Pasquotank (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Pasquotank (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Pasquotank (NC)
12,856
Total Investors in Pasquotank (NC)
3,469
Investor Owned SFR in Pasquotank (NC)
3,430(26.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
3,088
SFR Owned
2,589
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
381
SFR Owned
874
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 3,430 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small investors dominate Pasquotank's market with 87.3% ownership while securing massive 40.9% property discounts.
Investors own 26.7% of SFRs in Pasquotank County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a commanding 87.3% of that portfolio. In Q4, landlords were active net buyers, acquiring 22.8% of homes sold while securing a massive 40.9% price discount compared to traditional homeowners.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 3,430 SFR properties in Pasquotank County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 75.5% share.
The vast majority of investor-held properties (79.4%) are owned with cash, with 2,725 properties held free and clear versus 705 that are financed. The portfolio is heavily rental-focused, as 3,343 of the 3,430 properties are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords secured a massive 40.9% discount in Q4, paying an average of $277,695 while homeowners paid $470,259.
The price advantage for landlords has widened dramatically throughout the year, growing from a 24.7% discount in Q1 to 40.9% in Q4. This represents a $192,564 price gap per property in the latest quarter, highlighting investors' strong deal-finding capabilities.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 22.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 29 of the 127 homes on the market.
Mom-and-pop investors drove this activity, accounting for 82.8% of all landlord purchases (24 properties). In contrast, institutional buyers acquired just 2 properties, showcasing the dominance of small-scale investors in current market activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 87.3% of all investor SFRs in Pasquotank County.
In stark contrast, institutional investors with portfolios of over 1,000 properties have a negligible presence, holding just 23 homes, which accounts for only 0.6% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords are the largest segment, alone controlling 59.9% of all investor-owned housing.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
The shift to corporate ownership solidifies as portfolios grow, with companies controlling 92.2% of properties in the 21-50 property tier. This pattern indicates a clear trend towards professionalization and incorporation as investment scale increases.
Geographic Distribution
In Pasquotank County, investors own 3,430 SFR properties, representing a significant 26.7% ownership rate of the local market.
This single-county report highlights a high concentration of investor activity within the local geography. The 26.7% market penetration rate indicates that more than one in every four single-family homes is owned by a landlord.
Historical Transactions
Landlords in Pasquotank County are strong net buyers, acquiring 2.4 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
This trend of accumulation is consistent across investor types, with institutional landlords also in acquisition mode, buying 3 properties for every 1 sold. The net buying ratio for all landlords has remained robust and positive throughout 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all market transactions in Q4, conducting 36 of the 189 total sales and purchases.
A distinct pricing difference emerged between investor tiers, with institutional buyers paying 15.7% less than new single-property landlords ($260,555 vs $308,976). Institutions also sourced 66.7% of their acquisitions from other landlords, while new investors primarily bought from the open market.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 3,430 SFR properties in Pasquotank County, with individual landlords holding a dominant 75.5% share.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership constitutes a significant portion of the Pasquotank County housing market, with 3,430 single-family residential properties, or 26.7% of the total 12,856 SFRs, held by landlords.

The market is overwhelmingly controlled by individual investors rather than corporations. Individuals own 2,589 properties, making up 75.5% of the investor-owned housing stock, compared to 874 properties (25.5%) held by companies.

This individual dominance is even more pronounced when looking at the number of landlord entities, where 3,088 individuals (89.0%) far outnumber the 381 company entities.

Cash is the preferred acquisition method for local investors. A total of 2,725 properties are owned outright, nearly four times the 705 properties that are financed, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The investor portfolio is almost entirely dedicated to rentals, with 3,343 properties (97.5%) classified as rented or non-owner-occupied, underscoring the business focus of these holdings.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords secured a massive 40.9% discount in Q4, paying an average of $277,695 while homeowners paid $470,259.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Pasquotank County demonstrate a profound pricing advantage over traditional homebuyers, securing properties at a significant discount. In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $277,695, which is $192,564 (or 40.9%) less than the $470,259 average paid by homeowners.

This landlord discount is not a static figure; it has been rapidly accelerating throughout 2025. The price gap widened from 24.7% in Q1 to 28.1% in Q2, 42.2% in Q3, and peaked at 40.9% in Q4, signaling increasingly effective acquisition strategies by investors as the year progressed.

While landlord acquisition prices in Q4 ($277,695) have increased modestly from the 2020-2023 average of $262,016, they remain substantially below the prices paid by the general public.

The consistent, double-digit discount across all quarters suggests that investors are successfully targeting undervalued properties or employing off-market strategies not accessible to typical buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 22.8% of all SFR properties sold in Q4, purchasing 29 of the 127 homes on the market.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a major purchasing force in the Pasquotank County market during Q4 2025, acquiring 29 of the 127 total SFRs sold, for a market share of 22.8%.

The acquisition activity was overwhelmingly led by small-scale, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who purchased 24 properties, or 82.8% of the investor total. This highlights that market growth is driven by local, smaller investors, not large corporations.

The market continues to attract new participants, with 23 new single-property landlord entities making their first purchase in Q4. These new entrants alone accounted for 17 properties, representing 58.6% of all investor acquisitions for the quarter.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on Q4 purchasing, acquiring only 2 properties. This amounts to a volume 12 times smaller than that of mom-and-pop investors, reinforcing the fragmented, grassroots nature of the local rental market.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control the market, owning 87.3% of all investor SFRs in Pasquotank County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Pasquotank County is defined by the dominance of small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors (owning 1-10 properties) control a commanding 87.3% of all investor-owned SFRs, a figure that challenges the narrative of corporate consolidation.

Single-property landlords form the bedrock of the market, owning 2,152 properties. This single tier accounts for 59.9% of all investor-held homes, indicating that the typical landlord is a small, local operator rather than a large-scale enterprise.

The presence of institutional capital is minimal. Investors in the 1,000+ property tier own a mere 23 homes, representing just 0.6% of the market. This marginal share underscores the highly fragmented nature of SFR ownership in the county.

Mid-size landlords (11-100 properties) hold a combined 11.5% of the portfolio, serving as a bridge between the smallest investors and the nearly non-existent large players.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier.
Detailed Findings

A distinct pattern emerges when analyzing ownership structure by portfolio size: individuals build the foundation, while companies are used for scale. Individual landlords own the vast majority of properties in the smallest tiers, including 89.7% of single-property portfolios and 72.5% of 3-5 property portfolios.

The 6-10 property tier serves as a crucial inflection point where ownership formally professionalizes. At this level, companies take a majority stake for the first time, owning 57.1% of the properties.

This corporate dominance becomes more pronounced in larger tiers. Companies own 56.0% of properties in the 11-20 tier and a commanding 92.2% in the 21-50 property tier, indicating that incorporation is standard practice for mid-size investors in Pasquotank County.

Even so, individual ownership persists into larger portfolio sizes, with individuals holding 42.9% of properties in the 51-100 tier, showcasing that not all significant portfolios transition to a corporate structure.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
In Pasquotank County, investors own 3,430 SFR properties, representing a significant 26.7% ownership rate of the local market.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in this analysis is concentrated entirely within Pasquotank County, where landlords own a total of 3,430 single-family residential properties.

This portfolio represents a significant market penetration, accounting for 26.7% of the 12,856 total SFR properties in the county. This high concentration suggests that rental housing is a major component of the local real estate landscape.

The data focuses on the zip code 27909, which encapsulates the investor activity for the Pasquotank County geography. All 3,430 investor-owned properties are located within this area.

A 26.7% ownership rate positions Pasquotank County as a market with substantial landlord presence, influencing local housing availability, rental rates, and property values.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords in Pasquotank County are strong net buyers, acquiring 2.4 properties for every one they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Pasquotank County is in a clear state of expansion, with landlords consistently buying more properties than they sell. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 36 SFRs while selling only 15, resulting in a net gain of 21 properties and a strong 2.4x buy-to-sell ratio.

This net-buyer behavior has been a steady trend throughout the year, with positive net acquisitions in every quarter of 2025, culminating in a yearly total of 178 purchases versus 85 sales.

Institutional investors, though operating on a much smaller scale, are also actively growing their portfolios. In Q4, they demonstrated a 3.0x buy-to-sell ratio, acquiring 3 properties and selling just one.

While the pace of net buying has moderated from the high of 3.3x seen in 2024, the consistent positive ratio in 2025 signals sustained confidence and a continued strategy of portfolio growth among local investors.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 19.0% of all market transactions in Q4, conducting 36 of the 189 total sales and purchases.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords played a role in 19.0% of all SFR transactions in Pasquotank County. This involved 36 transactions out of a market total of 189.

A significant pricing disparity exists between new and established investors. First-time, single-property landlords paid the highest average price at $308,976 per home. In contrast, large institutional investors paid an average of $260,555, a 15.7% discount that reflects greater purchasing power or experience.

Sourcing strategies also differ dramatically by investor size. Institutional investors heavily engaged in inter-landlord trading, with two-thirds (66.7%) of their Q4 purchases coming from other landlords. This suggests a focus on acquiring established rental properties.

Conversely, new landlords entering the market primarily bought from traditional homeowners, with only 4.3% of their purchases sourced from an existing landlord. This highlights their reliance on the public market for initial acquisitions.

Mom-and-pop investors (Tiers 01-04) dominated transaction volume, accounting for 30 of the 36 landlord-involved transactions (83.3%), reinforcing their role as the primary drivers of market activity.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small investors dominate Pasquotank's market with 87.3% ownership while securing massive 40.9% property discounts.
Holdings
In Pasquotank County, landlords own 3,430 SFR properties, representing 26.7% of the total market. Individual investors are the dominant force, holding 2,589 of these properties (75.5%) compared to 874 (25.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated significant purchasing power in Q4, paying 40.9% less than traditional homeowners. This translated to an average discount of $192,564 per property ($277,695 vs $470,259).
Activity
In Q4, landlords purchased 29 properties, accounting for 22.8% of all SFR sales. The market saw a significant influx of new investors, with 23 new single-property landlords entering.
Market Share
Small, mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control the vast majority of investor housing at 87.3%. In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) own just 0.6% of the local investor-held inventory.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios starting at the 6-10 property tier. This signals a shift to a more professionalized structure as portfolios scale.
Transactions
Landlords are actively acquiring properties with a 2.4x buy/sell ratio in Q4 (36 buys vs 15 sells). Institutional investors are also net buyers, though on a smaller scale, with a 3.0x buy/sell ratio (3 buys vs 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Pasquotank County, NC, is characterized by a high degree of investor penetration and the overwhelming dominance of small, individual operators. Landlords own 3,430 properties, a substantial 26.7% of the county's total SFR stock. This market is not controlled by Wall Street; rather, it's driven by local entrepreneurs. Mom-and-pop investors (1-10 properties) control 87.3% of the rental inventory, while the institutional footprint is negligible at just 0.6%. Ownership begins with individuals, who hold 75.5% of properties, but tends to professionalize into corporate structures as portfolios grow beyond five homes.

Investor behavior in Pasquotank County is defined by aggressive and savvy acquisition. In Q4 2025, landlords were net buyers with a 2.4x buy-to-sell ratio, capturing 22.8% of all homes sold. Their most striking advantage is in pricing, where they secured a massive 40.9% discount compared to traditional homeowners—a gap that widened throughout the year. The market also shows healthy growth from new entrants, with 23 new single-property landlords making their first purchase in Q4. Interestingly, experienced institutional buyers demonstrate different tactics, paying 15.7% less than new landlords and sourcing two-thirds of their properties from other investors.

The key takeaway for the Pasquotank County housing market is that it is a vibrant, fragmented ecosystem powered by small-scale capital. The narrative of large corporations taking over is unsupported by the data here. Instead, the market's dynamics are shaped by a large base of local investors who are actively expanding their holdings and have demonstrated a clear ability to find and execute deals far below market rates. This environment suggests a competitive landscape where local knowledge and deal-sourcing capabilities provide a significant edge.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 02:05 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyPasquotank (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail