Wilson (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Wilson (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Wilson (NC)
24,360
Total Investors in Wilson (NC)
6,490
Investor Owned SFR in Wilson (NC)
7,263(29.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,756
SFR Owned
5,407
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
734
SFR Owned
1,914
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 7,263 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Dominate Wilson County with 83.5% Ownership, Capturing 31% of Q4 Sales
Investors own 7,263 SFR properties (29.8% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 83.5% versus a mere 0.1% for institutional firms. In Q4, landlords purchased 31.0% of all homes sold at a 38.6% discount to homeowners and continued to be strong net buyers, expanding their portfolios.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Landlords own 7,263 SFR properties in Wilson County, with individual investors holding a dominant 74.4%.
Cash-backed ownership is prevalent, with 6,013 properties owned outright versus just 1,250 that are financed. The vast majority of the portfolio (7,119 properties) is rental-focused and non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 38.6% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a deep $116,486 discount per property.
The landlord discount widened significantly in Q4 to 38.6% from 29.9% in Q3. This follows a volatile year where the discount was as low as 11.1% in Q1. Average landlord acquisition prices of $185,440 in Q4 are up 20.6% from the 2020-2023 average of $153,810.
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors captured 31.0% of the Q4 market, purchasing 70 of the 226 SFRs sold.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove acquisition activity, accounting for 78.6% of all investor purchases. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) made zero acquisitions, showing a complete absence at the top end of the market.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 83.5% of investor-owned housing.
The market structure is highly fragmented, with single-property landlords alone owning 4,091 properties, a 54.3% majority share. Institutional investors (1000+) have a negligible footprint, owning just 6 properties, or 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 54.3% of that tier.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control the entry-level, owning 90.3% of single-property portfolios and 84.5% of two-property portfolios. Company ownership becomes dominant in the 51-100 property tier, where they own 88.2% of the properties.
Geographic Distribution
The 27893 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 3,871 properties, 53% of all investor holdings.
The highest concentration is found elsewhere; the 27873 zip code has a staggering 90.0% investor ownership rate, followed by 27813 at 76.1%. This contrasts with the volume leader, 27893, which has a lower rate of 35.9%.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.6 times more properties than they sold in Q4.
This net buying trend has been consistent, with landlords purchasing 468 properties while selling only 141 throughout 2025 for a net gain of 327 properties. Q4 transaction volume (98 buys) is slightly lower than Q3 (111 buys), suggesting a mild seasonal slowdown.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 30.2% of all Q4 transactions, conducting 98 of 325 total market deals.
Transaction prices vary dramatically by tier; two-property landlords paid the most ($282,639) while small landlords (3-5 properties) paid the least ($55,667). New single-property landlords sourced 15.4% of their purchases from other investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Landlords own 7,263 SFR properties in Wilson County, with individual investors holding a dominant 74.4%.
Detailed Findings

Investors own 7,263 single-family residential properties in Wilson County, NC, representing a significant 29.8% share of the total 24,360 SFRs in the market.

The market is overwhelmingly dominated by individual investors, who own 5,407 properties, or 74.4% of the investor-owned portfolio, compared to 1,914 properties (26.4%) owned by companies.

This individual dominance is also reflected in the landlord entity count, with 5,756 individual landlords making up 88.7% of the total 6,490 investors in the area, underscoring the grassroots nature of the market.

A strong indicator of investment strategy is the financing method; landlords in Wilson County heavily favor cash acquisitions, with 6,013 properties owned outright, more than 4.8 times the 1,250 properties that are financed.

The primary purpose of these holdings is clear, as 7,119 properties are designated as non-owner-occupied, confirming a rental-focused strategy across the vast majority of the portfolio.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 38.6% less than homeowners in Q4, securing a deep $116,486 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords in Wilson County, NC demonstrated a significant pricing advantage, acquiring properties for an average of $185,440, which is 38.6% less than the $301,926 paid by traditional homeowners.

This translates to a substantial discount of $116,486 per property, giving investors a considerable competitive edge in the market.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been widening, increasing from a 29.9% discount ($94,490) in Q3 to the current 38.6% discount in Q4, suggesting improving market conditions for investor acquisitions.

Throughout 2025, the landlord discount has shown significant volatility, ranging from a low of 11.1% in Q1 to a high of 38.0% in Q2, before settling at an even higher 38.6% in Q4.

This consistent ability to purchase below the homeowner market rate indicates that investors are effectively targeting undervalued properties or leveraging different acquisition channels.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors captured 31.0% of the Q4 market, purchasing 70 of the 226 SFRs sold.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a major force in the Wilson County, NC market during Q4 2025, acquiring 70 of the 226 total SFR properties sold, which constitutes a 31.0% market share.

The acquisition landscape was completely dominated by smaller investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) were responsible for 55 of these purchases, representing 78.6% of all Q4 landlord activity.

New entrants and the smallest investors led the charge, with 65 new landlord entities entering the market in the single-property tier, who alone bought 46 properties (65.7% of the investor total).

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) were entirely absent from the market, making zero purchases in Q4. This highlights a market driven by local, small-scale capital rather than large corporations.

Mid-size landlords also showed activity, with those in the 11-50 property tiers acquiring a combined 11 properties, or 15.7% of the investor total, demonstrating a healthy mix of activity across the small and mid-sized segments.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 83.5% of investor-owned housing.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Wilson County, NC is unequivocally defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 83.5% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the rental market, owning 4,091 properties. This single tier accounts for a 54.3% majority of all investor-owned housing, far surpassing any other segment.

The influence of large-scale investors is minimal. Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a barely visible presence, with their holdings of 6 properties representing just 0.1% of the market.

Mid-size investors (11-100 properties) hold a combined 11.0% of the portfolio, indicating a gradual consolidation of properties as portfolio sizes increase, but they remain a small fraction compared to the mom-and-pop segment.

This distribution underscores a market characterized by high fragmentation and grassroots participation, challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in the single-family rental space.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owner in portfolios of 6-10 properties, controlling 54.3% of that tier.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, representing 90.3% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 84.5% of two-property portfolios. This highlights that the path to real estate investment is typically started by individuals.

A distinct crossover point emerges as portfolios grow. In the 6-10 property tier, companies take a majority ownership for the first time at 54.3%, signaling a shift towards more formalized business structures for larger holdings.

Company ownership solidifies in the mid-to-large tiers. They own a 57.1% majority in the 21-50 property tier and a commanding 88.2% share of the 51-100 property tier.

Even in the 11-20 property tier, ownership is nearly evenly split, with individuals holding a slight edge at 51.2% versus companies at 48.8%, marking this as a key transition zone.

This progression reveals a clear life cycle: individuals initiate and dominate small portfolios, while corporate structures are increasingly adopted as investors scale their operations and professionalize their holdings.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 27893 zip code is the epicenter of investor ownership with 3,871 properties, 53% of all investor holdings.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Wilson County, NC is highly concentrated, with the 27893 zip code alone containing 3,871 investor-owned properties, making it the clear leader by volume.

However, the market's highest penetration rate is found elsewhere. The 27873 zip code has a staggering 90.0% of its SFR properties owned by investors, indicating a near-complete conversion to rental housing.

This highlights a clear distinction between volume and density. The volume leader, 27893, has a 35.9% ownership rate, while smaller areas like 27813 (76.1%) and 27883 (44.7%) show much higher investor saturation.

The top five zip codes by property count (27893, 27896, 27822, 27851, 27883) collectively hold 6,425 properties, representing 88.5% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county, showcasing extreme geographic concentration.

Several other zip codes demonstrate significant investor presence with rates exceeding 40%, including 27829 (43.2%) and 27803 (41.8%), pointing to specific neighborhoods being heavily targeted for rental conversion.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords remain aggressive net buyers, acquiring 2.6 times more properties than they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Wilson County, NC are consistently expanding their portfolios, acting as strong net buyers throughout 2025. In Q4, they purchased 98 properties while selling only 37, a buy-to-sell ratio of 2.65 to 1.

This accumulation trend holds for the entire year, with 468 properties purchased versus 141 sold in 2025, resulting in a net gain of 327 properties for the investor community.

The net buying activity in Q4 (a gain of 61 properties) represents a continuation of the strong acquisition pace seen in Q3 (net gain of 82) and Q2 (net gain of 97).

A comparison with the previous year shows a slight increase in acquisition pace, with 468 properties bought in 2025 compared to 453 in 2024.

There were no institutional transactions recorded, indicating that the market's transactional velocity is driven entirely by small and mid-sized investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 30.2% of all Q4 transactions, conducting 98 of 325 total market deals.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a pivotal role in Q4 market liquidity, participating in 98 of the 325 total SFR transactions, for a market share of 30.2%.

Acquisition pricing strategies diverge significantly across the smallest investor tiers. Single-property landlords paid an average of $187,979, while those with two properties paid a much higher average of $282,639. In contrast, landlords in the 3-5 property tier acquired homes for just $55,667.

Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were the most active, accounting for 80 of the 98 investor transactions, demonstrating that small investors drive market activity.

New investors entering the market are a key source of inter-landlord trades. 15.4% of all properties purchased by single-property landlords were acquired from existing investors, indicating a healthy churn within the community.

Mid-size investors (11-20 properties) also participated in this churn, sourcing 37.5% of their 8 purchases from other landlords, suggesting strategic portfolio adjustments among more established players.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-pop landlords dominate Wilson County with 83.5% ownership, capturing 31% of Q4 sales.
Holdings
Investors own 7,263 SFR properties, representing 29.8% of the market in Wilson County, NC. Individual investors hold a 74.4% majority (5,407 properties), with companies owning the remaining 26.4% (1,914 properties).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords acquired properties at a 38.6% discount compared to homeowners, paying an average of $185,440 versus $301,926—a savings of $116,486 per home.
Activity
Landlords purchased 31.0% of all homes sold in Q4 (70 properties), with activity dominated by small investors. The market welcomed 65 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 83.5% of all investor-held SFRs. In stark contrast, institutional firms own just 0.1%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors are the primary force in smaller portfolios, owning 90.3% of single-property holdings. Companies become the majority owners once a portfolio reaches the 6-10 property tier.
Transactions
Landlords were strong net buyers in Q4 with a 2.65x buy-to-sell ratio (98 buys vs 37 sells), consistently expanding their portfolios. Institutional investors recorded no transaction activity.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Wilson County, NC is defined by small, local capital, with investors owning 7,263 properties, or 29.8% of the total market. This landscape is dominated not by corporations, but by individuals, who own 74.4% of the rental portfolio. The market structure is highly fragmented; mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 83.5% of investor housing, while institutional firms have a negligible 0.1% footprint.

Investor behavior underscores a strategy of aggressive accumulation. In Q4, landlords were responsible for 31.0% of all SFR purchases and demonstrated a significant competitive advantage by acquiring homes at a 38.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners. They remain strong net buyers, purchasing 2.65 times more properties than they sold. This activity is fueled by new entrants, with 65 new single-property landlords joining the market in the last quarter alone.

The key takeaway is that the Wilson County housing market fundamentally challenges the narrative of a corporate takeover. It is a grassroots ecosystem where individual investors and small businesses drive demand, liquidity, and rental supply. This dynamic creates both opportunities for local wealth creation and significant pressure on traditional homebuyers, who must compete with cash-heavy investors capable of securing substantial discounts and moving quickly on acquisitions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:21 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyWilson (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail