Johnston (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Johnston (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Johnston (NC)
76,106
Total Investors in Johnston (NC)
13,123
Investor Owned SFR in Johnston (NC)
14,258(18.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
11,486
SFR Owned
8,999
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,637
SFR Owned
5,584
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 14,258 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Johnston County's 14,258-Property Investor Market as Institutions Halt Acquisitions
Investors own 18.7% of single-family homes in Johnston County, with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a dominant 73.4% of that portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 19.3% of all homes sold, securing them at a 22.6% discount compared to homeowners, even as large institutional investors paused their acquisitions.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 14,258 SFR properties in Johnston County, with individuals holding a 63.1% majority of the portfolio.
Cash-owned properties (10,341) outnumber financed ones (3,917) by nearly three to one, demonstrating high liquidity among investors. The portfolio is heavily focused on providing rentals, with 13,883 properties actively rented.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Investors in Q4 2025 paid 22.6% less than homeowners, securing an average $90,305 discount per property.
The investor pricing advantage has significantly widened, growing from a 15.6% discount in Q2 to 22.6% in Q4. This suggests investors are finding better deals or targeting different property types as the market evolves.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 19.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 139 purchases.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 83.6% of all investor purchases (117 properties). In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) made up just 5.0% of the quarter's landlord buying volume.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 73.4% of all investor-owned housing in Johnston County.
This small landlord dominance dwarfs the institutional share, as investors with over 1,000 properties own just 14.0% of the portfolio. The single-property landlord tier is the largest single group, holding 53.0% of all investor-owned SFRs.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in tiers with 6 or more properties.
Individual landlords own 89.6% of single-property portfolios, but this share drops dramatically as portfolio size increases. In the 21-50 property tier, companies own a staggering 99.7% of the homes.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip codes 27520, 27527, and 27577 containing 53.1% of the county's investor-owned homes.
The zip codes with the highest investor penetration rates, such as 27607 (100.0%) and 27555 (87.2%), are distinct from those with the highest raw counts. This highlights niche markets where investors are the dominant owners.
Historical Transactions
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors have become neutral sellers.
Overall landlord transaction volume has decreased from 2024 to 2025, with purchases falling from 1,393 to 1,015. Institutional investors have also slowed, shifting from net buyers in 2024 to a neutral or net seller position in the second half of 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 15.5% of all single-family property transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 177 transactions.
A significant price gap exists between investor tiers, with institutional buyers paying 17.4% less than new single-property landlords ($284,911 vs $344,824). New investors sourced 12.2% of their purchases from other landlords.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 14,258 SFR properties in Johnston County, with individuals holding a 63.1% majority of the portfolio.
Detailed Findings

Investors have a significant footprint in Johnston County, owning 14,258 single-family residential properties, which constitutes 18.7% of the total market of 76,106 SFRs.

The investor landscape is dominated by individuals, who own 8,999 properties (63.1%), compared to the 5,584 (39.2%) owned by companies. This challenges the narrative of a market controlled by large corporations.

When examining landlord entities, the disparity is even greater, with 11,486 individual landlords compared to just 1,637 company landlords. This nearly 7-to-1 ratio indicates that the average individual's portfolio is significantly smaller than a company's.

A preference for liquidity is evident, as cash-owned properties (10,341) far exceed those that are financed (3,917). This suggests investors in the area are well-capitalized or favor a debt-free investment strategy.

The primary use of these properties is clear, with 97.4% of the investor-owned portfolio (13,883 properties) classified as rented, confirming their crucial role in supplying housing to the local rental market.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Investors in Q4 2025 paid 22.6% less than homeowners, securing an average $90,305 discount per property.
Detailed Findings

A stark pricing difference defined the Q4 2025 market, with landlords paying an average of $309,922 while traditional homeowners paid $400,227. This 22.6% discount, amounting to $90,305 per home, highlights a significant strategic advantage for investors.

This pricing advantage is not static but has been accelerating, widening from 15.6% in the first half of the year to 19.7% in Q3 and reaching its peak in Q4. This trend signals a growing divergence in acquisition strategy or negotiation power between investors and regular homebuyers.

Compared to the pandemic-era (2020-2023) average price of $304,232, the Q4 2025 landlord price of $309,922 shows only modest appreciation. This indicates investors are successfully targeting assets that have not experienced the same price inflation as the broader market.

The significant gap between what landlords and homeowners pay suggests that investors are not competing for the same turn-key properties. Instead, they are likely focusing on off-market deals, fixer-uppers, or other value-add opportunities that homeowners typically avoid.

The consistent and growing discount reveals a sophisticated acquisition apparatus among local investors, who are able to identify and secure undervalued assets far more effectively than the average buyer.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 19.3% of all SFR properties sold in Q4 2025, totaling 139 purchases.
Detailed Findings

Investors were a significant force in the Q4 2025 market, purchasing 139 of the 720 single-family homes sold, which constitutes a 19.3% market share of all transactions.

The overwhelming majority of this purchasing activity came from small-scale landlords. Investors owning 1-10 properties were responsible for 117 of the 139 acquisitions, representing a dominant 83.6% of all investor buying.

The market saw a substantial influx of new entrants, with 123 distinct single-property entities acquiring 88 homes. This group of new landlords alone accounted for 62.9% of all properties bought by investors in the fourth quarter.

Institutional investors (1000+ properties) played a comparatively minor role, purchasing only 7 properties (5.0% of the landlord total). Their activity was dwarfed by the volume from mom-and-pop landlords, highlighting where the real purchasing power is concentrated.

This quarter's activity demonstrates that the growth in Johnston County's investor market is being fueled from the ground up by new and small-scale landlords, not by large, out-of-state institutions.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 73.4% of all investor-owned housing in Johnston County.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Johnston County is overwhelmingly characterized by small-scale ownership. Landlords with portfolios of 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) collectively own 73.4% of all investor-held single-family homes, establishing them as the market's backbone.

The single-property landlord tier is the most significant segment, alone accounting for 7,840 properties, or 53.0% of the total investor portfolio. This underscores that the typical investor is not a large corporation but an individual with one rental home.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) hold a much smaller position, owning 2,069 properties. Their 14.0% market share is significant but less than a third of the share controlled by mom-and-pop landlords combined.

Comparing Q4 purchasing activity to overall ownership reveals a consistent pattern. Mom-and-pop landlords accounted for 83.6% of purchases while holding 73.4% of stock, indicating they are still in an aggressive accumulation phase.

The data reveals a highly fragmented market structure, heavily reliant on thousands of small, local investors rather than a few large, centralized institutions. This distribution runs contrary to common narratives about the corporate consolidation of housing.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individuals dominate small portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in tiers with 6 or more properties.
Detailed Findings

A clear crossover point in ownership structure occurs as portfolios grow. While individuals overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, companies become the majority owners starting in the 6-10 property tier, where they hold a 54.3% share.

The smallest tiers are the undisputed domain of individual investors. They own 89.6% of all single-property landlord portfolios and 75.5% of two-property portfolios, confirming their role as the primary entry point into real estate investment.

The transition to corporate ownership is both swift and stark as scale increases. Company ownership jumps to 66.6% in the 11-20 property tier and constitutes a near-total monopoly at 99.7% in the 21-50 property tier.

This pattern strongly indicates that while individuals can easily start and manage a few properties, scaling a real estate portfolio beyond five or six units typically necessitates the legal and financial advantages of a formal corporate structure.

The data illustrates a natural lifecycle of real estate investment in Johnston County: individuals start small, but professionalization and incorporation become essential for significant growth.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is highly concentrated, with zip codes 27520, 27527, and 27577 containing 53.1% of the county's investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

A significant portion of investor activity is geographically focused, with the top five zip codes by property count (27520, 27527, 27577, 27576, and 27504) collectively holding 10,013 properties, or 70.2% of all investor-owned SFRs in Johnston County.

The 27520 zip code stands out as the epicenter of investor ownership, with 3,408 properties. This single area accounts for 23.9% of all investor-owned homes in the county, making it a key submarket.

A clear distinction exists between areas with the highest count of investor properties and those with the highest rate of investor ownership. Zip codes like 27607 (100.0%) and 27555 (87.2%) show near-total market saturation by investors, but on a smaller number of total properties.

In contrast, the high-volume zip codes like 27520 and 27527 have more moderate investor ownership rates of 20.3% and 16.6% respectively. This shows they are large, diverse housing markets rather than pure rental enclaves.

This geographic split suggests at least two distinct investor strategies are at play: one focused on accumulating volume in large, central zip codes, and another focused on dominating smaller, high-penetration rental markets.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Landlords remain strong net buyers with a 3.2x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, while institutional investors have become neutral sellers.
Detailed Findings

The landlord community in Johnston County continues to accumulate property, acting as consistent net buyers. In Q4 2025, they purchased 177 properties while selling only 55, a strong 3.2-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio that indicates ongoing confidence in the market.

A sharp divergence is visible at the institutional level. These large-scale investors (1000+ tier) have halted their expansion, breaking even in Q4 with 7 buys and 7 sells after being net sellers in Q3. This marks a significant strategy shift from their net-buyer position in 2024.

While still positive, the overall pace of acquisitions is slowing down. Total landlord purchases for 2025 (1,015) were notably lower than the 1,393 properties bought in 2024, suggesting a market that is cooling from its previous velocity.

The data reveals a clear split between smaller investors and large institutions. Mom-and-pop and mid-size landlords continue to acquire properties and expand their portfolios, while the largest players are either pausing or beginning to rebalance their holdings.

The net acquisition trend for all landlords, though positive, has steadily declined throughout 2025, from a net gain of 175 properties in Q2 to 139 in Q3, and finally 122 in Q4. This steady decrease in net buying points to increasing market headwinds or fewer attractive opportunities.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 15.5% of all single-family property transactions in Q4 2025, totaling 177 transactions.
Detailed Findings

Investors represented a substantial portion of market activity in Q4 2025, participating in 177 of the 1,143 total SFR transactions for a market share of 15.5%.

A clear pricing advantage emerges with scale. Institutional investors paid an average of $284,911 per property, whereas new, single-property landlords paid $344,824. This $60,000 difference represents a 17.4% discount for the largest players.

Mirroring ownership patterns, mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) dominated Q4 transaction volume, accounting for 154 of the 177 landlord deals (87.0%), reinforcing that small investors are the primary drivers of market activity.

The market shows signs of internal liquidity, especially among smaller investors. New single-property landlords acquired 12.2% of their properties from existing landlords, suggesting a healthy resale market among peers.

In contrast, none of the 7 institutional purchases were sourced from other landlords. This indicates the largest players likely rely on different acquisition channels, such as direct from builders or off-market portfolios, rather than the open resale market.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Johnston County's 14,258-Property Investor Market as Institutions Halt Acquisitions
Holdings
Investors own 14,258 single-family homes in Johnston County, representing 18.7% of the market. Individual landlords hold 63.1% of this portfolio (8,999 properties), while companies own 39.2% (5,584 properties).
Pricing
In Q4, landlords acquired properties for 22.6% less than traditional homeowners, an average discount of $90,305 ($309,922 vs $400,227). This price advantage for investors widened significantly throughout the year.
Activity
Landlords purchased 19.3% of all homes sold in Q4 (139 properties), an effort led by small investors. The market welcomed 123 new single-property landlords, who alone accounted for 62.9% of investor purchases.
Market Share
The market is dominated by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling 73.4% of all investor-owned housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1000+) hold a much smaller 14.0% share.
Ownership Type
Individual investors form the base of the market, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios of 6-10 properties and larger. This signals a clear shift to corporate structures as investors scale their operations.
Transactions
Landlords remained strong net buyers in Q4 with a 3.2x buy-to-sell ratio (177 buys vs 55 sells). However, institutional investors have halted expansion, breaking even with 7 buys and 7 sells.
Market Narrative

The investor-owned housing market in Johnston County, NC, is extensive, with 14,258 properties comprising 18.7% of all single-family homes. This market is not a corporate monolith; rather, it is fundamentally shaped by small-scale participants. Individual investors own a 63.1% majority of these homes, and mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 73.4% of the entire investor portfolio, dwarfing the 14.0% share held by large institutional firms.

Investor behavior in Q4 2025 reveals a dynamic and bifurcated market. Landlords overall were highly active, purchasing 19.3% of all homes sold while leveraging a significant 22.6% price discount compared to traditional homeowners. The primary drivers of this activity were new and small investors, who remained strong net buyers with a collective 3.2-to-1 buy/sell ratio. In a telling strategic shift, however, institutional investors have pressed pause on acquisitions, moving from net buyers to a neutral position, signaling a potential market peak or a reallocation of capital.

The key takeaway from this data is that the health and growth of Johnston County's rental housing supply are overwhelmingly dependent on local, small-scale entrepreneurs, not large institutions. While the overall pace of acquisitions may be cooling, the continued entry of new landlords and the aggressive accumulation by existing small players define the market's trajectory. The retreat of institutional capital could create further opportunities for these smaller investors to solidify their dominant position in the local housing ecosystem.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:55 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyJohnston (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices
×
Chart Section12 Prices Detail
Chart Section12 Prices Detail