Craig (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Craig (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Craig (OK)
3,376
Total Investors in Craig (OK)
881
Investor Owned SFR in Craig (OK)
1,064(31.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
740
SFR Owned
852
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
141
SFR Owned
212
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,064 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Craig County's 31.5% investor-owned SFR market.
Landlords in Craig County own 1,064 SFR properties, representing 31.5% of the market, with individuals holding 80.1% of these. Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.2% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional investors remain absent. In Q4 2025, landlords made 33.3% of the SFR purchases, though with volatile pricing trends, sometimes paying a significant premium over homeowners. Overall, landlords are net buyers, steadily expanding their portfolios in the region.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 80.1% of Craig County's 1,064 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A vast majority of landlord properties, 1,046 (98.3%), are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. Furthermore, 985 (92.6%) of investor-owned SFR properties were acquired with cash, signaling low reliance on financing.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Craig County landlords paid a 36.9% premium in Q4 ($178,000) over traditional homeowners ($130,000).
This quarter's premium for landlords of $48,000 follows a $27,647 (20.9%) premium in Q3, but sharply contrasts with substantial discounts of $168,539 (74.5%) in Q2 and $62,433 (43.1%) in Q1, indicating highly volatile pricing dynamics. The reported acquisition numbers for 2025 show landlords purchased 0 properties in Q1-Q4, suggesting these average prices may reflect minimal, possibly atypical, transactions or external data points, creating a discrepancy with the Q4 purchase summary.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 33.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Craig County, driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors.
Of the total 3 SFR purchases in Q4, landlords made 1 acquisition. This single landlord purchase was by a mom-and-pop investor (Tier 3-5), representing 100.0% of all landlord purchases, with no institutional (Tier 09) activity recorded for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 95.2% of Craig County's investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, holding 64.9% of all investor-owned properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) own 0.0% of the market, signifying their complete absence from Craig County's SFR investment scene.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Company ownership becomes dominant in Craig County for portfolios of 6-10 properties, crossing over from individual control.
While individual investors own 87.6% of single-property portfolios and 79.9% of 3-5 property portfolios, companies take a 61.3% majority share in the 6-10 property tier. This tier represents the critical inflection point where larger, more structured investment takes over from individual efforts.
Geographic Distribution
OK-Craig-74301 leads in investor-owned properties (840), while OK-Craig-74349 has the highest ownership rate (58.1%).
OK-Craig-74331 notably appears in both top lists, ranking 4th by count (32 properties) and 2nd by percentage (55.2% investor-owned), highlighting concentrated investor activity. In contrast, OK-Craig-74301, while having the highest count, holds a more moderate investor ownership rate of 31.3%.
Historical Transactions
Craig County landlords remain net buyers, with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (15 buys vs 5 sells); institutional data is unavailable.
This net buying trend is consistent, with 2024 showing an even higher 4.09x ratio (45 buys vs 11 sells). Quarter-over-quarter 2025 also shows landlords as net buyers (Q3: 8 buys vs 3 sells; Q2: 3 buys vs 2 sells), indicating sustained portfolio expansion. Institutional investor transaction data for Craig County is not available for analysis.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 33.3% of Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Craig County, driven by mom-and-pop activity.
Out of 3 total transactions in Q4, landlords were involved in 1, with this single purchase made by a small landlord (Tier 3-5) at an average price of $178,000. There were no inter-landlord transactions recorded for this purchase, and institutional investors showed no activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 80.1% of Craig County's 1,064 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Craig County, Oklahoma, collectively own 1,064 Single Family Residential properties, accounting for a significant 31.5% of the total 3,376 SFR properties in the market. This reveals a substantial investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual landlords are the dominant force, owning 852 properties which represent 80.1% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio. In contrast, company-owned properties stand at 212, making up only 19.9%, strongly challenging any 'Wall Street' narrative.

The prevalence of individual owners extends to entity counts, with 740 individual landlords compared to 141 company landlords, a ratio of approximately 5.25 individual landlords for every company. This indicates a highly fragmented market structure primarily driven by local investors.

A striking 985 (92.6%) of landlord-owned properties were acquired via cash, demonstrating a strong preference for unfinanced purchases. This high cash acquisition rate suggests financial strength and a reduced exposure to interest rate fluctuations among investors in Craig County.

Reflecting their core business, 1,046 of the 1,064 (98.3%) investor-owned properties are designated as rented, confirming that almost all investor-owned properties are non-owner-occupied and primarily serve as rental units. This underscores the rental-focused nature of the landlord activity in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Craig County landlords paid a 36.9% premium in Q4 ($178,000) over traditional homeowners ($130,000).
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Craig County paid an average of $178,000 for SFR properties, a significant $48,000 (36.9%) premium compared to traditional homeowners who paid $130,000. This marks a notable shift in pricing dynamics, with landlords incurring higher costs in the current quarter.

This quarter's premium extends a trend from Q3 2025, where landlords paid a $27,647 (20.9%) premium ($160,000 vs $132,353). However, the year has seen extreme volatility, with landlords securing substantial discounts of $168,539 (74.5%) in Q2 and $62,433 (43.1%) in Q1, highlighting an inconsistent pricing advantage or disadvantage for investors.

The data from 'Landlord Acquisitions by Timeframe' indicates 0 properties acquired by landlords in all listed 2025 and 2024 quarters and years. This creates a data anomaly, as 'Landlord vs Homeowner Price Comparison' still reports average prices for these periods, suggesting these prices might reflect listing prices or specific, infrequent transactions not captured in the acquisition count.

The sharp swing from significant discounts in early 2025 to substantial premiums in Q3 and Q4 suggests a rapidly changing market or highly opportunistic purchasing behavior, potentially driven by a very small number of transactions influencing the average price for landlords.

Given the reported '0 properties purchased' by landlords for various timeframes, drawing definitive long-term acquisition price trends for landlords in Craig County is challenging. However, the Q-o-Q data reveals an unstable pricing environment where a consistent 'landlord discount' is not evident.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 33.3% of Q4 SFR purchases in Craig County, driven entirely by mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Craig County accounted for 33.3% of all Single Family Residential property purchases, acquiring 1 out of the 3 total SFR transactions. This indicates a modest but notable presence in the quarter's limited market activity.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 was exclusively from mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who made 100.0% of the landlord purchases. Specifically, a small landlord from Tier 3-5 was responsible for the single acquisition, highlighting the localized and independent nature of current market engagement.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Craig County during Q4 2025, reaffirming their complete absence from the county's investor landscape and allowing smaller investors to dominate.

The entire Q4 market experienced extremely low transaction volume, with only 3 total SFR purchases. This limited activity means that each transaction significantly sways market share percentages, making any trends volatile.

The single landlord entity active in Q4 belongs to the small landlord Tier 3-5, demonstrating that even modest portfolio holders are participating in acquisitions, albeit at a very low overall volume.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 95.2% of Craig County's investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), maintain an overwhelming dominance in Craig County, controlling 95.2% of all investor-owned SFR properties. This figure strongly refutes any perception of institutional control within the local market.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) segment is the largest contributor to the investor-owned housing supply, holding 696 properties, which represents 64.9% of the total. This highlights the significant role of first-time or casual investors in the county's rental market.

Further reinforcing the mom-and-pop structure, smaller portfolio tiers (Tier 02 with 9.9%, Tier 03-05 with 13.4%, and Tier 06-10 with 7.0%) collectively account for the vast majority of remaining ownership. Only 1.1% of properties are held by large landlords (Tier 101-1000), while institutional investors (Tier 09) hold none.

The distribution clearly shows a steep decline in property counts as tier size increases, indicating a highly fragmented market with very few larger players. For example, Tier 01 holds 696 properties, while Tier 06-10 holds only 75, and Tier 21-50 and 51-100 each hold just 1 property.

The complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) signifies that Craig County is not a target market for large-scale, corporate investment strategies, leaving the field open primarily to individual and local entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Company ownership becomes dominant in Craig County for portfolios of 6-10 properties, crossing over from individual control.
Detailed Findings

In Craig County, individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 87.6% of single-property (Tier 01) ownership and 79.9% of 3-5 property (Tier 03-05) ownership. This pattern underscores the foundational role of individual, often local, landlords in the county's rental market.

A significant shift occurs at the 'Small landlord (6-10)' tier (Tier 06-10), where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Companies control 61.3% of the properties in this tier, compared to 38.7% held by individuals, marking the definitive crossover point where corporate investment strategies begin to take precedence in larger portfolios.

Despite the individual dominance in smaller tiers, companies still hold a notable presence even at the entry level, representing 12.4% of single-property portfolios and 26.4% of two-property portfolios. This indicates a blended market where both types of investors exist across different scales.

Even in slightly larger 'Small-medium (11-20)' portfolios, individual ownership still accounts for a substantial 76.3%, demonstrating that individual investors are not exclusively limited to the smallest tiers and can grow to moderate sizes before companies become the majority.

The absence of pricing data specific to individual vs. company acquisitions within each tier prevents a deeper analysis of whether one owner type secures better deals or has different investment strategies based on cost. However, the ownership split clearly defines the operational structure of each tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OK-Craig-74301 leads in investor-owned properties (840), while OK-Craig-74349 has the highest ownership rate (58.1%).
Detailed Findings

Within Craig County, the zip code OK-Craig-74301 stands out with the highest number of investor-owned properties, totaling 840. This significant concentration of SFR properties under landlord ownership indicates a primary hub for investment activity within the county.

However, when looking at the investor ownership rate, OK-Craig-74349 leads with a striking 58.1% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This reveals highly saturated markets where over half of the available housing stock is managed by landlords, likely for rental purposes.

The zip code OK-Craig-74331 demonstrates a strong correlation between high property count and high ownership rate, ranking 4th by count with 32 properties and 2nd by percentage with 55.2% investor-owned. This suggests intense investor focus in this specific area.

There's a clear distinction between volume leaders and penetration leaders: OK-Craig-74301, despite its high count of 840 investor-owned properties, has a lower ownership rate of 31.3% compared to other zip codes like 74349 (58.1%) and 74331 (55.2%). This indicates larger housing stock in 74301 diluting the investor share.

The top 5 zip codes by investor ownership rate all exceed 30%, with two even surpassing 50% (OK-Craig-74349 at 58.1% and OK-Craig-74331 at 55.2%). This widespread high concentration signifies that investor activity is a pervasive characteristic across many parts of Craig County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Craig County landlords remain net buyers, with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (15 buys vs 5 sells); institutional data is unavailable.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Craig County have consistently been net buyers, actively expanding their portfolios over the past two years. In 2025, they purchased 15 properties while selling 5, resulting in a healthy buy-to-sell ratio of 3.0x, indicating strong demand for investment properties.

This trend of net accumulation is even more pronounced when looking at 2024, where landlords executed 45 buy transactions against only 11 sells, yielding a substantial buy-to-sell ratio of 4.09x. This highlights a sustained period of growth in landlord holdings.

The quarterly data for 2025 further corroborates this pattern, with landlords being net buyers in both Q3 (8 buys vs 3 sells) and Q2 (3 buys vs 2 sells). This consistent behavior quarter-over-quarter suggests a strategic, ongoing commitment to acquiring SFR properties.

Despite the overall strong buying activity by landlords, specific data regarding institutional investor transactions (Tier 1000+) is not available for Craig County. This limitation means a comparative analysis of large-scale corporate versus individual investor behavior cannot be performed in this section.

The relatively low absolute transaction volumes (e.g., 15 buys in 2025, 45 in 2024) suggest a less liquid market, where each transaction holds more weight in determining the overall buy/sell ratio and market direction.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 33.3% of Q4 2025 SFR transactions in Craig County, driven by mom-and-pop activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords accounted for 33.3% of all Single Family Residential transactions in Craig County, participating in 1 out of a total of 3 transactions. This indicates a modest but present landlord engagement in a very limited market.

The single landlord transaction recorded in Q4 was carried out by a 'small landlord' within the 3-5 property tier, at an average purchase price of $178,000. This reinforces the dominance of mom-and-pop investors in the county's current acquisition activity.

Notably, this Q4 landlord purchase involved no inter-landlord trading; the property was acquired from a non-landlord entity (0.0% bought from landlords). This suggests landlords are primarily expanding their portfolios by acquiring properties from traditional homeowners or other non-investor sellers.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely absent from Q4 transaction activity, recording 0 transactions. This continues the trend of large-scale corporate investors having no visible footprint in Craig County's SFR market.

The extremely low overall transaction volume for Q4, with only 3 SFR transactions in total, signifies a very quiet market. The limited number of sales means that even a single landlord transaction has a substantial impact on the market share percentages.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords control 95.2% of Craig County's SFR market; institutions remain absent.
Holdings
Landlords in Craig County, Oklahoma, own 1,064 SFR properties, representing 31.5% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority, with 852 properties (80.1%), compared to companies owning 212 properties (19.9%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $178,000 in Q4 2025, which was a 36.9% premium ($48,000 difference) over traditional homeowners' average price of $130,000. This quarter's premium contrasts sharply with earlier 2025 periods where landlords secured substantial discounts, reflecting highly volatile pricing dynamics.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords made 1 out of 3 total SFR purchases, securing a 33.3% share of transactions. This single purchase was from a mom-and-pop landlord in the 3-5 property tier, with no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) recorded for the quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 95.2% of the investor-owned housing in Craig County, Oklahoma, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
While individual investors own 80.1% of all landlord-held properties in Craig County, companies begin to hold a majority share once portfolios reach the 6-10 property tier. Below this point, individual ownership remains dominant across smaller tiers.
Transactions
Landlords in Craig County are net buyers, exemplified by a 3.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (15 buys vs 5 sells). However, there is no available data to assess the net position of institutional investors (1000+ tier) within this market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Craig County, Oklahoma, is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, individual landlords, significantly diverging from national narratives often focused on large corporations. With 1,064 SFR properties under landlord ownership, representing 31.5% of the total SFR market in the county, individual investors account for 852 properties or 80.1% of this portfolio. This market structure is further emphasized by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an immense 95.2% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone contributing 64.9%. Institutional investors owning 1000+ properties have no discernible presence in Craig County, confirming the localized, independent nature of the rental market.

Investor behavior in Craig County, Oklahoma, reveals a pattern of consistent portfolio expansion despite volatile acquisition pricing. While landlords were net buyers in both 2024 (45 buys vs 11 sells) and 2025 (15 buys vs 5 sells), Q4 2025 saw them pay a substantial 36.9% premium over traditional homeowners ($178,000 vs $130,000). This contrasts sharply with significant discounts observed earlier in the year, indicating a highly opportunistic, or possibly constrained, buying environment. Q4 also marked a period of very low activity, with only 1 landlord purchase out of 3 total SFR transactions, exclusively made by a mom-and-pop investor, signifying limited market liquidity.

These findings paint a picture of a landlord market in Craig County, Oklahoma, that is resilient and locally-driven, predominantly by individual investors leveraging cash acquisitions (92.6% of holdings) for rental purposes (98.3% non-owner-occupied). The absence of institutional players means the market is less susceptible to large-scale corporate investment trends, fostering a more fragmented and community-oriented rental housing supply. Geographic analysis further reinforces this by showing varied investor penetration across different zip codes, with some areas exhibiting over 50% investor ownership, underscoring localized investment hotspots.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 06:46 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCraig (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail