Burt (NE) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Burt (NE) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Burt (NE)
2,359
Total Investors in Burt (NE)
901
Investor Owned SFR in Burt (NE)
670(28.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
815
SFR Owned
600
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
86
SFR Owned
98
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 670 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Burt County Amidst Low Acquisition Activity
Individual, mom-and-pop landlords control a staggering 99.6% of investor-owned SFR properties in Burt County. Landlords, historically net buyers, demonstrated minimal Q4 2025 acquisition activity, with only 10 purchases, representing 32.3% of the market.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Burt County's 670 investor-owned SFR properties are overwhelmingly individual-held at 89.6%.
A high 98.7% of investor-owned properties are rented, reflecting a strong rental focus, with 83.6% acquired via cash. Individual landlords outnumber companies by nearly 9.5 to 1.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired 0 properties in Q4 2025, signaling a pause in investor buying activity.
No landlord purchases occurred in any 2025 or 2024 quarter, preventing a meaningful analysis of acquisition price trends. Homeowner purchases in Q4 2025 averaged $188,204.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 32.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% of activity from mom-and-pop investors.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, with 10 entities acquiring 8 properties, representing 80.0% of landlord purchases. No institutional investors participated in Q4 purchases.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 99.6% of Burt County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone hold 82.0% of properties, totaling 571 units, while institutional investors (Tier 09) own a negligible 0.1% (1 property). No tier-specific pricing data is available.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors hold a majority in every tier shown, with 88.6% of single-property portfolios.
Companies secure their highest share (36.7%) in the 6-10 property tier, but do not achieve majority ownership in any listed tier. No pricing data by owner type is available.
Geographic Distribution
NE-Burt-68020 leads with 107 investor-owned SFR properties, revealing local concentration.
NE-Burt-51557 records the highest investor ownership rate at 69.2% (9 properties), indicating intense landlord penetration in a smaller sub-market. NE-Burt-68020 also has a high rate of 48.2%.
Historical Transactions
All landlords are significant net buyers, showing a 9.60x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025.
In Q2 2025, landlords exhibited an exceptionally strong net buyer position with 21 buys against only 1 sell. No institutional transaction data is available for analysis.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords participated in 24.0% of Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop tiers.
Single-property landlords (Tier 01) executed 10 transactions at an average price of $58,286, which is notably higher than the $21,000 paid by 6-10 property landlords. No institutional transactions occurred.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Burt County's 670 investor-owned SFR properties are overwhelmingly individual-held at 89.6%.
Detailed Findings

Burt County, NE has an active landlord market comprising 670 investor-owned SFR properties, which represents 28.4% of the total 2,359 SFR properties in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate this segment, holding 600 properties (89.6% of investor-owned SFR), while companies own a smaller share of 98 properties (14.6%). This highlights a market largely driven by individual entrepreneurship.

By entity count, individual landlords significantly outnumber company landlords by nearly 9.5 to 1, with 815 individual landlords compared to 86 company landlords, indicating a prevalence of small-scale investors.

A vast majority of landlord-owned properties, 661 units (98.7%), are currently rented, signaling a primary focus on generating rental income within the portfolio.

The acquisition strategy for landlords leans heavily towards cash purchases, with 560 properties (83.6%) being bought outright, compared to 110 properties (16.4%) that are financed, indicating a preference for debt-free holdings.

The current holdings demonstrate a market structure where individual investors prioritize cash purchases for properties primarily intended for rental, solidifying their role as long-term, income-focused owners.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired 0 properties in Q4 2025, signaling a pause in investor buying activity.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition activity in Burt County came to a near standstill in Q4 2025, with 0 properties purchased. This complete absence of buying transactions limits any meaningful analysis of current landlord acquisition prices.

The reported average landlord acquisition price for Q4 2025 was $53,500, a significant 71.6% discount compared to homeowner purchases averaging $188,204. However, this landlord price is derived from zero acquisitions, making it a statistical artifact rather than a true market reflection.

Similarly, throughout all of 2025 and 2024, landlords recorded 0 properties purchased in any quarter or for the full year, preventing any reliable quarter-over-quarter or year-over-year price gap analysis against homeowners.

Homeowner acquisition prices, in contrast, showed activity, with Q4 2025 averaging $188,204, Q3 2025 at $165,569, and Q2 2025 at $245,772, indicating fluctuating but consistent homeowner market engagement.

The overall lack of landlord acquisition data for recent periods (2024 and 2025) suggests a significant withdrawal or pause in new investment activity in Burt County, making previous price trends and appreciation difficult to assess for investors.

This absence of transactions means that no current insights can be drawn regarding whether individual or company landlords pay different prices in the current market, as there were no transactions to compare.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 32.3% of Q4 SFR purchases, with 100% of activity from mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords made 10 SFR purchases, capturing a significant 32.3% share of the total 31 SFR purchases in Burt County, demonstrating their continued influence in the market.

All landlord purchasing activity in Q4 was driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who accounted for 100.0% of the quarter's landlord acquisitions, while institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchases.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, with 10 distinct entities acquiring 8 properties, constituting 80.0% of all landlord purchases during the quarter.

Small landlords in the 3-5 property tier and 6-10 property tier each contributed 1 property to Q4 purchases, representing 10.0% of landlord activity respectively.

The concentration of Q4 purchases in the mom-and-pop segment highlights the ongoing role of smaller investors in property acquisition, reinforcing the local, individual-driven nature of the market.

The significant participation of Tier 01 entities suggests a steady entry or expansion of new and existing single-property landlords into the Burt County market during this period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords overwhelmingly control 99.6% of Burt County's investor-owned SFR housing.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords, encompassing Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties), exert dominant control over Burt County's investor-owned SFR market, holding a staggering 99.6% of the 696 properties detailed in this tier breakdown.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) represent the largest segment, owning 571 properties, which accounts for 82.0% of all investor-owned SFR properties listed by tier, making them the cornerstone of the local rental market.

The combined share of smaller landlords in Tiers 02, 03-05, and 06-10 totals 17.6% (45, 47, and 30 properties respectively), further underscoring the market's fragmentation among small-scale investors.

In stark contrast to media narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal presence in Burt County, owning only 1 property, which constitutes just 0.1% of the total investor-owned portfolio.

This distribution reveals a highly decentralized market structure where individual and small portfolio owners, rather than large corporations, are the primary holders of investor-owned SFR properties.

A lack of available data on acquisition prices by tier prevents a direct comparison of whether larger or smaller investors typically pay more or less for properties, limiting insights into tier-specific pricing strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors hold a majority in every tier shown, with 88.6% of single-property portfolios.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors consistently maintain majority ownership across all small and mid-size portfolio tiers for which data is available, underscoring their predominant role in Burt County's SFR market structure.

In the single-property landlord tier (Tier 01), individuals own 526 properties (88.6%), significantly dwarfing company ownership at 68 properties (11.4%).

For two-property landlords (Tier 02), individual ownership remains high at 39 properties (86.7%), compared to 6 properties (13.3%) held by companies.

Even in larger mom-and-pop tiers, such as 6-10 properties, individuals still command a majority with 19 properties (63.3%), while companies hold 11 properties (36.7%), marking their highest concentration in these smaller tiers.

No crossover point is observed within the provided tiers (up to 10 properties) where companies achieve majority ownership, reinforcing the strong individual-driven market in Burt County.

The lack of data for larger portfolio tiers (e.g., 11-20, 1000+) prevents a comprehensive understanding of individual vs. company dynamics in larger-scale investment.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
NE-Burt-68020 leads with 107 investor-owned SFR properties, revealing local concentration.
Detailed Findings

Within Burt County, investor-owned properties are most concentrated in the NE-Burt-68020 zip code, which accounts for 107 investor-owned properties, establishing it as a primary hub for investment activity.

The NE-Burt-51557 zip code demonstrates the highest investor ownership rate across the county at 69.2%, despite having a smaller count of 9 investor-owned properties, signaling a highly saturated, albeit smaller, investment sub-market.

NE-Burt-68019 follows as another significant area, with 54 investor-owned properties and a substantial ownership rate of 32.7%, contributing to the county's geographic spread of landlord activity.

NE-Burt-68020 stands out by appearing in both the top count and top percentage lists, indicating it is both a large market in terms of investor-owned properties and has a high proportion of its SFR stock held by landlords (48.2%).

In contrast, NE-Burt-68029 shows minimal investor presence, with only 1 investor-owned property and an 11.1% ownership rate, highlighting varied levels of investor interest across different zip codes within Burt County.

The absence of data for average acquisition prices across these specific sub-geographies prevents a detailed analysis of how pricing strategies or market values differ by regional investor concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
All landlords are significant net buyers, showing a 9.60x buy/sell ratio in Year 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Burt County have consistently operated as strong net buyers over the past two years, demonstrating a clear pattern of property accumulation rather than divestment.

For the entirety of Year 2025, landlords recorded 48 purchases against 5 sales, resulting in a robust 9.60x buy/sell ratio, signaling ongoing expansion of their portfolios.

The most aggressive buying period was Q2 2025, where landlords acquired 21 properties while selling only 1, achieving an exceptionally high 21.00x buy/sell ratio, indicating intense acquisition momentum.

Year 2024 also saw significant net buying activity, with 62 purchases compared to 6 sales, yielding a 10.33x buy/sell ratio, reinforcing the long-term trend of landlord growth.

While landlords remain net buyers, there was a slight decrease in overall buy volume from 62 purchases in 2024 to 48 in 2025, suggesting a modest moderation in the pace of acquisitions.

The absence of transaction data for institutional investors (1000+ tier) prevents a comparison of their activity patterns or net buying/selling positions against the overall landlord market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords participated in 24.0% of Q4 transactions, entirely driven by mom-and-pop tiers.
Detailed Findings

Landlords engaged in 12 transactions during Q4 2025, representing 24.0% of the total 50 SFR transactions in Burt County, indicating a moderate level of market participation.

All landlord transactions in Q4 were carried out by mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04), with no transactional activity recorded from institutional (Tier 09) entities, further emphasizing the dominance of smaller landlords.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) were the most active, responsible for 10 transactions, with an average purchase price of $58,286.

A notable pricing pattern emerges among active tiers: Tier 01 landlords paid the highest average price at $58,286, while Tier 06-10 landlords secured properties at a significantly lower average price of $21,000, suggesting differing property types or market niches targeted by these investor sizes.

Across all active tiers (01, 03-05, 06-10), 0% of transactions were explicitly identified as being bought from other landlords, suggesting that Q4 purchases primarily originated from non-landlord sellers.

The disparity in average purchase prices, where smaller landlords in Tier 01 appear to be paying more than those in Tier 06-10, indicates varied investment strategies or access to different segments of the property market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command Burt County Market, Historically Net Buyers Amidst Low Q4 Activity
Holdings
Landlords own 670 SFR properties in Burt County, representing 28.4% of the total 2,359 SFR properties. Individual investors hold 600 properties (89.6%) while companies own 98 properties (14.6%).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords reportedly acquired 0 properties at an average price of $53,500, a significant 71.6% discount compared to homeowner purchases averaging $188,204; this highlights a near-complete pause in landlord acquisitions for the period.
Activity
Q4 landlords purchased 10 properties, accounting for 32.3% of all SFR sales, with 10 single-property landlords (Tier 01) making acquisitions. All Q4 landlord activity was exclusively from mom-and-pop tiers.
Market Share
Small landlords (1-10 properties) control 99.6% of investor-owned housing in Burt County, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) own a negligible 0.1%. NE-Burt-68020 leads with 107 investor-owned properties.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all observed tiers, holding 88.6% of single-property portfolios; no tier shows companies as majority owners, and individuals outnumber company landlords by nearly 9.5 to 1.
Transactions
All landlords in Burt County are strong net buyers with a 9.60x buy/sell ratio for 2025 (48 buys vs 5 sells), though no institutional transaction data is available to assess their specific position.
Market Narrative

Burt County, NE's real estate investment landscape is heavily shaped by individual and small-scale investors. Of the 2,359 total SFR properties, landlords own 670, representing a significant 28.4% market penetration. This investor-owned portfolio is overwhelmingly dominated by individual landlords, who hold 600 properties (89.6%), far outweighing the 98 properties (14.6%) owned by companies. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an astounding 99.6% of the investor market, with single-property owners alone holding 82.0% of these properties, effectively demonstrating a highly decentralized market structure.

Investor behavior in Burt County reflects a cautious but historically acquisitive stance. While landlords engaged in 10 Q4 2025 purchases, making up 32.3% of all SFR sales, there were 0 landlord acquisitions recorded for Q4 2025 in the broader acquisition pricing data, signaling a significant pause in new investor buying. Historically, landlords have been strong net buyers, with a 9.60x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (48 buys vs 5 sells), indicating a long-term strategy of portfolio expansion. In Q4, single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $58,286, which was notably higher than the $21,000 paid by 6-10 property landlords, suggesting varied investment targets or strategies.

The market in Burt County is characterized by strong local, individual investor participation, contrasting with national trends often highlighting institutional influence. The pronounced dominance of mom-and-pop landlords, coupled with historical net buying, suggests a resilient local investment ecosystem. Geographically, investor-owned properties are concentrated in areas like NE-Burt-68020 (107 properties) and NE-Burt-51557, which exhibits a high 69.2% investor ownership rate. This indicates that while the overall county market is individual-driven, certain sub-regions within Burt County demonstrate intensified landlord penetration and activity.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 12:10 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBurt (NE)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords