Licking (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Licking (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Licking (OH)
54,978
Total Investors in Licking (OH)
6,065
Investor Owned SFR in Licking (OH)
5,958(10.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,096
SFR Owned
4,038
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
969
SFR Owned
1,998
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,958 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Dominate Licking County, While Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Landlords own 5,958 SFR properties (10.8% of Licking County's market), with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 87.8% of these. In Q4 2025, landlords secured an 18.6% discount compared to homeowners, buying 112 properties. While all landlords are net buyers with a 2.96x buy/sell ratio, institutional investors acted as net sellers, indicating a strategic divergence in the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 5,958 SFR properties in Licking County, with individuals holding 67.8% of the portfolio.
A significant 95.3% of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental market focus. Individual landlords outnumber companies by a ratio of 5.26 to 1 (5,096 vs 969 entities), forming the majority of ownership entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $315,752, securing an 18.6% discount versus homeowners.
This $71,973 average discount in Q4 marks a narrowing from Q3's 23.8% ($92,203) discount. Landlord acquisition prices have significantly appreciated by 36.3% from the 2020-2023 average of $231,814 to $315,752 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Licking County, buying 112 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove this activity, accounting for 85.0% of landlord purchases (96 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) made only 4 purchases, representing 3.5% of landlord activity. A significant 100 new single-property landlords entered the market in Q4 2025.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Licking County, controlling 87.8% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 60.0% of all investor-owned properties (3,693 properties). In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minor 5.9% share (363 properties) of the market. Q4 2025 purchase data shows mom-and-pop landlords also dominate recent acquisition activity.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 73.1% in that segment.
Individual investors dominate the smallest portfolios, holding 84.6% of single-property (Tier 01) ownership. However, company concentration peaks at 98.3% in the 21-50 property tier, indicating a clear shift towards corporate ownership in larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
OH-Licking-43055 leads investor activity with 2,741 properties and a 14.8% ownership rate.
OH-Licking-43008 shows the highest investor concentration at 37.3%, despite not being the largest by raw property count. The top two highest percentage areas (OH-Licking-43008 and OH-Licking-43027) exhibit more than double the investor ownership rate of the top region by count (OH-Licking-43055).
Historical Transactions
All landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 2.96x buy/sell ratio, while institutions were net sellers.
Landlords accumulated 100 net properties in Q4 (151 buys vs 51 sells). Year-to-date 2025, landlords maintained robust buying activity with a 3.53x buy/sell ratio (603 buys vs 171 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) shifted from being net buyers in 2024 (9 buys vs 7 sells) to net sellers in 2025 (8 buys vs 10 sells).
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 16.5% of all Q4 transactions, indicating significant market participation.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led activity with 100 transactions and paid the highest average price at $322,506. Institutional investors (Tier 09) transacted 4 properties at a significantly lower average price of $206,400. Small landlords (Tier 03-05) showed the highest inter-landlord trading, with 31.2% of their purchases coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 5,958 SFR properties in Licking County, with individuals holding 67.8% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Licking County possess a substantial portfolio of 5,958 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 10.8% of the county's total SFR market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate this market, owning 4,038 properties, which accounts for 67.8% of all landlord-held SFR. In contrast, company-owned entities hold 1,998 properties, representing 33.5% of the market.

The primary focus of these landlords is rental income, with 5,677 properties (95.3% of the total landlord portfolio) being rented and therefore non-owner-occupied, underscoring the market's strong rental orientation.

A significant portion of properties, 3,988, were acquired with cash, indicating a strong cash-buying capacity among investors, while 1,970 properties are financed.

By entity count, individual landlords significantly outnumber company landlords, with 5,096 individuals compared to 969 companies, establishing a ratio of approximately 5.26 individual landlords for every single company entity in Licking County.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $315,752, securing an 18.6% discount versus homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Licking County consistently acquired SFR properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $315,752. This represents a $71,973 reduction, or 18.6% less than the $387,725 average paid by homeowners.

The landlord discount has fluctuated quarter-over-quarter; the 18.6% discount in Q4 2025 is narrower than the 23.8% ($92,203) discount observed in Q3 2025, yet wider than Q2's 17.6% ($67,878) discount, suggesting dynamic market conditions influencing pricing advantages.

Average landlord acquisition prices have shown a strong upward trend, increasing from $231,814 during the 2020-2023 period to $302,176 in Year 2025, signifying substantial market appreciation.

From the pandemic-era average of $231,814 (2020-2023), landlord acquisition prices have surged by 36.3% to $315,752 in Q4 2025, indicating significant property value appreciation over recent years.

The consistent ability of landlords to acquire properties at a substantial discount compared to homeowners underscores their market intelligence, negotiation power, or access to different purchasing channels in Licking County.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.5% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Licking County, buying 112 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a significant force in Licking County's Q4 2025 housing market, responsible for 112 of the 574 total SFR purchases, representing a substantial 19.5% share of all acquisitions.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) led investor activity, purchasing 66 properties and accounting for 58.4% of all landlord acquisitions, demonstrating their ongoing dominance in market entry and expansion.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively drove the vast majority of Q4 investor purchases, acquiring 96 properties, which amounts to 85.0% of all landlord buying activity, reinforcing their role as the primary market participants.

This quarter saw 100 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market, indicating a steady influx of small-scale investors despite only purchasing an average of 0.66 properties per entity in this tier.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 4 purchases, representing a modest 3.5% of landlord acquisitions in Q4, highlighting a relatively limited presence in recent buying behavior.

The average properties per entity varied, with small-medium landlords (Tier 04: 6-10 properties) showing the highest buying intensity at 1.43 properties per entity, suggesting a more focused expansion strategy for this group.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Licking County, controlling 87.8% of investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

The distribution of landlord-owned properties in Licking County is heavily concentrated among small-scale investors, with Mom-and-Pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively controlling an overwhelming 87.8% of all investor-owned SFR, totaling 5,366 properties.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 3,693 properties, which accounts for a substantial 60.0% of the entire investor-owned housing stock, positioning them as the primary owners in the market.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a significantly smaller share, accounting for just 5.9% (363 properties) of the total investor-owned portfolio, indicating limited large-scale corporate ownership in the county.

While the overall tier distribution showcases mom-and-pop dominance, comparing this to Q4 2025 purchase activity (Section 7) where mom-and-pops also accounted for 85.0% of purchases suggests a consistent and ongoing trend of small investor growth and market participation.

The pronounced asymmetry in ownership, with 5,366 mom-and-pop properties versus 363 institutional properties, highlights Licking County's investor market as predominantly decentralized and individually driven.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners starting at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 73.1% in that segment.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest property tiers in Licking County, accounting for 84.6% of single-property (Tier 01) ownership and maintaining a majority share through the 3-5 property tier (64.1%).

A significant crossover point occurs at the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where company ownership overtakes individual ownership, with companies holding 215 properties (73.1%) compared to individuals at 79 properties (26.9%).

The concentration of company ownership dramatically increases with portfolio size, culminating in the 21-50 property tier where companies own a commanding 118 properties, representing 98.3% of holdings, while individuals hold only 2 properties (1.7%).

This distribution reveals a clear strategic division: smaller portfolios are primarily the domain of individual investors, while larger portfolios are almost exclusively managed by company entities, indicating distinct operational scales and investor types.

The pattern demonstrates that while individual landlords form the numerical backbone of the market, company structures are leveraged for scaling investment, becoming near-exclusive owners as portfolios grow beyond 20 properties.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OH-Licking-43055 leads investor activity with 2,741 properties and a 14.8% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Licking County, investor-owned properties are heavily concentrated in specific zip codes, with OH-Licking-43055 leading by count with 2,741 landlord-owned SFR properties, representing 14.8% of its local market.

Following OH-Licking-43055, other significant areas by property count include OH-Licking-43062 with 710 properties (7.0% ownership rate) and OH-Licking-43056 with 411 properties (8.3% ownership rate), indicating localized hubs of investor activity.

When considering investor ownership rate, OH-Licking-43008 stands out with the highest percentage at 37.3% investor-owned, closely followed by OH-Licking-43027 at 36.4%, revealing zones of deep landlord penetration within the county.

There is a partial correlation between high count and high percentage regions; OH-Licking-43055 appears in both top lists, signifying it as a highly active and saturated investor market. However, other high-percentage regions like OH-Licking-43008 and OH-Licking-43027 are not among the top by raw count, suggesting smaller sub-markets with disproportionately high investor interest.

These localized concentrations illustrate that investor activity is not uniformly distributed across Licking County but targets specific areas for either sheer volume of properties or high market penetration, reflecting varied investment strategies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 2.96x buy/sell ratio, while institutions were net sellers.
Detailed Findings

Overall, landlords in Licking County remained strong net buyers in Q4 2025, acquiring 151 properties while selling 51, resulting in a healthy 2.96x buy/sell ratio and adding 100 properties to their collective portfolios.

This net buying trend is consistent throughout the year 2025, where landlords purchased 603 properties against 171 sales, reflecting a 3.53x buy/sell ratio and indicating a continuous strategy of portfolio expansion.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acted as net sellers in Q4 2025, divesting 5 properties while only acquiring 4, signaling a slight reduction in their holdings.

This shift in institutional behavior is notable: they were net buyers in Year 2024 (9 buys vs 7 sells), but transitioned to being net sellers in Year 2025 (8 buys vs 10 sells), suggesting a strategic divestment trend by large-scale investors.

The divergent transaction patterns between overall landlords (net buyers) and institutional investors (net sellers) highlight a split in market sentiment and strategy, with smaller investors continuing to accumulate while larger entities may be rebalancing their portfolios.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 16.5% of all Q4 transactions, indicating significant market participation.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlord transactions represented a substantial 16.5% of all SFR transactions in Licking County, with 151 purchases out of a total of 915, signifying their active role in market fluidity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, accounting for 100 transactions in Q4, far surpassing all other tiers and underscoring their prominence in the transactional landscape.

A notable price disparity exists across tiers: single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $322,506, whereas institutional investors (Tier 09) secured properties at a significantly lower average of $206,400, a discount of 36.0% or $116,106 per property compared to Tier 01.

Inter-landlord trading was most pronounced among small landlords (Tier 03-05), where 31.2% of their 16 transactions were acquired from other landlords, suggesting a circulating inventory within this segment. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) made 0.0% of their purchases from other landlords.

This transactional data reinforces the pattern observed in ownership distribution, with Tier 01 leading both in total ownership and Q4 transaction volume, highlighting their consistent engagement across all facets of the market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominate Licking County, While Institutions Retreat as Net Sellers
Holdings
Landlords own 5,958 SFR properties, representing 10.8% of Licking County's total SFR market. Individual investors hold the majority at 4,038 properties (67.8%), compared to companies with 1,998 properties (33.5%).
Pricing
Landlords consistently secured a significant discount in Q4 2025, paying $315,752 – 18.6% less than traditional homeowners who paid $387,725.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 112 properties, accounting for 19.5% of all SFR purchases. The vast majority, 66 properties, were purchased by single-property landlords, with 100 new entities entering the market at this tier.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 87.8% of investor-owned SFR housing, totaling 5,366 properties, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minor 5.9% share with 363 properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate in smaller portfolios up to 5 properties; however, companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger, showing a clear shift in ownership strategy by tier.
Transactions
Overall, landlords were net buyers in Q4 2025 with a buy/sell ratio of 2.96x (151 buys vs 51 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) acted as net sellers in Q4, divesting 5 properties while acquiring only 4.
Market Narrative

Licking County's real estate market features 5,958 investor-owned single-family residential (SFR) properties, representing 10.8% of the total SFR market. This landlord-owned portfolio is predominantly held by individual investors, who own 4,038 properties (67.8%), significantly outweighing the 1,998 properties (33.5%) held by company entities. Small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords, owning 1-10 properties, collectively control a substantial 87.8% (5,366 properties) of all investor-owned housing, clearly forming the backbone of the rental market in Licking County.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated strategic purchasing behavior, acquiring 112 SFR properties, which constituted 19.5% of all SFR purchases in the county. These investors consistently secured better deals, paying an average of $315,752—a notable 18.6% less than traditional homeowners who paid $387,725. Transaction data reveals landlords overall are net buyers, with a 2.96x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (151 buys vs 51 sells), indicating continued accumulation. However, a contrasting trend emerges within the institutional segment, as large investors (1000+ properties) were net sellers in Q4, divesting 5 properties against 4 acquisitions.

The Licking County market is overwhelmingly driven by individual, small-scale investors, who continue to grow their portfolios and capitalize on significant acquisition price discounts. This signals a robust, decentralized rental market, with mom-and-pop landlords expanding their footprint while institutional players appear to be recalibrating their strategies, possibly divesting some holdings. The strong net buying by smaller landlords, coupled with attractive pricing, suggests a healthy environment for local private capital in the SFR rental sector across Licking County.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:05 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLicking (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison