Wells (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wells (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wells (ND)
1,268
Total Investors in Wells (ND)
522
Investor Owned SFR in Wells (ND)
409(32.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
494
SFR Owned
381
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
28
SFR Owned
33
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 409 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Wells County with 99% Ownership Amidst a Frozen Q4 Market
Investors own 409 SFR properties in Wells County, representing 32.3% of the total market. This ownership is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (99.0%), with individuals comprising 93.2% of all investor holdings. The market came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, recording zero purchases or transactions by any buyer type, a stark contrast to 2024 when landlords were active net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 409 SFR properties in Wells County, with individuals holding 93.2%.
The investor portfolio is heavily skewed towards cash purchases, with 345 properties owned outright versus only 64 that are financed. All 409 investor-owned properties are classified as non-owner-occupied rentals. By entity, 494 individual landlords dominate the market compared to just 28 company landlords.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlord pricing showed extreme volatility, swinging from a 33.7% premium to a 12.8% discount.
In Q1 2025, landlords paid $25,889 more than homeowners on average, but by Q2 they secured a $25,065 discount. This fluctuation highlights an inconsistent pricing dynamic in a low-volume market. No purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, preventing a current comparison.
Current Quarter Purchases
The Q4 2025 market was frozen, with landlords making zero purchases.
There were a total of 0 SFR purchases in Wells County during Q4 2025 from any buyer type, including landlords and traditional homeowners. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional investors were equally inactive, with zero acquisitions recorded for any tier.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the market, owning 353 properties, which is 83.8% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors with 1,000+ properties have zero presence in Wells County, underscoring the market's hyper-local character.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals own over 95% of single-property landlord holdings; companies are nearly absent.
Companies only begin to establish a minor presence in the 2-5 property tier, where they own 27.8% of properties. Given the lack of larger portfolios, there is no tier where companies become the majority owner in Wells County.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 81.4% of all investor properties.
Zip code 58438 has the highest investor penetration rate at 57.7%. Zip code 58374 shows a 100.0% rate, but this is likely an anomaly based on a very small number of total properties. The top region by count, 58341, contains 194 investor-owned homes.
Historical Transactions
In 2024, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring nearly 10 properties for every 1 they sold.
Landlords purchased 29 properties while only selling 3 throughout 2024. This active accumulation phase provides a stark contrast to the complete halt in market activity seen in Q4 2025. Data on landlord-to-landlord transactions is not available.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0% as the market saw no activity.
With zero total transactions in the quarter, there was no buying or selling activity across any investor tier. This lack of liquidity affected mom-and-pop and institutional investors equally, as no properties changed hands.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 409 SFR properties in Wells County, with individuals holding 93.2%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 32.3% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market in Wells County, with a total of 409 properties under their ownership out of 1,268 total SFRs.

The investor landscape is dominated by private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 381 properties, accounting for a commanding 93.2% of the investor-owned portfolio, while companies own the remaining 33 properties (8.1%).

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced, with 494 individual landlords operating in the market compared to only 28 companies, a ratio of nearly 18 to 1.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership for investors in this market. A substantial 84.4% of the portfolio (345 properties) is owned free and clear, while only 15.6% (64 properties) are financed, indicating a low reliance on leverage among local investors.

The entire investor-owned portfolio of 409 properties is dedicated to rentals, with 100% classified as non-owner-occupied. This highlights a clear focus on generating rental income rather than speculation or secondary home usage.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlord pricing showed extreme volatility, swinging from a 33.7% premium to a 12.8% discount.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Wells County demonstrated significant volatility in 2025 prior to a market halt in Q4. In Q1 2025, landlords paid a substantial 33.7% premium over traditional homeowners, with an average price of $102,639 compared to the homeowner average of $76,750.

This trend completely reversed in the following quarter. In Q2 2025, landlords acquired properties at a 12.8% discount, paying an average of $171,333 while homeowners paid $196,398, a price difference of $25,065.

The market showed signs of cooling even before the Q4 freeze. Landlord acquisition prices peaked in Q2 at $171,333 before falling to $149,714 in Q3. However, Q4 2025 saw zero purchases by landlords, making a current price comparison impossible.

Comparing year-over-year trends, the average landlord purchase price in 2025 (based on pre-Q4 activity) was $148,995, a significant 75.3% increase from the 2024 average of $84,994, indicating a sharp rise in asset values before activity ceased.

The data from 2020-2023 shows a pandemic-era average price of $93,713, suggesting that the price escalation was a very recent phenomenon in 2025 before the market stalled.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The Q4 2025 market was frozen, with landlords making zero purchases.
Detailed Findings

The real estate market in Wells County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero Single-Family Residential properties purchased by any buyer type.

Landlords, who represent a significant portion of the ownership base, recorded zero acquisitions during the quarter, resulting in a 0.0% market share of purchases.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) and institutional investors (1000+ properties) both logged zero purchases in Q4.

The absence of activity means no new landlords entered the market in Q4, and existing investors did not expand their portfolios through new acquisitions during this period.

This market freeze is a critical finding, indicating a potential shift in local economic conditions, a lack of available inventory, or a standoff between buyer and seller price expectations leading into the new year.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a staggering 99.0% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Wells County is overwhelmingly dominated by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who collectively own 417 of the 421 investor-held properties where tier is identified, a 99.0% share.

First-time or single-investment landlords (Tier 01) form the largest segment, owning 353 properties alone. This accounts for 83.8% of all investor-owned housing, highlighting the market's reliance on small, individual investors.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) have a minimal footprint, with only 4 properties combined across the 11-50 property tiers, representing less than 1% of the market.

There is no institutional investor (1000+ properties) presence in Wells County, with Tier 09 ownership at 0.0%. This confirms the market is entirely driven by local and regional individuals and small companies, not large-scale corporations.

The ownership concentration is extremely high at the smallest end of the scale, with landlords owning 1-5 properties controlling 98.3% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio combined.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals own over 95% of single-property landlord holdings; companies are nearly absent.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors are the definitive force across all active tiers in Wells County. In the largest tier of single-property owners, individuals hold 339 properties (95.2%), while companies own a mere 17 properties (4.8%).

Companies gain a slightly larger foothold in portfolios of 3-5 properties, owning 5 out of 18 properties in that tier, for a 27.8% share. However, individuals still maintain a clear majority with 72.2%.

The crossover point where companies typically become the majority owners does not exist in this market. The largest active tiers are still heavily dominated by individual investors.

In the 6-10 property tier, ownership is 100% individual, with companies having no presence at all, further cementing the individual-driven nature of the local rental market.

This ownership structure indicates that the Wells County rental market is capitalized by personal investment rather than corporate capital, a defining characteristic of its real estate landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with two zip codes holding 81.4% of all investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Wells County is geographically concentrated, with the top two zip codes, 58341 and 58438, accounting for 333 of the 409 investor-owned properties, representing an 81.4% combined share.

The area with the highest number of investor-owned properties is zip code 58341, with 194 homes, though its investor ownership rate is a more moderate 23.1%.

Conversely, zip code 58438 demonstrates the highest density of investor ownership among major areas, with 139 properties translating to a 57.7% market penetration rate, meaning investors own more than half of the SFR housing stock.

Several smaller zip codes show extremely high investor saturation, including 58374 (100.0%), 58486 (48.9%), and 58356 (44.4%), indicating specific small towns or rural areas are predominantly rental markets.

This data reveals a dual dynamic: large-volume ownership in the main population center (58341) and high-saturation ownership in smaller, surrounding communities like 58438.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
In 2024, landlords were strong net buyers, acquiring nearly 10 properties for every 1 they sold.
Detailed Findings

Historical data from 2024 shows a period of aggressive accumulation by landlords in Wells County, starkly contrasting with the market freeze in Q4 2025.

During 2024, landlords were definitive net buyers, purchasing 29 SFR properties while selling only 3. This represents a buy-to-sell ratio of 9.7 to 1, signaling strong confidence and portfolio growth during that year.

The net gain of 26 properties in 2024 demonstrates a clear expansionary phase for investors in the period immediately preceding the recent market slowdown.

As there are no institutional investors (1000+ tier) in this county, their transaction activity is zero, meaning all historical buying and selling was driven by smaller mom-and-pop landlords.

This trend of strong net buying followed by a complete market halt suggests a significant and abrupt shift in market dynamics between 2024 and late 2025.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0% as the market saw no activity.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Wells County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero recorded sales or purchases of SFR properties. As a result, the landlord share of transactions was 0.0%.

This lack of activity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who dominate ownership, were completely inactive on both the buy and sell sides.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional tiers also recorded zero transactions, reflecting a market-wide pause in real estate liquidity.

Consequently, there were no inter-landlord trades during the quarter, as no properties were bought from or sold to other investors.

The average purchase price for all tiers was effectively $0 due to the absence of transactions, highlighting a period of complete illiquidity in the local real estate market.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Wells County's investor market, 99% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, ground to a halt with zero Q4 sales.
Holdings
Investors own 409 SFR properties, representing 32.3% of the Wells County market. The portfolio is overwhelmingly held by individual investors (381 properties or 93.2%) compared to companies (33 properties or 8.1%).
Pricing
Prior to the Q4 market freeze, landlord pricing was highly volatile, swinging from a 33.7% premium ($25,889) over homeowners in Q1 2025 to a 12.8% discount ($25,065) in Q2.
Activity
Q4 2025 was completely inactive, with landlords purchasing 0 properties for a 0.0% share of sales. This pause in activity meant no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have near-total control of the investor market, owning 99.0% of properties. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence (0.0%).
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every ownership tier, holding 95.2% of single-property portfolios. There is no tier in Wells County where companies become the majority owners.
Transactions
While Q4 2025 was frozen, landlords were strong net buyers in 2024 with a 9.7x buy/sell ratio (29 buys vs 3 sells). Institutional investors are not a factor in this market.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Wells County, North Dakota, is defined by the overwhelming dominance of local, small-scale players. Investors control a significant 32.3% of the single-family housing market, owning 409 properties. This portfolio is almost entirely in the hands of mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who command a 99.0% share of investor housing. Further emphasizing the grassroots nature of this market, individual investors own 93.2% of these properties, with large-scale institutional firms having zero presence.

Investor behavior has undergone a dramatic shift. After a period of aggressive expansion in 2024 where landlords were strong net buyers (29 buys vs. 3 sells), the market hit a wall in late 2025. Q4 2025 saw a complete freeze in activity, with zero purchases and zero transactions recorded for any buyer type. Before this halt, pricing was extremely volatile, with landlords paying a 33.7% premium over homeowners in Q1 but securing a 12.8% discount by Q2, reflecting instability in a low-volume environment.

The key takeaway for Wells County is a hyper-local, individual-driven rental market that has moved from a phase of rapid growth into a period of acute illiquidity. The complete cessation of Q4 activity signals a significant market pause, potentially driven by economic uncertainty or a disconnect between buyer and seller expectations. The market's future direction hinges on the re-engagement of its foundational base: the hundreds of small, local landlords who shape its housing dynamics.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:47 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWells (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price