Adair (OK) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Adair (OK) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Adair (OK)
2,230
Total Investors in Adair (OK)
443
Investor Owned SFR in Adair (OK)
364(16.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
399
SFR Owned
279
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
44
SFR Owned
89
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 364 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate 87.7% of Adair County SFR; Q4 prices show 69.6% landlord discount.
Adair County's 364 investor-owned SFR properties are overwhelmingly controlled by individual (76.6%) and mom-and-pop (87.7%) landlords, despite a significant 69.6% landlord acquisition discount in Q4 2025. Landlords were net buyers across 2024 and 2025, capturing 25.0% of all Q4 purchases.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 364 SFR properties in Adair County, with individuals holding 76.6%.
Of these holdings, 354 properties are rented, with 260 purchased purely with cash and 104 financed, underscoring a strong rental focus.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Adair County landlords secured 69.6% discount ($60,667) in Q4 2025 vs homeowners.
This landlord discount fluctuated wildly over 2025, from a mere 0.1% in Q2 to 69.6% in Q4, while overall landlord acquisition prices fell by 42.6% from 2020-2023 highs.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 25.0% of Adair County's Q4 SFR purchases, solely mom-and-pop.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100.0% of all landlord purchases, with no activity from institutional investors, highlighting small-scale market dynamics.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.7% of Adair County's investor-owned SFR, institutional just 0.5%.
Single-property landlords alone own 75.3% of the market (281 properties), while institutional investors hold a minimal 0.5% share (2 properties), showcasing deep fragmentation.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios; companies gain majority at 21-50 property tier.
Single-property holdings are 90.8% individual-owned, while the 21-50 property tier is overwhelmingly company-owned at 95.8%, marking a clear shift in ownership structure with scale.
Geographic Distribution
OK-Adair-74960 leads with 212 investor-owned properties; 73055 shows 100.0% ownership rate.
The 74965 zip code is a clear hotspot, ranking second in both investor-owned properties (98) and investor ownership percentage (21.4%), signaling concentrated investor interest.
Historical Transactions
Adair County landlords consistently net buyers in 2024-2025; institutions balanced transactions.
Overall landlords exhibited a high 8.33x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (25 buys vs 3 sells), while institutional investors maintained a neutral position in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 27.3% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops drove activity, prices varied.
Tier 02 investors paid the highest average price at $106,000, while Tier 01 investors secured properties at $38,000, and the single Tier 02 transaction was entirely landlord-to-landlord.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 364 SFR properties in Adair County, with individuals holding 76.6%.
Detailed Findings

Adair County's SFR market sees a significant landlord presence, with 364 investor-owned properties, representing 16.3% of the total 2,230 SFR properties available.

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the market, owning 279 properties, which accounts for 76.6% of all investor-held SFR, challenging perceptions of corporate control.

Company investors hold a smaller, yet notable, 89 properties, making up 24.5% of the landlord-owned portfolio, indicating a blend of ownership structures in the local market.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties are utilized for rental income, with 354 properties specifically designated as rented, demonstrating a clear focus on generating passive income.

Cash purchases are the preferred method for property acquisition among Adair County landlords, accounting for 260 properties (71.4% of all investor-owned) compared to only 104 properties that are financed (28.6%), indicating a preference for debt-free assets.

The entity count further solidifies individual dominance, with 399 individual landlords operating alongside just 44 company landlords, a robust ratio of over 9 individual landlords for every company.

With 354 rented properties out of 364 investor-owned, it highlights that virtually all landlord holdings in the county are maintained as non-owner-occupied rentals, underscoring their investment-centric strategy.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Adair County landlords secured 69.6% discount ($60,667) in Q4 2025 vs homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Adair County acquired properties at an average price of $60,667, securing a substantial 69.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $199,889, revealing a distinct price advantage for investors.

The price advantage enjoyed by landlords has been highly inconsistent throughout 2025, with discounts ranging from a negligible 0.1% ($266 difference) in Q2 ($212,875 vs $213,141) to the significant 69.6% in Q4, signaling volatile market conditions or highly opportunistic purchases.

Landlord acquisition prices have seen a decline following a 2024 peak; the average price fell from $155,952 in 2024 to $138,678 in 2025, indicating a cooling trend in overall investor-paid prices.

Comparing the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $105,641 to Q4 2025's $60,667, landlord acquisition prices have actually decreased by $44,974, indicating a 42.6% decline in average property value for landlord purchases in that period.

It is important to note that landlord acquisition prices for these specific quarters (2025-Q1 to Q4) are based on "0 properties" in the data, suggesting either very low transaction volume or highly specialized, infrequent deals influencing these averages.

The average price paid by landlords in Q1 2025 was $117,041, representing a 47.7% discount compared to homeowner purchases at $223,611, further illustrating the often advantageous but inconsistent pricing for investors.

Despite significant price fluctuations, the general trend of landlords paying less than homeowners suggests a targeted acquisition strategy or access to different market segments.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 25.0% of Adair County's Q4 SFR purchases, solely mom-and-pop.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Adair County were active in Q4 2025, securing 25.0% of all SFR purchases by acquiring 2 out of a total of 8 properties sold, indicating a notable investor presence in recent market activity.

The entirety of landlord purchasing activity in Q4 was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of landlord acquisitions, reinforcing the local, small-investor characteristic of the market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) remained entirely inactive in Adair County during Q4, recording 0 purchases, further underscoring the limited large-scale corporate influence.

The market saw activity from new or small landlords, with Tier 01 (single-property) investors acquiring 1 property involving 2 entities, and Tier 02 (two-property) investors acquiring 1 property through 1 entity.

The Q4 purchase data highlights the dominance of smaller-scale investors in Adair County, with Tiers 01 and 02 each contributing 50.0% of all landlord purchases for the quarter.

The single-property tier, specifically, saw 2 entities purchasing just 1 property, suggesting potential joint ventures or a nuanced data representation for new single-property landlord activity.

No large-scale or mid-size landlord tiers (05-08) showed any purchasing activity in Adair County's Q4, reinforcing the local market's reliance on smaller investors for property acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 87.7% of Adair County's investor-owned SFR, institutional just 0.5%.
Detailed Findings

Adair County's investor-owned SFR market is heavily skewed towards smaller landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively owning 87.7% of the 373 properties, demonstrating their foundational role.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the market, controlling a dominant 75.3% of all investor-owned properties, accounting for 281 holdings, highlighting the prevalence of first-time or small-scale investors.

Despite widespread discussion, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint in Adair County, holding only 2 properties, which represents a mere 0.5% of the market, indicating minimal large-scale corporate influence.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively own 12.3% of the market (44 properties), showing some concentration beyond the smallest portfolios but still significantly less than mom-and-pops.

The distribution clearly highlights a highly fragmented ownership structure, where a large number of individual investors manage small portfolios, driving the majority of rental housing supply in the county.

The Tier 01-04 segment, encompassing portfolios from 1 to 10 properties, clearly establishes the localized, small-scale nature of real estate investment in this county.

The data provided does not include specific acquisition prices per tier or entity counts for each tier, limiting insights into pricing strategies by investor size or average portfolio sizes for these ownership groups.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios; companies gain majority at 21-50 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors exhibit strong dominance in smaller portfolios, owning 90.8% of single-property holdings (Tier 01) and 71.4% of two-property holdings (Tier 02), underscoring the prevalence of individual entrepreneurs in this segment.

The ownership dynamic shifts dramatically in larger tiers; the Small-medium (21-50 properties) tier shows a significant company concentration, with 95.8% of properties owned by companies compared to just 4.2% by individuals, indicating a preference for corporate structures at scale.

A key crossover point occurs around the 6-10 property tier, where individual and company ownership reaches parity, both holding 50.0% of properties, signaling the entry of more formalized investment structures as portfolios grow.

While individuals hold 58.3% in the 3-5 property tier, their share declines as portfolio size increases, indicating a strategic shift towards corporate ownership for scaling and managing larger asset bases.

The Small-medium (21-50) tier stands out with the highest company concentration, demonstrating that once portfolios reach a certain size, companies overwhelmingly become the preferred ownership vehicle for investors in Adair County.

The data clearly illustrates that Adair County's smallest landlord segments are almost exclusively individual ventures, while professional entities manage the larger-scale rental portfolios, reflecting different operational approaches.

Specific acquisition price differences by owner type or growth patterns between all-time and Q4 by owner type are not detailed in the provided dataset for this section, limiting further comparative insights.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OK-Adair-74960 leads with 212 investor-owned properties; 73055 shows 100.0% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Adair County exhibits significant geographic concentration of investor-owned properties, with zip code 74960 leading by a substantial margin, holding 212 investor-owned properties, representing 15.4% of its SFR market.

The zip code 74965 stands out as a particularly attractive market for investors, appearing in the top 5 for both total count (98 properties) and investor ownership rate (21.4%), indicating robust activity and penetration.

While 74960 has the highest count, the 73055 zip code has the highest investor ownership rate at 100.0%, suggesting a highly niche or very small market entirely dominated by investors.

The top five zip codes by count (74960, 74965, 74964, 74347, 74931) together account for 357 investor-owned properties, showing strong regional pockets of investor activity within Adair County.

Analyzing ownership rates, 74347 is another concentrated area, with 19 investor-owned properties constituting 17.8% of its SFR market, demonstrating consistent investor interest across multiple zip codes.

The correlation between high property count and high ownership rate is evident in regions like 74965 and 74347, indicating mature investor markets where both volume and penetration are strong.

Data regarding acquisition prices by geographic region or the number of landlord entities per region was not provided, limiting deeper insights into market value and landlord density dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Adair County landlords consistently net buyers in 2024-2025; institutions balanced transactions.
Detailed Findings

Adair County's landlord market has demonstrated consistent net buying activity over the past two years, with 25 purchases versus 3 sales in 2025 (an 8.33x buy/sell ratio) and 22 purchases versus 12 sales in 2024 (a 1.83x ratio), signaling a clear accumulation phase.

In Q4 2025 specifically, landlords continued their net buyer position, acquiring 3 properties while selling 2, resulting in a buy/sell ratio of 1.5x, indicating ongoing, albeit moderated, market engagement.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed a significantly different pattern, with a balanced portfolio in 2024, recording 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating a neutral stance rather than active accumulation or divestment.

The sharp increase in the annual buy/sell ratio for all landlords from 1.83x in 2024 to 8.33x in 2025 suggests a surge in acquisition momentum earlier in 2025, which moderated by Q4, reflecting dynamic market shifts.

This data implies that while the broader landlord market is in an accumulation phase, the largest investors are adopting a more stable, perhaps portfolio-balancing, strategy.

The provided data does not include the percentage of inter-landlord transactions or average buy versus sell prices, limiting insights into market liquidity and potential profit margins.

The sustained net buying across all landlord segments (excluding institutional in 2024) points towards ongoing confidence and investment in Adair County's SFR market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 27.3% of Q4 transactions; mom-and-pops drove activity, prices varied.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a notable role in Adair County's Q4 transaction landscape, participating in 3 of 11 total transactions, representing a 27.3% market share, showcasing their continued influence.

All landlord transactions in Q4 2025 originated from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with Tier 01 accounting for 2 transactions and Tier 02 for 1 transaction, while institutional investors showed no activity.

There was a significant price disparity among active landlord tiers, with Tier 02 buyers paying an average of $106,000, considerably higher than the $38,000 average paid by Tier 01 investors, indicating varied property types or strategies.

Intriguingly, the single Tier 02 transaction was 100.0% a landlord-to-landlord trade, indicating specialized market dynamics or portfolio rebalancing within the smaller investor segment.

Conversely, Tier 01 transactions recorded 0.0% inter-landlord sales, suggesting these purchases were primarily from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers, avoiding trades among fellow landlords.

The price spread of $68,000 between Tier 01 ($38,000) and Tier 02 ($106,000) transactions highlights differing acquisition strategies or property types targeted by these smaller investor groups.

The Q4 transaction data reinforces the dominance of small-scale investors in Adair County, with no detectable transaction activity from larger or institutional landlord entities, reflecting the market's fragmented structure.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly dominate Adair County's SFR market; institutions remain peripheral.
Holdings
Landlords own 364 SFR properties in Adair County, representing 16.3% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 279 properties (76.6%) and companies owning 89 properties (24.5%).
Pricing
Landlords secured a substantial 69.6% discount in Q4 2025, paying $60,667 compared to homeowners at $199,889, though overall landlord acquisition prices have declined 42.6% since 2020-2023.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 2 properties, comprising 25.0% of all SFR purchases in Adair County, with 2 entities identified as new single-property landlords entering the market, and mom-and-pop landlords exclusively driving all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 87.7% of Adair County's investor-owned housing, totaling 327 properties, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.5% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios up to 5 properties (58.3%), but companies gain parity at the 6-10 property tier before becoming the majority (95.8%) in portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Transactions
Landlords in Adair County were net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 1.5x buy/sell ratio (3 buys vs 2 sells), and consistently net buyers across 2024 and 2025, while institutional investors maintained a neutral position in 2024 (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

Adair County's real estate investor landscape is predominantly shaped by small-scale, individual landlords, who collectively own 364 SFR properties, constituting 16.3% of the county's total SFR market. Individual investors hold a significant majority, controlling 279 properties (76.6%), while company-owned properties number 89 (24.5%). The vast majority of the market, 87.7% or 327 properties, is in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with single-property owners alone accounting for 75.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, owning just 2 properties, representing 0.5% of the market, underscoring the fragmented and localized nature of the investment.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated strategic purchasing, acquiring properties at an average of $60,667 – a substantial 69.6% discount compared to the $199,889 paid by traditional homeowners, although these averages are based on low transaction volumes. This quarter, landlords were involved in 25.0% of all SFR purchases, with all activity driven exclusively by mom-and-pop investors, including 2 entities newly acquiring single properties. Historically, landlord acquisition prices have seen a decline of 42.6% from the 2020-2023 period ($105,641) to Q4 2025 ($60,667). Across 2024 and 2025, landlords have consistently been net buyers, signaling ongoing confidence in the Adair County market, while institutional investors maintained a balanced transaction profile in 2024.

The pronounced dominance of individual and mom-and-pop landlords highlights a highly localized and fragmented investor market in Adair County. Despite fluctuations in acquisition pricing and a significant overall price decline for investor purchases since the pandemic era, smaller investors continue to be active net buyers, suggesting resilience and a focus on long-term rental income. The minimal role of institutional players and the strong presence of local investors underscore the unique, community-driven dynamics of the SFR rental market across Adair County's zip codes like 74960 and 74965, rather than large-scale corporate influence.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 06:39 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyAdair (OK)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail