Guadalupe (NM) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Guadalupe (NM) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Guadalupe (NM)
700
Total Investors in Guadalupe (NM)
371
Investor Owned SFR in Guadalupe (NM)
271(38.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
355
SFR Owned
261
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
16
SFR Owned
19
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 271 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Guadalupe County, Securing 67.1% Q4 Pricing Discounts
Landlords collectively own 271 SFR properties in Guadalupe County (38.7% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 96.3% share and mom-and-pop investors controlling 99.3% of the portfolio. In Q4, landlords made 44.4% of all SFR purchases, achieving a remarkable 67.1% discount over homeowner prices, with no institutional activity observed.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 271 SFR properties, comprising 38.7% of the market; individuals hold a dominant 96.3% share.
Nearly all landlord-owned properties (270 out of 271) are rented, underscoring a strong focus on rental income. A significant 254 properties were acquired with cash, signaling robust capital deployment in the market.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured an extraordinary 67.1% discount in Q4, paying $66,667 compared to homeowners' $202,895.
This represents a significant $136,228 per-property discount for landlords in Q4. Landlord acquisition prices have notably declined by 22.1% from the 2020-2023 average of $85,611 to $66,667 in Q4 2025, signaling a shift in market dynamics.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 44.4% of all Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pop investors driving 100.0% of this activity.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, acquiring 5 properties and representing 62.5% of landlord purchases. All 8 landlord purchases were by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with no institutional activity observed this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.3% of investor-owned SFR in Guadalupe County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, owning 240 properties (86.3% of the total investor-owned SFR). Institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share, indicating a non-institutionalized investor landscape.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers, peaking at 95.9% in the single-property tier.
Companies only reach a maximum of 20.8% ownership in the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, failing to achieve majority status in any tier. The single-property tier (Tier 01) exhibits the highest concentration of individual investors at 95.9%.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 88435 leads Guadalupe County with 181 investor-owned properties; 88353 boasts the highest rate at 76.7%.
Zip Codes 88435, 88353, and 87711 emerge as key investor hotspots, showing both high property counts and high investor ownership rates. The 88353 Zip Code has an exceptionally high investor penetration, with over three-quarters of its SFR properties being investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Data limitations prevent comprehensive analysis of historical transaction volumes and buy/sell ratios for landlords.
Specific numbers for overall landlord buy/sell activity, inter-landlord transactions, and institutional investor positions are unavailable in the provided data. Therefore, trends in transaction prices and net buyer/seller status cannot be definitively assessed for historical periods.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented 40.9% of all Q4 transactions, with no observed inter-landlord trading activity.
All 9 landlord transactions in Q4 were driven by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with single-property landlords leading at 5 transactions at an average price of $100,000. There were no institutional transactions and no properties bought from other landlords by any tier.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 271 SFR properties, comprising 38.7% of the market; individuals hold a dominant 96.3% share.
Detailed Findings

Guadalupe County landlords collectively own 271 SFR properties, representing a substantial 38.7% of the total 700 SFR properties in the market, demonstrating a significant investor footprint.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord landscape, owning 261 properties (96.3% of the landlord-owned portfolio), starkly contrasting with companies which own only 19 properties (7.0%). This highlights a market primarily composed of individual investors rather than large corporations.

The vast majority of landlord-owned SFR properties are rented, with 270 out of 271 properties generating rental income, underscoring the strong rental-focused nature of investor activity in this county.

Cash purchases are the predominant acquisition method, accounting for 254 properties, significantly outpacing financed properties at only 17. This suggests a market with a high degree of liquid capital among investors.

The entity count further emphasizes individual dominance, with 355 individual landlords compared to just 16 company landlords, a ratio of approximately 22 individual landlords for every company, reinforcing the local, independent nature of the investor base.

The close alignment of rented properties (270) with total investor-owned SFR (271) confirms that virtually all investor activity in Guadalupe County is directed towards non-owner-occupied rental investments, affirming the landlord definition.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured an extraordinary 67.1% discount in Q4, paying $66,667 compared to homeowners' $202,895.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Guadalupe County demonstrate exceptional pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $66,667, which is a remarkable $136,228 (67.1%) less than the average price paid by traditional homeowners ($202,895). This indicates a strong ability by investors to secure properties significantly below market value.

The available data suggests a downward trend in landlord acquisition prices, with the Q4 2025 average of $66,667 falling by $18,944 (22.1%) from the 2020-2023 average of $85,611. This could signal a shift towards more distressed or lower-priced inventory being acquired by investors post-pandemic.

While quarter-over-quarter comparison for the price gap is largely incomplete due to limited landlord transaction data in prior 2025 quarters, the Q4 data provides a clear snapshot of a substantial landlord discount.

The dramatic price difference underscores a highly opportunistic buying environment for landlords in Guadalupe County, suggesting they are either targeting different property types, employing sophisticated negotiation tactics, or benefiting from off-market deals.

The absence of significant recorded landlord acquisitions for most of 2024 and earlier 2025 quarters suggests either very low activity or data capture limitations for this specific geography outside of the identified Q4 purchases.

This profound discount of over two-thirds off homeowner prices in Q4 makes Guadalupe County an exceptionally attractive market for investors capable of sourcing undervalued SFR properties, presenting a unique market opportunity.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 44.4% of all Q4 SFR purchases, with mom-and-pop investors driving 100.0% of this activity.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, acquiring 8 out of 18 total SFR properties, which constitutes a significant 44.4% share of the market, demonstrating a strong presence in the county's housing transaction landscape.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) entirely dominated Q4 investor purchases, accounting for all 8 properties bought by landlords, or 100.0% of landlord-driven acquisitions. There was no recorded purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09), emphasizing the local market's structure.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of Q4 activity, purchasing 5 properties, which represents 62.5% of all landlord acquisitions this quarter. This highlights the ongoing entry and expansion of individual investors into the market.

The 5 entities identified in Tier 01 for Q4 suggest a notable influx of new single-property landlords entering the market, indicating accessibility and appeal for individual first-time or small-scale investors in Guadalupe County.

Small landlords (3-5 properties) were less active in terms of property volume, with 2 entities collectively acquiring only 1 property, contributing 12.5% to landlord purchases, but still showing activity beyond single-property owners.

The complete absence of institutional purchases in Q4 strongly contrasts with the high activity of smaller landlords, underscoring the granular and locally-driven nature of the investor market in Guadalupe County.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.3% of investor-owned SFR in Guadalupe County.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Guadalupe County is almost entirely dominated by mom-and-pop landlords, who collectively control an overwhelming 99.3% of all investor-held properties across Tiers 01-04.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, owning 240 properties and accounting for 86.3% of the total investor-owned portfolio, highlighting a market structure heavily reliant on individual, small-scale investors.

Mid-size landlords (Tiers 02 and 03-05) hold significantly smaller but notable portions, with Tier 02 owning 17 properties (6.1%) and Tier 03-05 owning 19 properties (6.8%), contributing to the diverse mom-and-pop segment.

The complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) with 0.0% ownership share, directly contradicts the common narrative of large corporate entities dominating the housing market in this specific county.

While single-property landlords dominate overall ownership, Q4 purchase activity (62.5% from Tier 01) indicates that larger mom-and-pop tiers (Tier 02 at 25.0% and Tier 03-05 at 12.5% of Q4 purchases) were proportionally more active in acquiring new properties compared to their overall portfolio share, suggesting existing small landlords are expanding.

Only a minimal presence of larger investors exists with one property each in the Small-medium (11-20 properties) and Large (101-1000 properties) tiers, together accounting for just 0.8% of the total investor-owned properties, further emphasizing the small-scale nature of the market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors maintain majority ownership across all tiers, peaking at 95.9% in the single-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across all observed tiers in Guadalupe County, demonstrating the strong presence of independent landlords in the SFR market.

The highest concentration of individual ownership is found in the single-property tier (Tier 01), where individual investors hold 234 properties, representing 95.9% of that tier's total, emphasizing the mom-and-pop foundation of the market.

Company ownership remains a minority across all presented tiers; even at its highest in the small landlord (3-5 properties) tier, companies own only 5 properties (20.8%), with individuals retaining a substantial 79.2% of the holdings.

The data clearly reveals no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in any tier, reinforcing the narrative that large corporate entities have a limited footprint in this particular market segment.

In the two-property tier (Tier 02), individual investors own 15 properties (88.2%), significantly outnumbering companies which hold only 2 properties (11.8%).

This consistent pattern across tiers highlights a market where investor portfolios, regardless of size, are predominantly assembled and managed by individuals rather than corporate entities, contributing to the distinct market character of Guadalupe County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 88435 leads Guadalupe County with 181 investor-owned properties; 88353 boasts the highest rate at 76.7%.
Detailed Findings

Within Guadalupe County, Zip Code 88435 stands out as the primary hub for investor-owned properties, with 181 SFRs under landlord control, representing a substantial 32.4% of its local market, indicating a significant concentration of investor assets.

Conversely, Zip Code 88353 exhibits the highest investor penetration rate, with an impressive 76.7% of its SFR properties owned by landlords, despite having a smaller absolute count of 56 properties. This indicates a very high saturation of rental properties in this specific area.

Zip Code 87711 also shows significant investor activity, with 26 properties and an ownership rate of 51.0%, indicating over half of its SFR market is landlord-owned, making it another key area for investor focus.

There is a clear correlation between high property counts and high ownership percentages in the top regions, with Zip Codes 88353 and 87711 appearing on both top 5 lists, signifying concentrated investor interest in specific sub-geographies.

The smallest top region by count, 88431, despite having only 1 investor-owned property, shows a notable 50.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a very limited and potentially tightly held SFR market.

These distinct patterns highlight that investors are strategically concentrating their holdings within specific Guadalupe County zip codes, either seeking sheer volume in 88435 or high market dominance in 88353, reflecting targeted investment strategies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Data limitations prevent comprehensive analysis of historical transaction volumes and buy/sell ratios for landlords.
Detailed Findings

A comprehensive analysis of historical landlord transaction patterns, including buy/sell ratios and inter-landlord trading percentages, is not possible due to the absence of detailed data for all landlord transactions in the provided dataset.

Consequently, it is not possible to determine if landlords in Guadalupe County are net buyers or sellers overall across historical timeframes, nor can an implied margin be calculated by comparing average buy and sell prices.

Similarly, the transactional activity of institutional investors (1000+ tier) cannot be assessed as specific data for their buy and sell volumes, prices, or net positions is not available for historical periods.

The lack of historical transaction data prevents a critical understanding of market liquidity, investor sentiment shifts, and the long-term investment strategies employed by both individual and corporate landlords in the county.

Without this information, it is challenging to identify trends in acquisition and disposition velocities or to ascertain how the market has evolved in terms of investment cycles over time.

The absence of data on landlord-to-landlord transactions also limits insights into the internal dynamics of the investor market and the efficiency of property transfers within this segment, preventing a full picture of market churn.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented 40.9% of all Q4 transactions, with no observed inter-landlord trading activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were significantly engaged in the Q4 market, participating in 9 out of 22 total SFR transactions, which accounts for a substantial 40.9% share of all recorded activity in Guadalupe County.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all landlord transactions in Q4, totaling 9 transactions, further emphasizing the granular and independent nature of investor activity in this county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, undertaking 5 transactions at an average purchase price of $100,000, signaling continued entry and expansion by smaller-scale investors.

Notably, there was no recorded inter-landlord trading in Q4, as 0.0% of properties were bought from other landlords across all active tiers. This suggests that landlords primarily acquired properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

The data indicates a complete absence of transaction activity from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Q4, reinforcing their non-participation observed in ownership and purchase patterns, aligning with their zero ownership share.

While Tier 01 led in transaction volume, its share of Q4 transactions (55.6% of landlord transactions) was proportionally lower than its overall ownership share (86.3%), suggesting that existing smaller multi-property landlords (Tiers 02 and 03-05) were relatively more active in expanding their portfolios this quarter.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Reign in Guadalupe County, Capturing 99.3% Ownership and Deep Q4 Discounts.
Holdings
Landlords own 271 SFR properties in Guadalupe County, representing 38.7% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 261 properties (96.3%) and companies owning just 19 (7.0%).
Pricing
Landlords achieved an exceptional 67.1% discount in Q4 2025, paying an average of $66,667 compared to homeowners' $202,895, a savings of $136,228 per property. This also marks a 22.1% price decline for landlord acquisitions from the 2020-2023 average.
Activity
Landlords accounted for 44.4% of all Q4 SFR purchases, acquiring 8 properties, with 5 new single-property landlords entering the market. Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) were solely responsible for all Q4 landlord purchases.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.3% of investor-owned housing in Guadalupe County, with institutional investors (1000+) holding a 0.0% share. Single-property landlords alone own 86.3% of this portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all tiers, holding 95.9% of properties in the single-property tier, with companies never reaching majority ownership in any observed portfolio size. The county has 22 individual landlords for every company landlord.
Transactions
Historical transaction data is unavailable to determine overall landlord net buyer/seller status. In Q4, landlords made 9 transactions, but institutional investors had 0 transactions and there was no inter-landlord trading observed (0.0%).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Guadalupe County, New Mexico, is overwhelmingly dominated by individual and small-scale landlords. Of the 700 SFR properties in the market, 271 (38.7%) are investor-owned, with a striking 96.3% held by individual investors compared to just 7.0% by companies. This mom-and-pop ownership is further solidified by Tiers 01-04 controlling a massive 99.3% of the investor-owned portfolio, leaving institutional investors with no discernible presence, defying common market narratives.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive, value-driven acquisitions, almost entirely by mom-and-pop entities. Landlords secured properties at an extraordinary average price of $66,667, a 67.1% discount compared to the $202,895 paid by traditional homeowners, signaling a highly opportunistic market where investors are adept at finding significantly undervalued assets. Landlords drove 44.4% of all SFR purchases this quarter, with 5 new single-property landlords entering the market, indicating strong grassroots investment activity.

This data clearly indicates that Guadalupe County's SFR market is a stronghold for individual, small-scale investors, largely insulated from the influence of institutional capital. The deep discounts achieved by landlords in Q4 2025, combined with the complete absence of institutional activity and inter-landlord trading, highlight a unique market dynamic. This presents significant opportunities for individual investors seeking high-value deals and suggests a robust, locally-supported rental market, particularly concentrated in zip codes like 88353 with its 76.7% investor ownership rate.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 09:48 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGuadalupe (NM)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail