Chenango (NY) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Chenango (NY) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Chenango (NY)
11,414
Total Investors in Chenango (NY)
2,889
Investor Owned SFR in Chenango (NY)
2,315(20.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,688
SFR Owned
2,127
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
201
SFR Owned
217
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,315 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Chenango County's SFR Market, Acquiring 50% of Q4 Purchases
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.8% of investor-owned SFR properties in Chenango County, owning 2,127 of the 2,315 investor-held properties. These investors were aggressive net buyers in 2025, with a 9.64x buy/sell ratio, capturing 50.0% of all Q4 SFR purchases while securing a 4.0% discount compared to homeowners. Institutional investors show a negligible presence and no transaction activity.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,315 SFR properties, with individuals holding 91.9% of the portfolio.
Nearly all investor-owned properties are rented, totaling 2,300 properties; 1,733 properties are held outright in cash, significantly outnumbering the 582 financed properties. These investor holdings represent 20.3% of Chenango County's 11,414 total SFR properties, with 2,315 properties confirmed as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 4.0% discount in Q4, paying $163,215 compared to homeowners' $170,039.
The landlord pricing advantage in Q4 ($6,824 discount) marks a shift from Q2 and Q3, where landlords paid premiums of $10,028 (6.5%) and $24,245 (13.5%) respectively. Landlords maintained a substantial discount in Q1 (18.8%), highlighting a volatile price gap quarter-over-quarter. Despite reported average acquisition prices, current quarter data indicates no distinct landlord properties were recorded as purchased for these periods, suggesting the averages may reflect a low volume or historical context for comparisons.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 50.0% of Q4 SFR purchases in Chenango County, acquiring 52 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 investor activity, accounting for all 52 landlord purchases (100.0%). The Single-property tier alone recorded 50 purchases, driven by 73 new entities entering the market, while institutional investors showed no Q4 purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.8% of investor-owned SFR properties in Chenango County.
The Single-property tier (Tier 01) alone constitutes 91.5% of the total investor portfolio, holding 2,136 properties, highlighting the profound dominance of small-scale investors. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible share, with only 1 property representing 0.0% of the market. There is no available data to compare acquisition prices by tier for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 58.8% of properties.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate smaller portfolios, holding 92.5% of single-property (Tier 01) and 88.5% of two-property (Tier 02) holdings. Above 10 properties, companies solidify their dominance, owning 66.7% of properties in the 101-1000 tier. The single institutional property (1000+ tier) in the county is likely company-owned, consistent with institutional definitions.
Geographic Distribution
NY-Chenango-13460 leads with 218 investor-owned properties, signaling concentrated activity.
Zip codes NY-Chenango-13124 and NY-Chenango-13072 exhibit the highest investor ownership rates at 36.4% and 36.0% respectively, indicating deep landlord penetration in these micro-markets. NY-Chenango-13801 is notable for being in both the top 5 by count (98 properties) and top 3 by percentage (31.0%), showing significant activity and market share.
Historical Transactions
Chenango County landlords are strong net buyers, with a 9.64x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Landlords accumulated 216 net properties in 2025 (241 buys vs 25 sells), indicating significant expansion. This strong buying trend continues into Q4 2025, with 75 buys against only 3 sells, resulting in a 25.0x buy/sell ratio for the quarter. Data for institutional investor transactions, inter-landlord purchase percentages, and average buy/sell prices is not available in this section.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 50.7% of Q4 transactions, signaling robust market participation.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for all 75 landlord transactions in Q4, while institutional investors registered no activity. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) had an average purchase price of $166,721, and only a small fraction (5.5%) of their purchases, 4 properties, were acquired from other landlords, suggesting acquisitions primarily from traditional sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,315 SFR properties, with individuals holding 91.9% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned Single Family Residential (SFR) market in Chenango County, holding 2,127 properties, which accounts for 91.9% of the total 2,315 investor-owned properties. Company-owned properties constitute a significantly smaller portion at 217 properties, or 9.4% of the market.

The overall landlord-owned portfolio comprises 2,315 SFR properties, representing 20.3% of the total 11,414 SFR properties in Chenango County. This indicates a substantial portion of the housing stock is dedicated to rental purposes, consistent with the definition of investor-owned properties being non-owner-occupied.

Analyzing property type composition reveals a strong preference for cash acquisitions among landlords. A total of 1,733 properties are owned outright in cash, far exceeding the 582 properties that are financed. This suggests a market where investors may prioritize lower debt exposure or have readily available capital for purchases.

Nearly all investor-owned properties are actively rented, with 2,300 properties classified as such. This close alignment with the total investor-owned count (2,315) underscores the primary focus of these holdings as income-generating rental assets within the county.

By entity count, individual landlords number 2,688, making up 93.0% of the total 2,889 landlords. This reinforces the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the investor market in Chenango County, where a large number of individual owners collectively manage the vast majority of rental properties, rather than a few large corporate entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 4.0% discount in Q4, paying $163,215 compared to homeowners' $170,039.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Chenango County acquired properties at an average price of $163,215, marking a 4.0% discount compared to traditional homeowners, who paid $170,039. This represents a saving of $6,824 per property for landlords during the quarter.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown significant volatility throughout 2025. While Q4 saw landlords benefiting from a discount, Q3 recorded landlords paying a substantial premium of $24,245 (13.5%) at an average of $203,498 versus homeowners' $179,253. Similarly, in Q2, landlords paid a $10,028 premium (6.5%) at $164,212 compared to homeowners' $154,184.

The first quarter of 2025 presented the largest landlord advantage, with investors securing an 18.8% discount, paying $144,142 against homeowners' $177,472, a difference of $33,330. This highlights a dynamic market where pricing opportunities for landlords have fluctuated drastically each quarter.

A notable trend across the listed timeframes is the absence of distinct SFR properties purchased by landlords, with '0 properties' recorded for each quarter and year from 2024 onwards. This suggests a period of extremely low or no new acquisition activity for landlords in the county, despite the presence of comparative average prices.

The given average prices for landlords in 2025 ($171,395) and 2024 ($160,443), along with pandemic-era prices (2020-2023) at $144,050, reveal a gradual increase in acquisition costs over time. However, the lack of recent purchase volume means these averages likely reflect a limited dataset or historical trends rather than ongoing robust market entry.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 50.0% of Q4 SFR purchases in Chenango County, acquiring 52 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Chenango County were highly active in Q4 2025, securing 52 of the total 104 SFR purchases, effectively capturing 50.0% of the market. This indicates that half of all single-family homes sold in the quarter were acquired for investment purposes.

The entirety of landlord purchase activity in Q4 was driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of the 52 landlord-owned properties acquired. This underscores the grassroots nature of the investor market in this geography, with no purchases recorded from larger, institutional players.

The Single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, responsible for 50 of the 52 landlord purchases (96.2%). This tier also saw 73 entities involved, suggesting a significant influx of new individual landlords or those expanding their portfolios with a single additional property.

In stark contrast to mom-and-pop activity, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) recorded no purchases in Q4, representing 0.0% of landlord acquisitions. This highlights their minimal or non-existent role in the recent acquisition market within Chenango County.

The remaining landlord purchases were modest, with the Two-property tier (Tier 02) accounting for 1 property (1.9%) by 1 entity, and the Small landlord tier (6-10 properties, Tier 04) also purchasing 1 property (1.9%) by 1 entity. This further emphasizes the concentration of Q4 activity at the smallest end of the investor spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 98.8% of investor-owned SFR properties in Chenango County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), defined as those owning 1-10 properties, overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Chenango County, controlling a remarkable 98.8% of all investor-held properties. This translates to 2,306 out of 2,315 total investor properties, emphasizing their foundational role.

The market's concentration is particularly acute within the Single-property tier (Tier 01), where 2,136 properties are owned by landlords with just one property, accounting for 91.5% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This makes first-time or single-property landlords the backbone of the rental housing supply.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a minimal share, totaling 28 properties or approximately 1.2% of the market. This segment includes 18 properties in the 11-20 tier, 5 in the 21-50 tier, 2 in the 51-100 tier, and 3 in the 101-1000 tier, showcasing limited scaling beyond the mom-and-pop level.

Institutional investors (Tier 09), defined as owning 1000+ properties, have an almost non-existent presence in Chenango County, with only 1 property recorded. This accounts for a negligible 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR market, starkly contrasting with national narratives of institutional expansion.

The breakdown of ownership clearly indicates that local, small-scale investors are the primary drivers and holders of rental housing in Chenango County. The combined shares of the Two-property (3.7%), Small landlord (3-5 properties, 2.8%), and Small landlord (6-10 properties, 0.7%) tiers further solidify this pattern of decentralized ownership.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 58.8% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across the smaller portfolio tiers. In the Single-property tier (Tier 01), individuals own 1,998 properties, representing 92.5% of holdings, while companies own 163 properties (7.5%). This pattern continues into the Two-property tier (Tier 02), where individuals hold 77 properties (88.5%) compared to 10 properties (11.5%) for companies.

A clear crossover point occurs at the Small landlord tier (6-10 properties), where companies become the majority owners. In this tier, companies own 10 properties (58.8%), surpassing individual owners who hold 7 properties (41.2%). This marks a shift in ownership structure as portfolio size increases.

For larger portfolios, companies further solidify their dominance. In the Large tier (101-1000 properties), companies own 2 properties (66.7%), while individuals hold just 1 property (33.3%). This trend indicates that larger-scale investing, even if limited in volume in Chenango County, is primarily driven by corporate entities.

The Small landlord tier (3-5 properties) also reflects individual investor strength, with 58 properties (87.9%) owned by individuals and 8 properties (12.1%) by companies. This consistent individual majority for portfolios up to five properties underscores their foundational presence in the county's investor market.

While specific data for the single institutional property (1000+ tier) by owner type is not provided, given the typical structure of institutional investors, it is highly probable that this one property is company-owned, aligning with the observed corporate shift in larger tiers.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NY-Chenango-13460 leads with 218 investor-owned properties, signaling concentrated activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Chenango County are highly concentrated within specific zip codes. NY-Chenango-13460 leads by count, with 218 investor-owned properties, representing a 23.3% investor ownership rate within that area. This indicates a significant concentration of rental housing in this particular sub-geography.

Beyond raw counts, other zip codes demonstrate even higher investor penetration rates. NY-Chenango-13124 leads in this metric with 36.4% of its SFR properties being investor-owned, closely followed by NY-Chenango-13072 at 36.0%. These areas show that more than a third of their housing stock is held by landlords, signifying a deeply embedded rental market.

The zip code NY-Chenango-13801 stands out for its dual presence in both top lists. It ranks second by investor-owned property count with 98 properties and third by investor ownership rate at 31.0%. This indicates a robust and highly active investor market within this specific region of Chenango County.

Other key areas by count include NY-Chenango-13780 with 85 investor-owned properties (29.6% rate) and NY-Chenango-13809 with 55 properties (20.8% rate). These figures further illustrate the varied landscape of investor activity across different local areas within the county.

The data highlights a distinct pattern of localized investment hotspots. While some areas show high volumes of investor-owned properties, others exhibit a higher proportional rate of ownership, suggesting varying market dynamics and investor strategies across Chenango County's sub-geographies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Chenango County landlords are strong net buyers, with a 9.64x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Chenango County have been consistently strong net buyers, actively expanding their portfolios throughout 2025. Cumulatively for the year, they completed 241 buy transactions against only 25 sell transactions, resulting in a net acquisition of 216 properties and an impressive buy/sell ratio of 9.64x.

This robust buying activity accelerated dramatically in Q4 2025, with landlords executing 75 buy transactions while selling only 3 properties. This resulted in a net increase of 72 properties for the quarter, pushing the buy/sell ratio to an exceptionally high 25.0x, indicating aggressive accumulation of assets.

The trend of net buying is consistent across the year. In Q3, landlords recorded 62 buys against 12 sells (5.17x ratio), and in Q2, they made 64 buys with 6 sells (10.67x ratio). These quarterly figures confirm sustained landlord confidence and expansion efforts.

Comparing 2025 to the previous year, landlords remained active net buyers in 2024 as well, with 288 buy transactions against 33 sells, resulting in 255 net acquisitions. This consistent pattern over multiple years underscores a long-term strategy of portfolio growth rather than short-term trading.

Notably, there is no transaction data available for institutional investors (1000+ tier) in this section, suggesting their transactional presence in Chenango County is either minimal or non-existent, further reinforcing the dominance of smaller, individual landlords in the market's activity.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 50.7% of Q4 transactions, signaling robust market participation.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Chenango County played a pivotal role in the Q4 2025 real estate market, participating in 75 of the total 148 SFR transactions. This means landlords accounted for a significant 50.7% of all property transactions during the quarter, highlighting their strong influence on market activity.

All landlord transactions in Q4 were exclusively conducted by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who collectively completed 75 transactions. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) recorded no transactions whatsoever, emphasizing the local and small-scale nature of the county's investment market.

The Single-property tier (Tier 01) was the most active segment, responsible for 73 transactions, demonstrating that the market's activity is heavily weighted towards new or very small-scale landlords. These single-property transactions had an average purchase price of $166,721.

Inter-landlord trading among single-property landlords (Tier 01) was minimal, with only 4 out of 73 transactions (5.5%) originating from other landlords. This low percentage suggests that the majority of Q4 acquisitions by this dominant tier were from traditional homeowners or non-investor sellers, rather than existing investor inventory.

Other mom-and-pop tiers showed limited Q4 transaction activity: the Two-property tier (Tier 02) completed 1 transaction at an average price of $50,600, and the Small landlord tier (6-10 properties, Tier 04) also completed 1 transaction at an average price of $55,000. No transactions in these tiers were from other landlords.

The overall Q4 transaction data reinforces the consistent dominance of mom-and-pop investors in Chenango County, not only in terms of ownership but also in driving market liquidity and acquisition patterns, primarily through direct purchases from non-investor sellers.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Chenango County's SFR Market, Owning 98.8% and Net Buying Aggressively
Holdings
Landlords own 2,315 SFR properties in Chenango County, representing 20.3% of the total SFR market. Individual investors dominate, holding 2,127 properties (91.9%) compared to 217 properties (9.4%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords secured a 4.0% discount, paying an average of $163,215 for properties compared to homeowners at $170,039, saving $6,824 per property. However, pricing trends were highly volatile in 2025, with landlords paying premiums in Q2 ($10,028) and Q3 ($24,245) but securing a substantial discount in Q1 ($33,330).
Activity
Landlords accounted for a significant 50.0% of all SFR purchases in Q4, acquiring 52 properties, an activity exclusively driven by mom-and-pop investors. This quarter also saw 73 new single-property landlords entering the market, signaling robust grassroots investment.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned housing in Chenango County, with the single-property tier alone holding 91.5% (2,136 properties). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.0% share, represented by just one property.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate smaller portfolios, holding 92.5% of single-property and 88.5% of two-property assets. However, companies gain majority control at the 6-10 property tier, owning 58.8% of properties in that segment, and extending their dominance in larger portfolios.
Transactions
Landlords in Chenango County are strong net buyers, with a 9.64x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (241 buys vs 25 sells), and a massive 25.0x ratio in Q4 alone (75 buys vs 3 sells). Institutional investors registered no transaction activity in either Q4 or 2025 overall.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Chenango County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, individual landlords. A total of 2,315 SFR properties, representing 20.3% of the county's SFR market, are investor-owned. Individual investors own 91.9% (2,127 properties) of this portfolio, with companies holding a mere 9.4% (217 properties). This structure is further emphasized by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling an astounding 98.8% of all investor-owned housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning only one property.

Landlords demonstrated robust activity in Q4 2025, accounting for 50.0% of all SFR purchases (52 properties), a buying spree entirely driven by mom-and-pop investors. Despite no distinct landlord acquisitions recorded in recent quarters, comparative pricing data indicates landlords secured a 4.0% discount in Q4, paying $163,215 compared to homeowners' $170,039. Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers, evidenced by a 9.64x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 and an even higher 25.0x ratio in Q4, indicating active portfolio expansion, primarily among the smallest investor tiers.

This data reveals a highly localized and small-investor-driven rental market in Chenango County, diverging significantly from narratives of institutional dominance often highlighted nationally. The market's resilience and growth are clearly fueled by individual investors building small portfolios, with a strong emphasis on cash holdings for over 75% of properties. This trend suggests a foundational market built on local capital and individual initiative, rather than large corporate strategies, making the county less susceptible to large institutional shifts but potentially more sensitive to local economic changes impacting individual landlord solvency.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 10:14 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyChenango (NY)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct