Alfalfa (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Alfalfa (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Alfalfa (OK)
1,812
Total Investors in Alfalfa (OK)
593
Investor Owned SFR in Alfalfa (OK)
646(35.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
505
SFR Owned
544
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
88
SFR Owned
105
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 646 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.7% of Alfalfa County's investor market amid minimal Q4 activity.
Investors own 646 SFR properties (35.7% of the market) in Alfalfa County, OK, with individual landlords comprising 84.2%. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominate with 99.7% ownership, while institutional activity is non-existent. Landlords secured significant discounts in Q1-Q2 2025, but Q4 saw near-zero landlord purchases and transactions, indicating a highly subdued market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords own 84.2% of Alfalfa County's 646 investor-owned SFR properties.
Cash acquisitions dominate, representing 623 properties compared to only 23 financed properties. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a significant 5.74:1 ratio (505 vs 88 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Alfalfa County landlords secured up to 64.6% discounts versus homeowners in Q2 2025.
Landlords paid $55,000 in Q2 2025, a $100,464 discount compared to homeowners at $155,464. This discount widened from Q1 2025, where landlords paid $48,000, a $32,001 (40.0%) discount against homeowners' $80,001.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords made no purchases in Alfalfa County during Q4 2025 amid minimal market activity.
Out of only 1 total SFR purchase in Q4, landlords made 0 purchases, showing no direct involvement in the quarter's sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market, and no mom-and-pop or institutional purchases were recorded.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Alfalfa County, controlling 99.7% of all investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords alone hold 78.5% of investor-owned properties (511 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers in Alfalfa County, consistently owning over 63% of properties.
Individual landlords maintain the majority in every tier, from 86.5% for single-property portfolios to 63.9% for 3-5 property portfolios. Companies achieve their highest concentration in the 3-5 property tier, representing 36.1% of those holdings, but never reach majority status.
Geographic Distribution
Alfalfa County's investor-owned properties are concentrated in specific zip codes, with 73728 leading with 247 properties.
Zip codes 73749 (50.2% investor-owned) and 73726 (44.5% investor-owned) show high landlord penetration rates. The 73760 zip code exhibits an extreme 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating a highly niche or small market segment.
Historical Transactions
Alfalfa County landlords were net buyers in 2025, completing 3 purchases against 1 sale.
The buy/sell ratio for all landlords in 2025 stands at 3:1, indicating a net accumulation of properties. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) registered no transactions throughout 2025, confirming their complete absence from this market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Alfalfa County landlords conducted no Q4 2025 transactions despite 2 total market transactions.
Neither mom-and-pop nor institutional investors registered any transactions in Q4 2025, indicating zero activity across all tiers. The reported $0 average purchase prices for all tiers further confirms this lack of landlord engagement.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords own 84.2% of Alfalfa County's 646 investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties constitute a substantial 35.7% of Alfalfa County's total 1,812 SFR market, with landlords holding 646 properties.

Individual landlords are the dominant force in the county, owning 544 properties (84.2%) compared to company-owned portfolios at 105 properties (16.3%). This highlights a market largely driven by smaller, individual investors rather than corporate entities.

The financing landscape reveals a strong preference for cash purchases among landlords, with 623 properties acquired outright compared to only 23 properties that are financed.

Of the 646 investor-owned properties, 633 are actively rented, indicating that almost all landlord acquisitions are for income-generating, non-owner-occupied purposes. This signifies a rental-focused investment strategy in Alfalfa County.

There are 593 total landlords in Alfalfa County, with individual landlords (505 entities) significantly outnumbering company landlords (88 entities), reinforcing the mom-and-pop character of the local investment market.

The high percentage of rented properties (633 out of 646 investor-owned) confirms that nearly all landlord holdings are utilized for rental income, emphasizing the county's role as a source of rental housing from predominantly local, individual investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Alfalfa County landlords secured up to 64.6% discounts versus homeowners in Q2 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q2 2025, landlords in Alfalfa County demonstrated exceptional deal-finding, acquiring properties at an average of $55,000—a remarkable $100,464 (64.6%) less than traditional homeowners, who paid $155,464.

This significant price gap represents a widening trend from Q1 2025, where landlords secured a $32,001 (40.0%) discount, paying $48,000 compared to homeowners' $80,001. This suggests increasing pricing disparity and possibly a more competitive edge for landlords in recent quarters.

Despite these substantial discounts in early 2025, landlord acquisition activity sharply declined, with 0 properties purchased in Q4 2024 and 0 in Year 2024, indicating a highly inconsistent market for investor acquisitions.

The data reveals extremely low landlord acquisition volumes across most timeframes, with 0 properties purchased in Q4 2024, Year 2024, Year 2025, and 2020-2023. This suggests that while discounts can be substantial, opportunities are rare in Alfalfa County.

The lack of consistent acquisition data for landlords in Alfalfa County, particularly for Q4 2025, prevents a comprehensive analysis of recent pricing trends or average acquisition prices, highlighting a currently dormant investor purchase market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Landlords made no purchases in Alfalfa County during Q4 2025 amid minimal market activity.
Detailed Findings

Alfalfa County experienced extremely low residential real estate activity in Q4 2025, with only 1 total SFR purchase recorded across the entire market.

Significantly, landlords were not involved in any recorded Q4 purchases, reflecting a complete halt in investor acquisition activity for the quarter in this county.

With zero landlord purchases, there was no entry of new single-property landlords (Tier 01) into the market, nor any activity from mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) or institutional (Tier 09) investors.

The absence of purchasing activity across all investor tiers in Q4 2025 signals a highly subdued market for real estate investors in Alfalfa County, diverging from more active regions.

This lack of activity also means that metrics such as average properties per entity or tier concentration for Q4 cannot be determined, underscoring the near-zero investor engagement during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Alfalfa County, controlling 99.7% of all investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Alfalfa County's investor-owned SFR market is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) controlling a staggering 99.7% of all investor properties.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who collectively own 511 properties, accounting for 78.5% of all investor-owned housing in the county.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09) are completely absent from Alfalfa County, holding 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR portfolio.

The ownership distribution rapidly declines with increasing portfolio size: two-property landlords hold 7.8% (51 properties), and landlords owning 3-5 properties control 9.4% (61 properties), reinforcing the local and small-scale nature of the market.

Landlords with 6-10 properties contribute 4.0% (26 properties), and only marginal activity is seen in the small-medium tiers (11-20 and 21-50 properties) with just 1 property each (0.2%).

The complete absence of pricing data by tier prevents an analysis of how acquisition costs vary for different investor sizes in Alfalfa County.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers in Alfalfa County, consistently owning over 63% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owner type across all observed tiers in Alfalfa County, consistently holding the majority share of properties.

Single-property portfolios (Tier 01) exhibit the highest individual concentration, with individual investors owning 443 properties (86.5%) compared to companies with 69 properties (13.5%).

For two-property portfolios (Tier 02), individual owners still significantly lead with 43 properties (84.3%), while companies own 8 properties (15.7%).

Even in the relatively larger 'small landlord' categories, individual ownership remains strong; for 6-10 property portfolios, individuals hold 22 properties (84.6%) versus 4 properties for companies (15.4%).

The 3-5 property tier (Small landlord, Tier 03) shows the highest proportional company involvement, with companies owning 22 properties (36.1%), though individuals still comprise the majority at 39 properties (63.9%).

No crossover point is observed where company ownership surpasses individual ownership in any of the present tiers, underscoring the deeply individual-centric nature of real estate investment in Alfalfa County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Alfalfa County's investor-owned properties are concentrated in specific zip codes, with 73728 leading with 247 properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Alfalfa County, investor-owned properties are not evenly distributed but show distinct concentrations in specific zip codes.

The zip code 73728 leads by count, with 247 investor-owned properties, representing a significant 31.7% of its total SFR inventory, making it the primary hub for landlord activity in the county.

Other key areas include 73749 with 112 investor-owned properties (50.2% rate) and 73726 with 94 properties (44.5% rate), indicating these regions are also significant centers for investment.

Zip code 73760 stands out with an remarkable 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a highly specialized or extremely limited housing market entirely held by landlords.

Regions like 73749 and 73726 appear on both the top-by-count and top-by-percentage lists, indicating they are not only popular for investors but also have a high density of investor-owned housing.

The variation in investor ownership rates, from 100.0% down to 31.4% in other top zip codes, highlights diverse market dynamics even within a single county, where some areas are almost entirely investor-held while others have more balanced ownership.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Alfalfa County landlords were net buyers in 2025, completing 3 purchases against 1 sale.
Detailed Findings

Alfalfa County's landlord market showed limited but positive transaction activity in 2025, with landlords collectively acting as net buyers, executing 3 purchases against 1 sale.

This transaction pattern suggests a modest expansion of landlord portfolios in the county over the year, despite generally low overall market activity.

Notably, there were no recorded transactions from institutional investors (Tier 09) in 2025, which reinforces the finding from Section 8 about their complete absence in Alfalfa County's SFR market.

The low transaction volumes for all landlords throughout 2025 indicate a market with infrequent buying and selling opportunities for investors.

The absence of data for inter-landlord transactions and average buy/sell prices prevents a deeper analysis into specific market dynamics or potential profit margins for these trades in 2025.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Alfalfa County landlords conducted no Q4 2025 transactions despite 2 total market transactions.
Detailed Findings

Alfalfa County's real estate market saw only 2 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025, a period marked by extremely low activity across the board.

Crucially, landlords in the county made no recorded transactions during Q4 2025, indicating a complete pause in their buying and selling activities.

This lack of activity extends across all investor tiers; both mom-and-pop (Tier 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) landlords recorded 0 transactions in the quarter.

The reported average purchase prices for Tier 01 and Tier 09 investors were $0, which directly reflects the absence of any completed transactions by these groups in Q4 2025.

The stagnation in Q4 landlord transactions contrasts sharply with the established base of 646 investor-owned properties, suggesting a period of market withdrawal or extreme caution among local investors.

The absence of any landlord-involved transactions means there was no inter-landlord trading activity or specific price trends to analyze by tier for this quarter.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Alfalfa County dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (99.7%) amid dormant Q4 investor activity.
Holdings
Landlords in Alfalfa County, OK, own 646 SFR properties, representing 35.7% of the county's 1,812 total SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority at 544 properties (84.2%) compared to companies with 105 properties (16.3%).
Pricing
Landlords secured substantial discounts in early 2025, paying $55,000 in Q2—a 64.6% reduction or $100,464 less than traditional homeowners who averaged $155,464. This discount widened significantly from Q1 2025, which saw a 40.0% landlord discount.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw minimal market activity with only 1 total SFR purchase, none of which involved landlords. Consequently, there was no formation of new single-property landlords, and all investor tiers reported zero purchases for the quarter.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control Alfalfa County's investor market with 99.7% of all investor-owned housing. Single-property landlords alone comprise 78.5% of this share, while institutional investors hold 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all property tiers present in Alfalfa County, holding 86.5% of single-property portfolios. Companies reach their highest concentration in the 3-5 property tier (36.1%), but no tier shows companies as majority owners.
Transactions
Alfalfa County landlords were net buyers in 2025 with a 3:1 buy/sell ratio (3 buys vs 1 sell), indicating modest accumulation. However, institutional investors reported no transactions throughout 2025, confirming their non-participation in this market.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Alfalfa County, Oklahoma, is profoundly characterized by the dominance of small, individual landlords. These mom-and-pop investors, holding between 1 and 10 properties, control an overwhelming 99.7% of the 646 investor-owned SFR properties, which collectively represent 35.7% of the county's total SFR market. Individual landlords alone own 84.2% of this portfolio, a stark contrast to national trends often focused on larger corporate entities, as institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no recorded presence in the county.

Investor activity in Alfalfa County was highly subdued in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero purchases or transactions. This follows a period in early 2025 where landlords demonstrated a strong ability to secure significant discounts, paying 64.6% less than homeowners in Q2. Despite these potential savings, the near-complete absence of recent acquisition and transaction data signals a stagnant or extremely illiquid market for investors in the current quarter, with no new landlords entering and no tier showing any buying or selling activity.

The market structure in Alfalfa County thus reveals a resilient, locally-driven investment base primarily focused on cash acquisitions and rental income, with 633 out of 646 investor-owned properties being rented. However, the extreme lack of recent activity, particularly in Q4, suggests that even these dominant local investors are either on pause or finding opportunities to be extremely scarce. This indicates a highly localized and unique market dynamic where opportunities for investor growth are infrequent, despite historical pricing advantages.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 06:40 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyAlfalfa (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price