Hocking (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Hocking (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Hocking (OH)
9,158
Total Investors in Hocking (OH)
2,243
Investor Owned SFR in Hocking (OH)
1,845(20.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,869
SFR Owned
1,395
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
374
SFR Owned
482
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,845 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-pop landlords drive Hocking County SFR market, dominating ownership and Q4 purchases.
Individual investors own 75.6% of Hocking County's 1,845 investor-owned SFR properties, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an overwhelming 97.2%. Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 9.4x buy/sell ratio, securing 31.2% of all SFR purchases. However, specific landlord acquisition prices from traditional sources show a significant premium over homeowners, despite an absence of recorded landlord purchase volume in those reports.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Hocking County landlords own 1,845 SFR properties, with individuals holding 75.6% versus companies at 26.1%.
Of these holdings, 1,156 properties (62.6%) were acquired with cash, and 689 (37.3%) were financed. A substantial 96.3% of landlord-owned properties (1,777) are designated as rented, signaling a strong focus on rental income.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Hocking County landlords were presented with average Q4 prices of $447,742, a 47.0% premium over homeowners.
The stated landlord premium over homeowners in Hocking County has narrowed from 76.5% in Q2 2025 ($185,871 difference) to 47.0% in Q4 2025 ($143,146 difference). However, no landlord acquisitions were recorded in acquisition summary tables for Hocking County, OH for any 2025 quarter, indicating a reporting discrepancy with observed Q4 purchases.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 31.2% of Hocking County's Q4 2025 SFR purchases, acquiring 35 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove Q4 activity, accounting for 88.6% of all landlord purchases (31 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made no purchases in Hocking County, OH during this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.2% of Hocking County's investor-owned SFR housing, dwarfing institutional ownership at 0.4%.
The distribution shows single-property landlords (Tier 01) as the backbone, holding 70.8% of properties. Data for acquisition prices by tier was not provided in this specific section, preventing a comparison of pricing strategies across investor sizes.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all reported tiers in Hocking County, signaling pervasive individual dominance.
For instance, in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 63.6% of properties versus companies at 36.4%. There is no discernible crossover point where companies become majority owners among the available data for Hocking County, OH.
Geographic Distribution
OH-Hocking-43138 leads in investor-owned properties with 1,003, while OH-Hocking-43152 shows the highest penetration rate at 38.1%.
The zip code OH-Hocking-43152 stands out by appearing in both top 5 lists, indicating strong investor interest and high ownership density with 138 properties and a 38.1% rate. Hocking County, OH's zip codes exhibit varied investor activity, reflecting localized market conditions.
Historical Transactions
Hocking County landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 9.4x buy/sell ratio (47 buys vs 5 sells).
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a balanced transaction profile in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell, showing no net accumulation or divestment. Across all landlords, buying activity (47 transactions) significantly outpaced selling activity (5 transactions) in Q4.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords captured 28.3% of Q4 2025 transactions in Hocking County, OH, participating in 47 out of 166 total trades.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for the vast majority of transactions (43 out of 47), with Tier 01 investors paying the highest average price at $523,936. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with Tier 01 landlords only acquiring 2.9% of their properties from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Hocking County landlords own 1,845 SFR properties, with individuals holding 75.6% versus companies at 26.1%.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned SFR properties constitute 20.1% of Hocking County's total 9,158 SFR properties, demonstrating a significant landlord presence in the local housing market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 1,395 properties (75.6% of investor-owned SFR), while companies hold a smaller share of 482 properties (26.1%).

The ownership structure is further highlighted by entity counts, with 1,869 individual landlords compared to 374 company landlords out of 2,243 total entities. This indicates that individual landlords are far more numerous, even if their average portfolio size is smaller.

Cash acquisitions are prominent among Hocking County landlords, accounting for 1,156 properties (62.6% of holdings), significantly outpacing financed properties at 689 (37.3%). This suggests a well-capitalized investor base or a preference for lower-value, unfinanced properties.

A striking 96.3% of landlord-owned properties, totaling 1,777, are identified as rented, underscoring that the vast majority of these properties are non-owner-occupied and actively managed for rental income.

While individual landlords make up 83.3% of landlord entities, they hold an average of 0.75 properties each (1,395 properties / 1,869 entities), compared to company landlords who average 1.29 properties per entity (482 properties / 374 entities), indicating companies, though fewer, manage slightly larger portfolios.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Hocking County landlords were presented with average Q4 prices of $447,742, a 47.0% premium over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

According to acquisition summaries, landlords had zero recorded property acquisitions in Hocking County, OH for Q4 2025, or any other quarter in 2025 or 2024, presenting a significant data anomaly given other sections show Q4 landlord purchases.

Despite the absence of recorded landlord acquisition volume in these specific tables, the stated average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 was $447,742, a substantial $143,146 (47.0%) premium compared to the traditional homeowner price of $304,596.

This stated price premium for landlords has seen a notable narrowing throughout 2025, decreasing from a peak of 76.5% ($185,871 difference) in Q2 to 58.8% in Q3 and settling at 47.0% in Q4, suggesting a shifting market dynamic if these prices reflect real activity.

The lack of landlord acquisition data in this section conflicts with other data points, such as 35 landlord purchases reported in Q4 2025 from Section 7, which had an average Tier 01 purchase price of $523,936 for those active buyers.

Comparing historical landlord prices from 2020-2023 ($332,268 avg) to Q4 2025's stated average ($447,742) implies a potential 34.8% price increase, assuming these average prices are representative of the market even without recorded local landlord acquisition volume in this table.

The persistent premium of stated landlord prices over homeowner prices across all quarters of 2025 (ranging from 47.0% to 76.5%) suggests that landlords may be targeting a different segment of the market or properties with higher value, or that data aggregation methods vary across reports.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 31.2% of Hocking County's Q4 2025 SFR purchases, acquiring 35 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hocking County, OH made 35 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, representing a significant 31.2% of the total 112 SFR properties transacted in the market, highlighting their active role in recent property acquisition.

Small-scale investors, particularly single-property landlords (Tier 01), dominated Q4 purchases, acquiring 23 properties (65.7% of all landlord buys) and demonstrating the market's reliance on new or expanding individual portfolios.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively accounted for 31 of the 35 landlord purchases, representing an overwhelming 88.6% of all investor activity this quarter, reinforcing their position as the primary buying force.

In stark contrast to smaller investors, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made no purchases in Hocking County, OH during Q4 2025, reflecting a complete absence of large-scale corporate buying activity in this local market.

The 35 entities involved in single-property (Tier 01) purchases acquired 23 properties, indicating that new or small landlords are actively entering or expanding within Hocking County's SFR market, even if some entities acquired less than one property on average.

Tiers 02 through 08 combined for only 12 properties (34.3% of landlord purchases), with each tier beyond Tier 01 typically seeing only 1-3 properties acquired, showing a clear tapering of activity as portfolio size increases for Q4 acquisitions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 97.2% of Hocking County's investor-owned SFR housing, dwarfing institutional ownership at 0.4%.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Hocking County, controlling a commanding 1,848 properties, which represents 97.2% of all properties distributed across investor tiers (1,901 properties).

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 1,345 properties and accounting for 70.8% of the total investor-owned housing distributed across tiers, highlighting the foundational role of small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible share in Hocking County, with only 7 properties, representing a mere 0.4% of the investor-owned market distributed by tier.

The absence of specific acquisition price data by tier in this section prevents a direct analysis of how pricing strategies differ between larger and smaller investors, leaving an insight gap on whether larger investors pay more or less per property in this county.

The distribution reveals a steep drop-off in property counts beyond the mom-and-pop tiers, with Tiers 05-08 together accounting for just 46 properties (2.4% of the tiered distribution), underscoring the limited presence of mid-size investors.

While Tier 01 has 1,345 properties, indicating an average portfolio size of 1 for these entities, higher tiers like Tier 03-05 with 272 properties and Tier 06-10 with 66 properties show concentration of slightly larger, but still relatively small, portfolios within the mom-and-pop spectrum.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors hold majority ownership across all reported tiers in Hocking County, signaling pervasive individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all investor tiers where data is provided in Hocking County, OH, demonstrating their pervasive influence in both very small and moderately-sized portfolios.

In the largest reported tier segment (6-10 properties), individuals still hold 53.0% (35 properties) compared to companies at 47.0% (31 properties), indicating that companies do not achieve majority ownership even in larger mom-and-pop portfolios.

The single-property tier (Tier 01) exhibits the highest individual concentration, with 1,123 properties (81.7%) owned by individuals versus 251 (18.3%) by companies, underscoring the role of first-time or sole property owners.

There is no crossover point evident in Hocking County, OH where company ownership surpasses individual ownership within the available tier data, contrasting with trends seen in larger, more institutionalized markets.

For the 3-5 property tier, individual investors own 173 properties (63.6%), while companies hold 99 properties (36.4%), further cementing the individual investor's stronghold even as portfolio size increases.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
OH-Hocking-43138 leads in investor-owned properties with 1,003, while OH-Hocking-43152 shows the highest penetration rate at 38.1%.
Detailed Findings

Within Hocking County, OH, the zip code 43138 holds the highest concentration of investor-owned properties, totaling 1,003, which represents 18.7% of its local SFR market, making it a key hub for landlord activity.

Conversely, OH-Hocking-43152 leads in investor ownership rate, with a substantial 38.1% of its SFR properties held by landlords, despite having a lower absolute count of 138 investor-owned properties.

The zip code OH-Hocking-43152 uniquely features in both the top 5 by count and top 5 by percentage, indicating that it is a market with both significant investor presence and high penetration of landlord-owned housing.

The top five zip codes by investor property count—43138 (1,003), 43149 (220), 43135 (179), 43152 (138), and 43155 (108)—collectively highlight specific areas within Hocking County where landlord investment is most concentrated by volume.

Examining investor ownership rates reveals other highly penetrated markets like OH-Hocking-43127 (35.1%), OH-Hocking-43144 (28.3%), OH-Hocking-45622 (25.0%), and OH-Hocking-45654 (24.8%), which, while not necessarily having the highest total counts, demonstrate a strong landlord presence relative to their total SFR inventory.

The wide variation between top regions by count and top regions by percentage indicates that investor strategies may differ, with some areas attracting high volume and others being targeted for their high rental market saturation.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Hocking County landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 2025 with a 9.4x buy/sell ratio (47 buys vs 5 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hocking County, OH demonstrated robust net buying activity in Q4 2025, executing 47 buy transactions against only 5 sell transactions, resulting in an aggressive 9.4x buy/sell ratio that signals strong accumulation.

The net buying trend for all landlords has been consistent, with 2025 recording 149 buys versus 19 sells (a 7.8x ratio) and 2024 seeing 199 buys versus 22 sells (a 9.0x ratio), indicating sustained growth in landlord portfolios.

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ properties) showed a neutral position in 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell transaction, indicating neither significant accumulation nor divestment at the top tier in Hocking County, OH.

While average buy and sell prices are not provided for all landlord transactions in this section, the high buy-to-sell ratio strongly suggests confidence in market appreciation or rental income prospects among local investors.

The quarterly transaction volumes for all landlords show sustained activity, with 47 buys in Q4, 24 in Q3, and 48 in Q2 2025, demonstrating consistent engagement throughout the year.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords captured 28.3% of Q4 2025 transactions in Hocking County, OH, participating in 47 out of 166 total trades.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Hocking County, OH were active players in Q4 2025, participating in 47 transactions, which represents a 28.3% share of the total 166 SFR transactions recorded in the market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 35 transactions and paying the highest average purchase price among all tiers at $523,936, reflecting their direct market engagement.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively drove 43 out of the 47 landlord transactions, reinforcing their dominant role in buying activity during Q4, while institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions.

Inter-landlord trading activity was notably low for the most active tier, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquiring only 1 of their 35 properties (2.9%) from other landlords, suggesting they primarily sourced properties from non-investor sellers.

The average purchase prices varied significantly across tiers, with Tier 01 paying $523,936, Tier 02 at $381,600, and larger tiers (51-100 properties) seeing an average of $45,000 for their single transaction, indicating diverse acquisition strategies and property types.

Tier 02 landlords showed a higher propensity for inter-landlord transactions, with 1 of their 3 properties (33.3%) bought from other landlords, suggesting a segment of the market where investors trade among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors fuel Hocking County SFR market, dominating ownership and acquisition activity.
Holdings
Landlords in Hocking County, OH own 1,845 SFR properties, accounting for 20.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 1,395 properties (75.6%) versus companies with 482 properties (26.1%) of the investor-owned portfolio.
Pricing
Landlord acquisition prices in Hocking County, OH were stated as $447,742 in Q4 2025, a 47.0% premium over traditional homeowners at $304,596. However, these specific acquisition summary tables recorded 0 landlord purchases, in contrast to actual Q4 transactions that show Tier 01 landlords purchased at an average of $523,936.
Activity
Landlords captured a substantial 31.2% of Hocking County's total 112 SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 35 properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 88.6% of these purchases, with 35 distinct entities classified as single-property landlords involved in Q4 acquisitions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 97.2% of Hocking County's investor-owned housing (1,848 properties), while institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a mere 0.4% (7 properties). Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 70.8% of the tiered investor portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all reported portfolio tiers in Hocking County, OH, even holding 53.0% in the 6-10 property tier. There is no observed crossover point where companies become the majority owners in this market.
Transactions
Landlords in Hocking County, OH are strong net buyers with a 9.4x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (47 buys vs 5 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) maintained a neutral transaction position in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

Hocking County, OH's single-family residential (SFR) market is significantly shaped by landlord activity, with 1,845 investor-owned properties representing 20.1% of the total SFR inventory. This market is overwhelmingly driven by individual investors, who own 75.6% of the landlord-held properties. Crucially, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.2% of the investor-owned housing distributed across tiers, underscoring their foundational role and effectively sidelining institutional investors, who own a negligible 0.4%.

In Q4 2025, landlords remained highly active, capturing 31.2% of all SFR purchases in Hocking County, acquiring 35 properties. These acquisitions were primarily fueled by mom-and-pop investors, who accounted for 88.6% of all landlord purchases, with single-property landlords particularly prominent. Landlords overall maintained a robust net buying position with a 9.4x buy/sell ratio in Q4, signaling strong confidence in the local market. While some acquisition reports indicate landlords facing significant price premiums, actual Q4 transaction data for Tier 01 buyers shows average purchase prices of $523,936.

The data reveals a resilient and locally-driven investor market in Hocking County, OH, largely immune to the influence of institutional capital. The high concentration of individual and mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with consistent net buying activity, suggests a stable market where properties are primarily acquired for long-term rental income. Geographic hotspots within Hocking County, such as zip code 43152 with its 38.1% investor ownership rate, further highlight specific areas of intensified landlord presence, indicating localized opportunities or demand for rental housing.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:58 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyHocking (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail