Yates (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Yates (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Yates (NY)
7,226
Total Investors in Yates (NY)
2,718
Investor Owned SFR in Yates (NY)
2,011(27.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,414
SFR Owned
1,762
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
304
SFR Owned
315
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,011 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Yates County, Paying Significant Premiums as Net Buyers
Landlords in Yates County own 2,011 SFR properties, representing 27.8% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 87.6% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 18 properties, making up 39.1% of all SFR sales, and notably paid an average of $439,350, a 57.4% premium over traditional homeowners. Landlords remain strong net buyers, acquiring 25 properties while selling only 1 in the last quarter.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors hold 87.6% of Yates County's 2,011 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Nearly all investor-owned properties (1,999 out of 2,011) are rented, indicating a strong rental market focus. A significant 69.4% of landlord-owned SFR properties are cash purchases (1,395), while 30.6% (616) are financed.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Yates County landlords paid a significant 57.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $439,350.
Landlords consistently pay a premium in Yates County, ranging from 35.8% in Q3 to an astonishing 175.0% in Q2 2025. This contrasts with nationwide trends where landlords often secure discounts, indicating unique market dynamics in this county.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 39.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Yates County, acquiring 18 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100.0% of all landlord purchases in Q4, while institutional investors showed no activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, representing 83.3% of landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of Yates County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone, owning 90.0% of investor-held properties. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no reported ownership in Yates County, solidifying the small landlord dominance.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Yates County's 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), outpacing individual investors.
While individuals dominate Tiers 01 (87.0%) and 02 (80.7%), companies account for 65.0% of properties in the 6-10 property tier. This marks a clear crossover point where corporate ownership begins to take precedence.
Geographic Distribution
NY-Yates-14527 leads Yates County with 1,013 investor-owned properties, a 26.2% ownership rate.
NY-Yates-14441 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 45.4%, while NY-Yates-14478 features prominently in both top count (193 properties) and top percentage (40.7%) lists, highlighting concentrated activity.
Historical Transactions
Yates County landlords are extremely strong net buyers, with a 25.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords acquired 25 properties while selling only 1 in Q4, signaling robust accumulation. Institutional investors, however, showed a balanced position in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating no net accumulation.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 36.8% of all Q4 transactions in Yates County, totaling 25 transactions.
Tier 02 buyers paid significantly more at $921,250 per transaction compared to Tier 01 at $347,560, highlighting different investment strategies. Inter-landlord purchases were minimal, representing only 4.8% for Tier 01 transactions.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors hold 87.6% of Yates County's 2,011 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Yates County control 2,011 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing a substantial 27.8% of the county's total SFR market of 7,226 properties. This high concentration signals a strong investor presence within the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord segment, owning 1,762 properties (87.6% of the investor-owned portfolio), while companies hold a significantly smaller share of 315 properties (15.7%). This challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in local markets.

The investor portfolio is highly focused on rentals, with 1,999 properties classified as rented out of 2,011 investor-owned SFR properties, demonstrating that virtually all investor-held assets serve as non-owner-occupied housing for the rental market.

A notable 69.4% of landlord-owned properties were acquired via cash (1,395 properties), indicating a preference for debt-free investment or significant capital liquidity among investors in Yates County. Conversely, 616 properties (30.6%) are financed.

Despite companies owning fewer properties, the average portfolio size per company landlord (1.04 properties per entity) is slightly higher than for individual landlords (0.73 properties per entity), suggesting companies may be consolidating or approaching multi-property ownership more readily.

The total count of landlord entities stands at 2,718, with individual landlords comprising 2,414 (88.8%) and company landlords accounting for 304 (11.2%). This further underscores the prevalence of individual, rather than institutional, investor engagement in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Yates County landlords paid a significant 57.4% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $439,350.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical national trends, landlords in Yates County consistently pay a significant premium for SFR properties compared to traditional homeowners. For Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $439,350, a substantial $160,245 (57.4%) more than homeowners, who averaged $279,105.

This pricing premium has been highly volatile throughout 2025, reaching an extraordinary 175.0% in Q2, where landlords paid $648,853 compared to homeowners' $235,955. This suggests landlords are willing to pay considerably more for specific types of properties or locations within the county.

The premium paid by landlords also registered at 35.8% in Q3 ($462,935 vs. $340,995) and 50.2% in Q1 ($298,700 vs. $198,873). This sustained pattern across all quarters in 2025 indicates a structural difference in landlord acquisition strategies or target properties in Yates County.

While no landlord acquisitions were explicitly reported for 2024 or 2020-2023 in the detailed acquisition data, the existing price comparisons for 2025 suggest a dynamic market where investors face higher acquisition costs relative to owner-occupiers.

The fluctuating size of the premium quarter-over-quarter — from 50.2% to 175.0% and back to 57.4% — highlights an unpredictable pricing environment for investors in Yates County. This volatility could reflect varying inventory, competition, or property types available to different buyer segments.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 39.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases in Yates County, acquiring 18 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Yates County were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 18 SFR properties, which represents a significant 39.1% share of the total 46 SFR purchases in the market. This indicates a strong appetite for investment properties during the quarter.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 was driven exclusively by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of the 18 landlord acquisitions. This highlights the complete absence of institutional (Tier 09) buying during this period.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 15 properties, which constitutes 83.3% of all landlord purchases. This emphasizes the role of first-time or small-scale investors in the market.

An analysis of Q4 purchases shows 21 entities contributing to 15 Tier 01 property acquisitions, suggesting that while entities are active, some may be buying fractional interests or are part of larger, distributed portfolios that still classify as single-property based on the immediate purchase.

Two-property landlords (Tier 02) also contributed to Q4 activity, acquiring 3 properties (16.7% of landlord purchases) through 3 distinct entities. This shows continued growth among existing small landlords.

The robust activity from mom-and-pop investors, alongside no institutional presence, signals that the Yates County SFR market for investment properties is primarily influenced by smaller, local players. This pattern contrasts with trends seen in more institutionalized markets.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.5% of Yates County's investor-owned SFR portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Yates County, controlling an exceptional 99.5% of the total portfolio. This concentration underscores the market's reliance on small-scale investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for 1,845 properties, representing 90.0% of all investor-owned SFR homes. This makes them the largest segment by a significant margin, confirming their critical role in the rental housing supply.

The remaining portion of mom-and-pop holdings includes two-property landlords (107 properties, 5.2%), small landlords with 3-5 properties (67 properties, 3.3%), and those with 6-10 properties (20 properties, 1.0%).

Institutional investors (Tier 09), those owning 1000+ properties, have no reported ownership in Yates County (0.0% of the investor-owned portfolio). This absence further reinforces the localized, non-institutional nature of the rental market.

The distribution beyond mom-and-pop tiers is minimal: Tiers 11-20 hold 5 properties (0.2%), Tiers 21-50 hold 1 property (0.0%), Tiers 51-100 hold 3 properties (0.1%), and Tiers 101-1000 hold 2 properties (0.1%). These segments collectively represent less than 1% of the total portfolio.

The lack of diverse tier distribution, with almost all ownership concentrated in the smallest segments, suggests that Yates County is not a target market for larger, corporate real estate investment strategies, making it a unique market profile.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Yates County's 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), outpacing individual investors.
Detailed Findings

In Yates County, individual investors maintain a strong hold on smaller portfolios, comprising 87.0% of single-property (Tier 01) ownership with 1,657 properties. This demonstrates their foundational presence in the entry-level investment market.

The dominance of individual owners continues into the two-property tier (Tier 02), where they own 88 properties, accounting for 80.7% of properties, while companies hold 21 properties (19.3%).

A significant shift occurs at the small landlord (6-10 properties, Tier 04) level, where companies take a majority stake, owning 13 properties (65.0%) compared to individuals' 7 properties (35.0%). This tier represents the crossover point for owner type concentration.

In the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03), individual owners still comprise the majority with 44 properties (65.7%), but company ownership significantly increases to 23 properties (34.3%), signaling a growing corporate presence even before the full crossover.

The pattern reveals that while individual investors are the prevalent force in initial and small-scale property acquisitions, companies are more likely to scale beyond a handful of properties within Yates County, indicating different growth strategies by owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NY-Yates-14527 leads Yates County with 1,013 investor-owned properties, a 26.2% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Yates County, the zip code NY-Yates-14527 exhibits the highest concentration of investor-owned properties, totaling 1,013 SFR units. This represents a 26.2% investor ownership rate within that specific sub-geography, indicating a significant landlord presence.

Following NY-Yates-14527, other leading sub-geographies by investor-owned property count include NY-Yates-14837 with 285 properties (28.4% rate), NY-Yates-14478 with 193 properties (40.7% rate), NY-Yates-14507 with 148 properties (30.0% rate), and NY-Yates-14418 with 96 properties (29.9% rate).

When analyzing by investor ownership percentage, NY-Yates-14441 stands out with the highest rate at 45.4% of all SFR properties being investor-owned. This indicates that nearly half of the housing stock in this zip code is held for investment purposes.

The zip code NY-Yates-14478 demonstrates a dual significance, ranking third in property count (193) and second in ownership percentage (40.7%). This correlation suggests a highly active and deeply penetrated investor market in this specific area.

Another area showing strong investor penetration is NY-Yates-14507, which ranks fourth by count (148 properties) and fifth by percentage (30.0%). This further reinforces the pattern of certain zip codes attracting both volume and a high proportion of investor activity.

The diverse top lists, where count leaders are not always percentage leaders, illustrate that investor activity is concentrated both in areas with large total SFR housing stock and in smaller, highly sought-after micro-markets within Yates County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Yates County landlords are extremely strong net buyers, with a 25.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Yates County are exhibiting exceptionally strong net buying behavior, especially in Q4 2025, where they purchased 25 properties and sold only 1, resulting in a formidable 25.0x buy-to-sell ratio. This indicates a significant and sustained expansion of their portfolios.

This aggressive net buying trend has been consistent throughout 2025: Q3 saw a 20.0x ratio (40 buys vs 2 sells), Q2 had a 17.0x ratio (34 buys vs 2 sells), and the entire year 2025 recorded a 23.2x ratio (116 buys vs 5 sells).

Compared to the previous year, 2024 also showed strong accumulation with 151 buys against 7 sells, resulting in a 21.6x buy-to-sell ratio. The sustained high ratios across all timeframes highlight a long-term strategy of portfolio growth among landlords in Yates County.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed a balanced transaction profile in 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in a net position of zero. This suggests that large-scale investors are not actively accumulating properties in this market, or are liquidating as much as they acquire.

The absence of inter-landlord transaction percentages in this historical data set limits insights into internal market liquidity. However, the high buy-to-sell ratios strongly suggest that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-landlord sellers, rather than trading among themselves.

The continuous high volume of purchases compared to sales signals a robust and attractive investment environment for landlords in Yates County, driving consistent growth in the rental housing supply from this segment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 36.8% of all Q4 transactions in Yates County, totaling 25 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were key players in the Yates County real estate market during Q4 2025, participating in 25 transactions, which accounts for a substantial 36.8% of all 68 SFR transactions that quarter. This confirms their active role in market fluidity.

Transaction volumes were dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who accounted for all 25 landlord transactions in Q4, consistent with their overall market presence. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transactions during this period.

A notable price disparity exists between purchasing tiers: Tier 02 landlords paid an average of $921,250 for their 4 transactions, significantly higher than the $347,560 average price paid by Tier 01 landlords for their 21 transactions. This indicates different property targets or investment strategies based on portfolio size.

Inter-landlord trading activity was very low: only 1 out of 21 Tier 01 transactions (4.8%) involved buying from another landlord, and zero Tier 02 transactions involved landlord-to-landlord sales. This indicates landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-investor sellers.

The significant price spread between Tier 01 and Tier 02, where larger small landlords are paying nearly triple the price, suggests that Tier 02 investors might be targeting premium properties or specific, higher-value market segments.

The high landlord transaction share, combined with low inter-landlord activity, signals a market where investors are expanding their portfolios by acquiring properties from the broader market, rather than through internal investor exchanges.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Yates County Market, Paying Premiums Amid Strong Buying
Holdings
In Yates County, landlords own 2,011 SFR properties, representing 27.8% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold 1,762 properties (87.6%) of this portfolio, significantly outnumbering companies who own 315 properties (15.7%).
Pricing
Landlords in Yates County paid an average of $439,350 in Q4, a $160,245 (57.4%) premium over traditional homeowners who averaged $279,105, reversing typical national trends.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase 18 properties, comprising 39.1% of all SFR sales, with all acquisitions made by mom-and-pop landlords. New single-property landlords were highly active, contributing 15 purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.5% of investor-owned housing in Yates County, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate small portfolios, companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), indicating a strategic shift towards corporate ownership in larger portfolios.
Transactions
Yates County landlords are significant net buyers, achieving a 25.0x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (25 buys vs 1 sell). Institutional investors, however, showed a balanced position in 2024 with 1 buy and 1 sell.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Yates County, NY, is predominantly shaped by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control an exceptional 99.5% of the 2,011 investor-owned SFR properties. This segment represents a substantial 27.8% of the county's entire SFR market, signaling a deep penetration of investor-owned rental housing. Individual investors, owning 1,762 properties (87.6%), are the primary force, strongly challenging any perception of large corporate dominance in this local market, where institutional investors (Tier 09) hold no reported properties.

Investor behavior in Yates County exhibits unique patterns, particularly in pricing and acquisition. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $439,350, securing an unexpected 57.4% premium over traditional homeowners, who averaged $279,105. This premium acquisition strategy has been consistent across the year, with premiums ranging from 35.8% to 175.0% in Q2. Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 25 properties and selling only 1 in Q4, indicative of a robust accumulation phase, with all Q4 purchases (18 properties, 39.1% of market sales) made by mom-and-pop investors.

The pronounced dominance of individual and small-scale investors, coupled with their unique premium-paying strategy and strong net buying activity, suggests a highly localized and competitive market in Yates County. The complete absence of institutional investors underscores that this market operates outside the sphere of large corporate real estate plays, potentially offering opportunities for local entrepreneurs and highlighting a distinct market structure driven by a diverse pool of smaller landlords committed to expanding their portfolios.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 11:04 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyYates (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail