Sullivan (NH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sullivan (NH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sullivan (NH)
14,511
Total Investors in Sullivan (NH)
8,779
Investor Owned SFR in Sullivan (NH)
5,822(40.1%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
7,955
SFR Owned
5,235
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
824
SFR Owned
878
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 5,822 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Sullivan County with 99.8% Ownership and Net Buying Activity
Investors own 5,822 SFR properties in Sullivan County, NH, representing 40.1% of the market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling 99.8%. Landlords secured a 6.8% discount in Q4 2025 against homeowners, while actively purchasing 60.2% of the market's sales, with all landlords acting as net buyers. Institutional investors show no activity in the county.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Sullivan County's 5,822 investor-owned SFR properties are overwhelmingly individual-held at 89.9%.
The vast majority, 99.5% (5,795 properties), of investor-owned SFR properties are rented, underscoring a strong rental market focus. Cash purchases account for 3,540 properties, surpassing financed properties at 2,282. Individual landlords significantly outnumber companies, with 7,955 individuals versus 824 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 6.8% discount on acquisitions in Q4 2025, paying $30,087 less than homeowners.
The pricing dynamics were highly volatile, with landlords paying premiums of up to 23.7% in Q3 2025, but shifting to a notable discount in Q4. Overall, acquisition prices in Q4 2025 averaged $410,992, representing a 6.8% appreciation from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average of $384,964.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired a significant 60.2% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Sullivan County.
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all 62 landlord purchases, representing 100.0% of the quarter's investor activity. Notably, 92 new entities entered the market as single-property landlords, driving 98.4% of total landlord acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this dominance, holding 92.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold no properties in Sullivan County, showcasing a market entirely driven by smaller, local players. No pricing data by tier was available for analysis.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a significant shift from individual dominance.
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest portfolios, accounting for 88.0% of single-property (Tier 01) and 66.8% of two-property (Tier 02) ownership. However, company ownership rises sharply, reaching 56.0% in the 6-10 property tier, indicating a transition in ownership structure as portfolios expand.
Geographic Distribution
NH-Sullivan-03753 and NH-Sullivan-03782 lead in investor-owned property counts.
Zip code 03754 shows an extraordinary 100.0% investor ownership rate, signaling a highly concentrated market, while 03753 and 03782 also exhibit high investor ownership rates of 72.0% and 56.2%, respectively, correlating high counts with high penetration. No acquisition price data for regions was available for analysis.
Historical Transactions
Sullivan County landlords are net buyers with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Landlords purchased 93 properties while selling 15 in Q4 2025, continuing a strong buying trend throughout 2025 with a 10.16x buy/sell ratio. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) showed no transaction activity in the county, indicating a complete absence from this market segment.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 54.7% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with single-property investors dominating.
Single-property (Tier 01) landlords were responsible for 92 of the 93 landlord transactions, paying an average of $413,927. The majority of these transactions were not inter-landlord trades, with only 8.7% of Tier 01 purchases coming from other landlords, while institutional investors showed no Q4 activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Sullivan County's 5,822 investor-owned SFR properties are overwhelmingly individual-held at 89.9%.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sullivan County, NH, control a substantial portfolio of 5,822 SFR properties, accounting for 40.1% of the total SFR market. This signifies a significant investor presence within the county's housing landscape.

Individual investors represent the dominant force in the county's rental market, holding 5,235 properties, which is 89.9% of all investor-owned SFR. Companies, in contrast, own 878 properties (15.1%), indicating that individual landlords are the primary providers of rental housing.

A striking 99.5% (5,795 properties) of the landlord-owned portfolio is designated as rented, demonstrating a clear and overwhelming focus on rental income generation. This high percentage underscores that investors are holding properties primarily for tenant occupancy rather than speculative flips or short-term gains.

Property financing reveals a preference for cash purchases, with 3,540 properties acquired without financing compared to 2,282 financed properties. This suggests a significant portion of investors have strong capital reserves or seek to minimize debt obligations in their holdings.

The sheer number of individual landlords, totaling 7,955, far surpasses the 824 company landlords, establishing a ratio of approximately 9.65 individual landlords for every company. This highlights that the landlord market is primarily driven by smaller, individual entities rather than large corporate players.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 6.8% discount on acquisitions in Q4 2025, paying $30,087 less than homeowners.
Detailed Findings

In a significant market shift, landlords in Sullivan County, NH, acquired properties for an average of $410,992 in Q4 2025, securing a notable $30,087 discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid $441,079. This represents a 6.8% price advantage for investors in the latest quarter.

The landlord-homeowner price gap experienced considerable volatility throughout 2025. Landlords paid a 3.0% premium in Q1 ($405,189 vs $393,203), which surged to a 14.5% premium in Q2 ($424,357 vs $370,718) and a substantial 23.7% premium in Q3 ($456,430 vs $369,053). The dramatic swing to a 6.8% discount in Q4 indicates a significant change in market dynamics or buying strategies.

Despite the recent discount, acquisition prices have appreciated since the pandemic era. The average landlord acquisition price in Q4 2025 ($410,992) shows a $26,028 increase, or 6.8% growth, from the 2020-2023 average of $384,964. This indicates underlying value appreciation over the past few years.

Annual trends also show price increases, with the average acquisition price for Year 2024 at $434,036 and Year 2025 at $426,532. Although Year 2025 saw a slight dip from 2024, both years reflect higher prices than the 2020-2023 period.

The absence of recorded landlord acquisitions (0 properties) in the specific `LANDLORD ACQUISITION PRICES BY TIMEFRAME` data for Q4 2025, despite explicit landlord purchases in other sections, highlights a data reporting inconsistency. However, the comparative prices provided in the `LANDLORD vs HOMEOWNER PRICE COMPARISON` table offer critical insights into investor pricing strategies relative to the broader market.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired a significant 60.2% of all Q4 2025 SFR purchases in Sullivan County.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sullivan County, NH, captured a dominant share of the housing market in Q4 2025, purchasing 62 SFR properties. This accounted for a significant 60.2% of all 103 SFR purchases during the quarter, signaling strong investor confidence and activity.

The Q4 purchasing landscape was entirely shaped by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions. This highlights the overwhelming absence of larger, institutional investors (Tier 09) from new purchases in the county during this period.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the primary drivers of Q4 activity, acquiring 61 properties, which constituted 98.4% of all landlord purchases. This indicates a robust influx of new or nascent investors into the market.

A substantial 92 distinct entities became single-property landlords in Q4 2025, suggesting a healthy entry rate for first-time or small-scale investors. This underscores the grassroots nature of investor growth within Sullivan County.

The remaining landlord purchases were made by small landlords in Tier 03-05, contributing a single property (1.6% of landlord purchases). This confirms that Q4 investor activity was concentrated almost entirely at the smallest end of the portfolio spectrum.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

The investor-owned SFR market in Sullivan County, NH, is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04), who collectively control an astounding 99.8% of all investor-held properties. This figure profoundly challenges any narrative of institutional dominance in the county.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the vast majority of this market structure, owning 5,465 properties, which represents 92.1% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio. This highlights that individual homeowners investing in a single rental property are the most prevalent type of landlord.

The concentration of ownership rapidly declines with portfolio size; two-property landlords (Tier 02) hold 274 properties (4.6%), and small landlords with 3-5 properties (Tier 03) own 160 properties (2.7%). These numbers further emphasize the market's reliance on small-scale investors.

Larger investor tiers, such as 6-10 properties (Tier 04), 11-20 properties (Tier 05), and 21-50 properties (Tier 06), collectively account for a minimal 0.6% of the market (25, 7, and 5 properties, respectively). This tapering off demonstrates a severe lack of mid-sized and institutional presence.

Notably, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) hold 0.0% of the investor-owned SFR properties in Sullivan County. This confirms that large corporate landlords have no footprint in the county's single-family rental market, which is a key distinguishing feature of this geography.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, a significant shift from individual dominance.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors are the predominant owner type in Sullivan County's SFR market, a distinct crossover point emerges where companies begin to take majority control as portfolio sizes increase. This shift occurs at the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier (Tier 04).

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the smallest tiers, representing 88.0% of single-property (Tier 01) ownership with 5,014 properties and 66.8% of two-property (Tier 02) ownership with 189 properties. This reflects the mom-and-pop backbone of the county's rental market.

Even within the 3-5 property tier (Tier 03), individual ownership maintains a slight majority at 53.9% (89 properties) compared to companies at 46.1% (76 properties). This tier represents a near-even split before the company majority takes hold.

The critical crossover happens at the small landlord (6-10 properties) tier (Tier 04), where company ownership rises to 56.0% (14 properties) while individual ownership drops to 44.0% (11 properties). This marks the threshold where larger portfolios are more likely to be company-held.

The data clearly illustrates that while individual investors initiate the vast majority of landlord activity, companies tend to scale portfolios more efficiently beyond a handful of properties. No pricing data by owner type or tier was available for analysis.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NH-Sullivan-03753 and NH-Sullivan-03782 lead in investor-owned property counts.
Detailed Findings

Investor-owned properties in Sullivan County, NH, exhibit significant geographic concentration, with specific zip codes standing out. NH-Sullivan-03753 leads with 1,038 investor-owned properties (72.0% ownership rate), closely followed by NH-Sullivan-03782 with 1,021 properties (56.2% ownership rate).

These two top zip codes alone account for 2,059 investor-owned SFR properties, revealing that a substantial portion of the county's investor activity is concentrated in just a few areas. NH-Sullivan-03280 also contributes significantly with 619 properties (56.5% ownership rate), further emphasizing this clustering.

Beyond absolute counts, some zip codes demonstrate exceptionally high investor ownership rates. NH-Sullivan-03754 leads with a remarkable 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting a specialized or niche market completely dominated by investors, though likely with a smaller overall property count. NH-Sullivan-03751 follows with an 87.5% rate.

There is a clear correlation between high property counts and high investor ownership percentages in some key areas; for instance, NH-Sullivan-03753 and NH-Sullivan-03782 appear in both the top by count and top by percentage lists, signifying regions where investors own a large volume *and* a high proportion of the available SFR properties.

Other top regions by count, such as NH-Sullivan-03773 (582 properties, 25.4% rate) and NH-Sullivan-03743 (504 properties, 16.5% rate), show substantial investor presence by volume but at lower market penetration rates compared to the highly concentrated percentage leaders. No data for the lowest investor ownership rates or average acquisition prices by region was available in the provided snippet.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Sullivan County landlords are net buyers with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sullivan County, NH, are overwhelmingly net buyers, demonstrating a robust accumulation strategy throughout 2025. In Q4 alone, they purchased 93 properties while selling only 15, resulting in a strong 6.2x buy/sell ratio.

This net buying trend has been consistent, with Year 2025 showing 437 purchases against 43 sells, yielding an impressive 10.16x buy/sell ratio. Year 2024 exhibited an even higher ratio of 28.67x (430 buys vs 15 sells), indicating a sustained period of property acquisition by investors.

The quarterly buy/sell ratios, though still heavily skewed towards buying, showed some fluctuation: Q2 2025 peaked at 15x (105 buys vs 7 sells), followed by 9.43x in Q3 (132 buys vs 14 sells), before moderating to 6.2x in Q4. This suggests a slight relative increase in selling activity or decrease in buying intensity later in the year.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions (0 buys, 0 sells) in Sullivan County across any of the provided timeframes. This signifies that the active market dynamics, including consistent net buying, are exclusively driven by smaller, non-institutional landlords.

The lack of specific data on average buy prices compared to sell prices prevents a direct analysis of implied profit margins for historical transactions. However, the consistent net buying indicates that landlords perceive value and long-term growth potential in the Sullivan County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 54.7% of all Q4 2025 transactions, with single-property investors dominating.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were deeply involved in the Sullivan County housing market during Q4 2025, accounting for 93 of the 170 total SFR transactions. This represents a substantial 54.7% share of all market transactions, underscoring their critical role in market liquidity and activity.

Transaction volume was overwhelmingly concentrated in the Single-property (Tier 01) segment, which recorded 92 transactions. This tier alone drove 98.9% of all landlord-involved transactions, with small landlords (Tier 03-05) contributing only a single transaction.

Average purchase prices varied significantly by tier for Q4 2025. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid an average of $413,927, while the single transaction in the small landlord (Tier 03-05) category averaged a much lower $141,000, creating a substantial price spread of $272,927 between the two active tiers.

Inter-landlord trading activity was minimal in Q4. Only 8.7% (8 transactions) of single-property landlord purchases originated from other landlords, suggesting that most acquisitions were from traditional homeowners or other non-landlord sellers. The small landlord tier (3-5 properties) had no inter-landlord purchases.

The almost exclusive activity of mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04, 93 transactions) and the complete absence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 0 transactions) in Q4 transactions mirror the long-term ownership distribution, confirming that the county's SFR market is overwhelmingly shaped by small-scale investors.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Drive Sullivan County Market, Dominating Ownership and Q4 Purchases
Holdings
Landlords own 5,822 SFR properties in Sullivan County, representing 40.1% of the total SFR market. Individual investors own 5,235 properties (89.9%), while companies own 878 properties (15.1%), indicating significant individual investor prevalence with some overlap in ownership types.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $410,992 in Q4 2025, securing a 6.8% discount ($30,087) compared to traditional homeowners at $441,079. This marks a shift from earlier 2025 quarters where landlords consistently paid a premium.
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 62 SFR properties, accounting for 60.2% of all sales. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) dominated this activity, with 92 new entities entering the market and driving 98.4% of landlord acquisitions.
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of all investor-owned housing in Sullivan County, NH, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) holding no market share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate the smaller portfolio tiers, holding 88.0% of single-property and 66.8% of two-property portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier (56.0%).
Transactions
Landlords in Sullivan County are significant net buyers, demonstrating a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4 2025 (93 buys vs 15 sells). Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions throughout any timeframe, maintaining a neutral net position.
Market Narrative

The Sullivan County, NH, real estate market is characterized by a robust and largely individual-driven investor landscape. Landlords collectively own 5,822 SFR properties, comprising a substantial 40.1% of the county's total SFR market. Critically, mom-and-pop landlords, defined as owning 1-10 properties, command an overwhelming 99.8% of this investor-owned housing. Individual investors maintain a strong hold, owning 5,235 properties, or 89.9% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies account for 878 properties (15.1%), highlighting a market fundamentally structured by smaller, local players rather than large corporate entities.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 showcased significant activity and strategic pricing. Landlords acquired 62 properties, representing 60.2% of all Q4 SFR purchases, and for the first time in 2025, secured a notable 6.8% discount, paying $30,087 less than traditional homeowners. This marks a sharp contrast to earlier quarters in 2025 where landlords paid premiums. Overall, landlords are strong net buyers, with a 6.2x buy/sell ratio in Q4, accumulating properties consistently throughout the year. The entire Q4 purchasing activity by landlords was driven by mom-and-pop investors, with 92 new entities entering as single-property landlords.

These trends signify a dynamic market in Sullivan County where smaller, individual investors are the primary engine of growth and ownership. The complete absence of institutional investor activity underscores a unique market structure, largely insulated from the pressures often associated with large corporate landlords. The sustained net buying and strategic pricing by mom-and-pop investors suggest continued confidence in the long-term value and rental income potential of SFR properties in this New Hampshire county, reinforcing its character as a grassroots investment environment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:01 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySullivan (NH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices