Furnas (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Furnas (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Furnas (NE)
1,878
Total Investors in Furnas (NE)
1,041
Investor Owned SFR in Furnas (NE)
822(43.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
956
SFR Owned
735
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
85
SFR Owned
94
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 822 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Furnas County with 100% Cash Holdings and Zero Recent Acquisitions
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords control virtually all 822 investor-owned SFR properties in Furnas County, representing 43.8% of the total SFR market, with 100% acquired via cash. While landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 (44 buys vs 8 sells), the Q4 2025 market saw no landlord or institutional acquisition activity, highlighting a pause in growth. Geographic hotspots within the county show investor ownership rates as high as 62.4%.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 89.4% of 822 landlord-owned SFR properties, all acquired with cash.
All 822 investor-owned properties are held with cash, with 807 currently rented, signifying a strong focus on cash-flow generation. Individual landlords represent 956 entities, vastly outnumbering the 85 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a 62.2% discount in 2025-Q1 and a 7.9% discount in Q2 compared to homeowners.
Landlords purchased no properties in Q4 or Q3 2025, or throughout 2024, indicating a recent pause in acquisition activity. However, in 2025-Q1, landlords paid an average of $62,093, a significant $102,147 less than homeowners' $164,240, showcasing substantial deal-finding ability. A smaller discount of $10,677 (7.9%) was observed in Q2 2025, with landlords at $124,000 against homeowners at $134,677.
Current Quarter Purchases
Zero landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
Both total Q4 SFR purchases and landlord Q4 purchases stood at 0, indicating a stagnant acquisition market. Consequently, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors also registered 0 purchases, showing no new entries or expansions across any tier this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of investor-owned SFR properties in Furnas County.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the backbone of the market, owning 649 properties (74.9% of the total). Institutional investors (Tier 09) hold 0 properties, indicating their complete absence from this local market. The average portfolio size is small, reinforcing the dominance of individual and small-scale investors.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, representing 88.1% to 90.1% of ownership in mom-and-pop segments.
There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners, as individual ownership consistently remains above 88% even in the 6-10 property tier. Companies hold a consistent minority share, ranging from 9.9% in Tier 01 to 11.9% in Tier 02.
Geographic Distribution
Furnas County zip codes show investor ownership rates up to 62.4%, with NE-Furnas-69022 leading by count.
NE-Furnas-69046 boasts the highest investor ownership rate at 62.4%, despite not being the leader in raw property count. NE-Furnas-69022 leads in investor-owned properties with 191, representing 37.0% of its local SFR market. The top five zip codes by count collectively hold a significant portion of the county's investor-owned properties.
Historical Transactions
Furnas County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 44 properties versus 8 sells.
Landlords in 2024 showed a robust buy/sell ratio of 5.5:1, indicating a period of significant portfolio expansion. Institutional investors (1000+ tier) had no recorded transactions in 2024, maintaining a complete absence from the county's transaction activity.
Current Quarter Transactions
Zero landlord transactions recorded in Q4 2025, halting all market activity for investors.
Total SFR transactions and landlord-specific transactions were both 0 in Q4 2025, indicating a completely dormant market for investor sales and purchases. This meant no activity from mom-and-pop landlords or institutional investors in this quarter, with average purchase prices naturally at $0 across all tiers.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 89.4% of 822 landlord-owned SFR properties, all acquired with cash.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landlord-owned SFR market in Furnas County, holding 735 properties, which accounts for 89.4% of all 822 investor-owned SFR properties. Companies, in contrast, own only 94 properties (11.4%).

Remarkably, all 822 investor-owned SFR properties in Furnas County were acquired with cash, indicating a strong preference for unencumbered assets and direct ownership. This 100% cash holding (0 financed properties) suggests a highly conservative investment strategy focused on cash flow.

Of the 822 cash-held investor properties, 807 (98.2%) are currently rented, confirming the rental-focused nature of these investments. This high rental rate, coupled with 100% cash holdings, underscores a strategy geared towards generating consistent income streams.

With 1,041 total landlords in the county, individual landlords number 956, significantly outweighing the 85 company landlords. This represents an individual-to-company landlord entity ratio of 11.2:1, further solidifying the market's mom-and-pop character.

The investor-owned portfolio of 822 SFR properties represents a substantial 43.8% of the total 1,878 SFR properties in Furnas County, indicating a highly engaged investor market despite the individual-dominated, cash-only nature of ownership.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a 62.2% discount in 2025-Q1 and a 7.9% discount in Q2 compared to homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity has been absent in recent quarters, with 0 properties purchased in Q4 2025, Q3 2025, Q1 2025, and throughout Year 2024. This signals a current pause in new investments by landlords in Furnas County.

Despite the recent inactivity, prior quarter data reveals a significant pricing advantage for landlords. In 2025-Q1, landlords acquired properties at an average price of $62,093, which was a substantial 62.2% or $102,147 less than the average homeowner price of $164,240.

The price discount for landlords, however, was not consistent, showing variability across quarters. In 2025-Q2, landlords paid an average of $124,000, still a 7.9% or $10,677 discount compared to the average homeowner price of $134,677.

The absence of homeowner pricing data for 2025-Q3 prevents a complete quarterly trend analysis, but the available data from Q1 and Q2 2025 demonstrates that landlords were capable of securing properties at notably lower prices when actively purchasing.

Average acquisition prices for landlords, when active, varied significantly, from $62,093 in 2025-Q1 to $124,000 in 2025-Q2. This fluctuation suggests deal-specific pricing rather than a stable market average for landlord acquisitions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Zero landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, reflecting a complete halt in acquisition activity.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 market in Furnas County saw a complete absence of SFR purchase activity, with 0 total SFR purchases recorded. This indicates a significant slowdown or pause in the local real estate market.

Correspondingly, landlord purchases in Q4 2025 were also 0, representing 0.0% of the market. This highlights a complete cessation of new acquisitions by investors during the quarter.

Given the overall inactivity, mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) made 0 purchases, meaning no new small-scale investors entered the market or expanded their portfolios. Similarly, institutional investors (Tier 09) also recorded 0 purchases, reinforcing the lack of activity across all investor sizes.

The absence of any purchasing data by tier further underscores the stagnant market conditions, with no entities recorded as active in acquiring SFR properties during Q4 2025.

This zero-activity quarter for landlords follows a period of sporadic purchasing, as seen in the Section 6 pricing data, suggesting that market conditions in Furnas County may not be favorable for new acquisitions by investors at this time.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.4% of investor-owned SFR properties in Furnas County.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04, exert near-complete control over the investor-owned SFR market in Furnas County, holding a dominant 99.4% of all investor-owned properties. This translates to 862 properties owned by smaller-scale investors (649 for Tier 01, 101 for Tier 02, 83 for Tier 03-05, and 29 for Tier 06-10).

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the most significant segment, owning 649 properties, which alone accounts for 74.9% of the total investor-owned SFR. This high concentration highlights the market's reliance on first-time and very small-scale investors.

Institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) are entirely absent from Furnas County's SFR market, owning 0 properties. This contrasts sharply with national narratives, confirming that this county remains a domain of local, smaller investors.

The distribution shows a steep drop-off after the smallest tiers: 74.9% in Tier 01, 11.6% in Tier 02, 9.6% in Tier 03-05, and 3.3% in Tier 06-10. Only 5 properties (0.6%) are held by small-medium landlords (Tier 21-50), indicating a market structure heavily weighted towards smaller portfolios.

Given the complete absence of pricing data by tier in this section, it's not possible to assess how acquisition prices vary with investor size, nor can we determine if tier distribution has evolved over time from this dataset.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate all tiers, representing 88.1% to 90.1% of ownership in mom-and-pop segments.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors maintain a significant majority across all analyzed mom-and-pop tiers in Furnas County, consistently owning between 88.1% and 90.1% of properties within each tier. For instance, in the 6-10 property tier, individuals own 26 properties (89.7%) compared to companies owning only 3 (10.3%).

The data reveals no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. Even in the largest presented mom-and-pop tier (6-10 properties), individual investors still own nearly 90% of the properties, reinforcing their foundational role in the local investment landscape.

In the single-property (Tier 01) segment, individual investors own 591 properties (90.1%), significantly outpacing the 65 properties owned by companies (9.9%). This pattern is consistent across all smaller tiers.

Companies represent a consistent but small minority across these tiers, holding 9.9% in Tier 01, 11.9% in Tier 02, 10.8% in Tier 03-05, and 10.3% in Tier 06-10. This indicates a limited corporate presence even among smaller-scale landlords.

The current data does not provide insights into how acquisition prices differ between individual and company buyers within these tiers, nor does it track growth patterns over time for specific owner types.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Furnas County zip codes show investor ownership rates up to 62.4%, with NE-Furnas-69022 leading by count.
Detailed Findings

Within Furnas County, NE-Furnas-69022 leads in raw count of investor-owned properties with 191 properties, representing a substantial 37.0% of its total SFR inventory. This zip code demonstrates a high concentration of investor activity.

While NE-Furnas-69022 has the highest count, NE-Furnas-69046 exhibits the highest investor ownership rate at 62.4%, indicating that a majority of SFR properties in this specific zip code are investor-owned. This highlights areas of high landlord penetration.

The top five sub-geographies by investor-owned property count (69022, 68922, 68926, 68967, 68948) collectively account for 709 properties, or 86.2% of the total 822 investor-owned SFR properties in the county, revealing significant geographic concentration.

Notably, there isn't a direct one-to-one correlation between the highest counts and highest percentages; for example, 69046 (highest percentage) does not appear in the top 5 by count, while 68948 (5th by count with 70 properties) also has a high ownership rate of 61.4% (2nd highest percentage).

Acquisition price variations across these regions cannot be determined from the provided section data, but the diverse ownership rates suggest varying market dynamics and investor appeal across different zip codes within Furnas County.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Furnas County landlords were strong net buyers in 2024, acquiring 44 properties versus 8 sells.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Furnas County were significant net buyers in 2024, purchasing 44 SFR properties while selling only 8. This strong accumulation trend signals a period of active portfolio expansion for investors.

The buy/sell ratio for all landlords in 2024 stood at 5.5:1 (44 buys / 8 sells), indicating a robust net buying position and positive sentiment among local investors during that year.

Institutional investors (1000+ tier) recorded no transactions in 2024, reinforcing their complete absence from the Furnas County market as observed in ownership data. This suggests the local market does not attract large-scale corporate investment.

The provided data does not include information on the percentage of buy or sell transactions that were inter-landlord trades, nor does it provide average buy prices versus average sell prices, making it impossible to assess implied profit margins or market liquidity patterns from landlord-to-landlord sales.

Comparing 2024's strong buying activity to the 0 purchases in Q4 2025 (as seen in Section 7) highlights a significant shift, suggesting a dramatic slowdown in landlord acquisition momentum from 2024 to the current quarter.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Zero landlord transactions recorded in Q4 2025, halting all market activity for investors.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 period in Furnas County experienced a complete standstill in SFR transaction activity, with 0 total transactions recorded. This indicates a highly illiquid market for this quarter.

As a direct consequence, landlord transactions were also 0 in Q4 2025, equating to a 0.0% share of the overall market. This confirms that no investors were buying or selling properties during this period.

The absence of activity extends across all investor tiers; both mom-and-pop landlords (Tier 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) registered 0 transactions. This signals a universal pause in activity regardless of investor size.

With no purchase activity, the average purchase price for Tier 01 and Tier 09 investors in Q4 stood at $0, reflecting the dormant market conditions rather than actual pricing trends.

The lack of any transactions from other landlords (bought from landlords) further underscores the complete inactivity. This quarter stands in stark contrast to 2024, which saw significant net buying by landlords (as detailed in Section 11).

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Furnas County with Cash Holdings, Halting Q4 Acquisitions
Holdings
Landlords own 822 SFR properties in Furnas County, representing 43.8% of the total SFR market, with individual investors holding 735 (89.4%) and companies owning 94 (11.4%). All investor-owned properties are held with cash.
Pricing
Landlords secured substantial discounts when active, paying 62.2% less than homeowners in 2025-Q1 ($62,093 vs $164,240) and 7.9% less in Q2 ($124,000 vs $134,677). However, no landlord acquisition pricing data is available for Q4 2025 due to zero activity.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw 0 landlord purchases, representing 0.0% of all sales, indicating a complete halt in acquisition activity across all tiers, including mom-and-pop and institutional investors.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.4% of investor housing in Furnas County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own 0.0%, signifying their complete absence from this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate ownership across all mom-and-pop tiers, consistently holding between 88.1% and 90.1% of properties, with no tier showing company majority control.
Transactions
While landlords were net buyers in 2024 with a 5.5:1 buy/sell ratio (44 buys vs 8 sells), institutional investors recorded 0 transactions in both 2024 and Q4 2025, signaling a pause in large-scale activity.
Market Narrative

The Furnas County SFR market is distinctly characterized by the overwhelming dominance of individual, mom-and-pop landlords. They own 822 SFR properties, constituting a significant 43.8% of the county's total SFR market. This portfolio is almost entirely individual-owned, with individual investors holding 89.4% (735 properties) compared to companies at 11.4% (94 properties). A striking feature is that 100% of these investor properties are acquired with cash, highlighting a conservative, debt-free investment strategy focused on stable rental income, as 807 of these properties are rented.

Investor activity in Furnas County has seen a notable slowdown recently. In Q4 2025, there were 0 landlord purchases or transactions, indicating a complete pause in market engagement. This contrasts with 2024, where landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring 44 properties versus 8 sells, demonstrating a 5.5:1 buy/sell ratio. When active, landlords have shown a significant ability to secure properties at a discount, paying as much as 62.2% less than traditional homeowners in Q1 2025. This deal-finding capability suggests strategic buying when opportunities arise, but current market conditions have halted this trend.

This data reveals a highly localized and small-investor driven market in Furnas County, NE, where institutional players are entirely absent. The market's high investor penetration (43.8% of SFR) is driven by cash-flush individual landlords, particularly those owning 1-2 properties, who focus on rental income. The current lack of transaction activity in Q4 suggests either a period of market re-evaluation or a scarcity of suitable inventory, indicating a potential shift from the earlier active buying observed in 2024. This market structure implies local dynamics are less influenced by national corporate trends and more by individual investor sentiment and opportunities within specific county zip codes like NE-Furnas-69046 with its 62.4% investor ownership rate.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:19 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFurnas (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price