Sargent (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sargent (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sargent (ND)
1,174
Total Investors in Sargent (ND)
591
Investor Owned SFR in Sargent (ND)
431(36.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
570
SFR Owned
413
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
21
SFR Owned
20
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 431 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Sargent County's investor market is defined by a 36.7% ownership rate, 100% control by mom-and-pop landlords, and a complete halt in Q4 activity.
Investors own 431 Single-Family Residential properties in Sargent County, a significant 36.7% of the total market, with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords owning 95.8% of this portfolio. Pricing is highly volatile due to low transaction volumes, but landlords have secured discounts as high as 56.2%. Investor purchasing activity completely froze in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 431 SFR properties (36.7% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 95.8% share.
Landlord portfolios are overwhelmingly purchased with cash, with 362 properties owned outright compared to only 69 financed. The portfolio is highly focused on rentals, as 427 of the 431 properties (99.1%) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Due to zero Q4 landlord purchases, no direct price comparison is available; however, prior quarters show extreme volatility, from a 56.2% discount to a 657.3% premium.
The landlord-homeowner price gap fluctuated wildly in 2025, from a $102,500 landlord discount in Q3 to a staggering $542,250 premium in Q1. This volatility highlights a market with very few transactions, where single atypical sales can heavily skew quarterly averages.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the single SFR property sold in Sargent County.
Mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases in Q4. The data indicates a total freeze in investor acquisitions for the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sargent County.
Single-property landlords are the cornerstone of the market, owning 393 properties, which constitutes 87.9% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have absolutely no presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate all ownership tiers; companies only exist in the single-property tier, holding just 20 properties (5.1% of that tier).
There is no tier where companies become the majority owner; in fact, individuals own 100% of all investor portfolios that contain two or more properties. The data shows no acquisitions by companies in recent quarters, indicating stagnant growth.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with the top three zip codes—58060, 58032, and 58040—holding 72.2% of all investor properties.
Investor ownership rates are exceptionally high in certain areas, peaking at 62.2% in zip code 58067. The top five regions all feature investor penetration rates above 33%, signaling deep saturation in these communities.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2025 with 7 purchases versus 4 sales, but momentum slowed to a halt with a neutral 3-to-3 buy/sell ratio in Q3.
Transaction volume shows a clear slowdown, dropping from 20 purchases in 2024 to just 7 in 2025. There is no transaction data for institutional investors, as they have no presence in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Reflecting a market at a standstill, landlords accounted for 0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as no investor transactions of any kind were recorded.
Both mom-and-pop and institutional tiers recorded zero transactions in Q4. There was no inter-landlord trading, and with no purchases, an average price could not be calculated.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 431 SFR properties (36.7% of the market), with individuals holding a dominant 95.8% share.
Detailed Findings

In Sargent County, investors hold a substantial 36.7% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, totaling 431 properties out of 1,174 available.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors, who own 413 properties, accounting for a massive 95.8% of the investor-owned portfolio. Company ownership is minimal, with just 20 properties (4.6%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, where 570 of the 591 total landlords (96.4%) are individuals, reinforcing the 'mom-and-pop' character of the local rental market.

A strong preference for all-cash acquisitions is evident, with 362 properties (84.0%) owned free of financing. This is more than five times the number of financed properties (69), indicating a well-capitalized investor base that is less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The investor portfolio is almost exclusively dedicated to rentals. A total of 427 properties are rented, which represents 99.1% of all investor-owned SFRs, underscoring a clear strategy focused on generating rental income.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Due to zero Q4 landlord purchases, no direct price comparison is available; however, prior quarters show extreme volatility, from a 56.2% discount to a 657.3% premium.
Detailed Findings

Landlord acquisition pricing in Sargent County displays extreme volatility, a direct result of a market with very low transaction volumes. There were no landlord purchases recorded in Q4 2025, making a direct price comparison for the quarter impossible.

In Q3 2025, landlords achieved a significant 56.2% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying an average of $80,000 while homeowners paid $182,500.

This trend reversed dramatically in Q1 2025, where the data indicates landlords paid a 657.3% premium ($624,750 vs. $82,500). This figure is a severe outlier, likely representing a single, non-standard, high-value transaction that disproportionately impacts the average in a period of otherwise low activity.

The wide swing from a deep discount to an enormous premium quarter-over-quarter underscores the risk of drawing broad conclusions from pricing data in a thinly traded market like Sargent County.

Comparing prices across years, landlord acquisition costs have fluctuated, with an average of $133,166 during the 2020-2023 period compared to a calculated average of $93,682 in 2024, though these figures are based on very few transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity came to a complete halt in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the single SFR property sold in Sargent County.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a complete cessation of investor purchasing activity in Sargent County. Of the single SFR property that was sold in the entire market, it was not acquired by a landlord.

This halt in activity means landlords had a 0% share of the Q4 market, a stark indicator of a dormant period for investor acquisitions.

Breaking down the inactivity by investor size, both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) made zero purchases during the quarter.

The lack of new acquisitions from single-property landlords (Tier 01) signifies that no new investors entered the Sargent County market in Q4.

This data points to an exceptionally quiet end to the year, where market liquidity was extremely low and investor participation was non-existent.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) exercise total control, owning 100% of all investor-owned SFRs in Sargent County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sargent County is exclusively controlled by small-scale operators. Mom-and-pop landlords, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, account for 100% of the investor-owned housing stock.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding 393 properties. This represents a commanding 87.9% of all investor-owned SFRs, highlighting the market's reliance on first-time or small-scale investors.

Portfolios with two properties make up the next largest segment with 29 properties (6.5%), followed by landlords owning 3-5 properties with 24 properties (5.4%).

The concentration at the smallest end of the investor spectrum is stark, with 94.4% of all investor-owned homes held by landlords with just one or two properties.

There is zero presence from mid-size (11-1,000 properties) or institutional (1,000+ properties) investors, solidifying Sargent County as a market shaped entirely by local, small-scale capital.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate all ownership tiers; companies only exist in the single-property tier, holding just 20 properties (5.1% of that tier).
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate every single investor tier in Sargent County, leaving a minimal footprint for corporate owners.

Companies are only present in the single-property (Tier 01) category, where they own 20 out of 393 properties. This gives them just a 5.1% share of that tier and only 4.6% of the total investor market.

Beyond the first property, individual ownership is absolute. Landlords with portfolios of 2, 3-5, and 6-10 properties are 100% individuals. This indicates that portfolio growth in this market is an exclusively individual-driven phenomenon.

The 'crossover point' where companies typically become majority owners in larger markets does not exist here. The data suggests that companies in Sargent County may be used as single-asset holding vehicles rather than as platforms for portfolio aggregation.

This structure underscores a market completely devoid of corporate scaling, where the path to building a rental portfolio is pursued solely by private individuals.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is heavily concentrated, with the top three zip codes—58060, 58032, and 58040—holding 72.2% of all investor properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sargent County is not evenly distributed but is instead highly concentrated in a few key areas. The top three zip codes by property count (58060, 58032, and 58040) collectively hold 311 of the 431 investor-owned SFRs, representing 72.2% of the entire investor portfolio.

The zip code 58060 is the epicenter of investor ownership by volume, with 134 properties. It also maintains a high investor ownership rate of 38.8%.

Certain smaller zip codes exhibit extremely high investor saturation. ND-Sargent-58067 leads with a remarkable 62.2% investor ownership rate, meaning nearly two-thirds of the SFRs in that area are investor-owned.

Similarly, ND-Sargent-58017 has a 45.2% investor ownership rate, demonstrating that in specific pockets of the county, investors are the dominant property owners.

Unlike in larger markets, the areas with the highest count of investor properties are also among those with the highest ownership percentages, indicating that investors are clustered in the most active housing zones within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Key Insight
Landlords were net buyers in 2025 with 7 purchases versus 4 sales, but momentum slowed to a halt with a neutral 3-to-3 buy/sell ratio in Q3.
Detailed Findings

Sargent County landlords have been net buyers on an annual basis, but transaction data reveals a significant deceleration leading into the end of the year. For the full year of 2025, investors acquired 7 properties while selling 4, making them net buyers by 3 properties.

This follows a more active 2024, when investors purchased 20 properties and sold only 3, a strong net accumulation of 17 properties.

However, the momentum shifted downward within 2025. The most recent quarter with activity, Q3 2025, showed a perfectly balanced market with 3 buys and 3 sells. This neutral position was a precursor to the complete freeze in Q4.

The trend shows a clear cooling of investor enthusiasm, moving from strong net buying in 2024 to slight net buying in early 2025, and finally to a standstill by year-end.

Consistent with ownership data, there is no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors (1,000+ tier), as they are not participants in this market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Reflecting a market at a standstill, landlords accounted for 0% of transactions in Q4 2025, as no investor transactions of any kind were recorded.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market for investors in Sargent County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025. Out of the single transaction recorded in the county's SFR market, none involved a landlord as either a buyer or a seller.

This lack of activity resulted in landlords having a 0% share of all Q4 transactions, highlighting an extreme case of market illiquidity for this investor class.

Analysis by tier confirms this market-wide pause, with zero transactions recorded for mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04). Institutional investors (Tier 09) also had no activity, which is expected given their absence from the market.

There was no evidence of inter-landlord trading, as the number of properties bought from other landlords was zero across all tiers.

Consequently, with no purchases made, it is not possible to determine an average purchase price or analyze pricing strategies for any investor tier in the fourth quarter.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Sargent County's investor market is defined by a 36.7% ownership rate, 100% control by mom-and-pop landlords, and a complete halt in Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 431 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 36.7% of Sargent County's market. Ownership is almost entirely in the hands of individual investors, who hold 413 properties (95.8%), while companies own just 20 (4.6%).
Pricing
Due to zero landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025, a direct price comparison is unavailable. Prior quarters showed extreme volatility, with landlords securing discounts as high as 56.2% ($102,500) in Q3 but paying a massive premium in Q1 due to a low-volume data anomaly.
Activity
Investor purchase activity completely froze in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0% of the single home sold in the market. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market, and all investor tiers, including mom-and-pop and institutional, recorded zero acquisitions.
Market Share
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100.0% of all investor-owned housing in the county. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero market share, making this an exclusively small-investor landscape.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, owning 95.8% of properties overall and 100% of portfolios with two or more properties. Companies have a negligible presence, appearing only in the single-property tier, indicating no corporate scaling in this market.
Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2025 (7 buys vs. 4 sells), but activity completely halted in Q4 with zero recorded purchases or sales. There is no institutional transaction activity to report.
Market Narrative

In Sargent County, the real estate investor market is characterized by deep penetration and an exclusive reliance on small, individual operators. Investors own a substantial 431 Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes 36.7% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. The market structure defies the national narrative of corporate dominance; individual 'mom-and-pop' investors own a staggering 95.8% of this portfolio, while institutional investors have zero presence. This concentration is absolute, with landlords owning 1-10 properties controlling 100% of the investor-held supply.

Investor behavior in Sargent County reflects a cautious and well-capitalized approach, but one that has recently paused. A remarkable 84.0% of investor-owned properties are held free of financing, indicating a preference for cash purchases. While landlords were net buyers over the past year, purchasing activity decelerated significantly before freezing entirely in Q4 2025, when zero investor acquisitions were recorded. Pricing data is highly volatile due to the low transaction volume, but in active quarters, landlords have demonstrated the ability to secure deep discounts, such as a 56.2% price advantage over homeowners in Q3 2025.

The key takeaway for the Sargent County housing market is its nature as a closed ecosystem dominated by a finite group of local investors. With investor ownership rates exceeding 62% in some zip codes and purchasing activity now at a standstill, the market shows signs of saturation and extremely low liquidity. The future direction will depend entirely on the decisions of these existing small landlords rather than on outside capital, suggesting a market that is stable but has limited potential for dynamic growth or disruption.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:42 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySargent (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords