Fairfield (OH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Fairfield (OH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Fairfield (OH)
48,722
Total Investors in Fairfield (OH)
14,498
Investor Owned SFR in Fairfield (OH)
10,918(22.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
13,573
SFR Owned
9,301
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
925
SFR Owned
1,814
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 10,918 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Fairfield's Market, Institutional Investors Retreat as Net Sellers
Fairfield County’s real estate market is heavily influenced by individual investors, who own 83.7% of the 11,115 landlord-owned SFR properties. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 91.9% of this portfolio, while institutional investors show a clear net-selling trend, offloading 16 properties in 2025. Landlords are robust net buyers overall, despite paying a 2.3% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, a reversal from previous quarters' typical discounts.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Fairfield County Landlords Own 10,918 SFR Properties, Driven by 83.7% Individual Ownership
Of the 11,115 properties with defined ownership, 98.5% are rented, underscoring a strong rental market focus. Over half (55.6%) of these properties are financed, while 44.4% were cash acquisitions, indicating a balance between leveraged and unleveraged investments.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Pay Q4 Premium of 2.3% in Fairfield, Reversing Prior Discounts
Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $358,632, representing a $7,913 premium over traditional homeowners. This marks a significant shift from previous quarters where landlords secured discounts of up to 9.6% ($38,105) in Q2 2025, suggesting a narrowing of competitive advantages or changing market dynamics.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Dominate Q4 Purchases, Securing 65.1% of all SFR Acquisitions
Landlords purchased 313 properties in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04) accounting for an overwhelming 98.4% of these acquisitions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchases, demonstrating their minimal presence in the quarter's buying activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 91.9% of Fairfield's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) own 78.3% of all investor-held SFR properties, totaling 8,710 properties. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) command a modest 4.2% market share, owning just 470 properties, challenging narratives of institutional dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at 11-20 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, owning 93.7% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. This shifts significantly in larger tiers, with companies controlling 74.9% of properties in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Fairfield's Investor Activity Concentrated in Key Zip Codes, with 43130 Leading Counts
The OH-Fairfield-43130 zip code boasts the highest count of investor-owned properties at 4,398. In contrast, OH-Fairfield-43008 leads in investor ownership rate at 100.0%, indicating highly localized concentrations of investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Fairfield Landlords are Robust Net Buyers (12.27x Ratio), While Institutions are Net Sellers
All landlords across Fairfield County maintained an aggressive net buying position in Q4 2025 with 503 buys against 41 sells. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) shifted to a net-seller stance in 2025, offloading 18 properties while only acquiring 2, indicating a divergence in strategy.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Drove 66.2% of All Q4 Transactions, Led by Single-Property Investors
Landlords participated in 503 out of 760 total SFR transactions in Q4 2025. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 469 transactions at an average price of $371,014, while institutional investors (Tier 09) had no Q4 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Fairfield County Landlords Own 10,918 SFR Properties, Driven by 83.7% Individual Ownership
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fairfield County own 10,918 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for a significant 22.4% of the total SFR market. This establishes investor activity as a substantial force within the local housing landscape.

Individual landlords are the dominant force, owning 9,301 SFR properties, which represents 83.7% of the 11,115 properties where ownership type is clearly defined. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties account for 1,814 properties, or 16.3% of the landlord-owned inventory, highlighting the grassroots nature of the market.

The prevalence of individual ownership extends to the entity count, with 13,573 individual landlords making up 93.6% of all 14,498 landlord entities. This far outpaces the 925 company landlords (6.4%), underscoring that the vast majority of investment activity stems from smaller, non-corporate entities.

The portfolio exhibits a strong rental focus, with 10,754 properties, or 98.5% of landlord-owned SFRs, classified as rented. This high non-owner-occupied rate confirms that investor holdings are primarily utilized for income generation rather than alternative uses.

A notable balance exists in acquisition methods for the 10,918 properties with known financing status, with 6,070 (55.6%) properties being financed and 4,848 (44.4%) acquired via cash. This nearly even split indicates a diverse approach to investment, with both leveraged growth and unleveraged stability playing key roles.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Pay Q4 Premium of 2.3% in Fairfield, Reversing Prior Discounts
Detailed Findings

In a notable shift, landlords in Fairfield County paid an average acquisition price of $358,632 in Q4 2025, which was a $7,913, or 2.3%, premium over traditional homeowners who averaged $350,719. This reverses a long-standing trend where landlords typically secured discounts.

The landlord pricing advantage has eroded significantly throughout 2025; starting with a substantial 9.0% discount ($33,554) in Q1 2025 and an even larger 9.6% discount ($38,105) in Q2 2025, it narrowed to 7.1% ($27,749) in Q3 before turning into a premium in Q4.

Despite the recent premium in Q4 2025, landlord acquisition prices have seen substantial appreciation over time. The Q4 average of $358,632 represents a 19.3% increase from the average acquisition price of $300,532 observed during the 2020-2023 period, reflecting strong market growth over the past few years.

The consistent pattern of landlords securing discounts throughout Q1-Q3 2025, only to pay a premium in Q4, indicates a tightening market and increased competition. This suggests that the strategic pricing advantage previously enjoyed by investors may be diminishing in the current quarter.

While specific property counts for landlord acquisitions were reported as '0' for several timeframes in the provided data, the consistently reported average prices across quarters indicate an underlying market valuation trend. This suggests that while formal acquisition tracking might be limited in these specific data points, the market itself continued to establish price benchmarks for investor properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Dominate Q4 Purchases, Securing 65.1% of all SFR Acquisitions
Detailed Findings

Landlords significantly dominated the SFR purchase market in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, acquiring 313 properties. This represents a substantial 65.1% of the total 481 SFR purchases made in the quarter, clearly positioning investors as the primary drivers of market activity.

Mom-and-pop landlords (those with 1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) were overwhelmingly active, responsible for 308 properties, which accounts for 98.4% of all landlord purchases in Q4. This highlights their critical role in fueling local housing investment.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) spearheaded this activity, purchasing 284 properties and representing 90.7% of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores the continuous entry and expansion of new and small-scale investors into the market.

A notable 469 entities classified as single-property landlords (Tier 01) were active in Q4 2025, far outnumbering the properties they acquired (284). This suggests a high number of individual investors entering the market, potentially involving co-ownership or diversified portfolios.

The stark contrast between mom-and-pop and institutional activity is evident, with institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) making zero purchases in Q4. This indicates a significant divergence in investment strategies, with larger entities opting out of recent acquisition efforts in Fairfield County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 91.9% of Fairfield's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04, owning 1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the investor-owned SFR market in Fairfield County, holding 91.9% of all properties. This translates to a significant majority of investor-owned housing remaining in the hands of smaller, local investors.

Within this mom-and-pop segment, single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the backbone of the market, owning 8,710 properties. This 78.3% share of all investor-owned SFRs demonstrates that individual, first-time, or small-scale investors are the primary custodians of the rental housing stock.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, with 1000+ properties) maintain a comparatively small footprint, controlling just 4.2% of the investor-owned SFR properties, totaling 470 units. This proportion is significantly lower than their perceived influence, highlighting the local nature of the Fairfield County market.

The distribution across other tiers shows a rapid decline in property share as portfolio size increases. For example, Tier 02 (two properties) holds 5.0% (558 properties), decreasing to 2.9% (319 properties) for Tier 06-10, before rising slightly to 4.2% for the institutional tier.

While specific pricing data by tier for all-time ownership was not provided, the concentration of properties in the lower tiers suggests that the majority of investor-owned housing reflects prices typical of smaller, individual transactions rather than large-scale portfolio acquisitions. This market structure is unlikely to have evolved significantly in the short term, maintaining a stable base of small property owners.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at 11-20 Property Tier, Shifting from Individual Dominance
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the predominant owners in smaller portfolios across Fairfield County. For instance, in the single-property (Tier 01) segment, individuals own 8,302 properties, representing a commanding 93.7% of the total, while companies hold only 555 properties (6.3%).

The ownership dynamic shifts considerably as portfolio size increases; companies become the majority owners at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier. Here, companies own 188 properties (74.9%), far surpassing individual ownership of 63 properties (25.1%).

This crossover point between Tier 06-10 and Tier 11-20 is a critical indicator of market structure. In the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, individuals still hold a majority at 52.7% (168 properties) compared to companies at 47.3% (151 properties), demonstrating a gradual transition towards corporate ownership in larger portfolios.

The concentration of company ownership steadily grows with tier size, moving from a minority share of 6.3% in Tier 01 to a dominant 74.9% in the 11-20 property tier. This pattern suggests that larger portfolio expansion is primarily driven by corporate entities, indicating a strategic preference for scale among companies.

Conversely, individual investors maintain a strong presence through the mom-and-pop tiers, holding 77.4% (438 properties) in Tier 02 and 72.2% (465 properties) in Tier 03-05. This highlights their foundational role in the market, particularly in the entry-level and small-scale investment segments.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Fairfield's Investor Activity Concentrated in Key Zip Codes, with 43130 Leading Counts
Detailed Findings

Within Fairfield County, investor-owned SFR properties are geographically concentrated in specific zip codes. OH-Fairfield-43130 leads by volume with 4,398 investor-owned properties, representing a 23.8% ownership rate, signifying a robust rental market.

OH-Fairfield-43147 follows closely in property count, with 2,703 investor-owned SFRs and a 19.0% ownership rate. These two zip codes collectively form the primary hubs for landlord investment within the county.

While OH-Fairfield-43130 leads in property count, other zip codes exhibit exceptionally high investor ownership rates. OH-Fairfield-43008 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a uniquely focused or smaller market completely dominated by investors.

Other high-percentage regions include OH-Fairfield-43157 at 45.1% and OH-Fairfield-43136 at 41.2%, demonstrating areas where investor presence is proportionally much higher, even if the absolute number of properties is lower than the top count regions.

There's a clear distinction between regions with high investor property counts and those with high investor ownership rates. The top count areas like OH-Fairfield-43130 have significant market volume, while areas like OH-Fairfield-43008, despite potentially lower absolute numbers, show a complete or near-complete saturation of investor ownership, reflecting different types of investment focus or market characteristics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Fairfield Landlords are Robust Net Buyers (12.27x Ratio), While Institutions are Net Sellers
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Fairfield County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a highly acquisitive market. In Q4 2025, they executed 503 buy transactions against only 41 sell transactions, resulting in a staggering 12.27x buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 462 properties.

This aggressive net buying trend has been consistent throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 2,256 properties against 163 sells, yielding a 13.84x buy-to-sell ratio year-to-date. This sustained activity indicates strong confidence and expansion in the landlord sector.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have become net sellers. In 2025, they sold 18 properties while only buying 2, leading to a net divestment of 16 properties, a significant shift from their neutral position of 4 buys and 4 sells in 2024.

The divergent behavior between all landlords (net buyers) and institutional investors (net sellers) suggests distinct market outlooks or strategic adjustments among different investor segments. Smaller investors appear to be in an accumulation phase, while larger entities are divesting or rebalancing their portfolios.

While data on inter-landlord transaction percentages and average buy/sell prices was not provided in this section, the high volume of buy transactions across all landlord types signals robust market liquidity and ongoing investment, particularly from non-institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Drove 66.2% of All Q4 Transactions, Led by Single-Property Investors
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for a dominant 66.2% of all SFR transactions in Fairfield County during Q4 2025, participating in 503 out of 760 total sales. This high share underscores the significant influence of investors on the quarterly housing market dynamics.

The overwhelming majority of this activity originated from single-property landlords (Tier 01), who completed 469 transactions, representing 93.2% of all landlord transactions. This highlights the sustained dynamism of the smallest investor segment.

Average purchase prices varied significantly across tiers in Q4 2025, indicating diverse investment strategies. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $371,014, while small landlords in Tier 06-10 paid the lowest at $135,400, reflecting a substantial price spread of $235,614 between these segments.

Inter-landlord trading activity was highest for Small-medium (11-20 properties) landlords, with 100.0% of their 2 transactions in Q4 being sourced from other landlords. This suggests specialized market segments where investors trade properties among themselves, although overall the percentage is low for the dominant Tier 01 at 7.2%.

The strong transaction activity from single-property landlords (Tier 01), who also represent the largest ownership segment (78.3%), confirms their continuous engagement in the market. Conversely, institutional investors (Tier 09), despite owning 4.2% of properties, had zero Q4 transactions, indicating a lack of recent transactional engagement from the largest players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Fairfield's Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Acquisitions Amidst Institutional Retreat
Holdings
Landlords own 10,918 SFR properties, representing 22.4% of Fairfield County's total SFR market. Within the 11,115 properties with defined ownership, individual investors hold 9,301 (83.7%), while companies own 1,814 (16.3%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $358,632, a 2.3% premium over traditional homeowners at $350,719. This marks a significant reversal from the 7.1% discount observed in Q3 2025.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords acquire 313 properties, making up 65.1% of all SFR purchases. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were highly active, with 469 new entities entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 91.9% of investor-owned housing, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding a modest 4.2% share in Fairfield County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate portfolios up to 10 properties, but companies become the majority owners at the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier, controlling 74.9% of those portfolios.
Transactions
Fairfield County landlords are overall strong net buyers, with a 12.27x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (503 buys vs 41 sells). In contrast, institutional investors are net sellers, offloading 16 more properties than they acquired in 2025.
Market Narrative

The Fairfield County real estate market is predominantly shaped by individual and mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively own 10,918 SFR properties, representing 22.4% of the total SFR inventory. Individual investors own 9,301 properties (83.7%) of the 11,115 properties with identified ownership type, vastly outnumbering corporate entities. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 91.9% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property investors (Tier 01) forming the largest segment at 78.3% ownership. This indicates a highly localized and accessible investment landscape, far removed from widespread institutional dominance.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased continued strong acquisition, with landlords responsible for 65.1% of all SFR purchases, totaling 313 properties. However, a significant shift in pricing occurred, as landlords paid a 2.3% premium over homeowners, averaging $358,632 compared to $350,719, reversing a trend of consistent discounts seen earlier in the year. Transactionally, all landlords remain aggressive net buyers (12.27x buy/sell ratio in Q4), actively expanding their portfolios. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors, who are clear net sellers in 2025, divesting 16 more properties than they acquired, signaling a divergence in market strategy.

This data reveals a resilient and locally-driven investment market in Fairfield County, where smaller investors are actively accumulating properties, even accepting higher acquisition costs in the most recent quarter. The retreat of institutional players as net sellers suggests a strategic re-evaluation by larger entities, while the consistent influx of new mom-and-pop landlords indicates ongoing confidence in the rental market's potential. Geographic hotspots like OH-Fairfield-43130 (4,398 investor-owned properties) continue to be key areas of activity, underscoring concentrated investment within the county's vibrant housing market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 07:51 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFairfield (OH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail