Kearney (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kearney (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kearney (NE)
2,172
Total Investors in Kearney (NE)
540
Investor Owned SFR in Kearney (NE)
426(19.6%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
510
SFR Owned
391
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
30
SFR Owned
36
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 426 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate 95.2% of Kearney's Investor Market Amidst Low Q4 Activity
Landlords in Kearney County, NE, own 426 SFR properties, representing 19.6% of the market. Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate, holding 91.8% of these properties, with no institutional presence. In Q4 2025, landlords made only 2 purchases, securing a 7.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners, signaling a cautious market for investors. Overall, landlords remain net buyers in Kearney.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual Landlords Own 91.8% of Kearney County's 426 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
A vast 97.2% of investor-owned properties are rented, indicating a strong rental market focus, while 85.9% were acquired with cash. There are 17 individual landlords for every company landlord, with 510 individual entities compared to just 30 companies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords Secure a 7.5% Price Discount on Q4 Acquisitions in Kearney, Paying $275,000
Despite minimal acquisition volume, landlords theoretically secured a $22,457 discount in Q4, paying $275,000 compared to homeowners' $297,457. This discount has fluctuated significantly, from 24.6% in Q1 to a substantial 71.1% in Q3, reflecting volatile market conditions.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords Accounted for 6.7% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Kearney County, with Only 2 Properties Acquired
Mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) made all 2 landlord purchases in Q4, representing 100.0% of investor activity. There was no institutional investor purchasing activity in the quarter, with 2 entities purchasing the 2 properties in the single-property tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 95.2% of Investor-Owned SFR in Kearney County
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 73.6% of all investor-owned properties. There is no institutional investor presence (Tier 09) in the county. Acquisition pricing data by tier is unavailable for Kearney County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers in Kearney County, Comprising 94.3% of Single-Property Ownership
Individuals retain majority ownership even in larger tiers, with 71.4% of properties in the 21-50 tier owned by individuals. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners in any tier, underscoring the prevalence of small-scale individual investing.
Geographic Distribution
Zip Code 68959 Leads Kearney County with 218 Investor-Owned Properties, While 68945 Boasts 32.8% Investor Ownership Rate
Zip codes 68945 (32.8%) and 68847 (29.4%) exhibit the highest investor ownership rates, indicating a greater concentration of rental properties in these areas. The top four zip codes by count represent a significant portion of the county's investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Kearney County Landlords Are Net Buyers with a 3.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025, but Historical Data Lacks Inter-Landlord Trades
Landlords acquired 6 properties and sold 2 in 2025, continuing a trend from 2024 (7 buys, 4 sells). Data on the percentage of buy or sell transactions originating from other landlords is not available. There is no data for institutional investor transactions.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords Made 2 Purchases in Q4, Comprising 6.7% of Total SFR Acquisitions in Kearney County
Both Q4 landlord purchases were made by single-property landlords (Tier 01) at an average price of $275,000. None of these purchases originated from other landlords. There was no institutional investor transaction activity in Q4.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual Landlords Own 91.8% of Kearney County's 426 Investor-Owned SFR Properties
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Kearney County, NE, collectively own 426 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, constituting 19.6% of the total SFR market in the county. This demonstrates a notable presence of investors in the local housing landscape.

Individual investors, often described as 'mom-and-pop' landlords, overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 391 properties which accounts for 91.8% of all investor-owned SFR. In stark contrast, companies own only 36 properties, making up a mere 8.5% of the investor portfolio, challenging perceptions of corporate dominance.

The ownership structure by entity count further emphasizes this individual prevalence, with 510 individual landlords compared to just 30 company landlords. This translates to a significant 17:1 ratio of individual to company entities, underscoring the fragmented, small-scale nature of the investor market in Kearney County.

Kearney County's landlord-owned properties are heavily rental-focused, with 414 properties (97.2%) identified as rented. This highlights that the vast majority of investor holdings are generating rental income, directly serving the housing needs of residents.

A significant preference for cash purchases is evident among landlords, with 366 (85.9%) of their properties acquired in cash, compared to only 60 (14.1%) properties being financed. This suggests a strong financial position or a strategic preference for avoiding mortgage debt within the investor community.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords Secure a 7.5% Price Discount on Q4 Acquisitions in Kearney, Paying $275,000
Detailed Findings

In the 2025-Q4, landlords in Kearney County theoretically acquired properties at an average price of $275,000, securing a 7.5% discount compared to traditional homeowners who paid an average of $297,457. This represents a $22,457 price advantage for investors in the recent quarter.

However, recent landlord acquisition activity has been extremely limited, with no properties recorded as purchased by landlords for all listed timeframes in Q1-Q4 2025 and Year 2024 in the specific acquisition summary data. The Q4 purchase data shows only 2 properties acquired by landlords, indicating a very low volume market.

The price gap between landlords and traditional homeowners has shown significant volatility throughout 2025. Landlords enjoyed a substantial 71.1% discount ($66,000 vs $228,298) in Q3, which narrowed significantly from a 46.3% discount in Q2 ($127,500 vs $237,265), and a 24.6% discount in Q1 ($183,000 vs $242,600).

The dramatic fluctuations in the landlord discount, ranging from 7.5% in Q4 to 71.1% in Q3, suggest an opportunistic buying pattern rather than a consistent pricing advantage in the Kearney market. These wide swings highlight specific, potentially distressed or niche, deals when they occur rather than a systemic trend.

Given the very low transaction volumes reported for landlords across 2024 and 2025, any observed average acquisition prices or price gaps should be interpreted cautiously. They likely reflect a handful of unique transactions rather than broad market trends for active investor purchasing.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords Accounted for 6.7% of Q4 SFR Purchases in Kearney County, with Only 2 Properties Acquired
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Kearney County demonstrated limited purchasing activity in Q4 2025, acquiring only 2 SFR properties. This accounted for 6.7% of the total 30 SFR purchases made in the county during the quarter, signaling a predominantly non-landlord-driven market.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 came from mom-and-pop investors (Tier 01-04), who acquired 2 properties. This represents 100.0% of the landlord purchases, reinforcing their role as the sole active investor segment in recent buying.

Specifically, the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01) was the only segment showing Q4 activity, with 2 entities purchasing the 2 properties. This indicates that new or very small-scale landlords are driving the minimal investor acquisitions.

There was no purchasing activity from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Kearney County during Q4 2025. This absence highlights the market's reliance on smaller, individual investors for any new landlord acquisitions.

The very low volume of landlord purchases in Q4, with just 2 properties out of 30 total SFR sales, suggests a cautious approach from investors or a limited inventory of properties meeting their criteria. This makes the local market less influenced by investor buying behavior compared to areas with higher landlord acquisition rates.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-Pop Landlords Control 95.2% of Investor-Owned SFR in Kearney County
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04), collectively dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Kearney County, controlling a substantial 95.2% of all properties held by investors.

The bedrock of this ownership structure is the single-property landlord (Tier 01), who alone accounts for 335 properties, representing an overwhelming 73.6% of the total investor-owned SFR portfolio. This confirms that individual, first-time, or very small-scale landlords form the vast majority of the rental housing supply.

The distribution shows a clear drop-off as portfolio size increases; the Two-property tier (Tier 02) holds only 18 properties (4.0%), while the Small landlord (3-5 properties) tier accounts for 37 properties (8.1%), and the Small landlord (6-10 properties) tier owns 43 properties (9.5%).

Beyond the mom-and-pop segments, mid-size landlords (Tiers 05-08) hold a much smaller share. For instance, the Small-medium (11-20 properties) tier accounts for 15 properties (3.3%), and the Small-medium (21-50 properties) tier owns 7 properties (1.5%).

Notably, there is no presence of institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) in Kearney County, as they control 0.0% of investor-owned SFR. This highlights the intensely local and fragmented nature of the investor market, with no 'Wall Street' influence.

Unfortunately, data regarding how acquisition prices vary by tier is not available for Kearney County, preventing an analysis of whether larger or smaller landlords pay different amounts for their properties.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual Investors Dominate All Tiers in Kearney County, Comprising 94.3% of Single-Property Ownership
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every tier of landlord ownership in Kearney County, starting with the single-property (Tier 01) segment where they own 317 properties, representing 94.3% of all properties in that tier. This signifies that the vast majority of initial landlord ventures are individual endeavors.

This individual dominance persists strongly across small and mid-size portfolios. For example, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 42 properties (97.7%), and even in the 11-20 property tier, they hold 13 properties (86.7%).

Companies maintain a very minor presence across all tiers for which data is available. Their highest concentration is observed in the Small-medium (21-50 properties) tier, where they own 2 properties, making up 28.6% of that tier's holdings, with individuals still holding 71.4%.

Notably, there is no observed crossover point where companies become the majority owners in any of the listed tiers. This reinforces the narrative that Kearney County's real estate investor market is fundamentally driven by individual, rather than corporate, capital and entities, even as portfolio sizes increase.

The consistent high percentage of individual ownership across tiers highlights a market structure heavily reliant on private individuals. This implies that local, smaller-scale motivations and investment strategies likely shape the market more than large-scale corporate objectives.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip Code 68959 Leads Kearney County with 218 Investor-Owned Properties, While 68945 Boasts 32.8% Investor Ownership Rate
Detailed Findings

In Kearney County, NE, investor-owned properties show clear geographic concentration at the zip code level. NE-Kearney-68959 leads by count with 218 investor-owned SFR properties, making it the primary hub for landlord activity, despite having a lower ownership rate of 16.2% compared to other top areas.

When examining investor ownership rates, NE-Kearney-68945 stands out with the highest percentage, where 32.8% of SFR properties are investor-owned. This indicates a high penetration of rental properties within this specific zip code, signaling a potentially robust rental market.

Following closely in investor ownership percentage is NE-Kearney-68847, where 29.4% of SFR properties are landlord-owned. This zip code also appears in the top by count (25 properties), suggesting a concentrated yet smaller market for investor holdings.

The zip codes with the highest number of investor properties (68959, 68924, 68847, 68945) collectively comprise a significant portion of Kearney County's total 426 investor-owned properties. This demonstrates a strong clustering of rental stock in specific communities within the county.

A comparison between the top regions by count and by percentage reveals that while some areas like 68959 have a high absolute number of investor properties, other, smaller zip codes like 68945 have a higher *proportion* of their housing stock dedicated to rentals, indicating varying market densities and investor strategies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Kearney County Landlords Are Net Buyers with a 3.0x Buy/Sell Ratio in 2025, but Historical Data Lacks Inter-Landlord Trades
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Kearney County, NE, have consistently been net buyers over the past two years, signaling a growth-oriented investment approach. In 2025, they purchased 6 properties while selling only 2, resulting in a strong net buyer position with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio.

This trend continues from 2024, when landlords also ended as net buyers, acquiring 7 properties and divesting 4. This historical pattern suggests a stable, albeit low-volume, accumulation strategy by investors in the county.

Reviewing quarterly trends in 2025, landlords maintained a positive net position in Q2 (2 buys, 1 sell). However, Q3 saw a neutral position with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating periods of balancing portfolios.

The average buy prices versus average sell prices across timeframes are not provided in this dataset, which limits the ability to analyze implied profit margins or changes in property valuation during transactions.

Crucially, there is no available data regarding the percentage of buy or sell transactions that occur between landlords (inter-landlord trades). This data gap prevents a comprehensive understanding of market liquidity and internal trading dynamics within the investor community.

Furthermore, information on institutional investor (1000+ tier) transactions is entirely absent from this dataset. This makes it impossible to assess whether larger entities are accumulating or divesting properties in Kearney County, leaving a significant blind spot in the overall market analysis.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords Made 2 Purchases in Q4, Comprising 6.7% of Total SFR Acquisitions in Kearney County
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Kearney County engaged in 2 transactions, both of which were purchases. This represents a modest 6.7% share of the total 30 SFR purchases recorded in the county during the quarter, highlighting the relatively minor role of landlords in recent market activity.

All landlord transaction activity in Q4 originated from single-property landlords (Tier 01), who completed 2 purchases. This indicates that the entry of new or very small-scale investors continues to be the primary source of landlord buying, consistent with the overall mom-and-pop dominance.

The average purchase price for these Tier 01 landlord transactions was $275,000. This pricing aligns with the overall landlord average discussed in Section 6, suggesting that smaller investors are acquiring properties at competitive rates.

Notably, none of the Q4 landlord purchases (0.0%) were bought from other landlords. This implies that new inventory for investors is primarily coming from traditional homeowners or new construction, rather than inter-landlord portfolio reshuffling, indicating a less liquid investor-to-investor market.

Institutional investors (Tier 09) showed no transaction activity in Q4 2025, further emphasizing their complete absence from Kearney County's investor market. This reinforces that the county's rental housing stock is not being acquired or sold by large corporate entities.

Comparing Q4 transactions to overall ownership distribution, the complete focus on Tier 01 transactions reflects the extreme concentration of ownership by single-property landlords (73.6% of holdings), indicating that the existing market structure is being maintained by new small-scale entries.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominant, Owning 95.2% of Kearney's 426 SFR Investor Properties
Holdings
Landlords in Kearney County own 426 SFR properties, representing 19.6% of the total SFR market in the county. Individual investors hold 391 properties (91.8%), significantly outweighing company ownership at 36 properties (8.5%).
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $275,000 in Q4, securing a 7.5% discount over traditional homeowners who paid $297,457. This reflects a $22,457 price advantage, though based on minimal Q4 landlord purchase volume.
Activity
Q4 saw landlords purchase only 2 properties, accounting for 6.7% of all 30 SFR purchases in the county. Both purchases were made by single-property landlords, with no institutional activity.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.2% of investor-owned housing in Kearney County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold 0.0%. Single-property landlords alone own 73.6% of this portfolio.
Ownership Type
Individual investors consistently dominate all tiers, holding 94.3% of single-property portfolios and remaining the majority (71.4%) even in the largest 21-50 property tier. Companies never achieve majority ownership across any tier.
Transactions
Kearney County landlords are net buyers in 2025 with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio (6 buys vs 2 sells). In Q4, landlords made 2 purchases, signaling a net buyer position, but there is no recorded institutional transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The real estate investor market in Kearney County, NE, is fundamentally characterized by the overwhelming dominance of mom-and-pop landlords. With a total portfolio of 426 SFR properties, representing 19.6% of the county's SFR market, individual investors hold 91.8% of these assets, a stark contrast to the mere 8.5% owned by companies. The market's structure is further emphasized by the fact that 95.2% of all investor-owned properties are held by landlords with 10 or fewer properties, with single-property landlords alone accounting for 73.6% of the entire investor portfolio. This fragmented ownership profile, marked by a 17:1 ratio of individual to company landlord entities, confirms an almost complete absence of institutional investment.

Investor activity in Q4 2025 was minimal, with landlords purchasing only 2 properties, constituting a modest 6.7% of all SFR purchases in the county. These acquisitions, valued at an average of $275,000, allowed landlords to secure a 7.5% discount compared to the $297,457 paid by traditional homeowners. This pricing advantage, though based on low transaction volume, highlights opportunistic buying strategies, with mom-and-pop landlords being the sole active investor segment. Historically, landlords in Kearney County have been net buyers, demonstrating a consistent accumulation strategy over the past two years, with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio in 2025.

Kearney County's investor market is a clear example of localized, individual-driven real estate investment, largely untouched by larger corporate entities. The strong prevalence of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with minimal Q4 activity and a notable pricing advantage on their few purchases, indicates a cautious yet strategic market. This structure suggests stability in local rental housing supply, primarily influenced by local individuals rather than external institutional forces, with a strong focus on rental income as 97.2% of investor properties are rented.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:25 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKearney (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail