Bowman (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Bowman (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Bowman (ND)
8
Total Investors in Bowman (ND)
3
Investor Owned SFR in Bowman (ND)
3(37.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1
SFR Owned
1
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
2
SFR Owned
2
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Hold 37.5% of Bowman County's SFR Market, But All Activity Has Halted
Investors own 3 of the 8 SFR properties in Bowman County, ND, a significant 37.5% market share. Ownership is concentrated in single-property landlords, with companies holding a 2-to-1 majority over individuals. However, the market was completely dormant in Q4 2025, with zero purchases or sales transactions recorded, indicating a highly illiquid and static investment landscape.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3 SFR properties in Bowman County, with companies holding a 66.7% majority.
All 3 investor-owned properties were purchased with cash and are currently rented. This indicates a portfolio focused entirely on rental income without leverage.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 2025 transactions occurred, making landlord vs. homeowner price comparisons unavailable.
The absence of recent sales activity for both landlords and traditional homeowners prevents any analysis of pricing trends or potential discounts in the Bowman County market.
Current Quarter Purchases
The investor purchase market was dormant, with landlords making 0% of Q4 2025 acquisitions.
There were zero total SFR purchases in Bowman County during Q4 2025 from any buyer type. Consequently, mom-and-pop and institutional investors recorded no new acquisitions.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors completely dominate the market, controlling 100% of all landlord-owned SFRs.
All 3 investor-owned properties fall into the single-property (Tier 01) category. There is no institutional (Tier 09) ownership presence in Bowman County whatsoever.
Ownership by Tier & Type
In the single-property tier, companies own 66.7% of properties, outnumbering individuals 2 to 1.
The crossover point where companies become the majority is at the very first tier (1 property), as they hold 2 properties compared to 1 for individuals. Pricing comparisons by owner type are unavailable due to zero sales.
Geographic Distribution
All investor activity in Bowman County is concentrated in a single zip code: 58623.
In the 58623 zip code, investors own 3 properties, representing a very high 50.0% ownership rate for that specific area. No investor-owned properties were recorded in other zip codes within the county.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available for landlords in Bowman County.
The absence of buy or sell records prevents any analysis of net buyer/seller status, landlord-to-landlord trading, or historical price comparisons.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market transactions.
With zero total transactions in the quarter, no purchases were made by any investor tier. This market inactivity prevents any comparison of purchase prices or inter-landlord trading activity.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3 SFR properties in Bowman County, with companies holding a 66.7% majority.
Detailed Findings

In Bowman County, investors hold a significant 37.5% of the Single-Family Residential (SFR) market, owning 3 out of the 8 total SFR properties.

Company investors are the majority owners, holding 2 of the 3 properties (66.7%), while an individual investor owns the remaining property (33.3%).

The small investor landscape consists of 3 distinct landlords (2 companies and 1 individual), indicating a market of single-property owners rather than a single large holder.

All investor-owned properties in the county are classified as rented, signaling a clear focus on generating rental income from their holdings.

A notable financial characteristic is that 100% of these properties are owned outright as cash properties, with none currently financed, suggesting a low-risk, unleveraged investment strategy among local landlords.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 2025 transactions occurred, making landlord vs. homeowner price comparisons unavailable.
Detailed Findings

Due to a complete lack of transactional activity in Q4 2025, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners in Bowman County.

No landlord purchases were recorded in the quarter, preventing any analysis of recent pricing strategies or trends.

Similarly, the absence of sales to traditional homeowners means no benchmark price is available to calculate a potential landlord discount or premium.

Historical pricing data is also unavailable, making it impossible to assess price appreciation or long-term trends within the local investor market.

The market's inactivity suggests a period of hold-and-rent rather than active acquisition or disposition, rendering price analysis moot for the current period.

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The investor purchase market was dormant, with landlords making 0% of Q4 2025 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Bowman County was nonexistent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 0 total SFRs sold during the period.

This lack of activity means landlords had a 0.0% share of a dormant market, reflecting a complete pause in real estate transactions.

No new landlords entered the market, as evidenced by zero purchases within the single-property (Tier 01) category.

Both mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors were equally inactive, each accounting for 0.0% of the nonexistent landlord purchases.

The data points to a highly illiquid market where neither investors nor other buyer types engaged in acquisitions during the final quarter of 2025.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors completely dominate the market, controlling 100% of all landlord-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Bowman County is exclusively composed of small, mom-and-pop landlords, who control 100.0% of the 3 investor-owned SFR properties.

All ownership is concentrated in the smallest possible tier, with 100.0% of properties held by single-property (Tier 01) landlords.

This market structure highlights a complete absence of mid-size or institutional investors, as Tiers 05 through 09 hold a 0.0% share.

The 3 properties are held by 3 separate entities, confirming that the market consists of three different small-scale investors rather than one owner with a three-property portfolio.

Pricing data by tier is unavailable due to the lack of recent transactions, but the ownership structure is clearly defined by entry-level investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Key Insight
In the single-property tier, companies own 66.7% of properties, outnumbering individuals 2 to 1.
Detailed Findings

Within Bowman County's investor market, where all 3 properties are in the single-property tier, company owners hold the majority share with 2 properties (66.7%).

Individual investors account for the remaining third of the market, owning 1 property (33.3%) in the same tier.

This structure shows that even at the smallest scale of investment, corporate entities represent the dominant ownership type in this specific market.

The crossover point for majority ownership is immediate; companies control the market from the very first tier of ownership.

Due to a lack of recent sales activity, it is not possible to compare acquisition prices between individual and company landlords.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
All investor activity in Bowman County is concentrated in a single zip code: 58623.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Bowman County is hyper-localized, with 100% of the 3 investor-owned SFRs located within the 58623 zip code.

Within this area, landlords have achieved a significant market penetration, owning 50.0% of the local SFR properties.

This demonstrates a clear geographic concentration, as no other zip codes in the county, such as 58651 or 58653, have any recorded investor-owned properties.

The data highlights that the zip code ND-Bowman-58623 is not only the leader by property count but also by ownership rate, consolidating all investor presence into one community.

The lack of geographic diversity suggests a targeted investment strategy or limited opportunities outside of this single zip code.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available for landlords in Bowman County.
Detailed Findings

A complete lack of historical transaction data for Bowman County means no analysis of long-term investor behavior is possible.

There are no records of past buy or sell transactions, making it impossible to determine if landlords have historically been net buyers or net sellers.

Consequently, the buy/sell ratio cannot be calculated, leaving the market's historical momentum unknown.

Data on inter-landlord transactions is also absent, so the percentage of properties traded between investors cannot be determined.

Similarly, without historical sales, it is impossible to compare average buy prices versus sell prices to infer potential profit margins over time.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were completely inactive in Q4 2025, accounting for 0.0% of market transactions.
Detailed Findings

The transaction market in Bowman County was completely frozen in Q4 2025, with 0 total transactions recorded for any buyer or seller type.

Landlords participated in 0 of these transactions, resulting in a 0.0% market share and underscoring a total lack of liquidity.

Activity was nonexistent across all investor tiers; mom-and-pop (Tiers 01-04) and institutional (Tier 09) investors both recorded zero transactions.

As there were no purchases, no data is available on average purchase prices by tier or the price spread between different investor sizes.

The level of inter-landlord trading was also zero, as no properties were bought or sold by investors during the quarter.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Control 37.5% of Bowman County's Static Housing Market Amid Zero Q4 Activity
Holdings
In Bowman County, ND, landlords own 3 Single-Family Residential properties, representing a 37.5% share of the market. Company investors hold a 66.7% majority (2 properties), while individuals own the remaining 33.3% (1 property).
Pricing
Pricing analysis is unavailable for Bowman County as there were no recorded SFR sales transactions by either landlords or traditional homeowners in Q4 2025.
Activity
The real estate market in Bowman County was entirely dormant in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0 properties and accounting for 0.0% of all sales. No new landlords entered the market during this period of inactivity.
Market Share
The local investor market is composed entirely of small landlords (1-10 properties), who control 100.0% of investor housing. There is zero presence from institutional investors (1000+ properties).
Ownership Type
Individual investors are present, but companies establish majority control from the smallest portfolio size, owning 2 of the 3 properties in the single-property tier.
Transactions
Due to a complete lack of sales in Q4 2025, the net buyer/seller status for landlords in Bowman County cannot be determined, as there were 0 buys and 0 sells.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Bowman County, ND, is a study in contrasts, defined by high market penetration but extremely low liquidity. Landlords own a substantial 37.5% of the county's Single-Family Residential properties, holding 3 of the 8 total homes. Ownership is entirely at the mom-and-pop level, with all 3 properties held by single-property landlords. Company entities represent the majority, owning 2 properties (66.7%) compared to 1 held by an individual investor (33.3%).

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 was characterized by complete inactivity. There were zero purchases and zero sales recorded for any investor type, mirroring a total freeze in the broader real estate market. This dormancy prevents any analysis of current pricing strategies, discounts relative to homeowners, or transactional trends. All existing investor-owned properties were acquired with cash and are utilized as rentals, indicating a stable, unleveraged, income-focused strategy among the few active landlords.

The key takeaway for Bowman County is its status as a small, static, and highly concentrated market. While the investor ownership rate of 37.5% is significant, the total lack of recent transactions suggests a 'buy-and-hold' environment with minimal opportunity for new entry or exit. The market is exclusively served by small-scale investors, with no institutional footprint, and all activity is confined to a single zip code, 58623, where investors own 50.0% of the housing stock.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:25 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBowman (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct