Williams (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Williams (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Williams (OH)
11,845
Total Investors in Williams (OH)
3,342
Investor Owned SFR in Williams (OH)
2,572(21.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,063
SFR Owned
2,263
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
279
SFR Owned
333
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,572 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Williams County Market, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts While Institutions Retreat
Williams County's investor-owned SFR portfolio comprises 2,572 properties (21.7% of the market), overwhelmingly held by individual mom-and-pop landlords. These investors continue to acquire properties at a significant Q4 discount of 38.9% compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors show minimal activity and remain net sellers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 88.0% of Williams County's 2,572 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
A vast majority, 98.3%, of these landlord-owned properties are rented, with 71.1% purchased with cash. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of 10.98 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Williams County Landlords Secured a Substantial 38.9% Price Discount Versus Homeowners in Q4
The average landlord acquisition price of $122,078 in Q4 was $77,842 less than the homeowner average of $199,920. This discount has dramatically widened from just 2.9% in Q1 2025 to nearly 39% in Q4, signaling growing market disparities or increased landlord negotiating power.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 24.8% of All SFR Purchases in Williams County During Q4
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) dominated Q4 activity, making 96.8% of all landlord purchases. Single-property investors led the charge, with 29 entities acquiring 21 properties in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 98.8% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Williams County
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share of the market. Single-property landlords alone account for 80.8% of all investor-owned housing, demonstrating their foundational role.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 11-20 Property Tier in Williams County
Individual investors hold over 85% of properties in Tiers 01-05, but their share drops to 64.0% in the 6-10 property tier and then to 48.0% in the 11-20 property tier, where company ownership takes over. Limited data prevents a detailed pricing comparison between individual and company buyers within tiers.
Geographic Distribution
Just Five ZIP Codes Hold Over 80% of Investor-Owned Properties in Williams County, OH
ZIP code 43506 leads by count with 838 properties, while 43505 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 57.6%. ZIP code 43518 stands out by appearing in both top 5 lists, indicating both high volume and high penetration.
Historical Transactions
Williams County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 4.76x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025, While Institutions are Net Sellers
Overall landlord buying activity was robust in 2025 with 176 purchases against 37 sells. Institutional investors, however, showed a net selling position in 2025 (3 buys vs 4 sells) and 2024 (1 buy vs 4 sells), indicating a divestment trend.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Executed 23.0% of All Q4 Transactions in Williams County
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for 39 of the 40 landlord transactions, reaffirming their market dominance. Single-property investors (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $145,800, while institutional investors showed no Q4 transaction activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 88.0% of Williams County's 2,572 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord market in Williams County, OH, controlling 2,263 properties (88.0%) out of the total 2,572 investor-owned SFR properties. This significantly outpaces company ownership, which accounts for 333 properties (12.9%).

The landlord sector shows a strong bias towards individual operators, with 3,063 individual landlords compared to just 279 company landlords, representing an almost 11-to-1 ratio of individual to company entities.

A striking 98.3% (2,528 properties) of all landlord-owned SFR properties are currently rented, indicating a market heavily focused on generating rental income.

Cash acquisitions are highly prevalent among landlords, with 1,828 properties (71.1%) purchased entirely in cash. Only 744 properties (28.9%) are financed, showcasing a preference for debt-free ownership or strong financial reserves among investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Williams County Landlords Secured a Substantial 38.9% Price Discount Versus Homeowners in Q4
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Williams County, OH, paid significantly less for SFR properties, averaging $122,078. This represents a substantial $77,842 discount (38.9%) compared to traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $199,920.

The pricing gap between landlords and homeowners has widened dramatically throughout 2025. Starting with a modest 2.9% discount ($5,257) in Q1, it grew to 13.4% ($25,771) in Q2, 36.9% ($73,991) in Q3, and peaked at 38.9% ($77,842) in Q4.

Despite the notable price advantage, landlord acquisition volume remained low or zero for all reported timeframes in sections detailing acquisition counts (e.g., '0 properties purchased'). However, Q4 transaction data confirms 30 landlord purchases, suggesting a data reconciliation is needed or the '0 properties' metric refers to a specific subset.

Comparing historical acquisition prices, landlords' average prices decreased by 7.2% from the 2020-2023 period ($131,483) to Q4 2025 ($122,078), indicating a softening in prices for investor-acquired properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 24.8% of All SFR Purchases in Williams County During Q4
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a significant portion of the Q4 SFR market in Williams County, OH, conducting 30 purchases, which accounts for 24.8% of all 121 SFR purchases made during the quarter.

The Q4 purchasing activity was overwhelmingly driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 30 acquisitions, representing 96.8% of all landlord purchases. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no purchases in Q4.

New single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, with 29 entities acquiring 21 properties. This highlights a steady stream of smaller, individual investors entering or expanding their presence in the market.

Beyond single-property buyers, small landlords in Tiers 03-05 and 06-10 also showed notable activity, acquiring 4 and 3 properties respectively, further cementing the small investor dominance in the Q4 market.

The distribution of Q4 activity mirrors the existing ownership structure, with the vast majority of purchases originating from the smallest investor segments, reinforcing their ongoing market presence.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control an Overwhelming 98.8% of Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Williams County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Williams County, OH, controlling 98.8% of all landlord-owned properties. This significant concentration underscores the market's reliance on smaller, individual investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of this market, holding 2,145 properties, which represents a commanding 80.8% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint in Williams County, controlling just 2 properties, equivalent to a mere 0.1% of the total landlord-owned SFR.

The tiered distribution reveals a clear inverse relationship between portfolio size and market share: as portfolio size increases, the percentage of properties owned drastically declines, indicating a highly fragmented market structure.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 11-20 Property Tier in Williams County
Detailed Findings

In Williams County, OH, individual investors significantly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 89.1% of single-property (Tier 01) and 89.7% of two-property (Tier 02) portfolios.

The market observes a clear crossover point in ownership type at the 11-20 property tier. While individuals account for 64.0% of properties in the 6-10 tier, companies become the majority in the 11-20 tier, owning 52.0% of the properties.

Larger portfolios, such as the 21-50 property tier, show 100.0% individual ownership, but this is based on a single property, indicating a limited presence for both individual and company investors in this specific larger tier.

This shift suggests that while mom-and-pop investors are prevalent across most portfolio sizes, companies begin to concentrate their holdings more effectively once a certain scale (11+ properties) is reached.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Just Five ZIP Codes Hold Over 80% of Investor-Owned Properties in Williams County, OH
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Williams County, OH, are highly concentrated within a few key ZIP codes. The top five ZIP codes by count—43506, 43543, 43517, 43518, and 43557—collectively account for 2,129 investor-owned properties, representing 82.8% of the county's total.

While 43506 has the most investor-owned properties (838), it has an 18.0% investor ownership rate. In contrast, 43505 exhibits the highest investor penetration, with 57.6% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, despite not leading in raw property count.

The top five ZIP codes by investor ownership percentage further highlight distinct landlord focus areas, with 43505 (57.6%), 43531 (55.8%), 43502 (50.0%), 43518 (33.7%), and 43512 (33.3%) showing significant landlord presence relative to their total SFR stock.

Notably, ZIP code 43518 appears in both the top 5 by count (269 properties) and top 5 by percentage (33.7%), identifying it as a highly active and deeply penetrated market for real estate investors in Williams County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Williams County Landlords are Strong Net Buyers with a 4.76x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025, While Institutions are Net Sellers
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Williams County, OH, demonstrated strong net buying activity throughout 2025, with 176 properties purchased compared to only 37 sold, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 4.76x. This signals continued accumulation of SFR assets by the overall landlord segment.

Q4 2025 saw an acceleration in this trend, with landlords making 40 purchases against just 6 sells, achieving an even higher buy/sell ratio of 6.67x for the quarter, indicating heightened confidence or opportunity.

In contrast to the broader landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a net seller position in both 2025 (3 buys vs 4 sells) and 2024 (1 buy vs 4 sells). This suggests a strategy of divesting or consolidating their limited holdings within the county.

Institutional activity in Q4 2025 was completely absent, with 0 buys and 0 sells recorded, reinforcing their minimal and declining engagement in the Williams County market.

The consistent net buying behavior of all landlords, contrasted with the net selling of institutions, highlights two distinct and opposing investment strategies within the county's SFR market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Executed 23.0% of All Q4 Transactions in Williams County
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Williams County, OH, were involved in 40 transactions during Q4 2025, comprising 23.0% of the total 174 SFR transactions in the county. This reflects their significant, though not majority, share of market movement.

Transaction volume was overwhelmingly concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who made 39 out of the 40 landlord transactions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 29 transactions.

The average purchase prices varied significantly by tier: Tier 01 investors paid the highest average of $145,800, while Tier 11-20 investors secured properties at a notably lower average of $10,000, indicating diverse pricing strategies or property types across investor sizes.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal overall, but Tier 06-10 showed some activity, with 1 out of 3 transactions (33.3%) originating from another landlord, suggesting a niche internal market for mid-size portfolios.

The complete absence of institutional (Tier 09) transactions in Q4, coupled with their minimal ownership, underscores that Williams County's transaction market is almost exclusively driven by smaller-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Williams County Market, Securing Deep Q4 Discounts While Institutions Retreat
Holdings
Landlords own 2,572 SFR properties in Williams County, OH, representing 21.7% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold a commanding 2,263 properties (88.0%) compared to companies with 333 properties (12.9%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $122,078 in Q4, a substantial 38.9% less than traditional homeowners who paid $199,920, equating to a $77,842 discount per property.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 30 properties, accounting for 24.8% of all SFR sales. Notably, 29 new single-property landlords entered the market, with mom-and-pop tiers driving 96.8% of landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned housing in Williams County, while institutional investors (1000+) hold a negligible 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate small portfolios, but companies emerge as the majority owners once portfolios reach the 11-20 property tier, controlling 52.0% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are strong net buyers with a 2025 buy/sell ratio of 4.76x (176 buys vs 37 sells), while institutional investors maintained a net seller position in 2025 (3 buys vs 4 sells).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Williams County, OH, is fundamentally shaped by the pervasive influence of individual, mom-and-pop landlords. Out of 11,845 total SFR properties, investors own 2,572, representing 21.7% of the market. Individual investors command an overwhelming 88.0% of this portfolio (2,263 properties), dwarfing company ownership at 12.9% (333 properties). This dominance extends across all but the very specific 11-20 property tier, underscoring that Williams County's rental housing stock is primarily managed by local, smaller-scale entities rather than large corporations. A striking 98.3% of these landlord-owned properties are rented, reflecting a clear focus on long-term rental income.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by significant buying activity from small landlords and notable pricing advantages. Landlords made 30 purchases, constituting 24.8% of all SFR sales, with 29 new single-property landlords entering the market. These investors secured properties at an average of $122,078, a substantial 38.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $199,920. This discount has widened dramatically throughout 2025, signaling either increased landlord bargaining power or a focus on distressed assets. Overall, landlords in Williams County were strong net buyers in 2025 with a buy/sell ratio of 4.76x, actively accumulating properties while institutional investors remained net sellers with limited activity.

The data clearly paints Williams County as a market where individual, small-scale investors are the primary drivers of landlord activity and ownership. This market structure, combined with landlords' ability to secure substantial discounts, suggests a highly competitive environment for smaller, local players. The negligible presence and net selling by institutional investors indicate that Williams County's SFR market does not align with the investment strategies of larger entities, reinforcing its character as a mom-and-pop dominated landscape. This dynamic could imply more stable, locally managed rental housing, but also highlights the significant financial advantage investors hold over traditional homeowners.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:35 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWilliams (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail