Billings (ND) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Billings (ND) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Billings (ND)
141
Total Investors in Billings (ND)
77
Investor Owned SFR in Billings (ND)
56(39.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
67
SFR Owned
46
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
10
SFR Owned
10
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 56 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Investors Hold Nearly 40% of Billings County SFRs in a Stagnant Market with Zero Q4 Sales
Investors own a significant 39.7% of the Single-Family Residential market in Billings County, ND, totaling 56 properties. This ownership is entirely concentrated among mom-and-pop landlords (100%), with no institutional presence. The market shows signs of extreme illiquidity, as there were zero SFR sales recorded for any buyer type in Q4 2025.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 56 SFRs, a high 39.7% share dominated by individual landlords (82.1%).
Cash is the primary acquisition method, with 51 of 56 properties (91.1%) owned outright versus just 5 financed. All 56 investor-owned properties are utilized as rentals, indicating a 100% focus on non-owner-occupied strategies.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
No Q4 sales activity occurred, preventing any landlord versus homeowner price analysis.
The complete absence of transactions in Q4 2025, as well as in the preceding periods of 2024 and 2020-2023, indicates a highly illiquid or stagnant market. No recent data is available to assess pricing trends or investor discounts.
Current Quarter Purchases
The market was completely inactive in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0.0% of 0 total sales.
Reflecting the total market freeze, mom-and-pop landlords and institutional investors both recorded zero purchases. Consequently, no new landlords entered the market during the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market with 100% of holdings; 96.4% are single-property landlords.
Institutional investors with portfolios of 1,000+ properties have absolutely no presence in Billings County, owning 0.0% of the investor-held SFRs. The market consists entirely of the two smallest investor tiers.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Due to zero Q4 sales, no price comparison between individual and company buyers is possible.
Individuals are the dominant owners across all existing tiers. Companies only hold a minority stake (18.5%) in the single-property tier and own 0% of two-property portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in the 58645 zip code, with 34 properties.
The 58645 zip code also has the highest investor penetration rate at a remarkable 64.2%. Other areas like 58634 and 58642 also show significant investor presence, with rates of 50.0% and 33.3% respectively.
Historical Transactions
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a prolonged period of low market liquidity.
The absence of buy or sell transactions for all landlords, including institutional investors, makes it impossible to determine net buyer/seller status or analyze inter-landlord trading. No data exists to compare buy and sell prices.
Current Quarter Transactions
Reflecting a frozen market, landlords' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0% of zero total sales.
All investor tiers, from single-property to institutional, recorded zero transactions in Q4. No inter-landlord trading occurred, and no pricing data is available for the quarter.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 56 SFRs, a high 39.7% share dominated by individual landlords (82.1%).
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant footprint in Billings County, owning 56 of the 141 available Single-Family Residential properties, which constitutes a high 39.7% market penetration rate.

Individual, or 'mom-and-pop', investors are the overwhelming majority, controlling 46 properties (82.1% of the investor portfolio). In contrast, company-owned entities hold just 10 properties (17.9%), underscoring the small-scale nature of the local rental market.

The financing profile of these holdings reveals a strong preference for cash acquisitions. An overwhelming 91.1% of the portfolio (51 properties) is owned free and clear, with only 5 properties currently financed. This suggests investors in this market are well-capitalized and risk-averse.

Every single investor-owned property (56 total) is classified as rented, demonstrating a 100% focus on generating rental income rather than other investment strategies like flipping or holding vacant land.

By entity count, the market structure further confirms individual dominance. There are 67 individual landlords compared to just 10 company landlords, a ratio of nearly 7-to-1.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
No Q4 sales activity occurred, preventing any landlord versus homeowner price analysis.
Detailed Findings

Analysis of acquisition pricing is impossible due to a complete lack of sales transactions in Billings County during Q4 2025. Neither landlords nor traditional homeowners purchased any SFR properties in the quarter.

This market inactivity extends historically, with zero landlord purchases recorded in all of 2024 and the 2020-2023 period. This prevents any analysis of price appreciation or changes in buying behavior over time.

Without transaction data, it is not possible to calculate the typical price gap between what landlords and traditional homeowners pay. This lack of data itself is a key finding, pointing to an extremely low-velocity real estate market.

The absence of sales prevents any comparison between individual and company investor pricing strategies, as there were no acquisitions by either group to analyze.

The market's stagnation means there is no data to assess price appreciation from the pandemic-era housing boom (2020-2023) to the current quarter, as no properties were transacted by investors in either period.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Key Insight
The market was completely inactive in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 0.0% of 0 total sales.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity in Billings County was non-existent in Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 0 of the 0 total SFRs sold. This 0.0% market share is a direct result of a completely frozen local real estate market.

The inactivity was universal across all investor sizes. Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) made up 0.0% of the quarter's landlord purchases, as there were no transactions to account for.

Similarly, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) also recorded zero purchases, maintaining their 0.0% share of an inactive market. There is no large-scale investor activity in this region.

The lack of purchasing by single-property investors (Tier 01) signifies that no new landlords entered the Billings County market in Q4 2025.

This complete halt in transactional activity highlights extreme illiquidity and a lack of both supply and demand in the local SFR market for the period.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop investors completely control the market with 100% of holdings; 96.4% are single-property landlords.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Billings County is defined by extreme concentration at the smallest scale. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04, holding 1-10 properties) command 100% of the entire investor-owned SFR market.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone account for a staggering 96.4% of all investor-owned housing, with 54 of the 56 properties. This demonstrates that the local rental market is overwhelmingly supported by first-time or small-scale investors.

The next tier, two-property landlords (Tier 02), holds the remaining 2 properties, making up just 3.6% of the market. There are no investors who own more than two properties in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-1,000 properties) and institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have zero presence, each holding a 0.0% share. This market completely lacks the scale and corporate ownership seen in larger metropolitan areas.

Due to the lack of recent transactions, it is not possible to analyze how acquisition prices vary by tier. The existing ownership structure, however, is firmly entrenched with the smallest investors.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Due to zero Q4 sales, no price comparison between individual and company buyers is possible.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the backbone of ownership in Billings County. In the largest existing tier (two-property owners), individuals own 100% of the 2 properties.

Even within the single-property tier, individuals are the clear majority, owning 44 of the 54 properties, an 81.5% share. Companies hold the remaining 10 properties, or 18.5%.

The crossover point where companies typically become majority owners in larger markets is non-existent here. Individual ownership is dominant across the board, with companies only participating at the smallest scale.

The lack of any recent buying activity means there is no data to compare acquisition prices or growth patterns between individual and company investors in Q4.

The current ownership structure shows that the market is comprised of 44 individual single-property landlords, 10 company single-property landlords, and 1 individual two-property landlord, highlighting the granular nature of local ownership.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is heavily concentrated in the 58645 zip code, with 34 properties.
Detailed Findings

Geographic analysis reveals that investor activity in Billings County is not evenly distributed but is instead hyper-concentrated. The zip code 58645 is the undisputed hub, containing 34 of the 56 total investor-owned properties.

This concentration in 58645 translates to a staggering 64.2% investor ownership rate, meaning nearly two out of every three SFRs in that area are investor-owned.

The second most active area by count is the 58622 zip code, with 17 investor properties, though its ownership rate of 24.3% is significantly lower than that of 58645.

Several other zip codes exhibit high investor penetration despite low property counts. For example, 58634 has a 50.0% investor ownership rate from just one property, and 58642 has a 33.3% rate, also from a single property.

The data shows a clear pattern where the area with the highest count of investor properties (58645) is also the leader in ownership percentage, indicating a deeply penetrated rental market in that specific locality.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Key Insight
No historical transaction data is available, indicating a prolonged period of low market liquidity.
Detailed Findings

A review of historical transactions reveals a complete lack of recorded sales activity for landlords in Billings County across all available timeframes. This signifies an extremely illiquid market where properties rarely change hands.

Without any buy or sell transactions, it is impossible to calculate a buy/sell ratio or determine if landlords have been net buyers or net sellers over time.

Similarly, there is no data on inter-landlord trading. The percentage of transactions between landlords cannot be calculated, as there were no transactions to begin with.

The lack of sales also prevents any analysis of implied margins, as there are no average buy prices to compare against average sell prices.

Institutional transaction patterns cannot be assessed, as the 1,000+ property tier has no presence or transaction history in this county.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Reflecting a frozen market, landlords' share of Q4 2025 transactions was 0.0% of zero total sales.
Detailed Findings

The Q4 2025 transaction summary for Billings County shows a market at a complete standstill. Landlords were involved in 0 of the 0 total SFR transactions, resulting in a 0.0% market share.

Transaction volume was zero across all investor tiers. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) and institutional investors (Tier 09) were equally inactive, reflecting the universal lack of market activity.

Consequently, there is no data to compare average purchase prices across different tiers for Q4. The price spread between the highest and lowest tier is indeterminable.

No inter-landlord trading occurred during the quarter. The percentage of properties bought from other landlords was 0%, as no acquisitions of any kind took place.

The transactional inactivity in Q4 perfectly mirrors the county's static ownership structure, where existing landlords hold their properties and new investors are not entering the market.

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Investors Own 39.7% of Billings County SFRs; Market Frozen with Zero Q4 Sales Activity
Holdings
Investors own 56 of the 141 Single-Family Residential properties in Billings County, ND, representing a significant 39.7% market penetration. The portfolio is dominated by individual landlords, who hold 46 properties (82.1%), compared to 10 properties (17.9%) owned by companies.
Pricing
The complete absence of sales in Q4 2025 makes it impossible to conduct a price comparison between landlords and traditional homeowners. The market's current illiquidity prevents any analysis of recent pricing trends or investor discounts.
Activity
The real estate market in Billings County was entirely stagnant in Q4 2025, with 0 landlord purchases out of 0 total sales. This lack of activity meant no new single-property landlords entered the market.
Market Share
Small mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) have absolute control, owning 100% of the investor-held housing stock. Single-property landlords alone account for 96.4% of the portfolio, while institutional investors have a 0.0% presence.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary owners in Billings County, holding a majority in every existing portfolio tier. Companies maintain a small presence, holding only 18.5% of properties in the single-property tier and having no portfolios larger than that.
Transactions
No transactions were recorded in Q4 2025, making it impossible to determine a net buyer or seller status for any investor group. Both landlords overall and the non-existent institutional tier had a buy/sell count of zero.
Market Narrative

In Billings County, ND, the single-family residential market is characterized by high investor penetration and extremely low liquidity. Investors own a substantial 56 properties, representing 39.7% of the total 141 SFRs. This landscape is entirely shaped by small-scale participants; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 100% of the investor-owned stock, with individuals holding 82.1% of these assets. Institutional capital has no presence, reinforcing the market's hyper-local, small-investor character.

The defining feature of investor behavior in Q4 2025 was a complete lack of activity. There were zero SFR transactions by any party, landlord or otherwise, indicating a frozen market. This inactivity prevents any analysis of investor pricing advantages or recent trends. The existing portfolio, however, reveals a strong preference for durable, long-term holds, evidenced by the fact that 91.1% of properties are owned with cash and 100% are utilized as rentals.

The key takeaway for Billings County is that it operates as a static, closed-loop rental market rather than a dynamic transactional one. The high ownership concentration, particularly in zip code 58645 (64.2% investor-owned), combined with zero sales activity, suggests a market where long-term landlords provide rental housing with very little turnover. This stability may limit opportunities for new entrants but provides a consistent, albeit illiquid, housing environment for renters.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:26 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyBillings (ND)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price