Pembina (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pembina (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pembina (ND)
2,057
Total Investors in Pembina (ND)
1,102
Investor Owned SFR in Pembina (ND)
826(40.2%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,064
SFR Owned
784
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
38
SFR Owned
52
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 826 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Pembina County, ND, Owning 99.8% of Rental Homes and Capturing Over Half of Q4 Sales
Investors own a significant 40.2% of all Single-Family Residential properties in Pembina County, ND, a market almost entirely controlled by small-scale 'mom-and-pop' landlords (99.8% of investor-owned properties). In Q4 2025, these local investors were aggressive net buyers, acquiring 55.6% of all homes sold while securing an average discount of 14.7% compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 826 properties, 40.2% of the market, with individuals holding a dominant 94.9% share.
The majority of investor properties are owned outright, with cash purchases (691 properties) far outnumbering financed ones (135 properties). The portfolio is almost entirely rental-focused, with 820 properties classified as rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 14.7% less than homeowners, securing an $18,568 average discount per property.
The landlord pricing advantage has been dramatic throughout 2025, with discounts reaching as high as 63.5% in Q2 ($112,564) and 62.1% in Q1 ($138,002). This widening gap indicates a significant and increasing ability for investors to acquire properties below typical market rates.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 15 properties and accounting for 55.6% of all SFR sales.
Activity was exclusively driven by 'mom-and-pop' investors (Tiers 01-04), who made 100% of all landlord purchases. The market saw an influx of new participants, with 16 new single-property landlord entities entering in Q4.
Ownership by Tier
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Pembina County.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have no presence, owning 0.0% of the investor-held housing stock. The market is defined by single-property landlords, who alone account for 735 properties, or 87.3% of the total.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios grow.
While individuals dominate smaller portfolios, companies control 53.6% of properties in the 6-10 property tier. Below this level, individual ownership is overwhelming, accounting for 96.1% of single-property portfolios and 89.4% of two-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 58220 zip code holding the most properties at 238.
Several zip codes exhibit extremely high investor penetration, with 58276 (51.0%), 58282 (50.9%), and 58241 (50.0%) all seeing investors own half or more of the local SFR housing stock.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Pembina County are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.4 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
This aggressive accumulation trend has been consistent, with a net gain of 65 properties in 2025 and 47 in 2024. The sole institutional transaction on record was a wash, with one purchase and one sale in 2024, showing no accumulation at the institutional level.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 51.3% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, with 20 transactions in total.
Smaller landlords (Tier 01) acquired properties for a lower average price ($101,787) than slightly larger ones (Tier 02 at $132,500). Notably, landlords in the 6-10 property tier sourced 100% of their two purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 826 properties, 40.2% of the market, with individuals holding a dominant 94.9% share.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a substantial 40.2% of the Single-Family Residential market in Pembina County, ND, with a total of 826 properties under their control.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 784 properties (94.9%), compared to just 52 properties (6.3%) held by companies. This signifies a strong 'mom-and-pop' landlord presence rather than corporate ownership.

By entity count, the disparity is even more pronounced, with 1,064 individual landlords versus only 38 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 28 to 1.

Investor portfolios are heavily weighted towards outright ownership, with 691 properties (83.7%) held as cash assets versus 135 (16.3%) that are financed. This suggests a well-capitalized investor base with low leverage.

The rental focus of these portfolios is clear, as 820 of the 826 investor-owned properties are actively rented, underscoring their primary role as housing providers in the local market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 14.7% less than homeowners, securing an $18,568 average discount per property.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Pembina County, ND consistently purchase properties at a significant discount compared to traditional homeowners. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $107,372, which is 14.7% less than the $125,940 paid by homeowners—a net savings of $18,568 per property.

The pricing advantage for investors was even more pronounced earlier in the year, highlighting a powerful negotiating position. In Q3, the discount was 35.3% ($62,104), and it peaked in Q2 at an extraordinary 63.5% ($112,564) discount.

This trend of deep discounts demonstrates that investors are not driving up prices; instead, they are effectively targeting undervalued assets or negotiating favorable terms unavailable to typical buyers.

Comparing recent prices to the 2020-2023 average of $123,969 reveals that current acquisition prices for landlords are lower, suggesting a market correction or a strategic shift towards purchasing lower-cost properties.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords dominated the market in Q4 2025, purchasing 15 properties and accounting for 55.6% of all SFR sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 15 of the 27 total SFR properties sold, capturing a majority 55.6% of the market share.

The purchasing activity was entirely concentrated at the smallest end of the investor spectrum. 'Mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for 100% of these acquisitions, with institutional investors (1000+ properties) showing zero activity.

New entrants are a key driver of the market, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone purchased 13 properties (86.7% of the investor total). This activity was driven by 16 distinct new entities, signaling a healthy influx of first-time investors.

The complete absence of purchasing from mid-size and institutional tiers underscores that the local investment landscape is controlled by small, independent operators.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Small 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) control a near-total 99.8% of all investor-owned SFRs in Pembina County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pembina County, ND is the epitome of a 'mom-and-pop' market, with landlords in Tiers 01-04 (1-10 properties) collectively owning 99.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of this market, with 735 properties (87.3%) held in Tier 01. This highlights the decentralized nature of rental ownership in the county.

In stark contrast to national narratives, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have zero ownership stake in the county's SFR market, controlling 0.0% of the properties.

The ownership concentration is almost entirely within the smallest tiers, with Two-property landlords holding 5.6%, and the 3-5 and 6-10 property tiers holding 3.6% and 3.3% respectively.

The data reveals a market completely devoid of large-scale corporate ownership, with local, small-scale investors providing the vast majority of rental housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to formal business structures as portfolios grow.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 96.1% of single-property portfolios (713 properties) and 89.4% of two-property portfolios (42 properties).

A clear strategic shift occurs as investors scale. The 6-10 property tier marks the crossover point where companies become the majority owners, holding 15 properties (53.6%) compared to 13 held by individuals (46.4%).

This pattern suggests that as landlords expand their holdings beyond a handful of properties, they tend to formalize their operations under a corporate structure for liability or financial reasons.

Company ownership remains a small fraction of the overall market, concentrated in just a few tiers. Companies own only 29 single-property rentals (3.9%) and 5 two-property rentals (10.6%), reinforcing their minority status in the broader landscape.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is highly concentrated, with the 58220 zip code holding the most properties at 238.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Pembina County is not evenly distributed but is concentrated in specific geographic pockets. The zip code 58220 has the highest volume of investor-owned homes, with 238 properties.

Certain areas show an extraordinary density of investor ownership. In zip codes 58276 and 58282, investors own more than half of the single-family homes, with ownership rates of 51.0% and 50.9% respectively.

The top 5 regions by investor-owned count are 58220 (238 properties), 58282 (199), 58225 (126), and 58271 (95), highlighting key sub-markets for rental activity.

This data reveals that while the county-wide investor ownership rate is 40.2%, certain communities are defined by rental housing, with investors playing a primary role in the local real estate market.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Pembina County are strong net buyers, acquiring 6.4 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

The data clearly shows that landlords are in an aggressive accumulation phase, consistently acting as net buyers. In 2025, they purchased 77 SFR properties while selling only 12, resulting in a net gain of 65 properties and a buy-to-sell ratio of 6.4x.

This buying trend was steady throughout the year. In Q4 2025, landlords bought 20 properties and sold 8 (a 2.5x ratio), and in Q3 they bought 27 while selling only 1 (a 27x ratio).

The pattern extends back to 2024, when landlords acquired 55 properties and sold just 8, for a net increase of 47 properties to their portfolios.

In contrast, institutional activity is negligible and shows no signs of growth. The only recorded transactions for the 1000+ tier in the past two years were a single purchase and a single sale in 2024, resulting in a neutral position.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 51.3% of all market transactions in Q4 2025, with 20 transactions in total.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a driving force in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 20 of the 39 total SFR transactions, which constitutes a majority share of 51.3%.

All 20 of these transactions were conducted by 'mom-and-pop' landlords, with no activity from institutional tiers, reinforcing their dominance in market activity.

First-time investors (Tier 01) demonstrated a cost-effective acquisition strategy, paying an average of $101,787 per property, which is 23.2% less than the $132,500 average paid by two-property landlords.

Inter-landlord trading is a key feature for more established small investors. The two transactions by landlords in the 6-10 property tier were both sourced from other landlords, indicating a liquid secondary market among existing rental owners.

In contrast, new investors were less reliant on this channel, with only 12.5% (2 of 16) of their purchases coming from fellow landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command 40.2% of Pembina County's Housing Market, Acquiring Properties at a 15% Discount
Holdings
In Pembina County, ND, landlords own 826 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a significant 40.2% of the total market. The ownership is dominated by individuals, who hold 784 properties (94.9%), versus just 52 (6.3%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated strong purchasing power in Q4 2025, paying an average of $107,372, which is 14.7% less than the $125,940 paid by traditional homeowners—an average discount of $18,568 per property.
Activity
Investors captured 55.6% of all Q4 2025 home sales with 15 purchases, driven entirely by small landlords. The market saw significant growth from new entrants, with 16 new single-property landlord entities making acquisitions.
Market Share
The investor market is almost entirely controlled by small-scale operators, as 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) own 99.8% of all investor-held housing. In contrast, institutional investors have zero presence in the county.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the overwhelming majority, but a strategic shift to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 20 properties while selling only 8 in Q4 2025. The sole institutional activity on record was neutral, with one purchase and one sale in 2024, showing no accumulation.
Market Narrative

The real estate investment landscape in Pembina County, ND is defined by the overwhelming presence of local, small-scale operators. Investors own a substantial 826 Single-Family Residential properties, accounting for 40.2% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly comprised of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control a near-total 99.8% of all investor-owned homes. Individual owners hold 94.9% of these properties, with institutional investors having no footprint, challenging the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership.

Investor behavior in Pembina County is characterized by strategic, value-oriented acquisitions and consistent portfolio growth. In Q4 2025, landlords were highly active, purchasing 55.6% of all homes sold in the county. They achieved this while securing a significant 14.7% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. This activity is fueled by new market entrants, with 16 new single-property landlords making purchases in the last quarter alone. Overall, landlords are aggressive net buyers, having acquired 6.4 properties for every one they sold in 2025.

The key takeaway for the Pembina County housing market is its stability and reliance on a decentralized network of individual investors as primary providers of rental housing. The high investor ownership rates in certain zip codes, some exceeding 50%, indicate that these landlords are integral to the local housing ecosystem. The market dynamics are not driven by institutional capital but by the steady, accumulative, and cost-conscious strategies of local individuals, signaling a mature and locally-rooted rental market.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:41 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPembina (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail