Kimball (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kimball (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kimball (NE)
1,217
Total Investors in Kimball (NE)
395
Investor Owned SFR in Kimball (NE)
341(28.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
359
SFR Owned
310
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
36
SFR Owned
41
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 341 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Kimball County's Investor Market Halts in Q4 After Small Landlords Secure Massive Discounts
Investors own 28.0% of single-family homes in Kimball County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 97.5% of that portfolio. While landlords secured discounts as high as 49.6% against homeowners in 2025, the market came to a complete standstill in Q4 with zero investor purchases, a sharp reversal from their strong net-buyer position in 2024.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 341 SFRs in Kimball County, with individuals holding a dominant 90.9%.
The entire investor portfolio of 341 properties was acquired with cash, as zero properties are currently financed. Of these, 335 are classified as rented, indicating a 98.2% rental focus. Individual landlords (359) outnumber company landlords (36) by nearly 10 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a staggering 49.6% discount against homeowners in Q3 2025, paying $84,798 less on average.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened dramatically throughout 2025, starting at just a 7.2% discount in Q1 ($11,042) and expanding to 49.6% by Q3. There were no recorded landlord purchases in Q4 2025 to continue the trend. Historical data shows prices averaged $95,606 during the 2020-2023 period.
Current Quarter Purchases
The investor purchase market completely froze in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero properties.
With zero total SFR purchases recorded for the quarter, landlords' market share was 0.0%. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) both had zero acquisitions, and no new landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.5% of Kimball County's investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords alone account for 68.2% of all investor-owned housing, with 247 properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence in the county, holding 0.0% of the portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier, holding over 90% of properties in the 1-10 unit range.
Companies fail to achieve majority ownership in any tier; their highest penetration is 12.1% in the two-property tier. In the largest active local tier (6-10 properties), individuals own 20 properties (90.9%) compared to just 2 for companies.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Kimball County, with the 69145 zip code holding 245 properties.
Certain zip codes show exceptionally high investor penetration, with 69128 at a 49.4% ownership rate and 69133 at 45.6%. The zip code with the most properties, 69145, has a more moderate but still high investor ownership rate of 24.2%.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold.
Landlords purchased 21 properties while selling only 3 throughout 2024, indicating strong conviction in portfolio growth. This net-buyer stance from 2024 contrasts sharply with the complete halt in purchasing activity seen in late 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Confirming a market-wide pause, landlords were involved in zero SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
The complete absence of transactions meant the landlord share of the market was 0.0%. No transactions occurred across any tier, from mom-and-pop to larger investors, and there was no inter-landlord trading.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 341 SFRs in Kimball County, with individuals holding a dominant 90.9%.
Detailed Findings

In Kimball County, investors hold a significant 28.0% of the single-family residential market, totaling 341 properties.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 310 of the properties (90.9%), compared to just 41 properties (12.0%) owned by companies. This highlights a market driven by local, small-scale participants rather than large corporations.

A defining characteristic of this market is its complete reliance on cash financing. All 341 investor-owned properties are held without financing, signaling a fiscally conservative or debt-averse investor base.

The portfolio is heavily geared towards rental income, with 335 properties (98.2%) classified as rented. This demonstrates a clear focus on buy-and-hold strategies over speculative flipping.

The entity count further reinforces the dominance of small investors. There are 359 individual landlords compared to only 36 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 10 to 1, indicating a very low level of corporate consolidation in the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a staggering 49.6% discount against homeowners in Q3 2025, paying $84,798 less on average.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing power in Kimball County yielded significant discounts compared to traditional homeowners in 2025. In Q3, landlords paid an average of $86,077, which was 49.6% less than the homeowner average of $170,875—a remarkable price advantage of $84,798 per property.

The discount available to landlords widened progressively throughout the year. The price gap grew from a modest 7.2% ($11,042) in Q1 to 36.7% ($74,907) in Q2, before peaking at nearly 50% in Q3, indicating an increasing negotiating advantage for investors as the year progressed.

Despite strong pricing advantages in prior quarters, investor acquisition activity completely halted in Q4 2025, with zero properties purchased. This abrupt stop prevents analysis of whether this widening discount trend would have continued.

Looking at longer-term trends, the average landlord acquisition price during the 2020-2023 boom period was $95,606, showing that 2025 prices, while variable, were generally in line with recent historical averages.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The investor purchase market completely froze in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring zero properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Kimball County's SFR market came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with landlords making zero purchases out of zero total market sales.

This halt in activity means landlords captured 0.0% of the market share for the quarter, a stark indicator of a dormant real estate market.

Reflecting the overall inactivity, no new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the market, and there was no acquisition activity from any other investor tier, including mom-and-pop or institutional players.

The lack of transactions signifies a potential market pause, possibly due to economic uncertainty, lack of inventory, or a mismatch between buyer and seller expectations.

This Q4 freeze represents a dramatic shift from earlier in the year and from 2024, where transaction data showed a more active market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 97.5% of Kimball County's investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Kimball County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a staggering 97.5% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

First-time or single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the rental market, alone accounting for 247 properties, or 68.2% of the entire investor portfolio. This highlights the highly fragmented and localized nature of rental ownership.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) have a negligible footprint, collectively owning just 2.6% of the investor-owned housing stock in the county.

In a direct counter-narrative to corporate consolidation, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1,000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in Kimball County, with 0.0% ownership.

This extreme concentration among small landlords suggests a market characterized by local relationships and individual capital, rather than large-scale, professionalized investment.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every ownership tier, holding over 90% of properties in the 1-10 unit range.
Detailed Findings

In Kimball County, individual investors maintain majority control across every single active portfolio tier, underscoring their comprehensive dominance of the local market.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. In fact, company ownership remains a small fraction across the board, peaking at just 12.1% in the two-property tier and falling to 9.1% in the 6-10 property tier.

For single-property landlords (Tier 01), who represent the largest segment of the market, individuals own 229 properties (90.5%) while companies own just 24 (9.5%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individuals own 49 properties (96.1%), leaving a minimal share of 2 properties (3.9%) for corporate entities.

This data reveals a market structure where corporate investment has not made significant inroads at any scale, with individuals firmly in control of portfolios of all sizes.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated in Kimball County, with the 69145 zip code holding 245 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Kimball County is not evenly distributed, showing strong concentration in specific zip codes. The 69145 zip code is the epicenter of activity by volume, containing 245 investor-owned SFRs.

While 69145 leads in raw count, other areas exhibit much higher market penetration rates. The 69128 zip code stands out with an investor ownership rate of 49.4%, meaning nearly half of all single-family homes there are investor-owned.

Similarly, the 69133 zip code shows significant investor concentration with a 45.6% ownership rate, further highlighting pockets of intense landlord activity.

This pattern reveals that while one area (69145) anchors the total volume, smaller surrounding areas (69128, 69133) have a much deeper saturation of rental properties relative to their total housing stock.

The concentration suggests targeted investment strategies focused on specific neighborhoods or communities within the county, rather than a broad, uniform approach.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 7 properties for every 1 they sold.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data from 2024 paints a picture of a bullish investor market in Kimball County. Landlords were definitive net buyers, with 21 acquisitions compared to only 3 sales over the course of the year.

This activity translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.0, signifying a strong market sentiment and a clear strategy of portfolio accumulation among local investors.

The net gain of 18 properties in 2024 demonstrates a period of active growth and investment in the local single-family rental market.

This robust buying activity from the previous year provides a crucial baseline that highlights the severity of the market freeze observed in Q4 2025, where acquisition volume dropped to zero.

Due to the absence of institutional investors in the county, all recorded transaction activity is attributable to smaller, mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Confirming a market-wide pause, landlords were involved in zero SFR transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The final quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete cessation of real estate transactions involving investors in Kimball County. Landlords participated in zero buys or sells, resulting in a 0.0% share of market transactions.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate the market's ownership, recorded zero transactions for the quarter.

Similarly, there was no activity from the few mid-size investors in the county, and no institutional transactions, as expected from their lack of presence.

The lack of deals also means there was no inter-landlord trading, where one investor sells a property to another. This suggests a broader market freeze affecting all participants, not just a lack of new inventory coming from homeowners.

The average purchase price for all tiers was effectively $0, reflecting the total absence of transactional data for the period.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Dominated by mom-and-pop investors owning 97.5% of rentals, Kimball County's market froze with zero Q4 sales.
Holdings
In Kimball County, landlords own 341 single-family properties, representing 28.0% of the market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors, who own 310 properties (90.9%), versus 41 (12.0%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant buying power in 2025, securing properties at discounts as high as 49.6% below traditional homeowners, a price advantage of $84,798 in Q3.
Activity
The investor market came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing zero properties for a 0.0% share of all sales, and consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 97.5% of the housing stock, while institutional investors (1,000+ units) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the dominant force across all portfolio sizes in Kimball County. There is no crossover tier where companies become the majority owner, as individuals control over 90% of properties even in the 6-10 unit bracket.
Transactions
While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 7-to-1 buy/sell ratio (21 buys vs. 3 sells), this momentum completely vanished by Q4 2025, which saw zero investor transactions.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Kimball County, Nebraska is a textbook example of a market dominated by local, individual participants. Investors own a notable 28.0% of the single-family housing stock, totaling 341 properties. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a staggering 97.5% of the investor-owned portfolio. Underscoring this trend, individual investors own 90.9% of these homes, and institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in the county.

Investor behavior in 2025 was defined by shrewd purchasing followed by a sudden halt. Throughout the first three quarters, landlords leveraged their position to secure massive discounts, peaking at a 49.6% price advantage over traditional homeowners in Q3. However, this activity came to an abrupt end in Q4, which recorded zero purchases by investors. This freeze is a sharp reversal from 2024, when landlords were aggressive net buyers, acquiring seven properties for every one they sold, signaling a dramatic shift in market conditions or sentiment.

The key takeaway for the Kimball County housing market is its dependence on a highly fragmented base of small, cash-reliant investors. The complete stop in Q4 activity, despite prior evidence of deep purchasing discounts, suggests a market sensitive to external economic pressures or a severe lack of desirable inventory. The absence of corporate or institutional players means the health of the local rental market is intrinsically tied to the financial confidence and strategic decisions of hundreds of individual community members, making it resilient to corporate consolidation but potentially vulnerable to widespread shifts in local economic sentiment.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:50 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKimball (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price