Kidder (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Kidder (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Kidder (ND)
319
Total Investors in Kidder (ND)
136
Investor Owned SFR in Kidder (ND)
102(32.0%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
135
SFR Owned
101
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1
SFR Owned
1
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 102 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Kidder County's investor market is 100% 'Mom-and-Pop' with 99% individual ownership, but activity halted in Q4.
Investors own 102 SFR properties in Kidder County, representing 32.0% of the market. The portfolio is almost entirely held by individuals (99.0%) and is completely controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties). After being net buyers in 2024, investor purchase activity came to a complete stop in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 102 properties, with individuals accounting for an overwhelming 99.0% of holdings.
Of the 102 investor-owned properties, 70 were acquired with cash, while 32 are financed. There are 135 individual landlords compared to just a single company landlord, underscoring the market's non-corporate nature.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4, but prior quarter data shows volatile landlord premiums over homeowners.
In Q3 2025, landlords paid a $179,000 premium (59.9%) over homeowners ($478,000 vs $299,000), a figure likely skewed by extremely low transaction volumes. This contrasts with a much smaller $6,100 premium in Q2.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the 0 total market sales.
With zero total purchases, both mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) had no acquisition activity in the quarter. No new single-property landlords entered the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors exert total control, owning 100.0% of all landlord-held SFRs in the county.
Single-property landlords alone own 94 properties, which accounts for 90.4% of the entire investor portfolio. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors fully dominate all tiers, with the market's single company-owned property in the 1-property tier.
Individuals own 98.9% of properties in the single-property tier and 100% in all other existing tiers. There is no crossover point where companies become the majority owners, as they have virtually no presence.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58482, which holds 54 of the 102 investor-owned properties.
Some areas show extremely high investor penetration, with zip code 58488 at a 52.2% investor ownership rate and 58418 at 100.0%. The top region by count, 58482, has a 29.0% rate.
Historical Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2024 with 6 purchases and only 1 sale before activity halted in 2025.
The 6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in 2024 indicates a strong accumulation phase. No institutional transactions were recorded, as they have no presence in the market.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of market transactions in Q4 2025, as total sales activity was zero.
Due to the market freeze, no transactions occurred across any investor tier. Average purchase prices and inter-landlord trading activity were consequently zero for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 102 properties, with individuals accounting for an overwhelming 99.0% of holdings.
Detailed Findings

In Kidder County, landlords own 102 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a significant 32.0% of the total 319 SFRs in the market.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the landscape, holding 101 of the 102 properties, or 99.0% of the investor-owned portfolio. A single property is registered to a company, making corporate ownership a negligible 1.0% of the market.

This dominance by individuals is further reflected in the landlord entity count, with 135 individual landlords active in the market compared to just one company entity.

Analysis of financing reveals a strong preference for cash acquisitions among landlords. A total of 70 properties (68.6%) are owned outright as cash properties, while 32 properties (31.4%) are financed.

The rental focus of this portfolio is clear, with 100 of the 102 properties classified as rented, indicating a 98.0% rental penetration rate within investor-owned housing in the county.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4, but prior quarter data shows volatile landlord premiums over homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchase activity in Kidder County ceased in the latter half of 2025, with zero properties acquired by landlords in Q3 and Q4. This halt in activity makes direct price comparisons for the most recent quarter impossible.

Data from earlier in 2025, while based on very few transactions, indicates landlords paid a significant premium. In Q3, the average landlord acquisition price was $478,000, which is 59.9% higher than the traditional homeowner price of $299,000—a stark difference of $179,000.

The price gap has been extremely volatile, likely due to the low transaction volume. The 59.9% premium in Q3 followed a much smaller 2.4% premium in Q2 2025, when landlords paid an average of $256,000 versus the homeowner average of $249,900.

Historical pricing data shows significant appreciation over time. The average acquisition price during the 2020-2023 period was $111,883, which climbed to $126,018 in 2024 before the price spikes seen in 2025.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing completely stopped in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0.0% of the 0 total market sales.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete freeze in the SFR sales market in Kidder County, with zero total properties purchased by any buyer type.

Consequently, landlord acquisition activity was also zero, giving them a 0.0% share of the market's non-existent sales volume.

This lack of activity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) recorded zero purchases for the quarter.

Similarly, mid-size and institutional investors also made no acquisitions, reflecting a total shutdown in investor-led property transactions.

As a result of the market halt, no new landlords entered the market in Q4, with the count of new single-property (Tier 01) investors remaining at zero.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors exert total control, owning 100.0% of all landlord-held SFRs in the county.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Kidder County is exclusively composed of small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100.0% of the 102 investor-owned SFRs.

First-time or single-holding investors are the definitive backbone of this market. Landlords in the single-property tier own 94 properties, representing an overwhelming 90.4% of all investor-owned housing.

The remaining share is held by other small investors, with two-property landlords owning 4 properties (3.8%) and landlords with 3-5 properties owning 6 properties (5.8%).

Portfolios larger than five properties do not exist in the county, indicating a complete absence of mid-size or large-scale investors.

Correspondingly, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have no footprint in Kidder County, holding 0.0% of the market share.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
Individual investors fully dominate all tiers, with the market's single company-owned property in the 1-property tier.
Detailed Findings

Ownership in Kidder County is almost entirely in the hands of individual investors across every portfolio size. There is no tier where companies hold a majority, or even a minority, stake.

In the largest tier of single-property landlords, individuals own 93 of the 94 properties (98.9%), while the county's lone company-owned property also falls within this smallest tier.

For all other tiers, individual ownership is absolute. Landlords with two properties and those with 3-5 properties are 100.0% individual-owned, with zero company participation.

This data illustrates a market structure completely devoid of corporate scaling. The traditional model where company ownership increases with portfolio size is non-existent here.

The lack of company investment, particularly in multi-property tiers, highlights a market driven exclusively by personal capital and local, small-scale landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip code 58482, which holds 54 of the 102 investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor ownership in Kidder County is highly concentrated. The zip code 58482 is the epicenter of activity, containing 54 investor-owned properties, which is over half of the county's total investor portfolio.

Certain zip codes exhibit remarkably high rates of investor ownership. In 58488, landlords own 12 properties, accounting for a 52.2% ownership rate, meaning investors own more than half of the SFR housing stock there.

An even more extreme case is 58418, where the investor ownership rate is 100.0%, although the total property count is very small.

Other notable areas of concentration include 58487 with 18 investor-owned properties (32.7% rate) and 58478 with a 42.9% investor ownership rate.

This pattern of high concentration in both count and percentage within specific zip codes suggests a hyper-localized investment strategy targeting distinct communities within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
Landlords were net buyers in 2024 with 6 purchases and only 1 sale before activity halted in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Historical transaction data shows a clear shift in market dynamics between 2024 and 2025. In 2024, landlords in Kidder County were active net buyers, signaling a period of portfolio growth.

During 2024, landlords collectively purchased 6 SFR properties while selling only 1, resulting in a net gain of 5 properties and a strong buy-to-sell ratio of 6.0x.

This accumulation trend came to an abrupt stop in 2025, when landlord purchase activity dropped to zero for the last three quarters of the year, indicating a market freeze rather than a shift to net selling.

Given the complete absence of institutional investors (1000+ properties) in the county, all historical transaction activity is attributable to mom-and-pop landlords.

The data does not contain information on inter-landlord transactions, but the net buying activity in 2024 followed by a market halt in 2025 points to changing local economic conditions or investment sentiment.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords accounted for 0.0% of market transactions in Q4 2025, as total sales activity was zero.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a complete cessation of real estate transactions in Kidder County, with the total number of SFR transactions at zero.

As a result, landlords' share of market transactions was 0.0%, reflecting the broader market inactivity rather than a specific retreat by investors.

This lack of activity was consistent across all investor portfolio sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who represent the entirety of the investor base, recorded zero transactions.

There was no inter-landlord trading activity, with the number of properties bought from other landlords standing at zero for the quarter.

Consequently, pricing analysis by tier is not possible for Q4, as average purchase prices across all tiers, from single-property to institutional, were $0 due to the absence of sales.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Kidder County's investor market, 100% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords, saw all purchase activity halt in Q4 2025.
Holdings
In Kidder County, landlords own 102 SFR properties, making up 32.0% of the market. Individual investors dominate with 101 properties (99.0%), while a single company holds the remaining 1.0%.
Pricing
No landlord purchases occurred in Q4. However, volatile data from Q3 2025 showed landlords paying a 59.9% premium over homeowners ($478,000 vs $299,000), likely an anomaly from very low sales volume.
Activity
Q4 investor purchase activity was non-existent, with landlords acquiring 0 properties for a 0.0% share of all sales. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100.0% of all investor housing. Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have zero presence in this market.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are dominant across all portfolio sizes, owning nearly 99% of single-property holdings and 100% of larger tiers. There is no crossover point where companies gain majority control.
Transactions
Landlords were net buyers in 2024 with a 6-to-1 buy/sell ratio before activity froze in 2025. With zero institutional presence, all transaction trends reflect mom-and-pop investor behavior.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Kidder County, North Dakota, is a unique ecosystem entirely defined by small, local investors. Landlords own a substantial 102 SFR properties, representing 32.0% of the county's housing stock. This market completely defies the corporate landlord narrative; individual investors own 99.0% of these properties (101 total), with only a single property held by a company. Furthermore, the market is 100% controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), with those owning just one property accounting for 90.4% of all investor-owned homes.

Investor behavior has undergone a dramatic shift. After actively accumulating properties in 2024 with a 6-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio, landlord purchasing came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions recorded. This market freeze makes recent pricing analysis difficult, though volatile data from earlier in the year suggests periods where landlords paid significant premiums over homeowners, a likely symptom of an extremely thin market. The absence of transactions means no new investors entered the market in the last quarter.

The key takeaway for Kidder County is its status as a closed, hyper-local market that is highly sensitive to local conditions. The 100% mom-and-pop control and 99% individual ownership create a market structure fundamentally different from more metropolitan areas. The recent halt in activity suggests a significant shift in local investment sentiment or economic stability, turning what was a growth market in 2024 into a static one by the end of 2025. This market's future trajectory depends entirely on the decisions of its small, independent landlords, not outside corporate interests.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyKidder (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price