Sampson (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Sampson (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Sampson (NC)
16,527
Total Investors in Sampson (NC)
5,280
Investor Owned SFR in Sampson (NC)
4,845(29.3%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
4,905
SFR Owned
4,344
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
375
SFR Owned
535
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,845 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Sampson County, Capturing 37% of Sales at a 38% Discount
Investors own 29.3% of all SFR properties in Sampson County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 97.6% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors bought 36.8% of all homes sold, paying an average of 37.9% less than traditional homeowners. The market is defined by consistent, long-term accumulation from small, individual investors, with virtually no institutional presence.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,845 SFRs, with individuals controlling a dominant 89.7% of properties.
The vast majority of investor-owned properties (89.0%) were acquired with cash, not financing. These holdings are overwhelmingly rental-focused, with 98.3% of the portfolio classified as non-owner-occupied. There are 13 individual landlords for every one company landlord in Sampson County.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid 37.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $93,412 per property.
This significant pricing advantage for landlords has been consistent throughout 2025, with discounts ranging from 32.4% to 47.6%. Landlord acquisition prices have appreciated 19.9% from the 2020-2023 average of $127,506 to $152,845 in Q4 2025.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Sampson County during Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) were responsible for 89.8% of all investor purchases, while institutional investors made zero acquisitions. The market welcomed an influx of 46 new single-property landlords this quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with over 1,000 properties own just 0.1% of the portfolio. Landlords with only a single property represent the largest segment, owning 3,822 properties, or 77.1% of the entire investor market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio scales beyond 10 properties.
In portfolios of 1-10 properties, individual landlords own between 58% and 94% of the assets. However, in the 11-20 property tier, company ownership jumps to 69.6%, marking a clear shift to corporate structures for larger portfolios.
Geographic Distribution
The 28328 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 2,053 properties.
While 28328 has the highest count, smaller zip codes show higher penetration rates, such as 28466 (42.9%) and 28444 (41.3%). This highlights a difference between high-volume and high-concentration submarkets within the county.
Historical Transactions
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.1 homes for every property they sold in Q4.
This net buyer position is a long-term trend, with a 3.4x buy-to-sell ratio for all of 2025 and a 4.8x ratio in 2024. Transaction data for institutional investors was unavailable, indicating their activity is negligible or non-existent.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord purchases represented 30.7% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
First-time investors (Tier 01) sourced 21.3% of their purchases from other landlords, showing a healthy internal market for assets. Purchase prices scaled with portfolio size, with large landlords paying $279,950 on average, compared to $162,318 for single-property investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,845 SFRs, with individuals controlling a dominant 89.7% of properties.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 29.3% of the single-family residential market in Sampson County, with a total portfolio of 4,845 properties.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by 4,905 individual landlords who own 4,344 properties, making up 89.7% of the investor-held housing stock. In contrast, 375 company investors own just 535 properties (11.0%).

A defining characteristic of this market is the preference for all-cash acquisitions, with 4,313 properties owned outright compared to only 532 that are financed. This 8-to-1 cash-to-financed ratio highlights a well-capitalized investor base less sensitive to interest rate fluctuations.

The portfolio is clearly geared towards generating rental income, as 4,764 of the 4,845 properties (98.3%) are non-owner-occupied, confirming their role as housing providers in the rental market.

The data reveals a market built on grassroots investment, where the typical investor is an individual, likely local, who pays with cash and operates a rental business.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid 37.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $93,412 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Sampson County demonstrate a powerful pricing advantage, acquiring properties in Q4 2025 for an average of $152,845, which is 37.9% less than the $246,257 paid by traditional homeowners.

This equates to a substantial average discount of $93,412 per property, indicating a sophisticated ability to find undervalued assets or off-market deals not accessible to the general public.

This trend is not an anomaly; the landlord discount remained consistently high throughout the year, registering 32.4% in Q3 ($83,347) and an astounding 47.6% in Q2 ($139,643).

Despite securing deep discounts, the value of assets acquired by investors has grown significantly. The average Q4 2025 purchase price of $152,845 represents a 19.9% increase over the average price of $127,506 during the 2020-2023 period.

The data consistently shows that landlords operate with a significant cost advantage, allowing for stronger returns and greater resilience against market shifts compared to typical homebuyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 36.8% of all SFR properties sold in Sampson County during Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity accounted for a substantial portion of the market in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 49 of the 133 total SFRs sold, a market share of 36.8%.

The acquisition activity was almost entirely driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) acquired 44 of the 49 properties, representing 89.8% of all landlord purchases.

In a clear sign of grassroots market expansion, 46 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, acquiring 31 properties. This highlights a dynamic and accessible entry point for new investors.

Conversely, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had no purchasing activity, with 0 properties acquired in Q4. Their absence underscores that the market's growth is fueled by smaller, independent operators.

The data paints a picture of a Q4 market where nearly four in ten homes were sold to an investor, and nine out of ten of those investors were small, local operators, many of whom were just starting their portfolios.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Sampson County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively hold 97.6% of all investor-owned single-family homes.

This concentration at the small end of the market directly counters the narrative of large-scale corporate ownership. Single-property landlords alone (Tier 01) own 3,822 properties, which accounts for 77.1% of the total investor portfolio.

The next two tiers, two-property landlords and those with 3-5 properties, own 8.9% and 9.6% of the market respectively, further solidifying the control of small operators.

At the opposite end of the spectrum, institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 7 properties, or 0.1% of the total investor portfolio.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized market structure, where the collective power of thousands of individual investors, not a handful of large corporations, shapes the rental landscape.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority property owners once a portfolio scales beyond 10 properties.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the bedrock of the Sampson County market, overwhelmingly dominating smaller portfolio tiers. For single-property landlords, individuals own 93.5% of the homes.

This individual dominance continues through the small landlord tiers, with individuals owning 86.5% of two-property portfolios and 82.2% of portfolios with 3-5 properties.

A distinct transition occurs as portfolios grow. The balance of power shifts in the 11-20 property tier, where companies own 39 properties (69.6%) compared to just 17 owned by individuals (30.4%).

This crossover point indicates that as investors scale their operations beyond 10 properties, they increasingly adopt formal corporate structures for liability, financing, or management purposes.

While individuals drive market entry and small-scale investment, company structures are the preferred vehicle for building mid-sized and larger rental portfolios in the region.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
The 28328 zip code is the epicenter of investor activity, holding 2,053 properties.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership in Sampson County is highly concentrated geographically, with the 28328 zip code serving as the primary hub, containing 2,053 investor-owned properties.

This single zip code accounts for a remarkable 42.4% of all investor-owned SFRs in the entire county, with an ownership rate of 28.4%.

Interestingly, the areas with the highest investor penetration rates are different from the volume leader. The 28466 zip code leads with a 42.9% investor ownership rate, followed by 28444 (41.3%) and 28441 (39.9%).

This distinction reveals different market dynamics: 28328 is a large, high-volume market for investors, while other smaller zip codes represent highly saturated rental markets where investors own more than two out of every five homes.

The top five zip codes by investor property count (28328, 28382, 28334, 28385, 28366) collectively hold 3,686 properties, representing 76.1% of all investor activity in the county, showcasing significant regional concentration.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Investors are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.1 homes for every property they sold in Q4.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Sampson County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying far more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, they purchased 66 properties while selling only 16, resulting in a net gain of 50 properties.

This buy-to-sell ratio of 4.1 to 1 demonstrates significant confidence in the local market and a clear strategy of portfolio expansion.

This behavior is not a recent development but a sustained, multi-year trend. For the full year of 2025, investors bought 259 properties and sold 76 (a 3.4x ratio). In 2024, the trend was even stronger, with 203 buys versus 42 sells (a 4.8x ratio).

The consistent net positive acquisition activity signals a stable and growing demand for rental housing in the county, which landlords are actively moving to supply.

The complete absence of transaction data for institutional-level investors further reinforces that this market's transactional velocity and growth are driven entirely by smaller, non-institutional players.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord purchases represented 30.7% of all property transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, investors were a driving force in market liquidity, participating in 66 of the 215 total SFR transactions, a share of 30.7%.

The bulk of this activity came from the smallest investors, with single-property landlords (Tier 01) alone accounting for 47 of the 66 landlord transactions (71.2%).

A notable pattern emerged in acquisition strategy: purchase price correlates strongly with investor size. Single-property landlords paid an average of $162,318, while large landlords (101-1000 properties) acquired assets at a much higher average price of $279,950.

This suggests larger investors target higher-value properties, while new entrants focus on more affordable entry points into the market.

The market shows signs of internal liquidity, with new landlords acquiring a significant portion of their inventory from established players. Of the 47 properties bought by Tier 01 investors, 10 (21.3%) were purchased from another landlord, indicating a fluid transfer of assets within the investor community.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Command Sampson County's Market, Buying 37% of Homes at a 38% Discount
Holdings
Investors own 4,845 SFR properties, representing 29.3% of the market in Sampson County. Individual investors hold a commanding 89.7% of these properties (4,344), with companies owning the remaining 11.0% (535).
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 37.9% less than traditional homeowners, securing an average discount of $93,412 per property ($152,845 vs $246,257).
Activity
Landlords were highly active in Q4 2025, purchasing 49 properties, which accounts for 36.8% of all SFR sales. The market saw an influx of 46 new single-property landlords, underscoring grassroots growth.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) owning 97.6% of all investor-held SFRs. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) hold a negligible 0.1% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in the 11-20 property tier, signaling a shift to corporate structures as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords in Sampson County are aggressive net buyers with a 4.1x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (66 buys vs 16 sells), continuing a multi-year accumulation trend. Institutional investors recorded no transactions.
Market Narrative

The single-family residential market in Sampson County, NC is heavily influenced by a large and active base of small, individual investors. Landlords own a significant 29.3% of all SFRs, a portfolio totaling 4,845 properties. This landscape is defined not by corporations, but by grassroots participation; individual investors own nearly 90% of these homes, and mom-and-pop operators (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 97.6% of the investor-owned housing stock, while institutional ownership is functionally non-existent at 0.1%.

Investor behavior is characterized by strategic acquisition and long-term growth. In the last quarter, landlords purchased 36.8% of all homes sold, demonstrating their role as a primary source of market demand. They operate with a distinct financial advantage, securing properties at a 37.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners—an average savings of over $93,000 per home. This activity is part of a sustained accumulation strategy, with investors acting as strong net buyers, purchasing more than four properties for every one they sold in Q4, a trend consistent over the past two years.

The key takeaway from the data is that Sampson County's rental market is a model of decentralized, small-scale capitalism. Its growth is fueled by an influx of new, single-property landlords and the expansion of existing small portfolios, not by Wall Street. This creates a dynamic environment where investors provide substantial market liquidity and are actively expanding the supply of rental housing, all while operating with a significant cost advantage that reinforces their market position.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:11 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographySampson (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth