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 631 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Pushmataha County Amidst Minimal Institutional Activity
In Pushmataha County, Oklahoma, individual landlords own 90.5% of the 631 investor-owned SFR properties, making mom-and-pop entities the market's foundation. While Q4 saw only one landlord purchase, landlords were net buyers throughout 2025, acquiring 23 properties compared to 2 sells. Institutional investors remain absent, cementing the local market's grassroots ownership structure.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 90.5% of 631 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Pushmataha County
The vast majority of investor-owned properties (625 of 631) are rented, with 549 purchased with cash and 82 financed. Individual investors comprise 92.2% of all landlord entities, numbering 552 compared to 47 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord-Homeowner Price Gaps Highly Volatile Amidst Extremely Low Transaction Volume
In Q2 2025, landlords secured a significant $78,867 (36.4%) discount against homeowners, however, Q4 2025 landlord pricing cannot be directly compared to homeowners due to missing data. Historic acquisition prices show year-over-year increases, with the 2025 average acquisition price rising to $179,773 from $139,370 in 2024.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Pushmataha County
All Q4 landlord purchases, representing 100.0% of the total, were made by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04). Specifically, a single-property landlord (Tier 01) was responsible for the only purchase in Q4, with no institutional activity observed.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.3% of Investor-Owned SFR in Pushmataha County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of investor ownership, holding 531 properties, or 84.0% of the total. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no presence in Pushmataha County, reinforcing the local market's small-investor dominance. Tier-specific pricing data is unavailable for historical or current periods.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Landlords Dominate Across All Tiers; No Company Majority Crossover in Pushmataha County
Individual investors maintain a significant majority in every listed tier, from 92.8% in Tier 01 to 85.7% in Tier 06-10, demonstrating their pervasive influence. Company ownership remains a minor component, with their highest share being 14.3% in Tier 06-10 (1 property out of 7).
Geographic Distribution
Pushmataha County's Zip Code 74523 Leads with 417 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Zip code 74557 shows the highest investor ownership rate at 45.2% (71 properties), indicating significant market penetration despite a lower property count. Zip codes 74521 and 74540 have no recorded investor-owned properties, suggesting highly localized investment activity within the county.
Historical Transactions
Pushmataha County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 23 Properties vs. Selling 2 in 2025
Landlords have consistently been net buyers, with a 23:5 buy/sell ratio in 2024 and a 23:2 ratio in 2025, indicating steady portfolio expansion. There is no historical transaction data available for institutional investors (1000+ tier), suggesting their continued absence from the county's market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of the Single Q4 Transaction in Pushmataha County
The lone Q4 transaction was a purchase by a single-property landlord (Tier 01) at an average price of $90,000. There was no inter-landlord trading observed, meaning the purchase was from a non-landlord seller. No institutional transaction activity occurred in Q4.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 90.5% of 631 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Pushmataha County
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned housing market in Pushmataha County, Oklahoma, controlling 571 (90.5%) of the 631 SFR properties. This stark contrast highlights the significant role of local, individual investors over corporate entities, which hold only 60 properties (9.5%).

The investor market in Pushmataha County is heavily geared towards rentals, with 625 of the 631 landlord-owned SFR properties being rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on income-generating assets rather than other holding strategies.

Cash acquisitions are the predominant financing method for landlords in Pushmataha County, with 549 properties purchased outright compared to just 82 that are financed. This suggests a preference for unencumbered assets or a market where cash offers are highly competitive.

Reflecting the property ownership, individual landlords far outnumber company landlords by nearly 12-to-1, with 552 individual entities compared to only 47 companies. This indicates a highly fragmented market composed primarily of single-owner operations.

The high percentage of individual ownership (90.5% of properties, 92.2% of entities) in Pushmataha County positions mom-and-pop investors as the primary drivers and backbone of the local SFR rental market, contrasting sharply with national trends often skewed towards larger corporate involvement.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord-Homeowner Price Gaps Highly Volatile Amidst Extremely Low Transaction Volume
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Pushmataha County exhibits extreme volatility, primarily due to very low transaction volumes; for example, Q4 2025 recorded only one landlord purchase for $90,000, and other 2025 quarters had 0 properties recorded but average prices.

While Q4 2025 data shows a landlord acquisition price of $90,000, a direct comparison to homeowner prices is not possible due to missing homeowner data for the quarter. This limits current-period insights into landlord pricing strategy.

Looking at previous quarters, landlord acquisition prices have fluctuated widely, with Q1 2025 showing a $72,214 (41.9%) premium over homeowners, followed by a substantial $78,867 (36.4%) discount in Q2 2025. This quarterly swings underscore the market's low liquidity and the impact of individual transactions.

Despite the volatility, there's an observable upward trend in average landlord acquisition prices over time. The average price for 2025 stands at $179,773, a notable increase from $139,370 in 2024 and $131,177 during the 2020-2023 period, indicating market appreciation even with low transaction counts.

The lack of consistent, robust transaction data across quarters and buyer types means definitive conclusions about landlord vs. homeowner price gaps cannot be drawn for every period in Pushmataha County, highlighting the localized nature and limited volume of investor activity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Pushmataha County
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Pushmataha County were the sole buyers in the SFR market, accounting for 100.0% of the total 1 purchase. This highlights a highly concentrated and perhaps slow market where landlord activity entirely defines the quarterly purchase landscape.

The single landlord purchase in Q4 2025 was made by a mom-and-pop landlord from Tier 01 (single-property owner), emphasizing the grassroots nature of investor activity in Pushmataha County. This single entity purchased 1 property, representing 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively executed 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4, further reinforcing their dominant role in market transactions. There was no observed purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09), consistent with their overall absence in the county.

The extremely low volume of Q4 purchases (only 1 total SFR purchase) suggests a very quiet or illiquid market. This single transaction, by a new or expanding single-property landlord, carries disproportionate weight for the quarter's market dynamics.

The data unequivocally demonstrates that new market entry or portfolio expansion in Pushmataha County's SFR sector is driven entirely by small, individual investors, with larger corporate entities not participating in recent acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 97.3% of Investor-Owned SFR in Pushmataha County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively control an overwhelming 97.3% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Pushmataha County. This equates to 615 properties held by smaller investors, underscoring their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

The market is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) owning 531 properties, representing 84.0% of all landlord-owned SFR. This highlights the prevalence of first-time or very small-scale investors in the county.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold no properties in Pushmataha County. This complete absence challenges common perceptions of institutional market takeover and emphasizes the market's reliance on local, individual capital.

Even mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold only a small fraction of the market, with 16 properties in Tier 11-20 and 1 property in Tier 21-50, totaling just 2.7%. This further reinforces the dominance of smaller portfolio holders in the county.

The current data does not provide tier-specific acquisition pricing, preventing analysis of whether larger or smaller investors pay different amounts for properties in Pushmataha County. However, the ownership distribution clearly indicates a small-scale, locally-driven investor market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Dominate Across All Tiers; No Company Majority Crossover in Pushmataha County
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords are the predominant owner type across all observed portfolio tiers in Pushmataha County, Oklahoma. Even in the largest tier documented (6-10 properties), individuals own 6 of the 7 properties, representing 85.7%.

The data reveals no crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in any tier within Pushmataha County. This stands in contrast to more institutionalized markets where companies often dominate larger portfolios.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are overwhelmingly individual, with 493 properties (92.8%) owned by individuals compared to only 38 (7.2%) by companies. This pattern of individual dominance extends to Tier 02 (92.7%) and Tier 03-05 (94.4%).

Company presence in Pushmataha County's landlord market is consistently low, never exceeding 14.3% of properties within any tier. This indicates that corporate investment remains minimal, with individual investors being the primary capital source across all portfolio sizes.

This persistent individual dominance across all tiers suggests that the Pushmataha County market primarily attracts and sustains local, private capital, largely untouched by the larger-scale corporate investment trends seen in other regions.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Pushmataha County's Zip Code 74523 Leads with 417 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

In Pushmataha County, Oklahoma, zip code 74523 stands out as the primary hub for investor activity, boasting the highest count of landlord-owned SFR properties at 417, which represents a 28.8% investor ownership rate within that area.

While 74523 has the highest raw count, zip code 74557 exhibits the highest investor ownership *rate* at 45.2%, holding 71 investor-owned properties. This indicates a higher concentration of landlord-owned properties relative to the total SFR market in that specific area, making it a more saturated investor market.

The distribution of investor properties across Pushmataha County is uneven, with significant concentrations in specific zip codes. For instance, 74536 has 46 properties (26.3% rate), and 74543 has 27 properties (30.0% rate), showing varied levels of investor interest.

Notably, some zip codes, such as 74521 and 74540, have no recorded investor-owned properties. This suggests highly localized investment patterns, with landlords focusing their portfolios on specific communities within Pushmataha County.

The distinction between raw property count and ownership percentage reveals different facets of market concentration: 74523 is where most investor properties are found, while 74557 is where investors own the largest share of the available SFR housing, signifying different strategic importance for investors.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Pushmataha County Landlords Are Strong Net Buyers, Acquiring 23 Properties vs. Selling 2 in 2025
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pushmataha County, Oklahoma, are consistently strong net buyers, actively expanding their portfolios. In 2025, they acquired 23 SFR properties while selling only 2, resulting in a net gain of 21 properties.

This trend of net buying is consistent year-over-year; in 2024, landlords bought 23 properties and sold 5, demonstrating a sustained accumulation strategy rather than divestment. The buy-to-sell ratio improved from 4.6x in 2024 to an impressive 11.5x in 2025.

During Q2 2025, landlords maintained their net buyer status, with 8 purchases against 1 sale, accumulating 7 properties. This highlights active albeit low-volume transaction behavior within specific quarters.

A critical finding is the complete absence of any transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) across all timeframes. This indicates that large-scale corporate entities are not participating in the buying or selling of SFR properties in Pushmataha County.

The continued net buying activity by all landlords, coupled with the non-existent institutional presence, underscores that the growth and dynamism of the Pushmataha County SFR rental market are driven exclusively by smaller, individual investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 100.0% of the Single Q4 Transaction in Pushmataha County
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords comprised 100.0% of the total 1 SFR transaction in Pushmataha County, indicating that all market activity for the quarter stemmed from investor engagement. This highlights a highly concentrated and quiet transaction environment.

The single Q4 transaction was executed by a mom-and-pop landlord from Tier 01 (single-property owner), purchasing one property at an average price of $90,000. This reinforces the dominance of small-scale investors in current market activity.

There was no inter-landlord trading in Q4, with 0.0% of transactions purchased from other landlords. This suggests that the single landlord buyer acquired the property from a traditional homeowner or other non-investor seller, rather than through an exchange within the investor community.

Consistent with historical trends, institutional investors (Tier 09) had no transaction activity in Q4, further cementing their non-involvement in the Pushmataha County SFR market.

The average purchase price of $90,000 for the Tier 01 transaction provides a snapshot of current acquisition costs for small-scale investors, albeit from a very limited data point for the quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Pushmataha, Outnumbering Absent Institutions
Holdings
Landlords own 631 SFR properties in Pushmataha County, representing 29.2% of the total SFR market. Individual investors account for 571 properties (90.5%) compared to 60 properties (9.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
While Q4 2025 landlord pricing for Pushmataha County at $90,000 cannot be directly compared to homeowners, Q2 2025 saw landlords secure a significant $78,867 (36.4%) discount over homeowners ($138,000 vs $216,867).
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords make 1 purchase, representing 100.0% of all SFR sales, with this sole acquisition made by a new single-property landlord (Tier 01). Mom-and-pop landlords dominate all buying activity.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.3% of investor-owned housing in Pushmataha County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold a decisive majority (90.5% of properties) across all tiers in Pushmataha County; companies never achieve majority ownership, even in the largest landlord tiers.
Transactions
Landlords in Pushmataha County are robust net buyers with an 11.5x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (23 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors remain entirely absent, with no recorded transactions.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Pushmataha County, Oklahoma, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop landlords. Of the 631 investor-owned SFR properties, a striking 90.5% are held by individual investors, significantly outpacing company-owned properties (9.5%). This local, grassroots ownership base comprises 599 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords outnumbering companies by a near 12-to-1 ratio, underscoring their foundational role in the county's 29.2% SFR market penetration.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was minimal, with landlords accounting for 100.0% of the single SFR purchase at $90,000, executed by a new single-property landlord. Despite this low quarterly volume, landlords were strong net buyers throughout 2025, acquiring 23 properties while selling only 2, demonstrating consistent portfolio expansion. While Q4 pricing could not be directly compared to homeowners, Q2 2025 showed landlords securing a notable 36.4% discount, though overall price trends are highly volatile due to low transaction volumes.

The data from Pushmataha County clearly paints a picture of a market sustained by local, private capital. The complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09) from both ownership and transaction records is a stark contrast to broader national trends, reinforcing that the county's SFR rental market is driven by individual strategies and local dynamics, with mom-and-pop investors as the undisputed market leaders.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:19 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPushmataha (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail