McIntosh (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the McIntosh (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in McIntosh (OK)
5,829
Total Investors in McIntosh (OK)
2,312
Investor Owned SFR in McIntosh (OK)
1,781(30.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,020
SFR Owned
1,416
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
292
SFR Owned
398
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,781 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate McIntosh County, Driving Strong Net Buying and Q4 Discounts
Landlords in McIntosh County, OK, own 1,781 SFR properties, representing 30.6% of the market, with individuals holding 79.5%. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.1% of this portfolio, while institutional investors hold just 0.1%. In Q4 2025, landlords were strong net buyers with a 17.5:1 buy/sell ratio and secured a substantial 27.5% discount compared to homeowner prices.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords hold 1,781 SFR properties; 79.5% are individually owned.
Individual landlords significantly outnumber companies by 6.92 to 1 (2,020 vs 292 entities) in McIntosh County, OK. A high 97.6% of investor-owned properties (1,739) are rented, underscoring a strong rental focus. Most investor-owned properties were cash purchases (1,303), significantly outweighing financed properties (478).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4, landlords secured a 27.5% discount, paying $189,219 vs homeowner $261,095.
This represents a dramatic shift from earlier 2025 quarters, where landlords paid premiums of 23.3% in Q1, 5.1% in Q2, and 13.7% in Q3. The substantial Q4 $71,876 discount signals a notable change in market dynamics or acquisition strategy by landlords in McIntosh County, OK. However, the provided data in section6-1.csv reports 0 distinct landlord properties purchased across all timeframes, which conflicts with Q4 purchase counts from section7-1.csv.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 36.5% of Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 23 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 acquisitions in McIntosh County, OK, accounting for 87.5% (21 properties) of landlord purchases based on detailed tier data. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone bought 19 properties (79.2% of landlord buys), representing the activity of 29 distinct entities. Institutional investors (Tier 09) had minimal activity, purchasing only 1 property (4.2% of landlord buys).
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 94.1% of investor-owned SFR; institutions hold just 0.1%.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of investor ownership in McIntosh County, OK, holding 1,437 properties (78.7%) of all investor-held SFR. This extreme concentration reveals a market structure heavily reliant on small-scale, individual investors. Institutional investors (Tier 09) own only 2 properties, representing a minuscule 0.1% of the total investor portfolio. Data on acquisition prices by tier and entity counts are not available for this section.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier.
Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios in McIntosh County, OK, owning 86.2% of Tier 01 properties, but their share steadily declines to 25.0% by Tier 11-20. Conversely, company ownership increases from 13.8% in Tier 01 to a peak of 75.0% in Tier 11-20, indicating increasing corporate presence with portfolio size. Data on acquisition prices by owner type within tiers and specific growth patterns are not available.
Geographic Distribution
Geographic distribution data is unavailable for McIntosh County, OK.
The provided data for sub-geographies within McIntosh County, OK (e.g., zip codes) contains 'nan' values for property counts, entities, and acquisition prices. Consequently, specific insights into investor activity concentrations or ownership rates by region cannot be generated from the given dataset.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 17.5:1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Across all of 2025, landlords in McIntosh County, OK, maintained a robust 10.07:1 buy/sell ratio (151 buys vs 15 sells), signaling consistent property accumulation. The Q4 2025 ratio represents a significant surge from Q3's 7.5:1 ratio, indicating an accelerated acquisition pace relative to sales. Data for institutional investor transactions, inter-landlord activity, and average buy/sell prices is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 41.7% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops acquired 32 properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active in McIntosh County, OK, making 29 transactions at an average price of $213,705. Institutional buyers paid 30.8% less than Tier 01, at an average of $147,792. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal across all tiers, with only 6.9% of Tier 01 purchases (2 transactions) coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords hold 1,781 SFR properties; 79.5% are individually owned.
Detailed Findings

The landlord-owned SFR portfolio in McIntosh County, OK, totals 1,781 properties, making up 30.6% of the overall SFR market of 5,829 properties. This indicates a substantial investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate this portfolio, owning 1,416 properties, which accounts for 79.5% of all investor-held SFR. In contrast, company-owned properties number 398, representing 22.3% of the total investor portfolio. This highlights the prevalence of individual, often smaller-scale, landlords.

The individual dominance extends to entity counts, with 2,020 individual landlords compared to 292 company landlords, resulting in a ratio of nearly 6.92 individual landlords for every company. This structure reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the market.

A significant 97.6% of investor-owned SFR properties (1,739 out of 1,781) are rented, clearly demonstrating that these holdings are primarily investment vehicles focused on generating rental income, rather than owner-occupied residences.

Property acquisition methods show a strong preference for cash purchases; 1,303 properties were acquired with cash, far exceeding the 478 properties that were financed. This suggests a lower reliance on traditional lending for property acquisition among landlords in this market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4, landlords secured a 27.5% discount, paying $189,219 vs homeowner $261,095.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in McIntosh County, OK, experienced a significant shift in acquisition pricing during Q4 2025, securing properties at an average of $189,219. This price was $71,876, or 27.5%, less than the average traditional homeowner price of $261,095 for the same period.

This substantial Q4 discount marks a dramatic reversal from earlier quarters in 2025. In Q1, landlords paid a 23.3% premium, followed by a 5.1% premium in Q2, and a 13.7% premium in Q3 compared to homeowners. The sudden pivot to a deep discount in Q4 suggests evolving market conditions or a change in landlord purchasing tactics.

The inconsistency in data, where `section6-1.csv` reports 0 distinct landlord properties purchased across all timeframes (Q1-Q4 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, 2020-2023), while `section7-1.csv` confirms 23 landlord purchases in Q4 2025, is notable. Despite this, the price comparisons themselves highlight a significant shift in relative purchasing power.

The pronounced fluctuation in the landlord-homeowner price gap—from premiums to a large discount—indicates an inconsistent market environment where pricing advantages are not stable but can swing dramatically quarter-to-quarter.

Without actual acquisition volumes linked to these average prices in `section6-1.csv`, a full analysis of price appreciation trends from the pandemic era to Q4 for landlords is not feasible from this dataset.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 36.5% of Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 23 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in McIntosh County, OK, made 23 SFR purchases, capturing a substantial 36.5% of the total 63 SFR properties sold in the market. This indicates a significant and active role for investors in the local housing market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the primary drivers of this activity, collectively acquiring 21 properties, which represents 87.5% of all landlord purchases in the quarter. This underscores the continued dominance of smaller-scale investors, consistent with the overall market structure.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, responsible for 19 purchases, making up 79.2% of all landlord acquisitions. This activity involved 29 distinct entities, suggesting a healthy influx of new or expanding small-scale investors entering the market with their first property.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop tiers, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 1 purchase, accounting for a mere 4.2% of landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025. This indicates a very limited or negligible presence of large corporate buyers in the county's current purchase activity.

The average properties per entity across the active tiers highlights the granular nature of these purchases, with most tiers showing 1 property acquired per entity, except for Tier 01 where 29 entities purchased 19 properties, reflecting diverse individual buying patterns.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 94.1% of investor-owned SFR; institutions hold just 0.1%.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of investor-owned SFR properties in McIntosh County, OK, reveals an overwhelming dominance by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control 94.1% of the entire investor portfolio. This signals a market heavily characterized by smaller, individual property owners.

Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) account for the vast majority of holdings, owning 1,437 properties, which is 78.7% of all investor-owned SFR. Even when expanding to Tiers 01-04, representing landlords with 1-10 properties, the concentration remains exceptionally high, affirming their foundational role in the local rental market.

Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09), defined as owning 1000+ properties, have an almost non-existent presence in McIntosh County, OK. They own a mere 2 properties, constituting only 0.1% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio, effectively debunking any notion of significant 'Wall Street' influence.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) also hold a relatively small share, totaling 6.0% (44+11+3+48=106 properties) of the market, indicating that very few investors manage larger portfolios between 11 and 1000 properties.

Due to limitations in the provided data, analysis regarding acquisition prices by tier, entity counts within each tier, or how this distribution has evolved over time is not possible from this section.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

An analysis of investor ownership by tier and owner type in McIntosh County, OK, reveals a distinct crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. This shift occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies hold a majority 59.4% compared to individuals at 40.6%.

In the smallest portfolio sizes, individual investors are overwhelmingly dominant; they own 86.2% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 77.1% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. This reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' characteristic of the foundational tiers.

As portfolio size increases, the proportion of company ownership steadily rises. Companies account for only 13.8% in Tier 01, but their share grows to 22.9% in Tier 02, 36.8% in Tier 03-05, and then becomes the majority at 59.4% in Tier 06-10. This trend culminates in Tier 11-20, where companies own 75.0% of properties.

This pattern suggests that while individual investors are the bedrock of the market, larger portfolios are increasingly managed by company entities, indicating a strategic shift in ownership structure as investors scale up their holdings.

However, the provided data does not include details on acquisition prices segmented by owner type within tiers, nor does it offer insights into growth patterns over time for individual versus company-owned properties within these specific tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Geographic distribution data is unavailable for McIntosh County, OK.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of geographic distribution within McIntosh County, OK, is currently not possible due to significant data limitations. All key metrics for sub-geographies, including total SFR properties, landlord-owned SFR properties, landlord entities, and acquisition prices, are reported as 'nan' in the provided `section10.csv`.

This absence of specific geographic data prevents the identification of investor hotspots, areas with high or low investor ownership rates, or any regional variations in acquisition pricing within the county.

Without this critical information, it is impossible to determine if investor activity is concentrated in certain zip codes or if prices fluctuate significantly across different parts of McIntosh County, OK.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 17.5:1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in McIntosh County, OK, are demonstrating a strong and consistent position as net buyers, dramatically outpacing their sales activity across all recorded timeframes. In Q4 2025 alone, landlords executed 35 buy transactions against just 2 sell transactions, resulting in an exceptionally high buy/sell ratio of 17.5:1.

This robust buying trend is not limited to the current quarter; landlords maintained a buy/sell ratio of 10.07:1 throughout the entirety of 2025 (151 buys vs 15 sells) and a healthy 7.71:1 in 2024 (131 buys vs 17 sells). These figures clearly indicate a sustained strategy of accumulating SFR properties within the county.

The Q4 2025 buy/sell ratio of 17.5:1 marks a notable increase in acquisition intensity compared to Q3's ratio of 7.5:1 and Q2's 9.75:1. This suggests a strengthening confidence or increased opportunity for landlords to expand their portfolios towards the end of the year.

The consistently high buy/sell ratios across multiple periods paint a picture of a growing investor market, where landlords are actively expanding their holdings rather than divesting.

Unfortunately, the provided data lacks details on institutional (1000+ tier) transactions, inter-landlord trading percentages, and average buy versus sell prices, limiting the ability to analyze specific market liquidity and potential implied profit margins.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 41.7% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops acquired 32 properties.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a significant role in the McIntosh County, OK, housing market, participating in 35 transactions out of a total of 84, equating to a 41.7% share of all SFR transactions. This highlights their considerable influence on market activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were the driving force behind these transactions, collectively accounting for 32 purchases. Specifically, single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated with 29 transactions, indicating a strong influx or expansion among the smallest investors.

There's a significant price disparity across investor tiers. Tier 01 buyers paid the highest average price at $213,705. In contrast, mid-range tiers like 06-10 and 11-20 secured properties at a much lower average of $35,000, representing a remarkable 510.6% discount compared to Tier 01. Institutional buyers (Tier 09) paid an average of $147,792, which is 30.8% less than the single-property buyers.

Inter-landlord trading activity was notably low in Q4. Only 2 of the 29 Tier 01 transactions (6.9%) involved buying from another landlord, and other tiers reported no such activity. This suggests that the majority of landlord acquisitions are occurring from non-landlord sellers.

The transaction activity by tier generally aligns with the overall ownership distribution, further solidifying the premise that the McIntosh County, OK, investor market is predominantly shaped by the actions of mom-and-pop landlords, with varying price strategies across different portfolio sizes.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

McIntosh Mom-and-Pops Dominate, Driving Strong Q4 Net Buying and Deep Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 1,781 SFR properties in McIntosh County, OK, representing 30.6% of the total SFR market of 5,829 properties. Individual investors hold 1,416 (79.5%) of these properties, significantly outweighing the 398 (22.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords in McIntosh County, OK, secured a substantial 27.5% discount, paying an average of $189,219 compared to traditional homeowners' $261,095, translating to a $71,876 saving per property.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords acquire 23 properties, representing 36.5% of all SFR purchases in McIntosh County, OK. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, with 29 entities making purchases and acquiring 19 properties.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 94.1% of investor-owned housing in McIntosh County, OK, while institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) own a minuscule 0.1% (2 properties).
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (86.2% of Tier 01 holdings) in McIntosh County, OK, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier, demonstrating a shift towards corporate ownership with increasing portfolio size.
Transactions
Landlords overall are strong net buyers in McIntosh County, OK, maintaining a 17.5:1 buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (35 buys vs 2 sells), indicating aggressive accumulation. Data on institutional investor transactions is unavailable to determine their specific net position.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in McIntosh County, OK, is predominantly shaped by small-scale, individual landlords. A robust 30.6% of the county's 5,829 SFR properties are investor-owned, totaling 1,781 properties, with an overwhelming 79.5% held by individual investors. Mom-and-pop landlords, owning 1-10 properties, control a dominant 94.1% of this portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors with 1000+ properties hold a negligible 0.1% (just 2 properties), effectively countering narratives of large corporate takeover in this market.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 signals an aggressive buying stance. Landlords were significant market participants, responsible for 36.5% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 23 properties. This active purchasing was accompanied by a remarkable pricing advantage; landlords secured a substantial 27.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying $189,219 vs $261,095. This dramatic shift from previous quarters, where landlords paid premiums, suggests a dynamic market or evolving acquisition strategies. Overall transaction data for McIntosh County, OK, shows landlords as strong net buyers, with a 17.5:1 buy/sell ratio in Q4, consistently accumulating properties.

The data clearly points to the resilience and continued growth of the mom-and-pop investor segment as the primary force in the McIntosh County, OK, SFR rental market. Their strong net buying activity and ability to secure significant discounts, coupled with the minimal presence of institutional players, highlight a market driven by smaller, local investors. This structural dynamic indicates a localized and accessible investment environment, rather than one dominated by large, distant corporations.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:08 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMcIntosh (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4