Rolette (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Rolette (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Rolette (ND)
782
Total Investors in Rolette (ND)
378
Investor Owned SFR in Rolette (ND)
269(34.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
367
SFR Owned
261
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
11
SFR Owned
9
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 269 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Rolette County's investor market is defined by small, individual landlords who own 99.6% of rentals.
Investors own 269 SFR properties in Rolette County (34.4% of the market), with individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords controlling a staggering 99.6% of that portfolio. In Q4, investor activity was minimal, with a single purchase at a 21.5% premium over homeowners, a pricing anomaly likely driven by extremely low transaction volume. The market shows no presence from institutional investors.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 269 SFRs, with individuals controlling a dominant 97.0% of the portfolio.
Cash purchases outnumber financed properties more than two-to-one (184 vs 85), indicating significant equity in the local rental market. All 269 investor-owned properties are classified as rented. Individual landlords (367) vastly outnumber company landlords (11).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 21.5% premium over homeowners in Q4, an anomaly in this low-volume market.
The Q4 landlord purchase price was $79,000 compared to the homeowner average of $65,000. This pricing dynamic is highly volatile, following a Q3 where the landlord premium was a staggering 170.7% ($412,755 vs $152,500). These figures reflect sporadic, low-volume transactions rather than a consistent market trend.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 10.0% of Q4 home sales, with a single purchase from a new investor.
Mom-and-pop investors accounted for 100% of landlord buying activity in Q4 2025. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) made zero acquisitions, reflecting their absence from this market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords have absolute control, owning 99.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
The market is defined by its smallest participants, as single-property landlords alone own an overwhelming 97.4% of the investor-owned housing stock (264 properties). Institutional investors with 1000+ properties have zero presence in Rolette County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors command 97.0% of rental properties, leaving no room for company dominance.
There is no tier where companies become the majority owner; in fact, even in the two-property tier, individuals hold 100% of the properties. Companies own only 8 properties in total, all in the single-property category.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58367, which holds 120 investor-owned homes.
While 58367 has the highest count, other zip codes show much higher investor penetration rates. Zip code 58316 has a 48.1% investor ownership rate, and 58310 shows a 100.0% rate, indicating specific smaller areas are almost entirely investor-owned.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 7.7 times more properties than they sold.
In 2025, landlords purchased 23 properties while selling only 3. The most active period was Q3, where they bought 12 properties and sold 3, demonstrating a clear trend of portfolio accumulation during that time.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords represented a small fraction of Q4 activity, with a 9.1% share of total transactions.
The single investor transaction was by a mom-and-pop landlord in the single-property tier at a price of $79,000. No transactions involved a landlord purchasing from another landlord, indicating a lack of churn within the investor community.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 269 SFRs, with individuals controlling a dominant 97.0% of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 34.4% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Rolette County, with a total of 269 properties under their ownership.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by individuals, who own 261 properties, accounting for 97.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. Company investors hold a minimal stake with just 9 properties (3.3%).

This individual dominance is also reflected in the entity count, where 367 out of 378 total landlords are individuals, underscoring the 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

A strong preference for cash acquisitions is evident, with 184 properties owned outright compared to 85 that are financed. This more than 2-to-1 ratio of cash-to-financed holdings suggests investors in this market are well-capitalized.

The entire portfolio of 269 investor-owned properties is actively rented, confirming a 100% focus on generating rental income from these assets.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 21.5% premium over homeowners in Q4, an anomaly in this low-volume market.
Detailed Findings

In a reversal of typical market dynamics, landlords in Rolette County paid a significant premium over traditional homeowners in the most recent quarters. In Q4 2025, the average landlord acquisition price was $79,000, which is 21.5% higher than the homeowner average of $65,000.

This trend was even more pronounced in Q3 2025, when landlords paid an average of $412,755, a massive 170.7% premium over the homeowner price of $152,500. This suggests a single high-value transaction skewed the average dramatically.

The extreme volatility in the price gap quarter-over-quarter indicates that these figures are driven by a very small number of transactions. The market lacks sufficient activity to establish a stable pricing trend or a reliable landlord discount.

Overall acquisition prices for landlords have fluctuated significantly, from an average of $140,631 in the 2020-2023 period to a much higher average of $317,170 for the full year of 2025, again highlighting the impact of outlier sales in a thin market.

Due to zero recorded purchases in many recent quarters, it's impossible to discern a reliable long-term pricing strategy, but the available data points to landlords competing directly with homeowners on price for desirable properties rather than seeking deep discounts.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 10.0% of Q4 home sales, with a single purchase from a new investor.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was minimal in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring just 1 of the 10 total SFRs sold, representing a 10.0% market share for the quarter.

The entirety of investor purchasing activity came from the smallest tier, with one new single-property landlord entering the market. This highlights that growth in the investor market is happening at the grassroots level, one property at a time.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 100.0% of all landlord acquisitions in Q4, reinforcing their complete control over market activity.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had no purchasing activity, posting 0 acquisitions. This absence underscores that Rolette County is not a target for large-scale corporate investment.

The low volume of just one landlord purchase signifies a very quiet quarter for investors, continuing a pattern of sporadic rather than consistent acquisition activity.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords have absolute control, owning 99.6% of all investor-held SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership structure in Rolette County is exceptionally concentrated at the smallest scale, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 99.6% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) are the definitive backbone of the rental market, holding 264 properties. This accounts for a staggering 97.4% of the entire investor portfolio, the highest possible concentration in the smallest tier.

Mid-size landlords are nearly non-existent, with only two properties held by investors with more than 10 units. This indicates a sharp drop-off in portfolio size after the initial entry point.

There is absolutely no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties), who own 0.0% of the market. This confirms that the local rental landscape is entirely shaped by small, local owners, not large corporations.

This distribution reveals a market with a very low barrier to entry for new landlords but little evidence of investors scaling up their portfolios into larger operations within the county.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors command 97.0% of rental properties, leaving no room for company dominance.
Detailed Findings

Individual ownership is the defining characteristic across all investor tiers in Rolette County. Individuals own 257 of the 264 single-property rentals (97.0%) and 100% of the properties in the two-property tier.

There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners. The minimal corporate presence is confined to just 8 properties, all held within the smallest single-property tier, suggesting these may be small, family-run LLCs rather than larger corporations.

The data clearly shows that as portfolios grow, they remain under individual ownership. This pattern reinforces the local, non-corporate nature of the rental market.

The complete absence of company-owned properties in tiers with two or more units indicates a lack of corporate strategy to scale and consolidate holdings within the county.

This ownership structure suggests that the rental market's dynamics are driven by the financial decisions of individual households rather than corporate investment strategies.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58367, which holds 120 investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

Geographically, investor ownership is most concentrated by volume in the 58367 zip code, where 120 SFR properties are investor-owned, representing 44.3% of that area's housing stock.

However, an analysis of ownership rates reveals pockets of even higher investor penetration. In zip code 58316, investors own 48.1% of the 25 SFR properties, making it one of the most landlord-dense areas.

The most extreme example of concentration is in the 58310 zip code, which reports a 100.0% investor ownership rate, suggesting it may be an area with a small number of homes all operating as rentals.

Conversely, some zip codes like 58329 (29.5%) and 58369 (28.3%) have a more moderate but still significant investor presence.

The distinction between high-volume areas (like 58367) and high-percentage areas (like 58316 and 58310) highlights different types of investor saturation within the county, from broad concentration to hyper-local dominance.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were strong net buyers in 2025, acquiring 7.7 times more properties than they sold.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows landlords in Rolette County have been in a phase of accumulation. Across 2025, investors were strong net buyers, purchasing 23 SFR properties while only selling 3.

This translates to a buy-to-sell ratio of 7.7-to-1 for the year, signaling strong confidence in the local rental market and a clear intent to expand portfolios.

The most significant activity occurred in Q3 2025, which saw 12 purchases versus only 3 sales. This single quarter accounted for over half of the year's buying activity.

As there is no institutional investor presence in the county, all transaction activity is attributable to smaller mom-and-pop landlords.

The consistent net-buyer status, even with low overall volume, indicates that the small, individual investor base is committed to growing its footprint in the Rolette County market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords represented a small fraction of Q4 activity, with a 9.1% share of total transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investor transaction volume was exceptionally low in Q4 2025. Landlords were involved in just 1 of the 11 total SFR transactions, a market share of only 9.1%.

The sole transaction was a purchase made by a single-property landlord, the smallest investor tier. This reinforces the market's reliance on new, small-scale entrants for any investor-related activity.

The purchase price for this transaction was $79,000, setting the bar for entry-level investment in the county during the quarter.

Notably, 0.0% of landlord purchases came from other landlords in Q4. This lack of inter-landlord trading suggests that existing investors are holding onto their properties rather than selling to other investors.

With no activity from institutional or even mid-size investors, the Q4 transaction data confirms that the market remains the exclusive domain of mom-and-pop operators making infrequent, individual purchases.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Rolette County's housing market is dominated by individual investors, with mom-and-pop landlords owning 99.6% of rental properties.
Holdings
Landlords own 269 SFR properties, representing 34.4% of Rolette County's market. Ownership is overwhelmingly individual, with local investors holding 261 of these properties (97.0%) compared to just 9 (3.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Defying national trends, landlords paid a 21.5% premium over homeowners in Q4 ($79,000 vs $65,000), a pricing anomaly likely caused by very low transaction volumes in the local market.
Activity
Investor activity was nearly dormant in Q4, with landlords responsible for just 10.0% of purchases (1 property). This single purchase was made by a new, single-property landlord entering the market.
Market Share
The market is entirely controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.6% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+) have zero presence, owning 0.0% of the market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate every portfolio tier, owning 97.0% of all investor-held SFRs. There is no crossover point where companies become majority owners, as their presence is minimal.
Transactions
While Q4 was quiet, landlords were aggressive net buyers over the course of 2025, with a 7.7x buy/sell ratio (23 buys vs 3 sells). There is no institutional transaction activity to report.
Market Narrative

In Rolette County, the investor landscape is fundamentally local and small-scale. Investors own a significant 269 single-family homes, comprising 34.4% of the total market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by individual 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who own 99.6% of all investor-held properties, with those owning just a single property making up 97.4% of the total. Corporate and institutional ownership is virtually nonexistent, painting a picture of a rental market shaped entirely by local, individual capital.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was marked by minimal activity, with only one purchase recorded, accounting for 10.0% of market sales. Pricing data is anomalous, showing landlords paying a 21.5% premium over homeowners, a statistical quirk likely stemming from the extremely low transaction volume rather than a deliberate strategy. Across the full year, however, landlords were decisive net buyers, acquiring 7.7 properties for every one they sold, indicating a broader trend of portfolio growth among the existing small investor base.

The key takeaway for Rolette County is its insulation from national institutional trends. The market is characterized by high penetration from small, individual landlords who are steadily accumulating properties. The lack of corporate competition and volatile pricing signals a market where local knowledge and individual financial capacity, not scaled operations, are the primary drivers of the rental housing sector. This creates a stable but slow-moving investment environment distinct from more dynamic metropolitan areas.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:42 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyRolette (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail