Griggs (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Griggs (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Griggs (ND)
642
Total Investors in Griggs (ND)
395
Investor Owned SFR in Griggs (ND)
287(44.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
368
SFR Owned
274
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
27
SFR Owned
27
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 287 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Griggs County's Investor Market: Dominated by Local Landlords with 44.7% Ownership, Activity Grinds to a Halt
Investors own 287 Single-Family Residential properties in Griggs County, representing a significant 44.7% of the total market. This ownership is almost entirely in the hands of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (100%), with individuals accounting for 95.5% of all holdings. While landlords historically paid less than homeowners, the market saw a complete halt in investor purchasing activity in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 287 homes (44.7% of market), with individuals holding 95.5%.
Cash is the dominant financing method, with 266 properties (92.7%) owned outright versus just 21 financed. The vast majority of properties (285) are non-owner-occupied rentals. Individual landlords (368 entities) vastly outnumber company landlords (27 entities).
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, halting any price comparisons.
In the most recent active quarter, Q3 2025, landlords paid $137,292, a 3.3% discount compared to homeowners. However, price data shows extreme volatility, with a massive 79.6% landlord discount recorded in Q1 2025, likely due to low transaction volumes.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with a 0.0% share of market purchases.
Reflecting the market-wide freeze, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases in Q4 2025. No new single-property landlords entered the market during this period.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) completely dominate, controlling 100% of investor SFRs.
Single-property landlords are the foundation of the market, owning 248 properties (83.2% of the total). There is zero ownership by institutional investors (1000+ properties) in Griggs County.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes in Griggs County.
Individuals own 90.3% of single-property portfolios and 100% of two-property portfolios. Companies never become the majority owners at any tier, holding only a minor stake in the smallest portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 58425 and 58416.
Zip code 58425 has the highest count of investor properties at 164. However, zip code 58416 has the highest penetration rate, with investors owning 61.1% of all SFRs.
Historical Transactions
A lack of historical transaction data indicates an extremely illiquid market for landlords.
No buy or sell transactions were recorded for either the overall landlord market or the institutional tier in the available historical data. This prevents analysis of buy/sell ratios or inter-landlord trading.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of transactions.
With zero transactions across the board, there were no differences in activity or pricing between mom-and-pop and institutional tiers. No inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 287 homes (44.7% of market), with individuals holding 95.5%.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Griggs County is substantial, with 287 of the 642 total Single-Family Residential properties (44.7%) held by landlords. This high penetration rate indicates a significant rental market within the county.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly composed of private individuals rather than corporations. Individual landlords own 274 properties, accounting for 95.5% of the investor portfolio, while companies own the remaining 27 properties (9.4%).

By entity count, the dominance of small-scale investors is even more pronounced, with 368 individual landlords compared to just 27 company landlords. This highlights a market driven by local, small-portfolio owners.

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for cash ownership. A staggering 266 investor-owned properties (92.7%) are held free and clear, with only 21 properties (7.3%) carrying financing. This suggests a financially stable, low-leverage investor base.

The portfolio is clearly focused on rental income, as 285 of the 287 properties are non-owner-occupied, confirming the primary business model of these landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025, halting any price comparisons.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Griggs County came to a complete standstill in Q4 2025, with zero properties acquired by landlords. This lack of activity prevents any direct price comparison with traditional homeowners for the quarter.

Looking at the most recent active quarter, Q3 2025, landlords paid an average of $137,292. This was 3.3% less than the average traditional homeowner price of $142,031, representing a modest discount of $4,739 per property.

The market exhibits significant price volatility, likely driven by a low number of transactions. For instance, in Q1 2025, landlords recorded an average acquisition price of just $48,000 against the homeowner average of $235,000, an unusually large discount of 79.6% ($187,000).

This quarter-to-quarter fluctuation suggests that average prices can be heavily skewed by the specific type and condition of the few properties that sell, rather than indicating a stable, consistent market trend.

Comparing annual data, the average landlord acquisition price in 2024 was $64,800, rising to $114,969 in 2025 based on limited early-year activity. This indicates a potential increase in the value of properties being acquired by investors, though data is sparse.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
Investor purchasing activity halted in Q4 2025, with a 0.0% share of market purchases.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 was marked by a complete absence of investor purchasing activity in Griggs County. Landlords acquired zero properties, accounting for 0.0% of the total 0 SFR purchases in the market.

This inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who constitute the entirety of the local market, made no acquisitions during the quarter.

Similarly, there was no purchasing activity from mid-size or institutional investors, underscoring a market-wide pause in portfolio growth.

The lack of new entrants is also notable. Zero new single-property landlords (Tier 01) entered the Griggs County market in Q4 2025, indicating a potential barrier to entry or a lack of desirable inventory.

This complete cessation of purchases contrasts with previous periods and signals a significant cooling or stagnation in the local real estate investment market at the close of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) completely dominate, controlling 100% of investor SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Griggs County is exclusively controlled by 'mom-and-pop' landlords, who own 100% of the 287 investor-held SFR properties. This demonstrates a market free from mid-size or large-scale corporate influence.

First-time or single-holding investors form the backbone of this market. Landlords with just one property (Tier 01) own 248 homes, a commanding 83.2% share of all investor-owned housing.

The next tier, two-property landlords, holds 36 properties (12.1%), followed by small landlords with 3-5 properties holding 14 homes (4.7%).

There is no presence from institutional investors (Tier 09) in Griggs County. The 0.0% share held by this tier highlights a market that is fundamentally local and small-scale in nature.

This tier distribution reveals a highly fragmented ownership structure, with market power diffused across a large number of very small-portfolio owners rather than being concentrated in a few large entities.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors are the dominant owners across all portfolio sizes in Griggs County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across every investor tier in Griggs County, leaving a minimal footprint for companies. There is no 'crossover point' where corporate ownership becomes prevalent.

In the largest segment, single-property landlords, individuals own 234 properties (90.3%) compared to just 25 (9.7%) for companies. This pattern of individual dominance is even stronger in the next tier.

For two-property portfolios, ownership is 100% individual, with all 36 properties held by private persons and zero by companies.

Even in the small landlord tier (3-5 properties), individuals maintain a strong majority, owning 12 of the 14 properties (85.7%).

This data confirms that the Griggs County rental market is operated by private citizens at every level, with corporate investment being a minor and non-scaling factor.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is concentrated in zip codes 58425 and 58416.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Griggs County is geographically concentrated, with two zip codes accounting for the vast majority of activity. The zip code 58425 leads by volume, containing 164 investor-owned properties.

In terms of market saturation, zip code 58416 stands out with the highest investor ownership rate. In this area, landlords own 88 properties, representing a remarkable 61.1% of the local SFR housing stock.

Other areas with notable investor presence include 58448, where investors own 29 properties (a 43.9% rate), and 58452, with 4 properties representing a 50.0% ownership rate.

The distinction between the top region by count (58425) and the top region by percentage (58416) highlights different market dynamics, one with a larger total housing stock and another where investors have a more dominant share of a smaller market.

The zip code 58212 shows no recorded investor properties, indicating areas within the county that remain almost entirely owner-occupied.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
A lack of historical transaction data indicates an extremely illiquid market for landlords.
Detailed Findings

The historical transaction data for Griggs County reveals an extremely illiquid market with no recorded buy or sell transactions for landlords. This lack of activity prevents any analysis of net buyer or seller status.

Consequently, it's impossible to calculate a buy/sell ratio, which would typically indicate whether investors are in a phase of portfolio accumulation or divestment.

The absence of transaction data also means there is no information on inter-landlord trading. It is unclear what percentage of properties, if any, are traded between existing investors.

Similarly, a comparison between average buy prices and sell prices cannot be performed, which would otherwise provide insight into potential profit margins or market appreciation over holding periods.

This data gap is a significant finding in itself, portraying a stable, buy-and-hold market where properties rarely change hands among investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of transactions.
Detailed Findings

The fourth quarter of 2025 saw a total freeze in landlord transaction activity in Griggs County. Investors were involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 0.0%.

This inactivity was consistent across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who make up the entire market, recorded zero transactions.

Consequently, there is no data to compare average purchase prices between different tiers, as no properties were bought or sold.

Inter-landlord trading was also non-existent. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, reflecting the overall lack of market liquidity.

This complete halt in Q4 transactions suggests investors were either satisfied with current holdings, faced a lack of available inventory, or were waiting for different market conditions before making a move.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop investors own 100% of Griggs County's landlord-held homes, a market now frozen with zero Q4 activity.
Holdings
Landlords own 287 SFR properties, a 44.7% share of the Griggs County market, with individual investors overwhelmingly controlling the portfolio at 274 properties (95.5%) versus 27 (9.4%) for companies.
Pricing
No landlord purchases were recorded in Q4 2025; however, in the prior quarter (Q3 2025), landlords paid 3.3% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $4,739 per property.
Activity
Q4 investor activity was non-existent, with landlords purchasing 0 properties (0.0% of all sales). Consequently, no new single-property landlords entered the market during this period of stagnation.
Market Share
Small, 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control of the market, owning 100% of all investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) have a 0.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate all portfolio sizes, from single-property (90.3% individual) to small portfolios (85.7% individual), with no crossover point where companies become majority owners.
Transactions
The market is characterized by extremely low liquidity, with zero landlord buy or sell transactions recorded in Q4 2025. This prevents the calculation of a net buyer or seller status for any investor group.
Market Narrative

In Griggs County, North Dakota, the single-family residential market is heavily influenced by a concentrated group of small-scale investors. Landlords own 287 properties, representing a significant 44.7% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This market is overwhelmingly local and private, with individual investors owning 95.5% of these homes (274 properties). The ownership structure is entirely composed of 'mom-and-pop' landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100% of the investor-owned inventory, while institutional-scale investors have zero presence.

Investor behavior in this market is defined by stability and a recent, stark halt in activity. The investor base is financially conservative, with 92.7% of properties owned outright with cash. While historical data from Q3 2025 shows landlords securing a 3.3% price discount compared to homeowners, all purchasing activity ceased in Q4 2025, with zero acquisitions by any investor type. This lack of transactions indicates an extremely illiquid market where investors appear to be in a long-term holding pattern rather than actively trading.

The key takeaway for the Griggs County housing market is its nature as a stable, yet stagnant, rental ecosystem dominated by a large number of small, private landlords. The high investor penetration rate suggests a substantial portion of the community are renters. However, the complete freeze in Q4 investor activity and the historical lack of transactions signal a mature or saturated market with limited opportunities for new growth or external investment. The future of this market depends not on large corporate players, but on the decisions of hundreds of local, cash-heavy individuals.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:32 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyGriggs (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price