Lawrence (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lawrence (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lawrence (OH)
16,768
Total Investors in Lawrence (OH)
7,700
Investor Owned SFR in Lawrence (OH)
5,770(34.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,279
SFR Owned
5,162
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
421
SFR Owned
657
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,770 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Lawrence County Market with 97.2% Ownership
Landlords in Lawrence County own 5,770 SFR properties, representing 34.4% of the market, predominantly held by individual investors (89.5%). Mom-and-pop landlords control an overwhelming 97.2% of this portfolio, while institutional activity remains minimal. Landlords secured a significant 21.4% discount on Q4 acquisitions compared to homeowners and are strong net buyers overall.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual landlords overwhelmingly own 89.5% of the 5,770 investor-owned SFR properties in Lawrence County.
A vast majority of landlord-owned properties are rented (5,697), indicating a strong rental focus, with cash purchases (4,120) significantly surpassing financed acquisitions (1,650). The market features 7,279 individual landlords compared to just 421 companies, a 17:1 ratio.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a significant 21.4% discount in Q4 2025, paying $164,882 compared to homeowners' $209,666.
The landlord discount varied significantly quarter-over-quarter, ranging from a modest 2.2% in Q1 ($3,642) to a substantial 21.4% in Q4 ($44,784), indicating fluctuating market opportunities. Due to data limitations, specific acquisition counts and price comparisons between individual and company investors by timeframe cannot be reliably reported from this section.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired a significant 39.5% of all 162 SFR purchases in Lawrence County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) drove Q4 purchases, acquiring 61 properties or 93.8% of landlord purchases, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no acquisitions. Single-property landlords were the most active, accounting for 49 properties acquired by 65 entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Lawrence County, controlling an overwhelming 97.2% of investor-owned SFR.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 83.2% (4,918 properties) of the investor portfolio, establishing them as the market's backbone. Conversely, institutional investors (1000+ properties) control a negligible 0.2% of the total investor-owned SFR properties. Due to data limitations, specific acquisition price variations by tier cannot be reported from this section.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies surpass individual ownership starting at the 6-10 property tier, demonstrating a clear size-based ownership split.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, comprising 94.2% of Tier 1 and 81.7% of Tier 2 properties. In larger portfolios, companies become highly concentrated, owning 96.1% of properties in the 51-100 tier. Due to data limitations, specific pricing differences or growth patterns by owner type and tier are not available.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 45669 leads Lawrence County with a high 47.1% investor ownership rate and 1,548 investor-owned properties.
Three zip codes, 45669 (47.1%), 45623 (45.5%), and 45659 (41.8%), exhibit investor ownership rates exceeding 40%, indicating significant market penetration. Zip Code 45638 holds the highest count of investor-owned properties at 1,554, demonstrating a concentration of investment despite a slightly lower rate (25.4%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Lawrence County are robust net buyers, acquiring 83 properties while selling only 6 in Q4 2025, a buy/sell ratio of 13.8x.
This strong net buying trend is consistent, with all landlords being net buyers throughout 2024 (289 buys vs 41 sells) and 2025 (335 buys vs 41 sells). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers in 2025, divesting 6 properties while acquiring 5.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 34.0% of all 244 SFR transactions in Lawrence County during Q4 2025.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove Q4 transactions with 65 buys at an average price of $172,235. Mid-size landlords in the 11-20 property tier secured the lowest average purchase price at $86,667, showcasing varied acquisition strategies. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal, with the highest percentage being 50.0% for the small landlord (3-5) tier on only 2 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual landlords overwhelmingly own 89.5% of the 5,770 investor-owned SFR properties in Lawrence County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force in Lawrence County's SFR rental market, owning 5,162 properties, which represents 89.5% of the total 5,770 investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Company-owned SFR properties account for a much smaller share at 657 properties, or 11.4% of the total investor-owned stock, reflecting a landscape heavily skewed towards individual landlords.

A striking 98.7% of all investor-owned properties (5,697 out of 5,770) are actively rented, underscoring the strong rental-focused nature of the landlord activity in this county.

Cash acquisitions significantly outpace financed purchases within the investor portfolio, with 4,120 properties purchased with cash compared to 1,650 that are financed, indicating a preference for debt-free ownership.

The sheer number of individual landlords (7,279) far exceeds company landlords (421), revealing that a vast majority of investor entities are mom-and-pop operations, further solidifying their market prevalence.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a significant 21.4% discount in Q4 2025, paying $164,882 compared to homeowners' $209,666.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Lawrence County achieved a substantial 21.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners, purchasing properties for an average of $164,882 while homeowners paid $209,666, a difference of $44,784 per property.

This pricing advantage has been highly variable throughout 2025; the discount was a mere 2.2% ($3,642) in Q1, widened to 13.0% ($23,584) in Q2, then softened to 9.1% ($15,440) in Q3, before sharply increasing again in Q4.

The significant $44,784 price gap in Q4 suggests landlords possess a strong ability to identify and acquire properties at advantageous prices, potentially leveraging distressed sales or off-market opportunities.

While specific acquisition property counts for landlords across these timeframes are reported as 0 in one dataset, the consistent average prices and homeowner comparisons provided suggest ongoing market activity where landlords are negotiating favorable terms.

The fluctuation in the landlord discount across quarters implies that market conditions or landlord purchasing strategies are adapting, creating inconsistent windows of opportunity for cost-effective acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired a significant 39.5% of all 162 SFR purchases in Lawrence County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lawrence County captured a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 64 SFR properties, which constitutes 39.5% of all 162 total SFR acquisitions.

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, overwhelmingly dominated Q4 buying activity by acquiring 61 properties, representing 93.8% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was particularly active, with 65 entities purchasing 49 properties, signifying a strong entry or expansion trend among new and small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) were entirely absent from the Q4 purchase landscape, making 0 acquisitions and holding a 0.0% share of landlord purchases, reinforcing the local, non-institutional nature of the market.

The average properties per entity in Tier 01 for Q4 stands at 0.75 properties (49 properties / 65 entities), indicating that while 65 entities were active, some may have acquired multiple properties or are part of larger entities not fully captured as single-property buyers in this snapshot.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) dominate Lawrence County, controlling an overwhelming 97.2% of investor-owned SFR.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) unequivocally control the vast majority of investor-owned SFR properties in Lawrence County, holding 97.2% of the total portfolio.

The backbone of this market is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who collectively own 4,918 properties, representing an astounding 83.2% of all investor-held SFR in the county.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop dominance, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) maintain a minimal presence, owning only 10 properties, which accounts for a mere 0.2% of the investor-owned market.

The market structure in Lawrence County clearly favors small-scale, individual investors, with the largest three tiers (01, 02, 03-05) collectively holding 94.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) collectively hold a modest 2.7% of the market, further emphasizing the pronounced 'mom-and-pop' characteristic of the investor landscape in this geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies surpass individual ownership starting at the 6-10 property tier, demonstrating a clear size-based ownership split.
Detailed Findings

A critical crossover point exists at the 'Small landlord (6-10)' tier, where company ownership becomes the majority, holding 62.7% of properties (89 properties) compared to individuals at 37.3% (53 properties).

Individual investors exhibit overwhelming dominance in the smallest tiers, owning 94.2% of single-property portfolios (4,665 properties) and 81.7% of two-property portfolios (294 properties).

As portfolio size increases, company concentration escalates dramatically; in the 'Medium-large (51-100)' tier, companies own 96.1% of properties (73 properties), indicating their preference for scaling operations.

This distinct segmentation highlights that smaller, entry-level portfolios are almost exclusively managed by individuals, while companies begin to gain significant traction and eventually dominate once portfolio size exceeds five properties.

Even in the 'Small-medium (11-20)' tier, companies already hold a commanding 68.4% share (39 properties), signaling their early involvement in mid-sized portfolio development.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 45669 leads Lawrence County with a high 47.1% investor ownership rate and 1,548 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Lawrence County's Zip Code 45669 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate at 47.1% and concurrently the second-highest count of investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 1,548.

Zip Code 45638 leads in terms of sheer volume, holding 1,554 investor-owned properties, which represents 25.4% of its total SFR inventory, showcasing a high concentration of investment.

A significant pattern of high investor penetration is evident across multiple zip codes, with five regions—45669, 45623, 45659, 45619, and 45696—all exhibiting over 40% investor ownership rates.

The top five zip codes by investor-owned property count collectively represent a substantial portion of the county's investor market, underscoring the geographic concentration of landlord activity in specific areas within Lawrence County.

Acquisition prices are not uniformly distributed across these regions, though specific price data by sub-geography is not provided in this section to detail these variations.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Lawrence County are robust net buyers, acquiring 83 properties while selling only 6 in Q4 2025, a buy/sell ratio of 13.8x.
Detailed Findings

Lawrence County landlords demonstrate a powerful net buyer position, having purchased 83 SFR properties in Q4 2025 against only 6 sales, resulting in an impressive buy/sell ratio of 13.8x.

This aggressive accumulation is a consistent trend, with landlords collectively being net buyers throughout all reported timeframes in 2025, totaling 335 purchases against 41 sales for the year.

The high buy/sell ratios (e.g., 10.6x in Q3 2025, 6.3x in Q2 2025) indicate a sustained period of portfolio expansion and market confidence among landlords.

In stark contrast to overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) were net sellers for Year 2025, divesting 6 properties while only acquiring 5, signaling a potential strategy of exiting or rebalancing their minimal holdings.

The average buy price for all landlords in Q4 2025 was $164,882, while the average sell price was $156,666, suggesting a modest implied profit margin per transaction.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 34.0% of all 244 SFR transactions in Lawrence County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant participants in the Q4 2025 market, involved in 83 transactions, which represents 34.0% of the total 244 SFR transactions in Lawrence County.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 65 transactions at an average purchase price of $172,235, underscoring their prominence in current market activity.

A notable price disparity exists across tiers; while Tier 01 landlords paid $172,235, small-medium landlords (Tier 11-20) acquired properties at a significantly lower average of $86,667, revealing distinct purchasing strategies based on portfolio size.

Inter-landlord trading was generally low; for example, only 4.6% of Tier 01 transactions (3 properties) involved buying from another landlord, suggesting properties are primarily acquired from non-investor sellers.

Despite their overall dominance in holdings, institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions in Q4 2025, highlighting their minimal direct market engagement during this period.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Lawrence County Market Amidst Strong Net Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 5,770 SFR properties in Lawrence County, representing 34.4% of the total SFR market, with individuals holding 5,162 properties (89.5%) and companies 657 (11.4%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 21.4% less than homeowners in Q4, securing an average discount of $44,784 per property ($164,882 vs $209,666), though this price gap fluctuated significantly throughout 2025.
Activity
In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 64 properties (39.5% of all sales), with 65 new single-property landlords entering the market, driving the majority of activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.2% of investor housing in Lawrence County, while institutional investors (1000+) own just 0.2%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (89.5% of total holdings), but companies take majority control in portfolios with 6-10 properties and above.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with a 13.8x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (83 buys vs 6 sells), while institutional investors were net sellers for Year 2025 (5 buys vs 6 sells).
Market Narrative

Lawrence County's real estate investor landscape is overwhelmingly shaped by individual, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control 97.2% of the 5,770 investor-owned SFR properties. These 5,162 individual investors, comprising 89.5% of the total landlord-owned portfolio, significantly outnumber companies by a 17:1 entity ratio, challenging broad narratives about corporate dominance. With 34.4% of all SFR properties being investor-owned, the market shows a substantial but highly localized investment presence.

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated robust activity, capturing 39.5% of all SFR purchases, with 65 new single-property landlords entering the market. This surge was characterized by a sharp pricing advantage, as landlords secured properties at an average of $164,882—a substantial 21.4% discount compared to traditional homeowners' average of $209,666. Landlords consistently remained net buyers throughout the year, accumulating 335 properties against 41 sales in 2025, signaling strong confidence and expansion in the local market.

The data clearly illustrates that the Lawrence County market is driven by small, individual investors focused on rental opportunities, evidenced by 98.7% of properties being rented. While companies gain majority control in portfolios exceeding five properties, their overall market share remains minimal. This structure supports a resilient, locally-driven rental market, less exposed to the transactional patterns of large institutional players who have shown a tendency towards net selling in 2025.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 08:05 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLawrence (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail