Tuscarawas (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Tuscarawas (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Tuscarawas (OH)
28,070
Total Investors in Tuscarawas (OH)
6,027
Investor Owned SFR in Tuscarawas (OH)
5,347(19.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,361
SFR Owned
4,018
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
666
SFR Owned
1,426
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,347 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Tuscarawas County's SFR Market is Defined by Mom-and-Pop Investors Who Control 91.1% of Rentals and Buy at a 38% Discount
Investors own 19.0% of the single-family homes in Tuscarawas County, a market overwhelmingly dominated by small, individual landlords who hold 91.1% of the rental stock. In Q4 2025, investors were aggressive net buyers, capturing 27.4% of all sales and paying an average of 38.3% less than traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 5,347 SFRs in Tuscarawas County, with individual landlords holding a 75.1% majority.
Cash purchases significantly outpace financing, with 3,331 properties owned outright versus 2,016 financed. The portfolio is heavily focused on income generation, with 5,145 properties (96.2%) classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Tuscarawas County paid 38.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $96,829 average discount.
This significant landlord discount has been a consistent market feature throughout 2025, ranging from 31.6% to 42.3% each quarter. Investors consistently acquire properties for substantially less than the general market.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured 27.4% of all Q4 home sales in Tuscarawas County, purchasing 83 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove this activity, accounting for 90.4% of all investor acquisitions. In stark contrast, institutional investors made zero purchases, highlighting a market dominated by smaller players.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords own a commanding 91.1% of all investor-held SFRs in Tuscarawas County.
The market structure is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone controlling 66.9% of the rental stock. Institutional investors have a negligible footprint, owning just 0.1% of all investor properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties in Tuscarawas County.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 89.6% of single-property rentals. However, company ownership escalates quickly, controlling 65.5% of properties in the 6-10 tier and a near-total 99.5% in the 21-50 tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in the 44663 and 44622 zip codes, holding 1,343 and 930 properties respectively.
Certain zip codes show extreme investor saturation, with 44610 at 100.0% and 44653 at 58.2% investor-owned. The zip code 43832 appears on both top lists, with 359 properties and a high 19.8% ownership rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Tuscarawas County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.3 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Investor buying accelerated towards the end of the year, with 102 acquisitions in Q4 compared to 83 in Q3. Institutional investors show minimal activity, but were slight net buyers in 2025 with 3 purchases versus 2 sales.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with 102 total transactions recorded.
New and smaller landlords paid the highest prices, with single-property buyers averaging $189,841 per purchase. In contrast, more established landlords in the 6-10 property tier paid significantly less at just $63,206.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 5,347 SFRs in Tuscarawas County, with individual landlords holding a 75.1% majority.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 19.0% of the total Single-Family Residential market in Tuscarawas County, controlling 5,347 properties.

The ownership landscape is dominated by individual investors, who own 4,018 properties (75.1%), compared to 1,426 properties (26.7%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in entity counts, with 5,361 individual landlords vastly outnumbering the 666 company landlords, an 8-to-1 ratio.

Investors in this market show a strong preference for cash ownership, with 3,331 properties owned free-and-clear, far exceeding the 2,016 properties that are financed.

The portfolio is almost entirely geared towards rental income, as evidenced by the 5,145 properties classified as rented, representing 96.2% of all investor-owned SFRs.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Tuscarawas County paid 38.3% less than homeowners in Q4, a staggering $96,829 average discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors demonstrated a remarkable ability to acquire properties below market rates in Q4 2025, paying an average price of $156,051 compared to the $252,880 paid by traditional homeowners.

This represents a massive 38.3% price advantage, or a raw discount of $96,829 per property, showcasing a highly effective acquisition strategy.

This pricing gap is not a one-time event but a persistent market trend throughout 2025. The investor discount was 31.6% in Q3, 39.4% in Q2, and 42.3% in Q1, indicating a sustained pattern of below-market purchasing.

Despite fluctuating market conditions, landlords have consistently maintained a price advantage of over 30% relative to homeowners all year, signaling deep market knowledge or a focus on off-market or distressed assets.

Comparing recent acquisitions to historical prices shows significant appreciation. The average 2025 price of $152,230 is a notable increase from the $138,511 average during the 2020-2023 period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured 27.4% of all Q4 home sales in Tuscarawas County, purchasing 83 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords represented a major force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 83 of the 303 total SFRs sold, which constitutes a significant 27.4% market share of all purchases.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) purchased 75 properties, making up 90.4% of all landlord buying activity.

The market saw a fresh influx of new investors, with 57 new single-property landlord entities entering the market in Q4, who collectively purchased 43 properties.

First-time or single-property landlords were the most active segment, responsible for 51.8% of all investor purchases, underscoring the grassroots nature of market growth.

There was a complete absence of large-scale institutional purchasing activity (1,000+ properties), with this tier acquiring zero properties in the quarter.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords own a commanding 91.1% of all investor-held SFRs in Tuscarawas County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Tuscarawas County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale operators. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 91.1% of all investor-owned SFRs.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a virtually nonexistent presence, controlling a mere 3 properties, which amounts to just 0.1% of the investor market.

The market is exceptionally fragmented, with the largest concentration of ownership in the hands of the smallest investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone own 3,693 properties, representing a staggering 66.9% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Ownership concentration declines rapidly as portfolio size increases. Two-property landlords hold 7.1% of the market, while those with 3-5 properties hold 11.1%, reinforcing the 'long tail' distribution of ownership.

The recent purchasing activity mirrors the ownership structure. In Q4, mom-and-pop investors accounted for 90.4% of purchases, closely aligning with their 91.1% ownership share, which indicates a stable and self-sustaining market dynamic led by small landlords.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner type in portfolios of 6 or more properties in Tuscarawas County.
Detailed Findings

A clear organizational shift occurs as investors grow their portfolios. While individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, companies become the majority owners for portfolios in the 6-10 property tier, holding a 65.5% share.

Individuals are the backbone of the small-scale rental market, owning 89.6% of single-property portfolios and 70.5% of two-property portfolios.

The transition to corporate ownership is rapid and decisive. By the time a portfolio reaches 11-20 properties, companies own 86.9% of the homes, a figure that rises to an overwhelming 99.5% for portfolios of 21-50 properties.

This pattern reveals a distinct lifecycle for real estate investors in the region: individuals start and build small portfolios, but scaling beyond 5 properties typically involves formalizing operations under a company structure.

The data illustrates a market where entry is accessible to individuals, but significant scale is almost exclusively the domain of corporate entities, even among mid-size landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in the 44663 and 44622 zip codes, holding 1,343 and 930 properties respectively.
Detailed Findings

The bulk of investor-owned properties in Tuscarawas County is concentrated in a few key areas. The 44663 zip code is the largest hub with 1,343 investor properties, followed by 44622 with 930 properties.

While some areas lead by sheer volume, others stand out for their extreme investor saturation. The 44610 zip code is 100.0% investor-owned, and 44653 has a 58.2% investor ownership rate, indicating pockets of very high rental density.

The zip code 43832 emerges as a significant hotspot, ranking in the top 5 for both total investor property count (359 properties) and high ownership percentage (19.8%).

There is a clear distinction between volume leaders and rate leaders. The zip codes with the highest counts, 44663 and 44622, have more moderate investor ownership rates of 17.0% and 15.5% respectively.

This geographical analysis reveals two distinct investor strategies: widespread acquisition in larger, core rental markets and deep saturation in smaller, niche sub-markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Tuscarawas County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.3 times more properties than they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Tuscarawas County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently operating as net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 102 properties while selling only 28, a buy-to-sell ratio of 3.64x.

This net-buyer trend was consistent throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 320 properties and sold just 97, resulting in a net gain of 223 properties and a yearly buy-to-sell ratio of 3.30x.

Acquisition momentum increased as the year progressed, with Q4's 102 purchases surpassing the 83 buys in Q3 and 86 in Q2, signaling growing investor confidence.

The appetite for acquisitions has grown significantly year-over-year. The 320 properties purchased in 2025 represent a 22.6% increase over the 261 properties bought in 2024.

Institutional activity remains negligible. While technically net buyers for the year with 3 purchases versus 2 sales, their volume is too low to have any meaningful market impact, reinforcing that growth is driven by smaller players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 23.4% of all Q4 property transactions, with 102 total transactions recorded.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a key driver of market liquidity in Q4, participating in 102 of the 436 total SFR transactions, a market share of 23.4%.

A distinct pricing pattern emerged among tiers, revealing that the least experienced investors paid the most. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) had an average purchase price of $189,841.

In stark contrast, more experienced small landlords in the 6-10 property tier demonstrated superior deal-finding, paying an average of only $63,206 per property—less than a third of the price paid by new entrants.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume with 90 transactions, while institutional investors had zero transactions, mirroring their absence in direct purchasing.

Inter-landlord trading was a notable source of inventory for some. Landlords in the two-property and 11-20 property tiers sourced 25.0% of their new acquisitions from other investors, indicating a fluid secondary market for rental properties.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors dominate Tuscarawas County's rental market with 91.1% ownership, acquiring properties at a 38.3% discount.
Holdings
Landlords own 5,347 single-family residential properties in Tuscarawas County, representing 19.0% of the market. The portfolio is primarily held by individual investors, who own 4,018 properties (75.1%), compared to 1,426 (26.7%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $156,051, securing a 38.3% discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid an average of $252,880. This amounts to a savings of $96,829 per property.
Activity
Investors were highly active in Q4, purchasing 83 properties and capturing 27.4% of all market sales. This activity was led by the smallest players, with 57 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The investor market is overwhelmingly controlled by small landlords (1-10 properties), who own 91.1% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible share of just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and control over 86% of properties in portfolios larger than 10 units.
Transactions
Investors in Tuscarawas County are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 3.64 properties for every one they sold in Q4 (102 buys vs 28 sells). Institutional investors showed minimal activity and were not a factor in the transaction market.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Tuscarawas County, OH, is fundamentally shaped by small, local investors. They own 5,347 properties, comprising a significant 19.0% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This landscape is dominated not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 75.1% of these homes. The market structure is highly fragmented, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 91.1% of all investor-owned real estate, while institutional firms have a nearly invisible footprint at just 0.1%.

Investor behavior is characterized by aggressive acquisition and sophisticated pricing strategies. In the fourth quarter of 2025, landlords purchased 27.4% of all homes sold, demonstrating their crucial role in market activity. They operate with a distinct financial advantage, paying an average of 38.3% less than traditional homeowners—a discount of nearly $97,000 per property. This deal-finding ability fuels their consistent growth, as shown by their status as strong net buyers, acquiring 3.64 properties for every one sold in Q4.

The key takeaway is that Tuscarawas County's rental market is a grassroots ecosystem, driven by an expanding base of new and small-scale landlords rather than large, remote institutions. These investors are effectively expanding their portfolios by capitalizing on market inefficiencies to purchase properties well below typical homeowner prices. Their continued, accelerating activity directly influences local housing affordability and availability, particularly in the entry-level and mid-range segments of the market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:57 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyTuscarawas (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail