Harmon (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Harmon (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Harmon (OK)
914
Total Investors in Harmon (OK)
352
Investor Owned SFR in Harmon (OK)
342(37.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
329
SFR Owned
304
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
23
SFR Owned
38
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 342 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of Harmon County's SFR market, securing 75.6% Q4 discounts.
Harmon County landlords own 342 SFR properties, comprising 37.4% of the market, with individuals holding 88.9% and mom-and-pop investors controlling 99.4% of the total investor portfolio. Landlords acquired their Q4 property at a significant 75.6% discount compared to homeowners, yet overall Q4 landlord transaction volume was minimal, with landlords being net neutral for the quarter (1 buy, 1 sell).
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Harmon County landlords own 342 SFR properties (37.4% of market), with individuals controlling 88.9%.
The vast majority of landlord properties (98.5%) are rented, and 86.5% are owned outright with cash. Companies hold 11.1% of properties, entirely as cash-owned rentals, highlighting a preference for unfinanced assets.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Harmon County landlords secured an astonishing 75.6% discount ($46,429) versus homeowners in Q4 2025.
The landlord discount has varied, from 54.6% in Q1 to 75.6% in Q4, though homeowner data for Q3 is unavailable. However, transaction volumes were minimal or zero in all reported quarters for landlords.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made 14.3% of Harmon County's Q4 SFR purchases, with single-property investors dominating.
A single mom-and-pop landlord (Tier 01) accounted for all landlord purchases (100.0%) in Q4. This highlights the absence of any institutional investor purchasing activity in Harmon County.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.4% of Harmon County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone comprise 74.7% of the market, owning 260 properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no ownership presence whatsoever in Harmon County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate all observable tiers, with no crossover to company majority in Harmon County.
Companies hold a modest 40.0% of properties in the 3-5 property tier but own 0 properties in the 6-10 property tier and have no institutional presence. The data does not provide acquisition prices split by individual vs company for analysis.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 73550 (Hollis) leads Harmon County with 319 investor-owned properties.
Hollis (73550) accounts for 37.6% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. Zip code 73554 shows the highest concentration with 100.0% investor ownership, though this represents only 1 property.
Historical Transactions
Harmon County landlords were net neutral in Q4 2025 (1 buy, 1 sell), but strong net buyers historically.
Landlords were significant net buyers in Year 2025 (22 buys vs 2 sells) and Year 2024 (17 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors showed no transaction activity across any timeframe.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented only 10.0% of Harmon County's Q4 transactions, dominated by Tier 01 activity.
A single mom-and-pop (Tier 01) landlord accounted for all 1 landlord transaction at an average price of $15,000. Institutional investors reported no transactions for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Harmon County landlords own 342 SFR properties (37.4% of market), with individuals controlling 88.9%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Harmon County control 342 single-family residential properties, accounting for 37.4% of the total SFR market of 914 properties, indicating a significant investor presence within the local housing stock.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 304 SFR properties (88.9%) compared to companies which hold 38 properties (11.1%), directly challenging narratives of corporate dominance in this market.

The investor-owned portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 337 properties (98.5%) identified as rented, underscoring the market's primary function as a source of rental housing for residents.

Cash purchases are the prevailing strategy among Harmon County landlords, with 296 properties (86.5%) owned outright, while only 46 properties (13.5%) are financed, suggesting a preference for lower leverage and immediate equity.

Company-owned portfolios exhibit a stark difference in financing; all 38 company-owned properties are held entirely in cash (100.0% cash, 0.0% financed), while individual investors utilize financing for 46 of their 304 properties.

With 329 individual landlords compared to 23 company landlords, the ratio of 14.3 individual landlords for every company landlord highlights the strong presence of independent, smaller-scale investors in the county.

Every single company-owned property (38 properties) is rented, while 299 out of 304 individually-owned properties are rented, confirming that both owner types are predominantly focused on the rental market in Harmon County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Harmon County landlords secured an astonishing 75.6% discount ($46,429) versus homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In 2025-Q4, the single landlord purchase in Harmon County was made at an average price of $15,000, representing a substantial $46,429 discount (75.6%) compared to the average homeowner acquisition price of $61,429, indicating landlords' ability to acquire properties significantly below market rates.

The landlord acquisition price for 2025-Q1 was $27,500, also a significant $33,125 discount (54.6%) compared to the average homeowner price of $60,625, highlighting a consistent pattern of landlords securing properties at lower prices.

Landlord acquisition prices show considerable quarterly volatility in 2025, with an average price of $27,500 in Q1 and $15,000 in Q4, but an anomalous $135,000 in Q3 (where homeowner data is missing), suggesting that these averages are driven by very low transaction volumes.

Comparing annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 stood at $102,647, a notable increase from Year 2024's average of $60,954, though both periods saw minimal distinct landlord purchases.

The long-term trend reveals that the average landlord acquisition price in Years 2020-2023 was $75,015, indicating some price appreciation into 2025 ($102,647 for Year 2025), even with the low transaction numbers recorded as '0 properties'.

The consistent pattern of landlords paying less than homeowners, demonstrated by the Q4 75.6% discount and Q1 54.6% discount, suggests that investors are either targeting distressed properties or leveraging unique purchasing channels not available to traditional buyers.

Despite listed average prices, the 'Distinct SFR Properties Purchased' column showing 0 for all landlord timeframes in section6-1.csv suggests extremely limited buying activity, meaning the reported average prices often reflect single or very few uncounted transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords made 14.3% of Harmon County's Q4 SFR purchases, with single-property investors dominating.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for only 14.3% of total SFR purchases in Harmon County during Q4 2025, acquiring 1 property out of 7 total transactions, indicating a subdued presence in the quarter's buying activity.

All landlord purchases in Q4 were exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), with a single-property landlord (Tier 01) buying 1 property, representing 100.0% of landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

The absence of any institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 underscores their complete lack of activity in the Harmon County market, leaving the field entirely to smaller-scale investors.

Only one new landlord, a single-property entity, entered the market in Q4, signifying extremely limited new investor formation and acquisition volume within the county.

The sole purchasing entity in Q4 was a Tier 01 landlord, which, by definition, implies an average of 1 property per entity for that tier's Q4 activity, showing first-time or small-scale investors are the only active buyers.

The very low volume of landlord purchases in Q4 (only 1 property) suggests a highly illiquid market or a strategic pause in acquisitions by larger investors, contrasting sharply with markets experiencing higher investor churn.

The market in Harmon County appears to be predominantly influenced by small, individual landlords, as evidenced by the 100.0% share of mom-and-pop purchases and the complete absence of institutional buying in Q4.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.4% of Harmon County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate the Harmon County investor market, controlling 346 properties or 99.4% of all investor-owned SFR, reinforcing their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

The majority of this mom-and-pop ownership is concentrated in the smallest tier, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) owning 260 properties, which represents 74.7% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio, making them the backbone of the market.

There is no presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) in Harmon County, as they own 0.0% of investor-held SFR, a striking contrast to larger metropolitan areas and a critical insight for this rural market.

The tier distribution shows a steep drop-off after the mom-and-pop segment; larger portfolios, such as small-medium (Tier 21-50) and large (Tier 101-1000) landlords, each own only 1 property (0.3%), indicating a very limited presence of larger, more sophisticated investors.

The market structure is highly fragmented, with 352 distinct landlord entities managing 342 properties (using metadata total), signifying an average portfolio size of just under one property per entity, further emphasizing the small-scale nature of ownership.

The significant concentration in Tiers 01-04 indicates that entry into the landlord market typically starts small, and growth into larger portfolios remains uncommon within Harmon County.

Despite the perception of growing corporate influence in housing, Harmon County's investor landscape remains almost exclusively in the hands of local, independent landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate all observable tiers, with no crossover to company majority in Harmon County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all reported portfolio tiers in Harmon County, owning 95.0% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 84.8% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios.

The data reveals no crossover point where companies become the majority owners; even in the Tier 03-05 segment, individuals still own 60.0% of properties compared to companies' 40.0% share.

Company ownership fluctuates dramatically by tier, comprising 5.0% of Tier 01 and 15.2% of Tier 02, peaking at 40.0% in Tier 03-05, before completely disappearing in the Tier 06-10 segment where individuals own 100.0%.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties), whether individual or company-owned, have no presence in Harmon County, reinforcing the market's complete reliance on smaller-scale landlords.

Given the data provided, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between individual and company landlords within each tier, as this specific pricing breakdown is not available.

The absence of companies in the Tier 06-10 segment (0 properties) indicates that any growth beyond the mid-size portfolio range in Harmon County is solely individual-driven or non-existent for companies.

The strong individual presence across all existing tiers, particularly in the foundational single-property segment (247 individual properties), signals a market built on personal investment rather than corporate aggregation.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 73550 (Hollis) leads Harmon County with 319 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

The zip code 73550 in Harmon County, corresponding to Hollis, leads the sub-geographies with 319 investor-owned properties, making it the primary hub for investor activity within the county.

While 73550 holds the highest count, the zip code 73554 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, although this represents only 1 investor-owned property, highlighting a highly concentrated but micro-scale market segment.

Investor ownership rates vary significantly across Harmon County's zip codes, from 100.0% in 73554 down to 35.2% in 73544 (Gould), indicating pockets of intense investor interest versus more traditional homeowner markets.

The zip code 73571 (Vinson) also shows a high investor ownership rate of 60.0% for its 3 investor-owned properties, signifying that smaller communities can also have substantial landlord penetration despite low absolute counts.

There is a clear distinction between regions with high investor property counts and those with high investor ownership percentages; 73550 dominates by count (319 properties), while 73554 leads by percentage (100.0%), illustrating different facets of market penetration.

The limited number of sub-geographies with observable investor properties (only four zip codes displaying data) suggests a geographically concentrated and potentially fragmented investor market within Harmon County.

The overall market in Harmon County appears to be driven by local dynamics within specific zip codes, with 73550 being the most significant in terms of sheer volume, while other smaller areas show high rates of investor penetration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Harmon County landlords were net neutral in Q4 2025 (1 buy, 1 sell), but strong net buyers historically.
Detailed Findings

Harmon County landlords exhibited a balanced transaction profile in 2025-Q4, with 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in a net neutral position for the quarter, indicating stability in current portfolio size.

Despite the Q4 balance, landlords have been robust net buyers over the past two years, with 22 buys versus 2 sells in Year 2025 (an 11.0x buy/sell ratio) and 17 buys versus 2 sells in Year 2024 (an 8.5x ratio), signaling a clear pattern of accumulation.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed no buy or sell transactions across any reported timeframe, confirming their complete absence from the Harmon County transaction market.

The overall volume of landlord transactions is very low, with only 24 total transactions (22 buys + 2 sells) for all of Year 2025, which suggests a relatively illiquid investor market.

The consistent pattern of very few sell transactions (only 2 in both 2024 and 2025) suggests that once landlords acquire properties in Harmon County, they tend to hold them, contributing to market stability rather than high turnover.

The absence of data for 'Bought From Landlords' percentages in section 11-1.csv means that inter-landlord transaction activity cannot be directly analyzed at a historical level for this geography.

Landlords have historically been in an expansion phase, consistently adding to their portfolios over the last two years, contrasting with the current quarter's pause in net growth.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented only 10.0% of Harmon County's Q4 transactions, dominated by Tier 01 activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords comprised a minor portion of Harmon County's total Q4 transactions, participating in only 1 out of 10 total SFR transactions, accounting for a 10.0% market share.

All landlord transaction activity in Q4 came from the smallest segment, with a single-property (Tier 01) landlord completing 1 transaction at an average purchase price of $15,000, underscoring the dominance of small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions in Q4, confirming their continued non-involvement in the Harmon County market and leaving all activity to mom-and-pop landlords.

The single landlord transaction in Q4 was not sourced from another landlord (0.0% bought from landlords), suggesting that the activity involved direct purchases from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

The average purchase price for the Tier 01 transaction was $15,000, which aligns with the overall landlord Q4 average price, given it was the only recorded landlord acquisition.

The extremely low volume of landlord transactions (1 transaction) indicates a very quiet market for investor activity during Q4 in Harmon County, reflecting minimal churn in the investor-owned housing stock.

The complete absence of Tier 09 transactions contrasts sharply with the activity of Tier 01, reinforcing that the Harmon County market is almost entirely characterized by the entry or exit of small, local investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of Harmon County's SFR market, securing 75.6% Q4 discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 342 SFR properties, representing 37.4% of Harmon County's total SFR market. Individual investors account for 304 properties (88.9%), significantly outweighing company ownership at 38 properties (11.1%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $15,000 in Q4, a substantial 75.6% discount ($46,429 difference) compared to traditional homeowners' average price of $61,429. This trend of significant discounts was also observed in Q1 2025.
Activity
In Q4, landlords made 1 out of 7 SFR purchases, representing 14.3% of all sales. This single purchase was by a new single-property landlord (Tier 01 entity), with no institutional purchasing activity recorded.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.4% of investor-owned SFR housing, totaling 346 properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no ownership presence in Harmon County (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every tier where data is available, never ceding majority control to companies. Companies hold a maximum of 40.0% in the 3-5 property tier, with no presence in larger tiers.
Transactions
Landlords in Harmon County were net neutral in Q4 (1 buy, 1 sell), a shift from being strong net buyers in Year 2025 (22 buys vs 2 sells) and Year 2024 (17 buys vs 2 sells). Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The Harmon County housing market is heavily influenced by investor activity, with landlords owning 342 SFR properties, comprising 37.4% of the total SFR market of 914 properties. This investor landscape is almost entirely shaped by individual "mom-and-pop" landlords, who control an overwhelming 99.4% of all investor-owned housing. Individual investors hold 304 properties (88.9%), significantly dwarfing the 38 properties (11.1%) owned by companies, and they maintain majority ownership across all observed portfolio tiers, defying narratives of widespread corporate dominance.

Investor behavior in Harmon County demonstrates a notable focus on value acquisition; in Q4 2025, landlords secured properties at an average price of $15,000, a striking 75.6% discount compared to the $61,429 paid by traditional homeowners. While Q4 saw minimal activity with just 1 landlord purchase (14.3% of market sales), historical data indicates landlords were net buyers in both Year 2025 (22 buys vs 2 sells) and Year 2024 (17 buys vs 2 sells). This suggests a long-term strategy of accumulation, albeit with a current pause, and a strong capability for below-market acquisitions.

The Harmon County market is characterized by a stable, small-scale landlord base and a complete absence of institutional investor presence across ownership, purchases, and transactions. Zip code 73550 (Hollis) stands out as the primary hub of investor-owned properties, highlighting localized investment patterns. The market's stability is further underscored by landlords' tendency to hold properties once acquired, resulting in low sell volumes. These dynamics indicate a market that remains accessible and primarily driven by local, individual investment rather than large-scale corporate plays.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 06:54 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHarmon (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail