Jefferson (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jefferson (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jefferson (NY)
26,103
Total Investors in Jefferson (NY)
7,852
Investor Owned SFR in Jefferson (NY)
6,066(23.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,329
SFR Owned
5,635
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
523
SFR Owned
582
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 6,066 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Jefferson County Market Amidst Institutional Retreat
Landlords own 6,066 SFR properties in Jefferson County (23.2% of the market), with individual investors controlling a significant 92.9% while mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) hold an overwhelming 99.1% of the total investor portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords secured a 1.5% discount on acquisitions compared to traditional homeowners, participating in 43.9% of all SFR purchases, yet institutional investors were net sellers for the year, indicating a shifting market dynamic.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Control 92.9% of 6,066 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Jefferson County
A vast 99.0% of investor-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a strong rental-focused portfolio. Cash purchases represent 60.2% of holdings, while financed properties account for 39.8%.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Jefferson County Landlords Secured 1.5% Acquisition Discount vs. Homeowners in Q4 2025
This Q4 discount of $3,543 contrasts sharply with premiums paid earlier in 2025, showing significant price gap volatility. However, Landlord acquisition data for 2024 and 2025 quarters indicates zero distinct properties were purchased despite reported average prices, suggesting a very low acquisition volume in these specific periods for landlords.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Acquired 43.9% of all Q4 SFR Purchases in Jefferson County, Totaling 119 Properties
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove this activity, responsible for 95.0% (114 properties) of all landlord purchases. Single-property landlords alone purchased 90.0% of these properties, with 151 entities active in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.1% of Jefferson County's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.2% of investor-owned properties. The Single-property tier alone accounts for 91.1% (5,590 properties) of all landlord holdings, solidifying its dominant market position.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier in Jefferson County
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 93.0% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. In larger tiers, such as Medium-large (51-100 properties), companies represent 75.0% of ownership, indicating a clear shift in investor type with portfolio growth.
Geographic Distribution
NY-Jefferson-13601 Leads with 1,626 Investor-Owned Properties, Representing 20.0% of its SFR Market
The top 5 zip codes by count collectively hold 51.8% of the county's investor-owned SFR portfolio. NY-Jefferson-13602, while not a top region by count, exhibits a 100.0% investor ownership rate, revealing highly concentrated niche markets.
Historical Transactions
Jefferson County Landlords Were Strong Net Buyers in 2025 with a 12.43x Buy/Sell Ratio, While Institutions Were Net Sellers
Landlords acquired 920 properties and sold 74 in 2025, maintaining consistent net buying throughout the year. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) however, were net sellers in 2025, divesting 14 properties while only buying 6.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Accounted for 42.5% of All Q4 Transactions in Jefferson County
Single-property landlords dominated Q4 transaction volume with 151 transactions, while paying the highest average price at $245,491. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) transacted only 3 times at a significantly lower average price of $167,718, a 31.7% discount compared to Tier 1 buyers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Control 92.9% of 6,066 Investor-Owned SFR Properties in Jefferson County
Detailed Findings

In Jefferson County, landlords hold a substantial portfolio of 6,066 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, accounting for 23.2% of the total SFR market. This establishes investors as a significant presence in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord market, owning 5,635 properties, which constitutes 92.9% of all investor-owned SFR. In contrast, company-owned SFR properties total 582, making up a smaller 9.6% of the portfolio.

The prevalence of individual ownership extends to entity counts, with 7,329 individual landlords compared to just 523 company landlords, resulting in a remarkable 14.01:1 ratio of individual to company entities in the county.

A critical finding reveals that 6,008 of the 6,066 investor-owned properties are rented, indicating that 99.0% of the landlord portfolio is actively generating rental income, highlighting the market's focus on rental investment rather than owner-occupancy.

The financing structure of investor-owned properties shows a preference for cash acquisitions, with 3,651 properties (60.2%) purchased outright. Meanwhile, 2,415 properties (39.8%) are financed, suggesting a balanced approach to capital deployment among investors.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Jefferson County Landlords Secured 1.5% Acquisition Discount vs. Homeowners in Q4 2025
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Jefferson County paid an average of $237,909 for SFR properties, securing a $3,543 (1.5%) discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid $241,452. This suggests landlords possess a slight pricing advantage in the current market.

The pricing dynamic between landlords and homeowners has fluctuated significantly throughout 2025. While Q3 saw a 1.8% landlord discount, Q2 and Q1 recorded landlords paying premiums of 15.4% ($37,394) and 7.8% ($15,986) respectively, indicating considerable market volatility.

Despite reported average acquisition prices, a critical observation is that zero distinct SFR properties were purchased by landlords in any of the 2024 and 2025 quarterly or annual timeframes provided. This anomaly suggests an extremely low, or unrecorded, volume of new acquisitions during these periods, or the average prices are reflecting underlying market values without specific transaction counts.

Comparing broader trends, the average landlord acquisition price for 2025 at $250,622 is lower than 2024's average of $274,384, signaling a potential softening in overall property values over the last year. However, it represents an appreciation of 6.7% from the 2020-2023 average of $234,960.

The shifts from paying a premium in early 2025 to a discount in latter quarters highlight a narrowing or reversal of the price gap, reflecting changing market conditions or landlord purchasing strategies to secure better deals.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Acquired 43.9% of all Q4 SFR Purchases in Jefferson County, Totaling 119 Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significant buyers in Jefferson County during Q4 2025, acquiring 119 SFR properties. This represents 43.9% of the total 271 SFR purchases made in the quarter, demonstrating their strong market participation.

The overwhelming majority of Q4 landlord purchases came from mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 114 properties, or 95.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This underscores their role as the primary purchasing force in the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated Q4 acquisitions, purchasing 108 properties, which represents a substantial 90.0% of all landlord purchases. A total of 151 entities were identified as active in this tier, indicating a strong influx of new or expanding small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) made only 3 purchases in Q4, representing a mere 2.5% of total landlord acquisitions, suggesting a limited footprint in recent buying activity in this county.

The average properties per entity in Q4 purchases varied by tier, with institutional entities showing the highest buying intensity at 1.50 properties per entity (3 properties by 2 entities). Single-property entities, despite making up 151 entities, purchased 108 properties (0.71 properties per entity), indicating a broad base of smaller-scale buyers.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 99.1% of Jefferson County's Investor-Owned SFR Portfolio
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) collectively own an overwhelming 99.1% of all investor-owned SFR properties in Jefferson County. This market structure highlights a highly fragmented ownership landscape dominated by smaller investors.

The Single-property tier (Tier 01) forms the backbone of the investor market, controlling 5,590 properties, which represents an astonishing 91.1% of the total landlord-owned SFR portfolio. This confirms the significant presence of first-time or minimal-portfolio landlords.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), defined by portfolios of 1000+ properties, hold a mere 10 properties, constituting just 0.2% of the total landlord-owned SFR market. This directly contradicts narratives of large corporations dominating local housing, at least in this county.

The distribution beyond single-property owners rapidly diminishes; the Two-property tier (Tier 02) holds 238 properties (3.9%), and the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier holds 199 properties (3.2%). Together, Tiers 01-04 command nearly all of the investor market.

Acquisition pricing data by tier for all-time, Q4, 2024, or 2020-2023 was not provided in the detailed CSV snippet for this section, precluding a direct analysis of how prices vary across investor sizes over time.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies Become Majority Owners at the 6-10 Property Tier in Jefferson County
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the dominant force in smaller portfolios, owning 5,315 properties (93.0%) in the Single-property tier, compared to companies which own 403 properties (7.0%) in the same tier. This pattern continues through the two-property (82.8% individual) and three-to-five property (71.1% individual) tiers.

A critical crossover point occurs in the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier, where company ownership surpasses individual ownership. Companies hold 29 properties (56.9%), while individuals own 22 properties (43.1%), signaling the point where portfolio scale attracts corporate structures.

The trend of increasing company dominance with portfolio size intensifies in larger tiers. In the Medium-large (51-100 properties) tier, companies own 3 properties, representing a substantial 75.0% share, leaving individuals with just 1 property (25.0%).

Conversely, the Single-property tier exhibits the highest concentration of individual investors, with 93.0% of properties owned by individuals. This confirms that the entry point into the landlord market is overwhelmingly individual-driven.

Data for acquisition prices split by individual vs. company within each tier, or comparisons of growth patterns over time, was not provided in the detailed CSV snippets for this section, limiting further analysis on pricing strategies or growth dynamics by owner type.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NY-Jefferson-13601 Leads with 1,626 Investor-Owned Properties, Representing 20.0% of its SFR Market
Detailed Findings

NY-Jefferson-13601 stands out as the primary hub for investor-owned properties in the county, with 1,626 SFR properties. This zip code alone accounts for 26.8% of all landlord-owned properties in Jefferson County and has a significant investor ownership rate of 20.0% within its own SFR market.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned property count – including 13601, 13619, 13624, 13634, and 13618 – together concentrate 3,145 properties, representing a substantial 51.8% of the county's total investor-owned SFR portfolio. This indicates a strong geographic clustering of investor activity.

While some regions lead in raw property count, others exhibit extremely high investor ownership rates, signifying dense investor penetration in smaller markets. For instance, NY-Jefferson-13602 has an investor ownership rate of 100.0%, followed by 13692 at 66.7%, highlighting areas where almost all SFR properties are investor-held.

NY-Jefferson-13618 presents a notable correlation, appearing in both the top five by property count (300 properties) and by ownership percentage (36.2%). This suggests it is a moderately sized market that is also highly attractive to investors, leading to a high concentration of landlord-owned housing.

Conversely, high-rate regions like 13602 (100.0%) or 13692 (66.7%) do not appear in the top-by-count list, implying these are smaller sub-geographies where almost all available SFR properties have been acquired by landlords, rather than large-volume markets.

Total SFR inventory varies significantly across these top regions, from 8,130 properties in 13601 to just 829 properties in 13618, indicating investors are active in markets of diverse sizes. However, acquisition prices and landlord entity counts by region were not provided, limiting deeper geographic market analysis.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Jefferson County Landlords Were Strong Net Buyers in 2025 with a 12.43x Buy/Sell Ratio, While Institutions Were Net Sellers
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Jefferson County exhibited strong net buying activity throughout 2025, accumulating 920 SFR properties while selling only 74, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 12.43x. This sustained acquisition momentum signals confidence in the local market.

The net buying trend for all landlords was consistent quarterly, with 164 buys against 10 sells in Q4 (16.4x ratio), 272 buys vs 24 sells in Q3 (11.33x ratio), and 289 buys vs 17 sells in Q2 (17.0x ratio), showcasing persistent growth in landlord portfolios.

In contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ properties) were net sellers for the entirety of 2025, selling 14 properties while only acquiring 6. This represents a net divestment of 8 properties, indicating a strategic retreat or portfolio rebalancing by large-scale entities in Jefferson County.

Despite their overall net selling position in 2025, institutional investors did show a minor shift in Q4, becoming net buyers with 3 acquisitions against 1 sale. This might signal a cautious re-entry or opportunistic buying within a broader divestment strategy.

Year-over-year comparison shows consistent activity levels for all landlords, with 920 buys and 74 sells in 2025, closely mirroring 923 buys and 68 sells in 2024. This stability suggests a predictable and sustained level of landlord-driven transactions.

Specific data on the percentage of transactions between landlords (inter-landlord transfers) and average buy vs. sell prices for all timeframes was not provided, limiting the ability to analyze market liquidity or implied profit margins from these transactions.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 42.5% of All Q4 Transactions in Jefferson County
Detailed Findings

Landlords were central to the Jefferson County real estate market in Q4 2025, participating in 164 transactions, which represents a substantial 42.5% share of the total 386 SFR transactions during the quarter. This indicates a high level of landlord engagement in market activity.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, conducting 151 transactions in Q4, vastly outpacing all other tiers. This tier also paid the highest average purchase price at $245,491, suggesting that smaller, individual investors are paying closer to market rates or for premium single properties.

A notable pricing disparity exists across tiers: institutional investors (1000+ properties) acquired properties at an average price of $167,718, which is a considerable 31.7% less than the average $245,491 paid by single-property landlords. Mid-size landlords (Tier 51-100) secured the lowest average price at $71,244.

Inter-landlord trading activity was relatively low in Q4. Only 6 (4.0%) of single-property transactions involved buying from another landlord, while two-property landlords had the highest percentage at 25.0% (1 transaction), indicating that most landlord acquisitions are from non-landlord sellers.

The highest concentration of Q4 transaction volume clearly resides with mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who together accounted for 158 transactions. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) were involved in only 3 transactions, reinforcing their limited direct market participation in this quarter.

The absence of an average purchase price for the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, despite recording 1 transaction, suggests an anomaly in the data, possibly a non-purchase transaction or an unrecorded price, highlighting the sporadic nature of activity in some smaller tiers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Dominate Jefferson County; Institutions Net Sellers Amidst Low Q4 Landlord Acquisitions
Holdings
Landlords own 6,066 SFR properties in Jefferson County, representing 23.2% of the total SFR market. Individual investors hold the vast majority, with 5,635 properties (92.9%) compared to companies owning 582 properties (9.6%).
Pricing
Landlords paid 1.5% less than homeowners in Q4 2025, securing an average discount of $3,543 per property ($237,909 vs $241,452), a significant shift from the premiums observed earlier in the year.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 119 properties, making up 43.9% of all SFR sales, with 151 new single-property landlords (Tier 01 entities) entering the market. Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly drove this activity, accounting for 95.0% of all landlord purchases.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.1% of investor-owned housing in Jefferson County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own just 0.2% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors hold 93.0% of single-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (56.9% company-owned), signifying a clear shift in ownership structure with portfolio scale.
Transactions
Overall, Jefferson County landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 with a 12.43x buy/sell ratio (920 buys vs 74 sells), while institutional investors were net sellers for the year, divesting 14 properties against 6 acquisitions.
Market Narrative

The Jefferson County real estate market is significantly influenced by landlord activity, with investors owning 6,066 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 23.2% of the county's total SFR market. This landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who control 92.9% of all investor-owned properties, effectively challenging the narrative of large corporate ownership. Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing portfolios of 1-10 properties, hold a commanding 99.1% of the investor-owned housing, with the single-property tier alone accounting for 91.1% of the entire portfolio, demonstrating a highly fragmented market structure.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw landlords participating in a substantial 43.9% of all SFR purchases, acquiring 119 properties. These landlords demonstrated a pricing advantage, securing an average 1.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, although this trend was volatile throughout the year. The surge of 151 new single-property landlords entering the market underscores sustained interest from smaller investors. While overall landlords were strong net buyers in 2025 with a 12.43x buy-to-sell ratio, institutional investors (1000+ properties) exhibited a contrasting trend, acting as net sellers for the year, signaling a potential shift in their local market strategy.

This data highlights Jefferson County as a robust market for individual and small-scale investors who continue to expand their portfolios, predominantly sourcing properties from non-landlord sellers. The limited presence and net selling activity of institutional investors suggest that this market, at least for now, remains largely inaccessible or less appealing to large-scale corporate entities. Geographic analysis reveals concentrated investor activity in specific zip codes, with NY-Jefferson-13601 leading in property count while other smaller regions show extremely high landlord penetration rates, indicative of diverse and localized investment opportunities.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 10:27 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJefferson (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership