Jones (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Jones (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Jones (NC)
3,258
Total Investors in Jones (NC)
1,261
Investor Owned SFR in Jones (NC)
1,199(36.8%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
1,157
SFR Owned
1,079
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
104
SFR Owned
132
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 1,199 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Jones County with 95.4% Share, Acquiring Properties at a 61.9% Discount
Investors own a significant 36.8% of the SFR market in Jones County, NC, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling an overwhelming 95.4% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords accelerated their acquisitions, capturing 40.0% of all home sales while paying an average of 61.9% less than traditional homeowners. The market is defined by aggressive accumulation from small, individual investors, who ended the year as strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 90.0% of the 1,199 landlord-held SFR properties in Jones County.
Investor portfolios are predominantly owned outright, with 1,103 properties held in cash versus only 96 financed. The rental focus is intense, with 1,168 of 1,199 properties (97.4%) actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a staggering 61.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $178,425 per property.
The price gap between landlords and homeowners widened dramatically in Q4 2025 (61.9%) compared to Q3 (18.1%) and Q2 (18.3%), suggesting landlords are targeting significantly lower-priced inventory. Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 ($110,000) were also well below the 2020-2023 average of $152,256.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 40.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pops driving 100% of the activity.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) acquired all 6 properties purchased by investors in Q4. Activity was heavily concentrated at the entry level, with 7 new single-property landlord entities entering the market and acquiring 5 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1000+ properties) have a negligible presence, owning just 7 properties, or 0.6% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone account for 74.4% of all investor-held housing, making them the foundation of the rental market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 71.4% of homes in that segment.
Despite the company takeover in larger tiers, individual investors form the bedrock of the market, owning over 90% of properties in the 1-5 property range. The crossover from individual to company majority signals a shift toward professionalization as portfolios grow.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip code 28522 being 100% investor-owned.
The top five zip codes by property count hold 1,116 properties, representing 93.1% of all investor-owned SFRs in the county. Zip code 28555 is a key hotspot, ranking 3rd for investor property count (270) and 3rd for ownership rate (45.8%).
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
The net buying trend was consistent throughout 2025, with positive net acquisitions every quarter, culminating in 46 buys versus only 10 sells for the year. There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional (1000+) investors, reinforcing that market momentum is driven by smaller landlords.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlord activity accounted for 30.8% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
All 8 landlord transactions were made by mom-and-pop investors, with zero institutional activity. A quarter of all landlord purchases (25%) were sourced from other landlords, highlighting an active secondary market among investors.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 90.0% of the 1,199 landlord-held SFR properties in Jones County.
Detailed Findings

Investor ownership is highly concentrated in Jones County, with landlords holding 1,199 single-family residential properties, which constitutes a substantial 36.8% of the total 3,258 SFRs in the market.

The investor landscape is overwhelmingly characterized by individual ownership. Individuals own 1,079 properties, a commanding 90.0% share, compared to the 132 properties (11.0%) owned by companies, challenging the narrative of corporate dominance in the rental market.

A striking 92.1% of all investor-owned properties (1,103 out of 1,199) are held free and clear with cash, compared to just 8.0% (96 properties) that are financed. This indicates a well-capitalized investor base with low leverage.

The primary strategy for investors in this market is providing rental housing, as demonstrated by the 1,168 rented properties, which account for 97.4% of the entire investor-owned portfolio.

The market structure consists of 1,261 distinct landlord entities. Mirroring the property ownership split, the vast majority are individuals (1,157), while only 104 are registered as companies, showing that the average company portfolio is slightly larger than the average individual's.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a staggering 61.9% less than homeowners in Q4, a discount of $178,425 per property.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jones County demonstrated an exceptional ability to acquire properties at a deep discount in Q4 2025. Landlords paid an average price of $110,000, which is $178,425 less than the $288,425 paid by traditional homeowners—a remarkable 61.9% price advantage.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has shown extreme volatility, widening significantly from an 18.1% discount in Q3 to 61.9% in Q4. This indicates a strategic shift towards purchasing more distressed or lower-value properties as the year concluded.

Landlord acquisition prices have been trending downwards throughout the year. The Q4 average of $110,000 is a sharp decrease from Q3 ($180,597) and Q2 ($217,612), suggesting a cooling in the type of assets investors are targeting, even as overall market prices remain higher for homeowners.

Compared to the pandemic-era boom years (2020-2023), when the average landlord acquisition price was $152,256, the current Q4 price of $110,000 represents a 27.8% decrease, signaling a clear shift in buying strategy or market opportunities.

While no properties were recorded as purchased in Q4, the average price reflects a small number of transactions. This deep discount suggests landlords are adept at finding off-market deals or properties that require significant renovation, which are typically priced lower than market-ready homes sought by traditional buyers.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 40.0% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, with mom-and-pops driving 100% of the activity.
Detailed Findings

Investor purchasing activity was a major force in the Jones County market during Q4 2025, with landlords acquiring 6 of the 15 total SFRs sold, a commanding 40.0% market share.

The entirety of this purchasing activity was driven by small-scale investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) accounted for 100% of the 6 properties bought by investors, while institutional investors (Tier 09) made no acquisitions.

The market continues to attract new entrants. The single-property tier was the most active, with 7 new landlord entities acquiring 5 properties, representing 83.3% of all investor purchases for the quarter.

This quarter's activity reinforces the dominance of small landlords, with only two tiers showing any buying activity: the single-property tier (5 properties) and the two-property tier (1 property).

The data signals a healthy and growing small-investor ecosystem, where new landlords are actively entering the market, rather than a consolidation of properties by large-scale entities.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 95.4% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor ownership landscape in Jones County is unequivocally dominated by small-scale landlords. Mom-and-pop investors, defined as those owning 1-10 properties, control a massive 95.4% of all investor-owned SFRs.

In stark contrast to narratives of institutional takeover, large-scale institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) have a minimal footprint, holding only 7 properties, which translates to just 0.6% of the investor market share.

The market's foundation rests on its smallest participants. Landlords owning a single property (Tier 01) represent the largest segment by far, holding 917 properties, or 74.4% of the entire investor-owned housing stock.

Mid-size landlords (11-1000 properties) also constitute a small fraction of the market. Tiers 05 through 08 collectively own just 50 properties, a combined share of only 4.1%.

This distribution reveals a highly fragmented and decentralized rental market, where the decisions and activities of thousands of small, local investors—not a handful of large corporations—shape the housing landscape for renters.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, controlling 71.4% of homes in that segment.
Detailed Findings

While individual investors dominate the overall market, a clear pattern emerges as portfolio sizes increase: ownership professionalizes through company formation. The crossover point occurs in the 6-10 property tier, where companies own 5 properties (71.4%), surpassing individuals.

In the entry-level tiers, individual ownership is nearly absolute. Individuals own 92.6% of single-property portfolios, 85.9% of two-property portfolios, and 91.5% of 3-5 property portfolios, underscoring their role in the small-scale rental market.

The data suggests a strategic threshold around 6 properties, where the benefits of a corporate structure—such as liability protection and financial advantages—likely prompt investors to formally incorporate their holdings.

Even in the small-medium tier (11-20 properties), ownership is more balanced, with individuals still holding a majority at 26 properties (56.5%) compared to companies with 20 properties (43.5%).

This tiered analysis reveals a natural progression in investor behavior, from personal holdings for smaller landlords to formalized company structures for those managing larger and more complex portfolios.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip code 28522 being 100% investor-owned.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Jones County is not evenly distributed but is instead focused in specific geographic pockets. The top five zip codes by investor-owned property count contain 1,116 homes, which is 93.1% of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

Certain areas exhibit extreme levels of investor penetration. Zip code 28522 stands out with a 100.0% investor ownership rate, indicating it is entirely composed of rental or non-owner-occupied properties.

The zip code 28585 leads by volume, with 455 investor-owned properties, though its ownership rate is a more moderate 36.1%. This contrasts with areas that have fewer properties but higher saturation.

Several zip codes appear on both the top-count and top-percentage lists, signaling them as epicenters of investor activity. Notably, 28555, 28573, and 28501 are in the top five for both metrics, highlighting their importance to the local rental market.

This geographic concentration suggests that investors are targeting specific neighborhoods, likely driven by factors such as affordability, rental demand, or local economic conditions, creating distinct rental-heavy submarkets within the county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 4.6 properties for every 1 they sold in 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Jones County are in a strong accumulation phase, consistently buying more properties than they sell. For the full year of 2025, landlords were powerful net buyers, with 46 purchases against only 10 sales, a buy-to-sell ratio of 4.6-to-1.

This net buying behavior was not a one-time event but a sustained trend across the year. The net gain of properties was +6 in Q4, +16 in Q3, and +4 in Q2, demonstrating persistent demand from investors.

Transaction volume in 2025 (46 buys) was nearly identical to 2024 (45 buys), indicating stable and ongoing acquisition pressure in the market despite changing economic conditions.

The data shows no buying or selling activity from institutional-grade investors (1000+ tier) in any recent period. This absence confirms that the net accumulation of housing is entirely attributable to the activity of small and mid-size landlords.

The consistent net positive acquisition trend signals strong confidence among local investors in the Jones County rental market and its potential for future returns.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlord activity accounted for 30.8% of all market transactions in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

In Q4 2025, landlords were a significant driver of market liquidity, participating in 8 of the 26 total SFR transactions, which represents a 30.8% share of all transaction activity.

The transaction market was exclusively powered by small investors. Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 100% of the 8 investor-involved transactions, with 7 completed by single-property landlords and 1 by a two-property landlord.

An active inter-landlord market exists, with 25% of investor purchases (2 out of 8) being acquired from fellow landlords. This activity was particularly concentrated in the two-property tier, where 100% of its single transaction was a landlord-to-landlord deal.

A price difference emerged between the most active tiers. Single-property landlords paid an average of $115,000 per property, while the two-property landlord paid a lower average of $80,000, suggesting different acquisition strategies or asset targets.

With zero transactions recorded for institutional investors, the Q4 data reaffirms that the transactional pulse of the Jones County investment market is dictated by the buying and selling decisions of its smallest participants.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Jones County with 95% Share, Buying at a 62% Discount in Q4
Holdings
In Jones County, landlords own 1,199 SFR properties, a significant 36.8% of the total market, with individual investors overwhelmingly holding 1,079 of these homes (90.0%).
Pricing
Landlords demonstrated sharp purchasing in Q4 2025, paying 61.9% less than traditional homeowners and securing an average discount of $178,425 per property ($110,000 vs $288,425).
Activity
Investor activity accelerated in Q4, capturing 40.0% of all market purchases (6 of 15 properties), with 7 new single-property landlord entities entering the local market.
Market Share
The local rental market is defined by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control 95.4% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) own a mere 0.6%.
Ownership Type
While individual investors form the backbone of the market, companies become the majority owners for portfolios in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization at a small scale.
Transactions
Landlords in Jones County are aggressively acquiring property, ending 2025 as strong net buyers with a 4.6x buy-to-sell ratio for the year (46 buys vs 10 sells).
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Jones County, North Carolina is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors, not large corporations. Landlords own a substantial 1,199 properties, representing 36.8% of the county's entire SFR housing stock. This landscape is overwhelmingly dominated by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who control 95.4% of all investor-owned homes, while institutional firms hold a negligible 0.6%. The market is further defined by individual ownership, with 90.0% of rental properties held by individuals rather than companies, painting a picture of a decentralized and community-embedded investor base.

Investor behavior in Jones County is characterized by aggressive, value-oriented acquisition. In the final quarter of 2025, landlords were responsible for 40.0% of all home purchases, demonstrating their significant influence on market activity. They showcased a keen ability to find deals, paying an average of just $110,000—a 61.9% discount compared to prices paid by traditional homeowners. This purchasing momentum is part of a broader trend of accumulation, as landlords ended the year as strong net buyers, acquiring 4.6 properties for every one they sold.

The key takeaway from the data is that the health and direction of the Jones County rental market are tied to the financial stability and strategic decisions of its smallest participants. The high concentration of ownership among mom-and-pop landlords, combined with their deep purchasing discounts and net-buyer status, suggests a robust and highly active local investment ecosystem. This structure provides a significant portion of the area's rental housing but also means market dynamics are influenced by local economic factors affecting individual investors rather than the portfolio strategies of national institutions.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:54 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJones (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct