Putnam (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Putnam (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Putnam (NY)
30,546
Total Investors in Putnam (NY)
6,790
Investor Owned SFR in Putnam (NY)
4,600(15.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
6,250
SFR Owned
4,100
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
540
SFR Owned
593
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,600 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Putnam County's Housing Market Sees Landlords Pay Premium, Dominated by Mom-and-Pops with Strong Buying Activity
In Putnam County, landlords own 4,600 SFR properties, representing 15.1% of the market, with individuals accounting for a dominant 89.1%. Q4 saw landlords secure 44.1% of SFR purchases, often paying a premium over traditional homeowners, with Mom-and-Pop investors (1-10 properties) controlling 98.6% of the investor-owned inventory and driving current acquisition activity. Landlords are consistently net buyers, particularly in Q4, while institutional activity remains minimal.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 4,600 SFR properties in Putnam County, overwhelmingly individual investors holding 89.1% (4,100 properties).
A vast 98.9% (4,550) of investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong focus on rental income. Over half (53.7%) of these properties are financed (2,472), while 46.3% (2,128) are owned outright with cash.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $616,609 on average, a 12.0% premium ($66,238) over traditional homeowners in Putnam County.
The landlord premium has fluctuated throughout 2025, from a high of 12.9% in Q1 to a low of 4.8% in Q2, before settling at 12.0% in Q4. Landlords consistently paid more than homeowners across all quarters in 2025, defying the common trend of investors securing discounts.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 44.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 135 properties in Putnam County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for virtually all landlord purchases, totaling 136 properties, while institutional investors (Tier 09) had no Q4 acquisitions. A significant 204 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entered the market during Q4, signaling robust individual investor interest.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned SFR housing in Putnam County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a mere 0.1% of investor-owned properties, highlighting their minimal presence in this market. The single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) is the backbone, owning 91.0% of all investor-held SFR properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios in Putnam County, comprising 89.8% of single-property owners, while companies gain majority control in portfolios of 21-50 properties.
The crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership occurs between the 6-10 property tier (where individuals hold 60.6%) and the 21-50 property tier (where companies hold 84.8%). Companies primarily concentrate their holdings in these mid-to-larger portfolio sizes rather than smaller tiers.
Geographic Distribution
NY-Putnam-10512 leads Putnam County with 1,326 investor-owned properties, showcasing a 15.9% investor ownership rate.
NY-Putnam-10524 demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate at 17.6%, despite having a smaller total count of 256 investor-owned properties. Zip codes 10512, 10541, 10509, and 10524 consistently appear among the top regions for both property count and ownership percentage, signaling concentrated investor activity.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Putnam County are strong net buyers, with 211 purchases against just 17 sells in Q4 2025, and institutional investors are net neutral/sellers.
Overall landlords show a robust net buying position, accumulating 810 properties in Year 2025 (867 buys vs 57 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ Tier) in contrast, show minimal activity, with 1 buy and 1 sell in Year 2025, indicating a balanced or slightly divesting stance.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 43.5% of all SFR transactions in Putnam County during Q4 2025, driving significant market activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) conducted all 211 landlord transactions in Q4, while institutional investors had no transactions. Tier 01 (single-property) landlords paid an average of $617,326, with only 4.4% of their purchases coming from other landlords, suggesting a preference for traditional seller sources.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 4,600 SFR properties in Putnam County, overwhelmingly individual investors holding 89.1% (4,100 properties).
Detailed Findings

In Putnam County, landlord-owned SFR properties total 4,600, constituting 15.1% of the county's 30,546 SFR properties, indicating a significant but not overwhelming investor presence in the local housing market.

Individual investors represent the overwhelming majority of landlord entities, with 6,250 individual landlords compared to 540 company landlords, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the investor landscape in this region.

Individual investors also dominate in terms of property counts, holding 4,100 SFR properties (89.1% of landlord-owned SFR), significantly dwarfing company-owned properties at 593 (12.9%). This highlights the fragmented and non-corporate structure of the investor market in Putnam County.

Nearly all landlord-owned properties, 4,550 out of 4,600 (98.9%), are classified as rented, confirming that the vast majority of these properties serve as income-generating rentals rather than speculative holdings.

The portfolio is split almost evenly between financed and cash purchases, with 2,472 (53.7%) properties financed and 2,128 (46.3%) owned outright. This balance suggests a mix of investment strategies, with a slight leaning towards leveraging capital through financing.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $616,609 on average, a 12.0% premium ($66,238) over traditional homeowners in Putnam County.
Detailed Findings

In a notable trend for Putnam County, landlords consistently paid a premium for SFR properties throughout 2025, culminating in Q4 with an average acquisition price of $616,609, which is 12.0% or $66,238 more than the $550,371 paid by traditional homeowners.

This landlord premium has been a persistent feature across the year: Q1 saw landlords pay 12.9% more ($608,812 vs $539,457), Q2 a 4.8% premium ($582,528 vs $555,837), and Q3 a 6.5% premium ($627,338 vs $588,940). This pattern suggests unique market dynamics where landlords are willing or compelled to outbid homeowners.

Despite this, Landlord average acquisition prices have shown some quarterly volatility, with Q4's $616,609 being lower than Q3's $627,338 but higher than Q2's $582,528, indicating shifting market valuations within the year.

Looking at annual trends, the average landlord acquisition price for Year 2025 was $610,621, an increase from $592,734 in Year 2024, demonstrating a continued upward trajectory in landlord acquisition costs within the county.

Compared to the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average of $508,993, current 2025 acquisition prices averaging $610,621 represent a substantial price appreciation of 19.9%, highlighting the significant increase in property values over recent years.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 44.1% of all SFR purchases in Q4 2025, acquiring 135 properties in Putnam County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in Putnam County's Q4 2025 housing market, purchasing 135 SFR properties, which represents a substantial 44.1% of all 306 SFR purchases made during the quarter.

The Q4 acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by mom-and-pop landlords, with Tiers 01-04 responsible for 136 purchases, effectively 100% of all landlord acquisitions, underscoring their market influence.

Notably, the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) accounted for 129 properties (94.9% of landlord purchases) and involved 204 distinct entities, indicating a strong influx of new, small-scale investors into the market.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09) made no SFR purchases in Putnam County during Q4, further cementing the market's reliance on smaller, local investors.

The distribution of Q4 activity beyond Tier 01 remained minimal: Tier 02 (two-property) saw only 1 purchase, Tier 03-05 (small landlord) made 4 purchases, and Tier 06-10 (small landlord) made 2 purchases, confirming the hyper-local, small-scale nature of recent investor entries.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned SFR housing in Putnam County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Putnam County is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively control 98.6% of the 4,600 investor-owned properties, asserting their foundational role in the local rental housing supply.

Specifically, the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) alone holds 4,256 properties, constituting a staggering 91.0% of the total investor-owned SFR, demonstrating that first-time and smallest-scale investors are the primary owners.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09), those with 1000+ properties, possess a negligible share, owning only 5 properties which represents a mere 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio, debunking any notion of significant institutional footprint in Putnam County.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08, 11-1000 properties) also maintain a very small presence, collectively owning only 62 properties (1.3% of the total), further emphasizing the fragmented, small-investor nature of the market.

The distribution of entities largely mirrors property counts, with Tier 01 representing the vast majority of individual landlords, while higher tiers show a steep decline in both entity and property counts, indicating a narrow pyramid of ownership.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios in Putnam County, comprising 89.8% of single-property owners, while companies gain majority control in portfolios of 21-50 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers in Putnam County; for single-property landlords (Tier 01), 3,898 properties (89.8%) are individually owned, compared to 442 (10.2%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance continues through the two-property tier (Tier 02), where individuals hold 126 properties (75.4%) against companies' 41 properties (24.6%), and in the three-to-five property tier (Tier 03-05), where individuals own 114 properties (73.5%) vs. companies' 41 properties (26.5%).

The shift towards corporate ownership begins to become noticeable in the six-to-ten property tier (Tier 06-10), where individuals still hold the majority with 20 properties (60.6%), but companies account for a significant 13 properties (39.4%).

A clear crossover point occurs within larger portfolios, as companies assume majority ownership in the 21-50 property tier (Tier 05), controlling 28 properties (84.8%), while individuals own only 5 properties (15.2%).

This distribution reveals that while the entry-level and small-scale rental market is heavily individual-driven, companies with more structured operations tend to scale up into mid-size portfolios in Putnam County, indicating different strategic focuses for each owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NY-Putnam-10512 leads Putnam County with 1,326 investor-owned properties, showcasing a 15.9% investor ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Within Putnam County, the zip code NY-Putnam-10512 stands out as the primary hub for investor-owned properties, housing 1,326 SFR properties under investor ownership, which represents 15.9% of its total SFR market.

Following closely in terms of sheer volume, NY-Putnam-10541 has 877 investor-owned properties (11.8% rate), and NY-Putnam-10509 contains 637 investor-owned properties (12.3% rate), indicating concentrated investor interest in these specific areas.

When analyzing by ownership rate, NY-Putnam-10524 exhibits the highest landlord penetration, with investors owning 17.6% of its SFR properties, even though its absolute count of 256 investor-owned properties is smaller than other top regions.

The top five regions by investor-owned count (10512, 10541, 10509, 10524, and 10537 which has 14.8% rate, implied from rate data) collectively show significant investor presence, pointing to specific geographic areas being more attractive for real estate investments in Putnam County.

The data suggests a strong correlation between high counts of investor-owned properties and high investor ownership rates in Putnam County, indicating that investors tend to flock to regions where they already have a significant presence, potentially creating localized landlord markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords in Putnam County are strong net buyers, with 211 purchases against just 17 sells in Q4 2025, and institutional investors are net neutral/sellers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Putnam County are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a strong acquisition trend across 2025. In Q4 alone, they purchased 211 properties while selling only 17, resulting in a net gain of 194 properties.

This net buying activity has been consistent throughout 2025, with landlords acquiring 867 properties and selling just 57, leading to a substantial net accumulation of 810 SFR properties over the year, indicating a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.

Comparing year-over-year, Year 2025 purchases (867) were slightly lower than Year 2024 purchases (926), but sales remained low, ensuring continued net growth for landlords.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ Tier) show extremely limited activity in Putnam County, recording only 1 buy and 1 sell in Year 2025, resulting in a net-neutral position.

The minimal institutional transaction volume in both Year 2025 and Year 2024 (2 buys, 1 sell) suggests that large-scale institutional players have either a negligible presence or are not actively expanding their portfolios in this specific market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 43.5% of all SFR transactions in Putnam County during Q4 2025, driving significant market activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant players in Putnam County's Q4 2025 transaction landscape, participating in 211 transactions, which represents a substantial 43.5% of the total 485 SFR transactions during the quarter.

The entire landlord transaction volume in Q4 was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), who collectively completed 211 transactions, reaffirming their dominant role in both ownership and market activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, completing 204 transactions at an average purchase price of $617,326, indicating sustained entry-level investor engagement and the price point at which these smaller investors are acquiring properties.

Inter-landlord trading was minimal among Tier 01 investors, with only 9 transactions (4.4%) sourced from other landlords, suggesting that new landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-investor sellers or through traditional market channels.

The absence of any transactions from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Q4 further highlights their negligible impact on the immediate transaction dynamics in Putnam County, leaving the market largely to smaller private landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Putnam County's Market: Mom-and-Pops Dominate, Pay Premium, and Drive Strong Landlord Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 4,600 SFR properties in Putnam County, representing 15.1% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding a commanding 89.1% (4,100 properties) and companies owning 12.9% (593 properties).
Pricing
Landlords in Putnam County paid an average of $616,609 in Q4 2025, which is a significant 12.0% ($66,238) premium compared to traditional homeowners' average of $550,371.
Activity
Landlords secured 44.1% of all Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 135 properties, with a notable 204 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were responsible for all Q4 landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties, Tiers 01-04) control an overwhelming 98.6% of investor-owned housing in Putnam County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties, Tier 09) own a marginal 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold 89.8% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios ranging from 21-50 properties (84.8% company-owned), indicating a clear shift in ownership structure at higher tiers.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are consistent net buyers in Putnam County, with 867 purchases versus 57 sells in Year 2025, demonstrating strong accumulation, while institutional investors remain net neutral/sellers (1 buy vs 1 sell in Year 2025).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Putnam County, NY, is predominantly shaped by small, individual landlords. A robust 15.1% of all SFR properties in the county are investor-owned, totaling 4,600 properties, with individual investors accounting for a staggering 89.1% of this portfolio. This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) who collectively control 98.6% of all investor-owned housing, with single-property owners alone representing 91.0%. Institutional investors, conversely, maintain a minimal footprint, owning just 0.1% of investor properties, clearly demonstrating that the county's rental market is driven by local, individual players.

Investor behavior in Putnam County shows distinct patterns. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a substantial 44.1% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 135 properties. Unusually, landlords consistently paid a premium for properties compared to traditional homeowners throughout 2025, with Q4 seeing them pay 12.0% ($66,238) more on average. This suggests a competitive market where investors are willing to pay more to acquire properties. Transaction data reveals landlords are strong net buyers, accumulating 810 properties in Year 2025 (867 buys vs 57 sells). This aggressive buying is almost exclusively led by mom-and-pop investors, with 204 new single-property landlords entering the market in Q4, while institutional transaction activity remains negligible.

These trends highlight a dynamic market in Putnam County where local, small-scale investors are the driving force, actively expanding their portfolios despite paying a premium over homeowners. The overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with consistent net buying and high rental property rates, indicates a stable and growing individual-investor-driven rental market. The minimal presence and activity of institutional investors suggest that Putnam County remains an attractive market for local entrepreneurs and long-term individual investors rather than large corporate entities.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 10:39 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPutnam (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail