Mercer (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Mercer (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Mercer (OH)
12,789
Total Investors in Mercer (OH)
2,236
Investor Owned SFR in Mercer (OH)
1,775(13.9%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,989
SFR Owned
1,417
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
247
SFR Owned
386
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,775 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Mercer County's SFR Market, Actively Buying as Institutions Remain Neutral
Landlords own 1,775 SFR properties (13.9% of market) in Mercer County, with individuals holding 79.8% and mom-and-pop landlords controlling 94.6% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 15.7% of all SFR sales, securing properties at a 14.4% discount compared to homeowners, and are strong net buyers with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 1,775 SFR properties in Mercer County, with individuals holding 79.8% of the portfolio.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 98.0% (1,740 out of 1,775), are rented, primarily through cash acquisitions comprising 77.8% of the portfolio. Individual landlords significantly outnumber companies, representing 88.9% of all entities in Mercer County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Mercer County paid an average of $290,130 in Q4 2025, securing a 14.4% discount versus homeowners.
The landlord discount fluctuated dramatically throughout 2025, ranging from a low of 4.1% in Q2 to a high of 35.9% in Q3. Landlord acquisition prices have seen a significant 52.4% increase from the 2020-2023 average of $190,411 to $290,130 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords accounted for 15.7% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 22 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 purchases, securing 95.5% (21 properties) of all landlord acquisitions, while institutional investors made no purchases. The Single-property tier (Tier 01) was most active, with 26 entities acquiring 19 properties.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 94.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Mercer County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 74.9% (1,370 properties) of the total investor portfolio, underscoring their foundational role. Institutional investors (Tier 09) maintain a negligible presence, owning only 2 properties (0.1%) of the market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller tiers, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Single-property portfolios (Tier 01) are 87.2% individually owned, while Small-medium portfolios (Tier 11-20) are 84.9% company-owned, showcasing a clear shift in ownership structure as portfolio size increases. The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
OH-Mercer-45822 leads Mercer County with 1,003 investor-owned properties, signaling concentrated activity.
While OH-Mercer-45822 holds the most investor-owned properties at 15.9% market penetration, OH-Mercer-45866 exhibits the highest concentration rate at 44.0% despite not being a top count leader. Conversely, OH-Mercer-45828 has a relatively high count (138 properties) but a lower ownership rate of 7.2%.
Historical Transactions
Mercer County landlords are strong net buyers, with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Overall, landlords purchased 126 properties and sold 37 in 2025, maintaining a 3.41x buy/sell ratio, indicating consistent portfolio expansion. In contrast, institutional investors showed balanced activity in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating a neutral net position.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 13.5% of Q4 2025 transactions in Mercer County, driven predominantly by single-property investors.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were responsible for 26 out of 30 landlord transactions, paying an average of $242,783. Notably, only 3.8% of Tier 01 purchases were acquired from other landlords, suggesting a preference for properties outside the existing investor pool.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 1,775 SFR properties in Mercer County, with individuals holding 79.8% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mercer County's SFR market sees 1,775 properties (13.9% of the total 12,789 SFR properties) owned by investors, indicating a notable but not overwhelming landlord presence.

Individual investors predominantly shape the landlord landscape in Mercer County, owning 1,417 (79.8%) of all investor-held SFR properties, significantly dwarfing the 386 (21.7%) held by companies.

The vast majority of investor-owned properties, 1,740 out of 1,775 (98.0%), are actively rented, underscoring a strong focus on rental income within landlord portfolios in the county.

Cash transactions are the preferred method for Mercer County landlords, with 1,381 properties (77.8% of the portfolio) acquired without financing, showcasing a strong financial position among investors.

The high proportion of individual landlords (1,989 out of 2,236 total entities, or 88.9%) suggests a market primarily driven by small-scale investors rather than large corporate entities.

The composition of landlord portfolios highlights a clear strategy: high rental utilization combined with a preference for cash purchases, positioning landlords as stable, long-term holders focused on income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Mercer County paid an average of $290,130 in Q4 2025, securing a 14.4% discount versus homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Mercer County consistently secure properties at a notable discount compared to traditional homeowners, exemplified by a $48,899 (14.4%) savings in Q4 2025, where they paid $290,130 versus homeowners' $339,029.

The landlord pricing advantage has shown extreme volatility throughout 2025, with discounts fluctuating from a modest 4.1% ($11,953) in Q2 to a substantial 35.9% ($113,816) in Q3, indicating opportunistic buying behavior.

Comparing average landlord acquisition prices, there has been a significant appreciation from the pandemic-era average of $190,411 (2020-2023) to $290,130 in Q4 2025, representing a 52.4% price increase.

While Q4 2025 landlord prices ($290,130) are higher than the overall 2025 average ($252,470), they are slightly below the 2024 average of $287,589, suggesting a potential stabilization or minor softening after rapid growth.

The sharp quarterly swings in the landlord-homeowner price gap underscore a dynamic market where negotiation and timing are critical for investors to maximize their purchasing advantage.

The pronounced increase in landlord acquisition prices from the 2020-2023 period to 2025 indicates a robust and appreciating market for investor-held SFR properties in Mercer County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 15.7% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 22 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords actively participated in Mercer County's Q4 2025 real estate market, securing 22 SFR properties, which represents 15.7% of the total 140 purchases made across all buyer types.

The Q4 purchasing landscape was overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 21 out of 22 landlord acquisitions (95.5%), demonstrating their strong market presence.

New or single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of investor activity, with 26 distinct entities making 19 purchases, representing 86.4% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no SFR purchases in Mercer County during Q4 2025, holding 0.0% of landlord acquisition activity.

The high number of entities (26) in the Single-property tier compared to the number of properties acquired (19) suggests that many individual investors are making their first foray into the rental market or expanding their portfolios one property at a time.

The minimal activity from larger tiers (one property each in Tier 02, Tier 03-05, and Tier 11-20) further solidifies the mom-and-pop dominance in Q4 acquisitions, signaling a fragmented and accessible market for smaller investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 94.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Mercer County.
Detailed Findings

Mercer County's investor-owned SFR market is heavily concentrated among smaller landlords, with mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) collectively owning an overwhelming 94.6% of all properties.

The Single-property tier (Tier 01) forms the bedrock of investor ownership, holding 1,370 properties, which represents 74.9% of the entire landlord-owned SFR portfolio.

In stark contrast to the small-scale dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint in Mercer County, owning only 2 properties, accounting for a mere 0.1% of the market.

Even the largest local landlord categories, such as Small-medium (11-20 properties) and Small-medium (21-50 properties), hold relatively modest shares of 4.0% (73 properties) and 1.1% (21 properties) respectively.

This highly skewed distribution highlights that the narrative of large corporate landlords dominating housing does not apply to Mercer County, where individual and small-portfolio investors are the primary market participants.

The combined market share of tiers 01-08 (99.9%) compared to the 0.1% held by institutional investors strongly indicates that the vast majority of rental housing in this county is provided by local, smaller-scale owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller tiers, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios in Mercer County, holding 87.2% of Single-property (Tier 01) and 75.2% of Two-property (Tier 02) landlord-owned SFRs.

A significant shift in ownership structure occurs at the 6-10 property tier, where companies become the majority owners, holding 71.2% of properties, compared to 28.8% by individuals.

This trend intensifies in larger portfolios, with Small-medium landlords (11-20 properties) seeing companies own 84.9% of properties, while individuals hold a mere 15.1%.

The data clearly illustrates a 'crossover point' between the 3-5 property tier (70.3% individual ownership) and the 6-10 property tier, where companies take over as the dominant ownership type for larger portfolios.

This pattern reveals that while individual investors are the foundation of small-scale rental property ownership, larger-scale operations in Mercer County are predominantly structured under company entities.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found in the Single-property tier at 87.2%, reflecting the typical 'mom-and-pop' entry into the market, whereas the largest company concentration (84.9%) is seen in the 11-20 property tier.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OH-Mercer-45822 leads Mercer County with 1,003 investor-owned properties, signaling concentrated activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties in Mercer County are geographically concentrated, with the zip code OH-Mercer-45822 alone holding 1,003 properties, representing a substantial 15.9% of its local SFR market.

Beyond raw counts, areas like OH-Mercer-45866 demonstrate extremely high investor penetration, with 44.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, indicating a robust rental market in that specific zip code.

Zip codes OH-Mercer-45348 and OH-Mercer-45894 also show significant investor presence, with one-third (33.3%) of their SFR properties owned by landlords, highlighting specific pockets of high investor activity.

A clear distinction emerges between areas with high investor property counts and those with high ownership percentages; for instance, OH-Mercer-45828 has 138 investor-owned properties but only a 7.2% ownership rate, implying a larger overall housing stock.

The combined top four zip codes by count (OH-Mercer-45822, 45846, 45882, and 45828) account for 1,436 investor-owned properties, indicating that a significant portion of Mercer County's investor activity is clustered within a few key areas.

The varying ownership rates across zip codes, from 7.2% in OH-Mercer-45828 to 44.0% in OH-Mercer-45866, underscore diverse local market conditions and investor strategies within Mercer County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Mercer County landlords are strong net buyers, with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Mercer County landlords are aggressively expanding their portfolios, evidenced by their significant net buyer position with 30 buys versus only 4 sells in Q4 2025, resulting in a robust 7.5x buy/sell ratio.

This strong buying trend is consistent throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 126 properties while selling 37, accumulating a net of 89 properties and maintaining an annual buy/sell ratio of 3.41x.

Comparing annual trends, the buy/sell ratio for all landlords increased from 3.11x in 2024 (109 buys vs 35 sells) to 3.41x in 2025, suggesting an accelerating pace of acquisition relative to divestment.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) demonstrated a neutral market stance in 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation or divestment during that year.

The dramatic increase in the quarterly buy/sell ratio from 3.21x in Q2 and 3.38x in Q3 to 7.5x in Q4 2025 highlights a surge in buying confidence or opportunistic acquisitions towards the end of the year.

The consistent net buying activity from landlords contrasts sharply with the balanced or negligible activity from institutional players, underscoring that growth in Mercer County's investor-owned SFR market is predominantly driven by smaller, independent investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 13.5% of Q4 2025 transactions in Mercer County, driven predominantly by single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were involved in 30 transactions in Q4 2025, representing 13.5% of the total 222 SFR transactions in Mercer County, highlighting their consistent, albeit minority, presence in the market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) completely dominated Q4 transaction activity, accounting for 29 out of 30 landlord transactions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) recorded zero transactions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led all buying activity with 26 transactions, and acquired properties at an average price of $242,783, reflecting their active role in the lower-to-mid price segments.

An outlier emerged in Tier 02, where two transactions resulted in a significantly higher average purchase price of $977,100, indicating high-value acquisitions by this small segment of investors.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal in Q4, with only 1 out of 26 Tier 01 purchases (3.8%) originating from another landlord, suggesting that most properties acquired by small investors are sourced from non-landlord sellers.

The activity in Q4 reinforces the ownership distribution, with Tier 01 showing even higher proportionate transaction volume (86.7% of landlord buys) than its overall ownership share (74.9%), indicating strong current buying momentum from new and small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Mercer County's SFR Market, Actively Buying as Institutions Remain Neutral
Holdings
Landlords own 1,775 SFR properties in Mercer County, representing 13.9% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 1,417 (79.8%) and companies owning 386 (21.7%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $290,130 in Q4 2025, securing a 14.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $339,029. Overall landlord acquisition prices across Mercer County have risen 52.4% since 2020-2023.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 22 properties, accounting for 15.7% of all SFR purchases in Mercer County, with 26 new or single-property landlord entities entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords drove 95.5% of all landlord purchases this quarter.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly control 94.6% of investor housing in Mercer County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a minimal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors account for 79.8% of all landlord-owned properties in Mercer County, but companies become the majority owners for portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Mercer County landlords are strong net buyers with a 7.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (30 buys vs 4 sells), while institutional investors maintained a neutral transaction position in 2024 (1 buy vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

Mercer County's Single-Family Residential (SFR) market reveals a strong presence of local, independent investors, who collectively own 1,775 properties, constituting 13.9% of the total SFR housing stock. Individual investors form the backbone of this market, holding a dominant 1,417 properties (79.8%) compared to 386 properties (21.7%) owned by companies. This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 94.6% of all investor-owned housing, with institutional investors holding a negligible 0.1% across Mercer County.

In Q4 2025, Mercer County landlords continued their acquisitive trend, securing 15.7% of all SFR purchases with 22 properties, predominantly driven by mom-and-pop activity (95.5% of landlord buys). These investors demonstrated smart buying strategies, acquiring properties at an average of $290,130—a 14.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners’ average of $339,029. Historically, landlord acquisition prices across Mercer County have surged by 52.4% since the 2020-2023 period, indicating a robust appreciating market. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers, reflected by a 7.5x buy/sell ratio in Q4, signaling confidence and expansion within the county.

The Mercer County SFR market is predominantly shaped by small-scale, local investors who are actively expanding their portfolios while consistently securing advantageous pricing. The minimal presence and neutral transaction activity from institutional investors underscore that large corporate entities do not dictate local housing trends. This robust mom-and-pop activity, combined with a significant rise in acquisition prices over recent years, suggests a healthy and accessible investment environment for smaller landlords, reinforcing their critical role in providing rental housing across Mercer County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:10 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyMercer (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail