Colfax (NM) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Colfax (NM) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Colfax (NM)
6,662
Total Investors in Colfax (NM)
5,588
Investor Owned SFR in Colfax (NM)
4,266(64.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,987
SFR Owned
3,691
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
601
SFR Owned
744
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,266 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Drive Colfax County's Highly Investor-Penetrated Market Amidst Unusual Price Premiums
Landlords in Colfax County own 4,266 SFR properties, representing 64.0% of the total SFR market, with individual investors dominating at 86.5% of holdings. In Q4 2025, landlords acquired 66.3% of all SFR purchases and uniquely paid a 235.6% premium over traditional homeowners. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers with a 16.58x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, primarily led by mom-and-pop investors who control 94.6% of the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 86.5% of 4,266 landlord-owned SFR properties in Colfax County.
A staggering 99.5% (4,245) of investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong rental focus, with 75.3% (3,213) acquired via cash transactions. There are 4,987 individual landlords compared to 601 company landlords in the county.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 235.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, averaging $438,743 versus $130,721.
This unusual trend of landlords paying significantly more than homeowners was consistent throughout 2025, with premiums of 65.2% in Q3 ($453,131 vs $274,319) and 75.3% in Q2 ($492,193 vs $280,755). These reported average prices are based on system-wide data, as zero landlord acquisitions were specifically recorded for these timeframes in local datasets.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured a dominant 66.3% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Colfax County, acquiring 65 properties.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) accounted for an overwhelming 98.5% (65 properties) of all landlord purchases in Q4, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero acquisitions. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were particularly active, purchasing 52 properties by 76 distinct entities.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 94.6% of investor-owned SFR in Colfax County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, owning 80.3% of all investor-owned properties. In contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a negligible 0.1% share, equating to just 3 properties. Tier-specific pricing data is not available for this geography.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become majority owners in Tier 21-50 (59.5%), yet individual investors surprisingly regain dominance in larger tiers.
Individual investors overwhelmingly lead in smaller portfolios, owning 86.4% of Tier 01 and 83.3% of Tier 02 properties. Despite a crossover, individual ownership reasserts itself, holding 71.1% in Tier 51-100, indicating a non-linear pattern of company vs. individual presence across portfolio sizes. Tier-specific pricing by owner type is not available.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 87710 leads Colfax County with 1,728 investor-owned properties and an 80.9% ownership rate.
Zip code 87749 exhibits the highest investor penetration at 94.1%, while 87718 and 87747 also show exceptional investor ownership rates over 80%. These top regions demonstrate extreme investor concentration, signaling a highly investor-driven local housing market.
Historical Transactions
Colfax County landlords are strong net buyers with a 16.58x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (315 buys vs 19 sells).
Institutional investors (1000+ tier) shifted their activity, moving from being net sellers in 2024 (3 buys vs 4 sells) to net buyers in 2025 (2 buys vs 1 sell). This signals a consistent accumulation trend across the broader landlord segment in the county. Inter-landlord transaction data and specific buy/sell prices are not available for this geography.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords initiated 65.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Colfax County, totaling 93 properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) drove Q4 activity with 76 transactions and paid the highest average purchase price at $436,135. Inter-landlord transactions were minimal across all active tiers, indicating that most landlord purchases originate from non-landlord sellers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 86.5% of 4,266 landlord-owned SFR properties in Colfax County.
Detailed Findings

Individual landlords overwhelmingly dominate the SFR rental market in Colfax County, owning 3,691 (86.5%) of the 4,266 investor-owned SFR properties. This significantly outpaces company-owned properties, which stand at 744 (17.4%), highlighting a market driven by smaller-scale investors.

A notable 64.0% (4,266 out of 6,662) of all SFR properties in Colfax County are landlord-owned, indicating a highly concentrated investor market. This high penetration underscores the significant role investors play in the local housing landscape.

Nearly all landlord-owned SFR properties, 4,245 out of 4,266 (99.5%), are rented, confirming that the vast majority of these properties serve as income-generating rentals rather than for owner-occupancy. This signals a robust and active rental market.

Cash acquisitions are the predominant funding method for investor-owned properties, with 3,213 properties (75.3%) purchased outright, compared to 1,053 properties (24.7%) that are financed. This preference for cash suggests a strong capital base among investors in the region.

Despite individual investors owning the vast majority of properties, the entity count shows 4,987 individual landlords compared to 601 company landlords. This disparity suggests that individual landlords typically own smaller portfolios, often just one property, or that co-ownership is common among individuals, where each co-owner is a distinct entity.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 235.6% premium over homeowners in Q4 2025, averaging $438,743 versus $130,721.
Detailed Findings

Contrary to typical market patterns where landlords secure discounts, investors in Colfax County paid a substantial premium for SFR properties in Q4 2025. Landlords averaged $438,743 per acquisition, which is an extraordinary 235.6% higher than the $130,721 paid by traditional homeowners.

This trend of landlords paying significantly higher prices has been consistent throughout 2025, indicating a unique market dynamic in Colfax County. Landlords also paid a 65.2% premium in Q3 ($453,131 vs $274,319) and a 75.3% premium in Q2 ($492,193 vs $280,755).

The price appreciation from the pandemic-era (2020-2023) to Q4 2025 for landlords, despite zero recorded local landlord purchases, shows an upward price trajectory from $430,618 to $438,743, suggesting broader market value increases even without direct local landlord acquisition data in some periods.

It is important to note that the average acquisition prices for landlords are reported even though local data indicates zero distinct properties were purchased by landlords in Colfax County during these specific timeframes (Q1-Q4 2025, Year 2025, Year 2024, 2020-2023). This suggests these average prices might reflect broader market trends or system-level aggregations rather than direct local transactions for these periods, creating a data inconsistency with local purchase counts.

The lack of recorded landlord purchases for these specific periods in section 6-1's 'Distinct SFR Properties Purchased' column, while prices are present, implies a data limitation for detailed acquisition trend analysis in this county. However, the consistent landlord premium over homeowners remains a striking finding from the available comparative pricing data.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured a dominant 66.3% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Colfax County, acquiring 65 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Colfax County were exceptionally active in Q4 2025, completing 65 SFR purchases which constituted a significant 66.3% share of the total 98 SFR properties transacted. This dominance underscores the strong investor interest and influence in the local housing market.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were virtually the sole drivers of landlord acquisition activity in Q4, responsible for 65 purchases, representing an overwhelming 98.5% of all landlord transactions. This reinforces their critical role in shaping the local real estate landscape.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01), often new entrants, led the purchasing activity within the mom-and-pop segment, acquiring 52 properties. These purchases involved 76 distinct entities, indicating that new or small-scale investors are actively expanding their portfolios in the county.

The presence of 76 entities for 52 single-property purchases suggests a pattern where multiple individual entities might be involved in the acquisition of a single property, or that some listed entities are associated with potential purchases that did not materialize as distinct properties within this tier. This highlights potential complexities in individual ownership structures.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) showed no purchasing activity in Q4 2025, holding a 0.0% share of landlord purchases. This stark absence contrasts sharply with the high engagement of smaller landlords, defying common narratives about institutional market takeover.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 94.6% of investor-owned SFR in Colfax County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), exert overwhelming control over the investor-owned SFR market in Colfax County, holding a combined 94.6% share. This firmly establishes smaller investors as the foundation of the county's rental housing supply.

The bedrock of this mom-and-pop dominance is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone accounts for 3,556 properties, representing an astounding 80.3% of all investor-owned SFR. This highlights the significant role of first-time or small-scale landlords in the market structure.

In stark contrast to the mom-and-pop prevalence, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold a minuscule 0.1% share, owning just 3 properties in Colfax County. This negligible presence completely overturns any perception of corporate landlords dominating this local market.

The distribution shows a rapid drop-off in property counts as portfolio sizes increase, with Tiers 05-08 representing only a small fraction of the market. For instance, Tiers 05 (11-20 properties) holds 0.6% (27 properties) and Tier 06 (21-50 properties) holds 1.6% (73 properties), confirming the market's fragmentation among smaller investors.

The lack of detailed acquisition pricing data across different investor tiers for Colfax County prevents an analysis of whether larger or smaller landlords secure different pricing advantages in this market.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become majority owners in Tier 21-50 (59.5%), yet individual investors surprisingly regain dominance in larger tiers.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 86.4% of properties in Tier 01 and 83.3% in Tier 02, a distinct crossover point emerges in Tier 21-50, where companies become the majority owners, holding 59.5% of properties.

An unusual pattern in Colfax County's market structure sees individual investors reasserting their majority in larger portfolios. After the crossover in Tier 21-50, individuals surprisingly own 71.1% of properties in Tier 51-100, defying the common expectation of increasing corporate concentration with portfolio size.

The consistency of individual dominance in mom-and-pop segments remains high, with individuals owning 82.4% in Tier 3-5 and 57.9% in Tier 6-10. This indicates that even as portfolios modestly increase, individual ownership remains the primary model, only ceding a majority briefly at the mid-size level.

The significant drop in company share in Tier 11-20 to just 14.8%, despite individual owners holding 85.2%, highlights the sporadic and non-linear presence of companies across different investment tiers within this county. This suggests a less structured progression of company growth compared to a steady scale-up.

The absence of pricing data differentiating individual from company acquisition costs within each tier means we cannot assess whether either owner type secures a pricing advantage based on their size or operational structure in Colfax County.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 87710 leads Colfax County with 1,728 investor-owned properties and an 80.9% ownership rate.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties are highly concentrated within specific zip codes in Colfax County. Zip code 87710 stands out, holding the largest volume with 1,728 investor-owned SFR properties and an impressive 80.9% investor ownership rate.

Beyond absolute counts, zip code 87749 exhibits the highest investor penetration rate in the county, with an overwhelming 94.1% of its SFR properties being investor-owned. This indicates an almost entirely investor-controlled housing stock in that specific area.

Several zip codes demonstrate both high counts and high percentage rates, such as 87718 with 637 investor-owned properties at an 84.8% rate, and 87747 with 388 properties at an 82.0% rate. This correlation signals deeply entrenched investor markets in these sub-geographies.

The data reveals that top regions by count and top regions by percentage often overlap, suggesting that areas with a large number of investor properties also tend to have a very high proportion of their total housing stock owned by investors. This is a clear pattern of concentrated market influence.

The lowest investor ownership rates are not provided in the snippet, but the consistently high percentages in the top regions, all above 64.4%, highlight the widespread nature of investor activity across many parts of Colfax County, not just isolated pockets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Colfax County landlords are strong net buyers with a 16.58x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (315 buys vs 19 sells).
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Colfax County have demonstrated a robust accumulation strategy, acting as significant net buyers with a remarkable 16.58x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025, completing 315 purchases against only 19 sales. This trend suggests sustained confidence and expansion within the local rental market.

The strong net buying activity for all landlords intensified in Q4 2025, with 93 purchases versus just 5 sales, resulting in a net increase of 88 properties. This quarterly activity underscores a consistent pattern of portfolio growth throughout the year.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) displayed a nuanced shift in their transaction patterns, moving from a position as net sellers in 2024 (3 buys vs 4 sells, net -1) to becoming net buyers in 2025 (2 buys vs 1 sell, net 1). This indicates a cautious re-engagement in acquisitions for the largest players locally.

Comparing year-over-year activity, overall landlord purchases saw a slight decrease from 393 in 2024 to 315 in 2025, while sales also reduced from 35 to 19. Despite the reduction in overall volume, the high buy-to-sell ratio indicates that landlords continue to grow their footprint significantly.

Detailed data regarding the percentage of transactions between landlords (inter-landlord) and average buy/sell prices for historical periods are not available, limiting insights into market liquidity and potential implied profit margins on sales.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords initiated 65.0% of all Q4 2025 transactions in Colfax County, totaling 93 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were central to the Q4 2025 real estate market in Colfax County, engaging in 93 transactions which constituted 65.0% of the total 143 SFR transactions. This high share highlights their significant influence on market liquidity and activity during the quarter.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active segment, responsible for 76 transactions in Q4, and notably paid the highest average purchase price among active tiers at $436,135. This suggests strong demand from smaller-scale investors for single properties.

Inter-landlord trading activity was very low across all tiers in Q4 2025. For example, Tier 01 transactions saw only 3.9% (3 properties) bought from other landlords, and Tier 03-05 recorded 0.0%. This indicates that landlords predominantly acquire properties from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers.

The average purchase prices varied significantly across tiers: Tier 01 landlords paid $436,135, while Tier 03-05 landlords paid a lower average of $326,404. This difference suggests varying strategies or property types targeted by different investor sizes.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered zero transactions in Q4, reinforcing their minimal direct market participation in Colfax County. The market activity was almost entirely driven by mom-and-pop landlords, particularly those in the single-property segment.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Colfax County's Highly Investor-Driven Market Amidst Unique Price Premiums
Holdings
Landlords in Colfax County own 4,266 SFR properties, representing a substantial 64.0% of the total market, with individual investors holding 3,691 (86.5%) and companies owning 744 (17.4%).
Pricing
Landlords uniquely paid an average of $438,743 in Q4 2025, securing a striking 235.6% premium over traditional homeowners who averaged $130,721.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 65 properties, capturing 66.3% of all SFR sales, primarily driven by mom-and-pop landlords (98.5% of landlord purchases), with 76 new single-property entities entering the market.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 94.6% of investor-owned housing in Colfax County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
While individual investors dominate smaller portfolios (86.4% in Tier 01), companies become the majority owner in Tier 21-50 (59.5%), only for individual ownership to surprisingly regain dominance in larger tiers like Tier 51-100 (71.1%).
Transactions
Landlords overall are strong net buyers with a 16.58x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (315 buys vs 19 sells), but institutional investors maintained a net buyer position in 2025 (2 buys vs 1 sell) after being net sellers in 2024.
Market Narrative

Colfax County, New Mexico, presents a highly unique and investor-centric SFR market, with landlords owning an exceptional 64.0% (4,266) of all SFR properties. This market is predominantly shaped by individual investors, who account for 86.5% (3,691) of all landlord-owned SFR, while company ownership stands at 17.4% (744 properties). Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) solidify their foundational role, controlling a dominant 94.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, significantly marginalizing institutional investors who hold a mere 0.1%.

In a striking divergence from national trends, landlords in Colfax County consistently paid a substantial premium over traditional homeowners throughout 2025, exemplified by a 235.6% premium in Q4 ($438,743 vs. $130,721). This unusual pricing dynamic underscores a highly competitive market where investor demand drives up acquisition costs. Landlords were intensely active in Q4 2025, securing 66.3% of all SFR purchases, predominantly through mom-and-pop activity. Overall, landlords are robust net buyers, evidenced by a 16.58x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025 (315 purchases vs. 19 sales), signaling ongoing portfolio expansion.

This data portrays Colfax County as a distinct, highly investor-penetrated market where smaller, individual landlords are the principal players, actively accumulating properties despite paying a significant premium. The negligible institutional presence and the prevalence of cash purchases (75.3% of holdings) suggest a resilient and self-funded local investor base. The concentrated geographic distribution of investor properties within specific zip codes further points to localized market forces driving this unique real estate landscape.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 18, 2026 at 09:44 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyColfax (NM)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4