Roosevelt (NM) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Roosevelt (NM) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Roosevelt (NM)
5,811
Total Investors in Roosevelt (NM)
2,445
Investor Owned SFR in Roosevelt (NM)
2,381(41.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
2,263
SFR Owned
1,921
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
182
SFR Owned
482
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 2,381 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Roosevelt County with 90.6% Ownership, Driving 57.6% of Q4 SFR Purchases
In Roosevelt County, NM, landlords own 2,381 SFR properties, representing 41.0% of the market, with individuals holding 80.7% of these. Q4 saw landlords acquire 57.6% of all SFR purchases, predominantly driven by mom-and-pop investors who control 90.6% of the overall investor-owned portfolio. While landlords demonstrated a strong net buyer position with a 5.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4, they paradoxically paid a significant 27.1% premium over traditional homeowners during the same period.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 2,381 SFR properties in Roosevelt County, with individuals holding 80.7% of the portfolio.
A significant 96.6% of these properties are rented, indicating a strong rental market focus, with 80.9% acquired via cash transactions versus 19.1% through financing. Individual landlords outnumber companies by over 12:1, representing 2,263 entities.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords in Roosevelt County paid a significant $65,633 premium (27.1%) over homeowners in Q4 2025.
This Q4 premium marks a continued trend from Q3 and Q2 where landlords paid 34.6% and 11.9% more respectively, a stark reversal from the 62.1% discount observed in Q1 2025. It is important to note that the provided data shows 0 properties acquired by landlords in these quarters, indicating these averages might represent market-level pricing rather than direct transactions in Roosevelt County.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords secured 57.6% of all SFR purchases in Roosevelt County during Q4 2025, acquiring 34 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly dominated Q4 buying, accounting for 97.1% (33 properties) of all landlord purchases, while institutional investors acquired just 1 property. A significant 37 new single-property landlords entered the market, acquiring 25 properties and driving the majority of activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 90.6% of investor-owned SFR in Roosevelt County.
This dominance is driven by single-property owners (Tier 01) holding 57.4% of the portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties), despite media attention, account for just 5.0% of the total investor-owned properties. Unfortunately, current data does not provide specific acquisition price variations by tier to compare mom-and-pop vs. institutional pricing directly for overall holdings.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners over individuals in Roosevelt County at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 95.7% of properties.
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, owning 93.3% of single-property (Tier 01) holdings. This trend continues with individuals holding 86.6% in the two-property tier and 84.5% in the 6-10 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 88130 in Roosevelt County leads with 2,205 investor-owned SFR properties, showing high concentration.
Zip Code 88134 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 75.0%, indicating a deeply saturated investor market. Zip Code 88116 also shows significant investor concentration, with 80 properties owned by investors and a high ownership rate of 66.7%.
Historical Transactions
All landlords are strong net buyers in Roosevelt County with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 5.33x (48 buys vs 9 sells).
Institutional investors, in contrast, maintained a stable position in Q4 with 1 buy and 1 sell, showing neither accumulation nor divestment. Overall landlord buy prices consistently exceeded sell prices, indicating an implied profit margin on dispositions, with Q4 buy prices averaging $276,432 compared to sell prices of $142,500.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords comprised 54.5% of all SFR transactions in Roosevelt County during Q4 2025, with 48 total transactions.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly drove this activity, accounting for 97.9% of landlord transactions, while institutional investors participated in only 1 transaction. Single-property landlords paid an average of $302,814, while smaller multi-property landlords (Tiers 02 and 03) paid a higher average of $360,385. Inter-landlord trading was minimal, with only 16.2% of single-property transactions originating from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 2,381 SFR properties in Roosevelt County, with individuals holding 80.7% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

In Roosevelt County, NM, landlords collectively own 2,381 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting a substantial 41.0% of the entire SFR market of 5,811 properties. This indicates a highly active investor presence shaping the local housing landscape.

Individual investors, often known as mom-and-pop landlords, are the overwhelming majority, controlling 1,921 properties, which accounts for 80.7% of all investor-owned SFRs. Conversely, company-owned properties represent a smaller segment at 482 properties, or 20.2% of the investor portfolio.

The dominance of individual investors is further highlighted by entity counts, with 2,263 individual landlords compared to just 182 company landlords, creating a striking ratio of 12.4 individuals for every company in the market. This structure challenges the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental sector in Roosevelt County.

A remarkable 96.6% of landlord-owned properties, totaling 2,301 units, are rented, emphasizing a clear focus on income generation rather than owner-occupancy. This high rental rate confirms landlords' primary role as providers of rental housing in the county.

The acquisition methods reveal a strong preference for cash transactions, with 1,927 properties (80.9%) purchased outright, suggesting financial strength among investors or a strategic avoidance of interest-bearing debt. Only 454 properties (19.1%) are financed, indicating a lower reliance on traditional lending for property acquisition.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords in Roosevelt County paid a significant $65,633 premium (27.1%) over homeowners in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to common market assumptions, landlords in Roosevelt County, NM, paid a notable premium for SFR properties compared to traditional homeowners in recent quarters. In Q4 2025, landlords' average acquisition price was $307,611, an substantial $65,633 (27.1%) higher than the $241,978 paid by homeowners.

This premium trend has persisted, with landlords also paying more in previous quarters: a $64,089 (34.6%) premium in Q3 ($249,509 vs $185,420) and a $22,015 (11.9%) premium in Q2 ($206,558 vs $184,543). This consistent overpayment by investors suggests a high demand or specific property targeting by landlords in this market.

However, this trend presents a dramatic shift from Q1 2025, where landlords acquired properties at an average of $90,078, securing a remarkable $147,827 (62.1%) discount compared to homeowners who paid $237,905. This single quarter's deep discount stands out as an anomaly within the year's otherwise premium-paying trend for landlords.

The acquisition data provided indicates that 0 properties were acquired by landlords in each of the listed timeframes (Q1-Q4 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, Years 2020-2023) for Roosevelt County. This suggests that while average prices are presented, these may reflect broader market pricing or theoretical valuations rather than actual property purchases by landlords within the county during those specific periods. Therefore, direct inferences about acquisition trends based on these "0 properties" counts should be made with caution.

Despite the lack of direct acquisition counts, the average landlord acquisition prices have shown significant volatility. From a pandemic-era average of $165,338 (2020-2023), the average price surged to $242,108 in 2025, representing a 46.4% increase. This indicates substantial price appreciation within the market, even as landlord activity levels, by direct count, remain minimal.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords secured 57.6% of all SFR purchases in Roosevelt County during Q4 2025, acquiring 34 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords demonstrated a significant presence in the Q4 2025 housing market in Roosevelt County, NM, acquiring 34 SFR properties. This represents a substantial 57.6% of all 59 SFR purchases made during the quarter, highlighting investors' strong buying activity compared to other buyer types.

The quarter's acquisition activity was overwhelmingly driven by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who purchased 33 properties, constituting 97.1% of all landlord acquisitions. This contrasts sharply with institutional investors (1000+ properties), who acquired only 1 property, representing a mere 2.9% of landlord purchases in Q4.

A notable surge in new investor entry was observed, with 37 distinct entities identifying as single-property landlords (Tier 01) entering the market in Q4, collectively purchasing 25 properties. This indicates a robust influx of first-time or small-scale investors actively expanding their portfolios.

Tier 01, representing single-property landlords, was the most active segment, responsible for 73.5% (25 properties) of all landlord purchases. Following in activity were small landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03), acquiring 4 properties (11.8%), underscoring the fragmented, small-investor driven nature of the market.

The average properties per entity in Tier 01 during Q4 stood at 0.68, reflecting that while 37 entities were active, some might have acquired properties in earlier periods, or their Q4 acquisitions were part of smaller, initial entries into the market. This tier clearly represents the backbone of recent landlord buying activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 90.6% of investor-owned SFR in Roosevelt County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those with 1 to 10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert significant control over the investor-owned SFR market in Roosevelt County, NM, collectively holding a commanding 90.6% of the total portfolio. This concentration underscores the market's reliance on small-scale investors rather than large entities.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market structure, owning 1,443 properties, which alone represents 57.4% of all investor-held SFR. This highlights the accessibility and appeal of individual property investment in the county, making it a market largely shaped by new and small-scale landlords.

In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09), defined as those with 1000 or more properties, maintain a relatively minor presence, controlling only 125 properties, which equates to 5.0% of the total investor-owned SFR. This figure is substantially lower than the mom-and-pop share, challenging perceptions of widespread institutional dominance in this local market.

The distribution extends beyond single-property owners, with Tiers 02 (two properties) and 03 (three-to-five properties) holding 8.6% (216 properties) and 17.5% (440 properties) respectively. Even small landlords (Tier 04, 6-10 properties) contribute 7.2% (181 properties), reinforcing the fragmented, non-corporate ownership landscape.

While the data provides a clear picture of ownership distribution, specific average acquisition prices broken down by tier across all timeframes are not available in the current section. This limitation prevents a direct comparison of how acquisition costs vary between different investor sizes based on their total holdings.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners over individuals in Roosevelt County at the 11-20 property tier, controlling 95.7% of properties.
Detailed Findings

The ownership structure in Roosevelt County, NM, reveals a distinct shift from individual to company dominance as portfolio size increases. Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller tiers, holding a commanding 93.3% of single-property (Tier 01) portfolios (1,354 properties). This pattern persists through the two-property (Tier 02) segment at 86.6% (187 properties) and the 6-10 property (Tier 04) segment at 84.5% (153 properties).

The critical crossover point where companies become the majority owners occurs within the 11-20 properties tier (Tier 05). In this tier, company investors own a significant 95.7% (22 properties), dramatically surpassing the 4.3% (1 property) held by individuals. This clearly marks the threshold for scalable corporate investment in the county.

Even in the mid-range tiers, such as 3-5 properties (Tier 03), individual ownership remains strong at 78.9% (347 properties), indicating that the mom-and-pop investor model is deeply entrenched across a wide spectrum of portfolio sizes before corporate entities truly take over.

The data highlights that company ownership, though a minority in the overall market, begins to concentrate and achieve majority status in larger, albeit still mid-sized, investment portfolios. This suggests that while companies may not enter the market at the single-property level as frequently as individuals, they scale up more rapidly once established.

This section primarily details ownership counts by tier and owner type. However, a direct comparison of acquisition prices between individual and company buyers within each tier is not provided in the available data, preventing insights into differing purchasing strategies based on entity type and portfolio size.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 88130 in Roosevelt County leads with 2,205 investor-owned SFR properties, showing high concentration.
Detailed Findings

Within Roosevelt County, NM, investor-owned SFR properties are highly concentrated in specific zip codes. Zip Code 88130 emerges as the dominant hub for investor activity, housing a substantial 2,205 landlord-owned properties, which represents 40.3% of its total SFR inventory. This makes it the most significant area by sheer volume of investor holdings.

While Zip Code 88130 leads in property count, Zip Code 88134 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate within the county, with 75.0% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This high percentage signifies a highly penetrated market where three out of four homes are likely rentals or non-owner-occupied investments.

Zip Code 88116 also shows a strong combination of high investor count and rate, with 80 landlord-owned properties and a significant 66.7% investor ownership rate. This indicates that more than two-thirds of SFR properties in this area are held by investors, suggesting a robust rental market or active investment environment.

The provided data for other zip codes (88123, 88124, 88125) is incomplete, preventing a comprehensive comparison across all sub-geographies in Roosevelt County. However, the available information clearly identifies key hotspots for investment activity based on both volume and market penetration.

Unfortunately, the available section10.csv data does not include average acquisition prices for these specific sub-geographies. Therefore, insights into how property values for investor acquisitions vary across these regions cannot be provided at this time, limiting a full understanding of regional pricing dynamics.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
All landlords are strong net buyers in Roosevelt County with a Q4 buy/sell ratio of 5.33x (48 buys vs 9 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Roosevelt County, NM, are decisively net buyers, consistently acquiring significantly more properties than they sell across all analyzed timeframes. In Q4 2025 alone, landlords executed 48 purchases against only 9 sales, resulting in a robust buy/sell ratio of 5.33x, indicating strong market confidence and growth in their portfolios.

This net buying trend is not a recent phenomenon; it extends throughout 2025 (209 buys vs 27 sells, 7.74x ratio) and 2024 (194 buys vs 26 sells, 7.46x ratio). The highest quarterly activity was seen in Q3 2025 with 73 buys and 6 sells, achieving an impressive 12.17x buy/sell ratio, reflecting sustained demand from investors.

In contrast to the overall landlord market, institutional investors (1000+ properties) maintained a neutral stance in Q4 2025, with 1 buy and 1 sell transaction, signifying no net change in their portfolio. However, over the full year 2025, institutions were net buyers with 4 acquisitions against 2 dispositions, showing a cautious accumulation trend.

Analyzing average transaction prices, landlords consistently bought at higher prices than they sold. In Q4 2025, the average buy price was $276,432, while the average sell price was $142,500, suggesting an implied profit margin on sales of previously acquired, likely appreciating, assets. This pricing dynamic points to a healthy market for existing landlords looking to divest.

Across the entire historical period (All Time), landlords bought properties at an average of $158,162 and sold at $141,607. This long-term trend, combined with current quarter pricing, implies that landlords are strategically holding assets that have appreciated, then selling some at a profit, or are investing in higher-value properties in recent periods.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords comprised 54.5% of all SFR transactions in Roosevelt County during Q4 2025, with 48 total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a dominant role in the Roosevelt County, NM, SFR transaction market in Q4 2025, accounting for 48 transactions, which represents a significant 54.5% of the total 88 transactions recorded. This indicates that more than half of all SFR property exchanges involved an investor as a buyer or seller during the quarter.

Transaction volumes were overwhelmingly concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who engaged in 47 transactions, comprising 97.9% of all landlord activity. In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) participated in only 1 transaction, highlighting their minimal direct transactional impact in the current quarter.

A notable pricing pattern emerged across tiers: single-property landlords (Tier 01) acquired properties at an average price of $302,814. Interestingly, smaller multi-property landlords in Tier 02 (two properties) and Tier 03 (3-5 properties) paid a higher average of $360,385, suggesting they might be targeting different property types or locations than first-time investors. The average purchase price for institutional investors (Tier 09) was not provided.

Inter-landlord trading, where properties are bought from other landlords, was relatively low across the board. Only 16.2% of single-property landlord transactions (6 out of 37) involved purchasing from another landlord. This suggests that the majority of investor acquisitions are still coming from traditional homeowners or other sources, rather than an active churn within the investor community.

The clear disparity in transaction volume between mom-and-pop and institutional investors in Q4 aligns with the overall ownership distribution (Section 8), reinforcing that smaller investors are the primary drivers of market liquidity and portfolio growth in Roosevelt County, actively increasing their holdings while larger entities remain largely on the sidelines in terms of Q4 activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Roosevelt County with 90.6% Ownership, Driving 57.6% of Q4 SFR Purchases
Holdings
Landlords in Roosevelt County, NM, own 2,381 SFR properties, representing 41.0% of the total market, with individual investors holding 1,921 properties (80.7%) and companies owning 482 properties (20.2%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid a significant $65,633 premium, or 27.1% more, than traditional homeowners for SFR acquisitions, averaging $307,611 compared to $241,978.
Activity
Landlords acquired 34 properties in Q4 2025, representing 57.6% of all SFR purchases, predominantly driven by 37 new single-property landlords who entered the market, acquiring 25 properties.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 90.6% of investor-owned housing in Roosevelt County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold a minor share of 5.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors lead significantly in smaller portfolios, but companies achieve majority control at the 11-20 property tier, holding 95.7% of properties in that segment.
Transactions
Overall, landlords are strong net buyers with a 5.33x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (48 buys vs 9 sells), while institutional investors maintained a stable position with 1 buy and 1 sell, showing no net accumulation or divestment.
Market Narrative

Roosevelt County, NM, presents a distinct real estate investment landscape, heavily dominated by individual or mom-and-pop landlords. With 2,381 investor-owned Single Family Residential properties, landlords collectively control a substantial 41.0% of the county's SFR market. Individual investors are the overwhelming force, owning 80.7% (1,921 properties) of this portfolio, with their presence significantly outweighing corporate entities who hold 20.2% (482 properties). This market structure is further emphasized by the fact that mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) alone command 90.6% of all investor-owned housing, relegating institutional investors (1000+ properties) to a minor 5.0% share.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 saw landlords as highly active participants, securing 57.6% of all SFR purchases by acquiring 34 properties. This strong activity, predominantly driven by new entrants, saw 37 single-property landlords acquire 25 properties during the quarter. Paradoxically, landlords paid a considerable premium, averaging $307,611 in Q4, which was 27.1% higher than the $241,978 paid by traditional homeowners. Despite these higher acquisition costs, landlords across all tiers consistently maintained a strong net buyer position with a 5.33x buy/sell ratio (48 buys vs 9 sells) in Q4, indicating sustained confidence and growth. Institutional investors, however, showed a neutral transaction stance in Q4, with 1 buy and 1 sell.

These trends underscore a resilient and fragmented investor market in Roosevelt County, primarily fueled by smaller, individual landlords who are actively expanding their portfolios despite paying higher prices than traditional homeowners. The significant market penetration by investors, coupled with a preference for cash acquisitions (80.9%) and a high rental rate (96.6%), suggests a robust and mature rental market. The concentration of activity in specific zip codes, such as 88130 with 2,205 investor-owned properties and 88134 with a 75.0% investor ownership rate, further highlights localized investment hotbeds within the county.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 09:54 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyRoosevelt (NM)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail