Franklin (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Franklin (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Franklin (NC)
22,740
Total Investors in Franklin (NC)
6,059
Investor Owned SFR in Franklin (NC)
4,870(21.4%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
5,527
SFR Owned
3,959
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
532
SFR Owned
970
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 4,870 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Franklin County's Investor Market, Securing Deep Discounts
Investors own 21.4% of Franklin County's SFR market (4,870 properties), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a massive 90.2% of that portfolio. In Q4, investors purchased 25.1% of all homes sold, paying an average of 27.8% less than traditional homeowners, and continued to be strong net buyers.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 4,870 properties in Franklin County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.3%.
Cash purchases significantly outweigh financing, with 3,289 properties owned outright versus 1,581 financed. The portfolio is overwhelmingly rental-focused, as 97.6% of investor-owned properties (4,751) are non-owner-occupied.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords acquired properties for 27.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a $132,251 discount.
The landlord discount widened significantly in Q4 (27.8%) compared to Q3 (19.3%), reaching its second-highest level of the year. Landlord acquisition prices in Q4 ($343,880) have appreciated 6.7% from the 2020-2023 pandemic-era average ($322,258).
Current Quarter Purchases
Investors purchased 25.1% of all SFR properties sold in Franklin County in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) drove this activity, accounting for 84.5% of all landlord purchases. They acquired over 16 times more properties than institutional investors, who bought just 3 homes.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 90.2% of investor-owned homes.
The institutional investor (1000+) footprint is minimal at just 3.8% of the investor-owned market. Single-property landlords alone form the backbone of the market, owning 72.9% of all investor-held properties.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier, a clear strategic shift.
Individual investors overwhelmingly control smaller portfolios, owning 92.2% of single-property holdings. As portfolios grow, the shift to corporate structures is evident, with companies holding a 57.6% majority in the 11-20 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 27549 zip code holding 2,476 properties.
The 27536 zip code has the highest investor penetration at a staggering 100.0%. This highlights a key difference, as the area with the most properties (27549) has a high but lower rate of 37.9%.
Historical Transactions
Investors are strong net buyers with a 5.9x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, adding 69 properties.
This accumulation trend is consistent, with landlords achieving a 4.62x buy-to-sell ratio for all of 2025. Institutional investors are also aggressively expanding, with a powerful 13.5x buy-to-sell ratio in 2025.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 21.8% of all Franklin County home sales in Q4, totaling 83 acquisitions.
Institutional buyers paid 13.6% less than new single-property landlords, averaging $330,333 versus $382,198. Second-property landlords were most likely to buy from other investors, sourcing 33.3% of their Q4 purchases from them.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 4,870 properties in Franklin County, with individuals holding a dominant 81.3%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 21.4% stake in the Franklin County single-family residential market, controlling 4,870 of the 22,740 total properties.

The ownership landscape is overwhelmingly composed of individual investors, who own 3,959 properties (81.3%), dwarfing the 970 properties (19.9%) held by companies. This pattern suggests the market is driven by local entrepreneurs rather than large corporations.

This individual dominance is further reflected in the entity count, where 5,527 of the 6,059 total landlords (91.2%) are individuals, compared to just 532 companies.

The primary strategy for these investors is clearly rental income, with a staggering 97.6% of the portfolio (4,751 properties) classified as non-owner-occupied.

Investors in this market demonstrate a strong capital position, with more than twice as many properties held in cash (3,289) as those with financing (1,581), indicating less reliance on leverage.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords acquired properties for 27.8% less than homeowners in Q4, a $132,251 discount.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Franklin County demonstrated a profound pricing advantage in Q4 2025, acquiring properties for an average of $343,880 while traditional homeowners paid $476,131. This represents a substantial 27.8% discount, or $132,251 per property.

The price gap between landlords and homeowners has been volatile but significant throughout 2025, widening from 19.3% in Q3 to 27.8% in Q4. This suggests investors are becoming more adept at finding undervalued assets or are targeting different segments of the market than typical buyers.

This Q4 discount is the second-largest of the year, surpassed only by the 28.6% gap observed in Q2, and is a sharp increase from the 9.9% discount seen in Q1.

Despite securing discounts, the prices investors are paying show consistent market appreciation. The Q4 average price of $343,880 is 6.7% higher than the average price paid during the 2020-2023 period ($322,258).

While acquisition counts in the pricing data show as zero, purchase summary data confirms active buying, indicating this pricing advantage is being realized on a consistent flow of transactions.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Investors purchased 25.1% of all SFR properties sold in Franklin County in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Landlords were a major force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 58 of the 231 total SFRs sold, which translates to a 25.1% market share of all purchases.

The activity was dominated by small investors, with mom-and-pop landlords (owning 1-10 properties) responsible for 49 of the 58 acquisitions (84.5%). This highlights their role as the primary engine of investor-led housing demand.

The market saw a significant influx of new capital, as 60 new single-property landlord entities entered the market, purchasing 38 homes. This tier alone accounted for 65.5% of all landlord acquisitions for the quarter.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) had a minimal impact on the purchasing landscape, acquiring only 3 properties, or 5.2% of the investor total.

The data reveals a barbell-shaped activity pattern, with buying concentrated among the smallest first-time investors and a small number of purchases by the very largest, while mid-size landlords were comparatively quiet.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control a commanding 90.2% of investor-owned homes.
Detailed Findings

The investor landscape in Franklin County is defined by small-scale ownership, with mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) controlling a commanding 90.2% of the entire investor-owned SFR portfolio.

Single-property landlords are the bedrock of the rental market, owning 3,674 properties, which accounts for 72.9% of all investor-owned housing stock. This debunks the narrative of large-scale corporate dominance in the region.

Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a surprisingly small presence, holding only 189 properties, or 3.8% of the investor market. Their influence on overall ownership is minor compared to the cumulative power of small landlords.

Ownership is heavily concentrated at the smallest end of the spectrum. The top four tiers combined (portfolios of 1-10 properties) account for 4,544 of the 4,870 total investor-owned homes.

Mid-size to large investors (portfolios of 11-1,000 properties) occupy a niche segment of the market, collectively owning just 6.0% of the investor-held housing, indicating a steep drop-off in ownership after the 10-property mark.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the dominant owner at the 11-20 property tier, a clear strategic shift.
Detailed Findings

Ownership structure in Franklin County follows a clear lifecycle based on portfolio size. Individual investors are the undisputed majority in smaller portfolios, holding 92.2% of single-property assets and 77.2% of two-property assets.

A distinct 'corporate crossover' point occurs when portfolios reach 11-20 properties. At this tier, companies become the majority owners for the first time, holding a 57.6% share of the properties, compared to 42.4% for individuals.

This pattern suggests that scaling a real estate portfolio beyond 10 properties in Franklin County often involves incorporating for liability, financing, or management purposes.

While individuals dominate the sheer number of properties overall, companies control a larger share of the more consolidated mid-size portfolios, indicating a more professionalized approach at scale.

Even within company-dominated tiers, a significant number of properties remain under individual ownership, highlighting that personal holdings can still be part of a larger, diversified strategy.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor activity is hyper-concentrated, with the 27549 zip code holding 2,476 properties.
Detailed Findings

The geographic distribution of investor-owned properties in Franklin County is extremely concentrated. The 27549 zip code is the epicenter of activity, containing 2,476 properties, which represents more than half of the entire investor portfolio in the county.

While 27549 leads by volume, the 27536 zip code exhibits the highest possible market penetration, with a 100.0% investor ownership rate. This signals a unique sub-market, possibly a build-to-rent community or an area with zoning that favors rentals.

A clear distinction exists between areas with the highest count versus the highest rate of investor ownership. After 27536, other smaller zip codes like 27508 (39.3%), 27549 (37.9%), and 27589 (37.5%) show the greatest saturation, indicating targeted investor strategies in specific neighborhoods.

The top five zip codes by investor ownership rate all exceed 36%, demonstrating that high levels of investor concentration are a feature across several distinct areas, not an isolated phenomenon.

The data reveals that investors are active across a range of community types, with top zip codes representing both dense suburban areas and more rural-fringe locations, pointing to diverse acquisition strategies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Yoy Institutional
Key Insight
Investors are strong net buyers with a 5.9x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4, adding 69 properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Franklin County are in a phase of aggressive portfolio expansion, underscored by their activity in Q4 2025 where they purchased 83 properties while selling only 14. This resulted in a net gain of 69 properties and a robust 5.93 buy-to-sell ratio.

The trend of net accumulation is not a recent event; it has been consistent throughout the year. For all of 2025, landlords added a net total of 362 properties to their portfolios, and they added 441 net properties in 2024.

This sustained buying momentum signals strong investor confidence in the Franklin County market and a clear long-term hold strategy over short-term flipping or selling.

Institutional investors (1,000+ tier), though smaller in overall presence, are expanding at an even faster relative pace. In 2025, they bought 27 properties and sold only 2, reflecting an exceptionally high buy-to-sell ratio of 13.5x.

The high transaction volume, with 462 buys in 2025 and 585 in 2024, indicates a liquid and active market for investors seeking to grow their holdings in the region.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 21.8% of all Franklin County home sales in Q4, totaling 83 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Investors played a crucial role in market liquidity in Q4 2025, participating in 21.8% of all transactions with 83 property acquisitions.

A clear pricing hierarchy exists among investor tiers. Institutional buyers leveraged their scale to acquire properties for an average of $330,333, securing a 13.6% discount ($51,865) compared to the $382,198 average paid by new single-property landlords.

New entrants to the market (Tier 01) paid the highest average price of any investor group. This suggests they compete more directly with traditional homebuyers and pay a premium for market-ready assets, while larger players target off-market or value-add opportunities.

The vast majority of Q4 transactions (60 of 83) were made by single-property investors, reaffirming that the market's transactional velocity is driven by a continuous stream of new, small-scale participants.

Landlord-to-landlord sales were a niche but important sourcing strategy for smaller, growing investors. Landlords in the two-property tier sourced one-third (33.3%) of their new acquisitions from existing landlords, while larger and institutional buyers made no such purchases in Q4.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Landlords Command 90.2% of Franklin County's Investor Market While Securing 27.8% Price Discounts
Holdings
Landlords own 4,870 SFR properties in Franklin County, NC (21.4% of the market), with individual investors holding a dominant 3,959 properties (81.3%) compared to 970 (19.9%) for companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid 27.8% less than traditional homeowners, a significant average discount of $132,251 per property ($343,880 vs. $476,131).
Activity
Landlords acquired 25.1% of all properties sold in Q4 (58 homes), a period which also saw the entrance of 60 new single-property landlord entities into the market.
Market Share
The market is overwhelmingly controlled by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 90.2% of investor housing, while institutional investors (1000+) hold just 3.8%.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, but companies become the majority owners in portfolios sized at 11-20 properties, indicating a strategic shift to corporate structures with scale.
Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers with a 5.9x buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (83 buys vs. 14 sells), a trend mirrored by institutional investors who are also in an expansion phase.
Market Narrative

The single-family rental market in Franklin County, NC is fundamentally shaped by small, individual investors, not large corporations. Landlords control a significant 21.4% of the total SFR housing stock, amounting to 4,870 properties. The defining characteristic of this market is its granular ownership structure: mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own a staggering 90.2% of this portfolio, while institutional firms (1,000+ properties) hold a mere 3.8%. This distribution, combined with the fact that individuals own 81.3% of all investor properties, paints a clear picture of a market driven by local capital and entrepreneurship.

Investor behavior in Franklin County is characterized by sophisticated acquisition strategies and aggressive growth. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased 25.1% of all homes sold and demonstrated a remarkable ability to secure deals, paying an average of 27.8% less than traditional homeowners. This trend of accumulation is consistent, with investors acting as strong net buyers throughout the year, posting a 5.9x buy-to-sell ratio in the final quarter. The market is also dynamic, with a constant influx of new participants, evidenced by the 60 new single-property landlord entities that entered in Q4 alone.

The key takeaway for the Franklin County housing market is that it remains a vibrant and accessible arena for small-scale investment. The dominance of mom-and-pop landlords suggests a resilient and decentralized rental market that is less susceptible to the strategic shifts of a few large players. These investors are not only providing a significant portion of the area's rental housing but are also demonstrating a consistent ability to acquire assets at a discount and expand their holdings. This indicates a healthy, long-term outlook for real estate investment in the region, driven by a broad base of market participants.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:47 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyFranklin (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership