Rockingham (NH) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rockingham (NH) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rockingham (NH)
82,957
Total Investors in Rockingham (NH)
17,056
Investor Owned SFR in Rockingham (NH)
11,401(13.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
14,804
SFR Owned
9,908
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2,252
SFR Owned
2,336
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,401 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Rockingham County with 99.8% Ownership, Capturing 45.4% of Q4 Home Sales
Investors own 11,401 SFR properties in Rockingham County, representing 13.7% of the total market, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling virtually the entire portfolio (99.8%). In Q4, landlords were aggressive net buyers, purchasing 45.4% of all homes sold at a 5.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, while institutional investors remained completely inactive.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 11,401 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 86.9% share.
Of the total investor portfolio, 54.4% of properties are owned outright with cash (6,207), while 45.6% are financed (5,194). The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 98.5% of properties classified as non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 5.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $35,925 per property.
This Q4 discount marks a sharp reversal from Q2 and Q3 of 2025, where landlords paid premiums of 6.3% and 2.1% respectively. The average landlord acquisition price in Q4 ($668,952) is 16.8% higher than the average from the 2020-2023 period ($572,725).
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured an aggressive 45.4% of all Rockingham County home purchases in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100.0% of all investor acquisitions, with no purchases from institutional firms. The market saw an influx of 440 new single-property landlords who bought 267 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned housing in Rockingham County.
Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market. Single-property landlords alone represent the vast majority of the market, owning 10,648 properties or 91.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Ownership structure shifts decisively at 6 properties, where companies become the majority owners (74.6%).
Individual investors are the primary owners in smaller portfolios, holding 83.3% of single-property rentals and 67.0% of two-property portfolios. The crossover happens in the 3-5 property tier, where ownership is nearly split at 51.2% individual and 48.8% company.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip code 03842 (Hampton), with 1,122 properties.
The highest investor penetration rate is in zip code 03825 (Hampton Falls) at 83.3%, despite it not being a leader in total count. This highlights a clear distinction between markets with high raw numbers of investor properties and those that are heavily saturated by investors.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
This strong accumulation trend was consistent throughout 2025, with landlords purchasing 2,430 properties while selling only 176, a buy-to-sell ratio of 13.8x for the year. Institutional investors reported no buying or selling activity, remaining entirely on the sidelines.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 market, participating in 43.1% of all transactions.
First-time landlords paid the highest average price this quarter at $666,481. These new entrants primarily sourced properties from the open market, with only 6.1% of their 440 transactions coming from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 11,401 SFR properties, with individual investors holding a dominant 86.9% share.
Detailed Findings

In Rockingham County, investors hold a significant 11,401 Single-Family Residential (SFR) properties, which constitutes 13.7% of the county's total SFR market of 82,957 homes.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership. Individual landlords own 9,908 properties, an 86.9% share, compared to 2,336 properties (20.5%) held by companies, with some properties being co-owned between the two types.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity counts, where there are 14,804 individual landlords compared to just 2,252 company landlords, a ratio of approximately 6.6 to 1.

A majority of investor-owned properties are held free and clear, with 6,207 properties (54.4%) owned with cash versus 5,194 (45.6%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base in the region.

The portfolio's primary purpose is clear, with 11,226 of the 11,401 properties (98.5%) identified as rented or non-owner-occupied, underscoring the deep focus on providing rental housing to the community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 5.1% less than homeowners in Q4, a significant discount of $35,925 per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords demonstrated a strong purchasing advantage, acquiring properties for an average price of $668,952, which is 5.1% less than the $704,877 paid by traditional homeowners. This equates to a substantial average discount of $35,925 per home.

This price advantage is a notable shift in market dynamics. It reverses the trend from the previous two quarters, where investors paid premiums over homeowners, including a 2.1% premium in Q3 ($715,478 vs. $700,831) and a 6.3% premium in Q2 ($727,482 vs. $684,340).

The recent acquisition prices reflect significant market appreciation since the pandemic-era boom. The Q4 average landlord price of $668,952 represents a 16.8% increase over the average price of $572,725 seen between 2020 and 2023.

While landlords secured a discount in Q4, their average purchase price of $703,135 for the full year of 2025 was slightly below the 2024 average of $709,685, suggesting some price stabilization or a shift in the type of assets being acquired.

The return to a discount model in Q4 could signal that investors are becoming more adept at finding value or that market conditions are shifting to favor buyers with more liquidity or negotiating power.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured an aggressive 45.4% of all Rockingham County home purchases in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 279 of the 614 total SFRs sold in Rockingham County. This represents a commanding 45.4% market share, highlighting their significant impact on housing demand.

The entirety of this purchasing activity came from small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (portfolios of 1-10 properties) were responsible for 100.0% of the 279 investor acquisitions, with institutional investors (1,000+ properties) making zero purchases.

New entrants are the primary driver of the market. The single-property tier saw 440 new landlord entities enter the market, acquiring 267 properties, which accounts for 95.4% of all investor purchases in the quarter.

The data reveals a highly concentrated purchasing base, as the top four 'mom-and-pop' tiers (1-10 properties) completely dominated acquisition activity, leaving no room for mid-size or large institutional players.

The high ratio of new entities (440) to properties purchased (267) in the single-property tier suggests a trend of co-ownership, where partners or family members are likely entering the rental market together for the first time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.8% of all investor-owned housing in Rockingham County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Rockingham County is definitively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, collectively own 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

In a direct contradiction to the narrative of corporate consolidation, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have no footprint in this market, with a 0.0% ownership share.

The market's foundation is built on first-time investors. Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant group by far, owning 10,648 properties, which accounts for 91.6% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

Ownership concentration dissipates rapidly as portfolio size increases. After the single-property tier, two-property and 3-5 property landlords each hold a 3.8% share, while all tiers above 10 properties combined account for just 0.2% of investor housing.

This distribution underscores a hyper-localized and fragmented market structure, where the rental housing stock is provided by a large number of individual community members rather than a small number of large corporations.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Ownership structure shifts decisively at 6 properties, where companies become the majority owners (74.6%).
Detailed Findings

A clear pattern emerges in ownership structure as portfolios grow: individuals dominate small portfolios, while companies take over larger ones. The critical crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier (Tier 04), where companies own a 74.6% majority of the properties.

For entry-level investors, individual ownership is the standard. Individuals own 9,460 of the single-property rentals (83.3%) and 311 of the two-property rentals (67.0%).

The transition toward a corporate structure begins in the 3-5 property tier, where the ownership is almost evenly split, with individuals holding a slight 51.2% majority (233 properties) compared to companies at 48.8% (222 properties).

This trend suggests that as investors scale their operations beyond five properties, the legal and financial benefits of a corporate structure, such as an LLC, become compelling enough to drive a shift away from personal ownership.

Even within the company-dominated tiers, individual co-ownership remains present, indicating that many investment strategies involve a hybrid approach, combining personal assets with corporate entities for liability protection and operational efficiency.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is most concentrated by volume in zip code 03842 (Hampton), with 1,122 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals specific pockets of high investor concentration in Rockingham County. By sheer volume, the zip code 03842 (Hampton) leads with 1,122 investor-owned properties.

Following Hampton, other areas with a high count of investor properties include 03038 (Derry) with 799 properties, 03079 (Salem) with 739 properties, and 03801 (Portsmouth) with 713 properties.

However, the highest concentration by ownership rate tells a different story. The zip code 03825 (Hampton Falls) has the highest investor penetration, with landlords owning 83.3% of the SFR properties, indicating a market dominated by rental housing.

Other zip codes with exceptionally high investor ownership rates include 03871 (Seabrook) at 78.6% and 03854 (Newfields) at 50.8%, far exceeding the county-wide average of 13.7%.

This divergence between top areas by count and by percentage shows that investor strategy varies geographically. Some areas attract a large number of investors overall, while smaller markets can become saturated, with rentals making up the majority of the housing stock.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 11.6 properties for every one they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Transactional data shows landlords in Rockingham County are in a strong accumulation phase. In Q4 2025, they purchased 453 properties while selling only 39, resulting in a net gain of 414 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 11.6 to 1.

This behavior is not a recent phenomenon but a consistent trend throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords acquired 2,430 SFRs and sold just 176, making them powerful net buyers with a full-year ratio of nearly 14 properties bought for every one sold.

The transaction volume reflects a healthy and active market, with buying activity in 2025 (2,430 purchases) slightly outpacing 2024 (2,270 purchases).

Notably, all recorded transaction activity comes from mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords. Institutional investors in the 1,000+ property tier were completely inactive, with zero buy or sell transactions recorded in any recent timeframe.

The high net-buyer ratio indicates strong confidence in the local rental market, with investors overwhelmingly choosing to expand their portfolios rather than divest assets.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 market, participating in 43.1% of all transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing power was a major factor in the Q4 2025 housing market, as landlords were involved in 453 of the 1,051 total SFR transactions, a 43.1% share.

Pricing strategies varied significantly by investor size. New, single-property landlords paid the most, with an average purchase price of $666,481 across 440 transactions. This is substantially higher than the prices paid by more established small landlords, such as the $426,500 average for those in the 6-10 property tier.

This price premium paid by new entrants suggests they are competing directly with traditional homeowners for properties and may be less focused on securing deep discounts than on simply entering the market.

The market does not show significant inter-landlord trading. Among the most active group, single-property buyers, only 27 of 440 transactions (6.1%) involved purchasing from an existing landlord. For all other active tiers, 0.0% of purchases came from other landlords.

This indicates that the vast majority of investors in Rockingham County are growing their portfolios by acquiring properties from the general housing stock, not by trading assets among themselves.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Rockingham County with 99.8% ownership, capturing 45.4% of Q4 sales.
Holdings
Landlords own 11,401 SFR properties, representing 13.7% of Rockingham County's market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individuals, who own 9,908 properties, while companies own 2,336.
Pricing
In Q4, landlords paid 5.1% less than traditional homeowners, securing properties for an average of $668,952 versus $704,877, a discount of $35,925.
Activity
Landlords acquired 279 properties in Q4, representing a 45.4% share of all SFR sales, with 440 new single-property landlords entering the market.
Market Share
The market is definitively controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.8% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own 0.0%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owner (74.6%) in the 6-10 property tier, marking a clear shift to corporate structures for larger holdings.
Transactions
Landlords are strong net buyers with an 11.6x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (453 buys vs. 39 sells), while institutional investors had no transaction activity whatsoever.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Rockingham County, New Hampshire is a quintessential example of a market driven by local, small-scale participants. Investors own 11,401 single-family properties, comprising 13.7% of the county's total SFR housing stock. This market staunchly defies the narrative of corporate dominance; mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 99.8% of all investor-held homes, while large-scale institutional firms have a 0.0% footprint. Ownership is primarily individual, with private citizens and families holding 9,908 properties compared to 2,336 for companies.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by aggressive acquisition and strategic purchasing. Landlords were involved in 45.4% of all home sales, acting as powerful net buyers with a ratio of 11.6 properties purchased for every one sold. This activity was fueled by an influx of 440 new, single-property landlords. These investors demonstrated a pricing advantage, securing homes at a 5.1% discount compared to traditional homeowners, saving an average of $35,925 per property. This marks a sharp reversal from earlier in the year when investors were paying a premium.

The key takeaway from Rockingham County is the resilience and dominance of the individual investor. The market's growth is not fueled by Wall Street, but by new entrants buying their first rental property. This creates a fragmented and community-embedded rental market where the primary participants are local individuals and small businesses. The complete absence of institutional activity, combined with the strong, ongoing accumulation by small landlords, signals a stable and deeply localized market poised for continued growth from the ground up.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:51 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyRockingham (NH)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail