Carter (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Carter (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Carter (OK)
15,395
Total Investors in Carter (OK)
4,250
Investor Owned SFR in Carter (OK)
4,153(27.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,745
SFR Owned
3,206
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
505
SFR Owned
996
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,153 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Carter County, Expanding Portfolios with 55.3% Q4 Price Discount
Landlords in Carter County, OK, own 4,153 SFR properties (27.0% of the market), with individual investors holding 77.2% and mom-and-pop landlords controlling 92.0% of these. In Q4, landlords purchased 18.3% of sales, securing properties at a 55.3% discount to homeowners, while acting as strong net buyers with a 3.8x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 4,153 SFR properties; individuals hold 77.2% of the portfolio.
Of investor-owned properties, 78.1% were acquired with cash, significantly outpacing financed properties at 21.9%. A high 96.5% of landlord properties are rented, indicating a strong focus on income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 55.3% discount on Q4 purchases, paying $118,430 versus $264,756 for homeowners.
The landlord discount has been highly volatile, ranging from 60.9% in Q1 to 35.4% in Q2, then widening to 55.3% by Q4 2025. Landlords consistently pay less than traditional homeowners, with discounts varying from $83,399 to $149,428 per property.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 18.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pops driving 93.1% of activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, representing 41.4% of landlord purchases and bringing 18 new entities into the market. Institutional investors (Tier 09) only accounted for a minimal 3.4% of landlord acquisition activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate, controlling 92.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 58.5% of properties. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio. Larger investor tiers generally pay lower average prices, with institutions paying 66.5% less than single-property buyers in Q4.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 21-50 property tier, dominating 98.9% of those portfolios.
Individual landlords overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, holding 88.5% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. Company ownership gradually increases with tier size, surpassing individual ownership significantly in the mid-size landlord segment.
Geographic Distribution
OK-Carter-73401 dominates investor-owned property counts, holding 3,281 SFRs.
While 73401 leads in volume with 3,281 properties, other zip codes like OK-Carter-73435 and OK-Carter-73487 exhibit higher investor saturation, with rates of 55.6% and 52.6% respectively. This suggests investor activity is both concentrated and highly pervasive in specific pockets of Carter County.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Carter County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 3.8x.
Across all reported timeframes in 2024 and 2025, landlords consistently bought more properties than they sold, indicating active portfolio expansion. The Q4 2025 buy/sell ratio of 3.8x (38 buys vs 10 sells) marks the highest quarterly ratio, signifying increased acquisition momentum.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords facilitated 16.7% of all Q4 transactions, primarily driven by mom-and-pop activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 18 transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 1000+) made only 1 transaction. There's a significant price disparity, with Tier 01 paying $151,500 on average, 66.5% more than institutional buyers at $50,778.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 4,153 SFR properties; individuals hold 77.2% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Carter County, OK, collectively own 4,153 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for a significant 27.0% of the total SFR market of 15,395 properties. This indicates a substantial investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Carter County, holding 3,206 properties, which represents 77.2% of the total landlord portfolio. Companies, by contrast, own 996 properties, or 24.0%, reinforcing the "mom-and-pop" structure of the local rental market.

The prevalence of individual investors is further underscored by entity counts, with 3,745 individual landlords making up 88.1% of all 4,250 landlords in the county, compared to just 505 company landlords (11.9%). This highlights the fragmented nature of the landlord base.

A striking 96.5% of all investor-owned properties (4,007 out of 4,153) are rented, demonstrating that the vast majority of landlord holdings are actively generating rental income rather than being held vacant or for other purposes. This confirms a strong rental-centric strategy among investors.

Cash acquisitions are the predominant method for landlords, with 3,243 properties (78.1% of investor-owned) purchased outright. This significantly outweighs properties acquired through financing, which stand at 910 (21.9%), suggesting a preference for debt-free ownership or strong capital reserves among local investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 55.3% discount on Q4 purchases, paying $118,430 versus $264,756 for homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Carter County paid significantly less for SFR properties, averaging $118,430. This represents a substantial $146,326 discount, or 55.3% less than the average $264,756 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price advantage for landlords has shown considerable quarter-over-quarter volatility. The discount narrowed from 60.9% ($149,428) in Q1 to its smallest at 35.4% ($83,399) in Q2, before widening again to 39.7% ($99,511) in Q3, and ultimately reaching a pronounced 55.3% in Q4.

The Q4 2025 data shows a notable widening of the landlord discount compared to Q2 and Q3, indicating that landlords were able to secure more favorable prices relative to homeowners towards the end of the year. This shift suggests potentially differing market access or negotiation strategies.

Despite the fluctuations, landlords consistently acquired properties at a lower price point than traditional homeowners across all quarters of 2025. This enduring pattern underscores a structural advantage, whether through distressed sales, off-market deals, or different property characteristics.

The lowest average price paid by landlords in 2025 was $95,913 in Q1, while their highest was $151,969 in Q2. This range suggests a certain price floor for investor acquisitions, even as market prices for homeowners showed less extreme variations.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 18.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pops driving 93.1% of activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were active participants in the Carter County SFR market during Q4 2025, purchasing 28 properties which represents 18.3% of the total 153 SFR purchases made across the county. This indicates a consistent investor presence, absorbing nearly one-fifth of available properties.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) significantly drove Q4 acquisition activity, accounting for 27 properties or 93.1% of all landlord purchases. This highlights their crucial role as the primary buying force within the investor segment.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) made only 1 purchase in Q4, representing a mere 3.4% of landlord acquisitions. This low volume suggests a minimal or declining institutional footprint in the local market.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the most active, with 18 entities making purchases in Q4. This indicates a healthy influx of new, small-scale investors entering the Carter County rental market.

The highest concentration of Q4 landlord purchase activity was observed in the single-property (Tier 01) category, accounting for 41.4% of properties, followed by small landlords (3-5 properties) at 20.7%, and two-property landlords (Tier 02) at 17.2%. This further solidifies the market's reliance on smaller investors for liquidity.

While the single-property tier saw 18 entities purchasing 12 properties, the next most active tiers, Tier 02 and Tier 03-05, each had 6 entities acquiring 5 and 6 properties respectively. This shows varied acquisition patterns, with some entities acquiring more than one property, demonstrating active portfolio building within the smaller tiers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate, controlling 92.0% of investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those owning 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively control an overwhelming 92.0% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Carter County. This highlights their foundational role in the local rental market.

The single-property landlord (Tier 01) forms the largest individual segment, owning 2,601 properties, which accounts for 58.5% of the total investor-owned housing. This signifies that first-time or small-scale investors are the primary custodians of rental housing stock.

In stark contrast to the small landlord dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible 6 properties, representing just 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio. This refutes any notion of significant "Wall Street" takeover in this local market.

Analysis of Q4 acquisition prices reveals a clear pattern: larger investor tiers secure properties at significantly lower average prices. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) paid the lowest average price at $50,778, a striking 66.5% less than the $151,500 paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01).

The average purchase price generally decreases as portfolio size increases: from $151,500 for Tier 01 down to $64,911 for Tier 03-05, and further to $55,000 for Tier 21-50. This pattern suggests bulk buying advantages or access to different property types for larger investors.

Mid-size landlords, those owning 11-1000 properties (Tiers 05-08), collectively own 350 properties, representing 7.9% of the investor-owned market. This segment acts as a bridge between the vast mom-and-pop base and the very small institutional presence.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 21-50 property tier, dominating 98.9% of those portfolios.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Carter County distinctly shifts from individual to company dominance around mid-size portfolios. Individuals hold a majority up to the 11-20 property tier (53.4%), but companies become the overwhelming majority at the 21-50 property tier, controlling 98.9% of those properties.

Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolio tiers, exemplified by their 88.5% share in single-property (Tier 01) holdings and 76.7% in the 3-5 property tier. This underscores the grassroots nature of most rental operations.

Company ownership exhibits a clear upward trend as portfolio size increases, from a mere 11.5% in Tier 01 to 42.2% in the 6-10 property tier and 46.6% in the 11-20 property tier, indicating a gradual consolidation or shift towards corporate structures with growth.

The nearly complete corporate control (98.9%) of properties within the 21-50 portfolio tier demonstrates that once landlords reach a certain scale, they predominantly operate as companies. This suggests strategic benefits of corporate structuring for larger-scale operations.

Even in the 6-10 property tier, individual investors still maintain a majority with 57.8% of properties, showing that even moderately sized portfolios often remain under individual ownership rather than corporate entities. This challenges the assumption of a sharp corporate transition.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OK-Carter-73401 dominates investor-owned property counts, holding 3,281 SFRs.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Carter County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes, with OK-Carter-73401 leading significantly by count. This single zip code accounts for 3,281 investor-owned properties, dwarfing other areas.

While 73401 has the highest count, other zip codes demonstrate a much higher rate of investor ownership. OK-Carter-73435 and OK-Carter-73487 show striking investor penetration, with 55.6% and 52.6% of their SFR properties being investor-owned respectively, indicating deeply entrenched investor markets.

The top zip code by investor-owned property count, OK-Carter-73401, has an ownership rate of 27.2%, which is considerably lower than the rate leaders like 73435 (55.6%). This highlights a distinction between areas with high volumes of investor properties and areas where investors constitute a larger proportion of the market.

The data suggests that smaller, less populous zip codes (like 73435, 73487, 73488, 73444) can have very high investor ownership rates despite not appearing in the top counts. This pattern suggests that investors may be targeting specific, potentially less competitive, sub-markets within the county.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned property count are OK-Carter-73401 (3,281 properties), OK-Carter-73438 (319 properties), OK-Carter-73463 (207 properties), and OK-Carter-73443 (157 properties), collectively showcasing where the bulk of investor-owned housing stock is located in the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain robust net buyers in Carter County, with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 3.8x.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Carter County have maintained a strong net buyer position across all recorded periods in 2024 and 2025. In Q4 2025, they bought 38 properties while selling only 10, resulting in a net acquisition of 28 properties.

The buy/sell ratios consistently show landlords accumulating properties. Q4 2025 exhibited the highest quarterly ratio at 3.8x (38 buys vs 10 sells), followed by Q2 with 3.53x (53 buys vs 15 sells), indicating a robust appetite for acquisitions throughout the year.

The latest quarter, Q4 2025, reflects an acceleration in landlord accumulation activity, with the buy/sell ratio increasing compared to Q3 (2.68x). This suggests landlords are capitalizing on market opportunities towards the end of the year.

Annually, landlords were net buyers of 161 properties in 2025 (228 buys vs 67 sells) and 195 properties in 2024 (268 buys vs 73 sells). While 2025 saw slightly fewer overall transactions than 2024, the net buying trend remains firmly established.

No transaction data is available for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in this geography, preventing a comparative analysis of their buying and selling patterns against the overall landlord market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords facilitated 16.7% of all Q4 transactions, primarily driven by mom-and-pop activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were involved in 38 transactions, representing a notable 16.7% of the total 228 SFR transactions in Carter County. This confirms their active role in shaping market liquidity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) executed 36 out of the 38 landlord transactions, comprising 94.7% of all landlord-involved trades. This shows their transaction activity is highly proportionate to their overall ownership share, reinforcing their market influence.

Institutional investors (Tier 1000+) completed just 1 transaction in Q4, acquiring a property for $50,778. This price is a remarkable 66.5% less than the $151,500 paid by single-property landlords (Tier 01), indicating institutional focus on significantly discounted assets.

A clear inverse relationship exists between investor tier size and average purchase price in Q4. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average of $151,500, while larger tiers like Tier 21-50 paid $55,000, and institutional investors (Tier 1000+) paid the lowest at $50,778.

While overall landlord transactions are robust, inter-landlord trading is relatively low, with only a few instances where properties were bought from other landlords. The highest percentage was seen in Tier 21-50 at 100% (1 transaction), followed by Tier 03-05 at 14.3% and Tier 01 at 11.1%.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active tier in Q4, participating in 18 transactions. This highlights their continuous entry into or expansion within the market, serving as a dynamic force for market churn.

The substantial price difference of $100,722 between the highest-paying single-property landlords ($151,500) and the lowest-paying institutional investors ($50,778) underscores diverse acquisition strategies and property types targeted across investor tiers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Carter County Market, Securing Deep Discounts Amidst Active Expansion
Holdings
Landlords in Carter County, OK, own 4,153 SFR properties, representing 27.0% of the total SFR market of 15,395 properties, with individual investors holding 3,206 (77.2%) and companies 996 (24.0%) of these investor-owned assets.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $118,430 in Q4, securing a substantial $146,326 discount (55.3% less) compared to traditional homeowners who paid $264,756.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 28 properties, comprising 18.3% of all SFR sales, with 18 new single-property landlords entering the market, and mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) accounting for 93.1% of these acquisitions.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 92.0% of investor-owned housing in Carter County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minimal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (88.5% of single-property holdings), but companies take majority control at the 21-50 property tier, representing 98.9% of ownership in that segment.
Transactions
Landlords overall were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 3.8x buy/sell ratio (38 buys vs 10 sells), however, no transaction data is available for institutional investors in this county.
Market Narrative

Landlords in Carter County, OK, collectively own 4,153 Single Family Residential properties, making up a notable 27.0% of the overall SFR market of 15,395 properties. This market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who hold 3,206 properties (77.2%) of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to companies owning 996 properties (24.0%). Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) further cement this trend, controlling 92.0% of all investor-owned housing, effectively marginalizing institutional investors who account for just 0.1% of the market.

Landlords demonstrated robust acquisition activity in Q4 2025, purchasing 28 properties and securing 18.3% of all SFR sales. Notably, landlords consistently benefit from a significant pricing advantage, paying an average of $118,430 in Q4—a substantial 55.3% less than the $264,756 paid by traditional homeowners. This quarter also saw 18 new single-property landlords enter the market, reflecting a healthy influx of small-scale investors. Overall, landlords remain strong net buyers in Carter County, recording a 3.8x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (38 buys versus 10 sells), indicating active portfolio expansion.

The Carter County housing market is largely shaped by its "mom-and-pop" investor base, who are actively expanding their portfolios and consistently acquiring properties at a significant discount compared to traditional buyers. This decentralized ownership structure, coupled with high acquisition rates by small investors and minimal institutional presence, suggests a resilient local rental market primarily driven by individual wealth building. The high percentage of cash purchases (78.1%) also points to a financially robust and less leveraged investor segment, contributing to market stability.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 06:41 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCarter (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail