Carteret (NC) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Carteret (NC) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Carteret (NC)
31,699
Total Investors in Carteret (NC)
16,136
Investor Owned SFR in Carteret (NC)
11,558(36.5%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
14,777
SFR Owned
10,176
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
1,359
SFR Owned
1,560
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 11,558 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Small Landlords Dominate Carteret County, Paying 39% Premiums to Acquire Nearly Half of Homes Sold
Investors own 11,558 SFR properties in Carteret County, NC (36.5% of the market), with mom-and-pop landlords controlling a staggering 98.8% of this portfolio. In Q4 2025, investors purchased 47.0% of all homes sold, paying an unprecedented 39.0% premium over traditional homeowners. The market is defined by aggressive net buying from small investors, while institutional presence remains negligible at just 0.1% ownership.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Investors own 11,558 SFR properties (36.5% of the market), with individuals holding 88.0%.
The investor portfolio is heavily tilted towards cash ownership, with 7,603 cash-owned properties versus 3,955 that are financed. An overwhelming 99.1% of the investor-owned portfolio is classified as rented (11,452 properties), signaling a strong focus on income generation.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Landlords paid a 39.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $679,655 per purchase.
The price premium paid by landlords has widened significantly throughout the year, growing from 20.8% in Q1 to 39.0% in Q4. This trend suggests intensifying competition for specific, high-value properties that investors are targeting over typical homebuyers.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords acquired 47.0% of all SFR properties sold in Carteret County, NC in Q4 2025.
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) accounted for a near-total 98.5% of all landlord purchases. Institutional investors with over 1,000 properties made zero acquisitions, showing their complete absence from the market's recent activity.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a negligible footprint, owning just 15 properties, which amounts to only 0.1% of the entire investor-owned housing stock. The market structure is definitively controlled by small-scale operators.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Individuals dominate the entry-level tiers, owning 89.7% of single-property portfolios. However, company ownership grows with portfolio size, controlling 53.3% of the 6-10 property tier and 95.0% of the 21-50 property tier.
Geographic Distribution
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in specific zip codes, with rates exceeding 58% in some areas.
The zip codes 28512 and 28594 lead with the highest investor ownership rates at 58.6% and 56.6%, respectively. These two areas alone contain 4,424 investor-owned properties, representing 38.3% of all investor holdings in the county.
Historical Transactions
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
This strong accumulation trend has been consistent, with landlords maintaining a buy-to-sell ratio of over 8x for all of 2025 (820 buys vs. 99 sells). The data indicates a sustained period of portfolio growth across the county.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, totaling 206 acquisitions.
New, single-property landlords paid the highest prices, averaging $625,591 per purchase. In contrast, larger investors making acquisitions paid significantly less, with one in the 101-1000 tier paying just $166,500.

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Investors own 11,558 SFR properties (36.5% of the market), with individuals holding 88.0%.
Detailed Findings

Investors hold a significant 36.5% share of the Single-Family Residential market in Carteret County, NC, controlling 11,558 properties out of a total of 31,699.

Individual investors are the definitive force in the market, owning 10,176 properties, which constitutes 88.0% of the entire investor portfolio, compared to 1,560 properties (13.5%) owned by companies.

Cash is the preferred method of ownership, with cash-owned properties (7,603) outnumbering financed ones (3,955) by a nearly 2-to-1 ratio, indicating a well-capitalized investor base.

The rental focus of the portfolio is nearly absolute, with 11,452 of the 11,558 investor properties (99.1%) classified as rented, underscoring the market's role as a key source of rental housing.

The market is composed of 16,136 distinct landlord entities, with individual landlords (14,777) outnumbering company landlords (1,359) by more than 10-to-1, reinforcing the dominance of small-scale operators.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Landlords paid a 39.0% premium over homeowners in Q4, averaging $679,655 per purchase.
Detailed Findings

In a striking reversal of national trends, landlords in Carteret County, NC paid a substantial 39.0% premium over traditional homeowners in Q4 2025, with an average acquisition price of $679,655 compared to the homeowner average of $488,883.

This investor premium represents a massive price gap of $190,772 per property in Q4, indicating that investors are targeting a different, more expensive segment of the market than typical buyers.

The trend shows the landlord premium is not an anomaly but an accelerating pattern, widening each quarter from 20.8% in Q1 ($100,352 gap) to 30.6% in Q3 ($152,460 gap) and finally 39.0% in Q4.

Acquisition prices have risen sharply since the 2020-2023 period, with the average Q4 2025 landlord price of $679,655 representing a 31.9% increase over the pandemic-era average of $515,249.

This consistent and growing price premium suggests landlords are likely competing for desirable vacation or coastal properties where the rental income potential justifies paying significantly above the median home price.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords acquired 47.0% of all SFR properties sold in Carteret County, NC in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity surged in Q4 2025, with landlords purchasing 132 of the 281 total SFR properties sold, capturing a dominant 47.0% of all market transactions.

The market's growth is fueled entirely by small investors, as mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were responsible for 133 purchases, or 98.5% of all landlord acquisitions in the quarter.

New entrants are a primary driver of activity, with 179 new single-property entities acquiring 115 homes, which alone accounts for 85.2% of all properties bought by investors in Q4.

In stark contrast, institutional investors (Tier 09) had no presence in the Q4 market, making zero purchases and underscoring that Carteret County's investor landscape is exclusively shaped by smaller operators.

Mid-size landlords showed minimal activity, with only two entities in the 21-1000 property tiers making a purchase, reinforcing the market's bifurcation between new entrants and a dormant large-investor segment.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) control an overwhelming 98.8% of investor-owned SFRs.
Detailed Findings

The investor market in Carteret County, NC is unequivocally dominated by small landlords, with those owning 1-10 properties (Tiers 01-04) controlling 98.8% of all investor-held SFRs.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of the market, alone owning 9,906 properties, which represents 82.8% of the total investor portfolio.

The narrative of large-scale institutional ownership does not apply here; investors with over 1,000 properties (Tier 09) hold a mere 15 properties, a statistically insignificant 0.1% of the investor market.

Even mid-size landlords have a limited presence, with all tiers from 11 to 1,000 properties combined owning just 144 properties, or 1.2% of the total investor portfolio.

This extreme concentration in the hands of small landlords indicates a highly fragmented market driven by individual financial decisions rather than corporate acquisition strategies.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Companies become the majority owners at the 6-10 property tier, signaling a shift to professionalization.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors form the foundation of the market, owning 89.7% of all single-property landlord portfolios (9,030 properties) and 82.6% of two-property portfolios (725 properties).

A clear transition to corporate ownership occurs as portfolios grow, with companies becoming the majority owner for the first time in the 6-10 property tier, where they hold 98 properties (53.3%).

This trend toward professionalization accelerates in larger tiers; companies own 59.6% of properties in the 11-20 tier and a commanding 95.0% in the 21-50 property tier.

Despite this shift in larger portfolios, the sheer volume of small-scale individual landlords means they still own the vast majority of properties overall, with 10,176 homes compared to 1,560 for companies.

The crossover point at 6 properties suggests that this is the scale at which the benefits of incorporation—such as liability protection and financial advantages—begin to outweigh the simplicity of individual ownership for local investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Investor ownership is hyper-concentrated in specific zip codes, with rates exceeding 58% in some areas.
Detailed Findings

Investor activity in Carteret County, NC is not evenly distributed but is intensely focused on specific coastal zip codes, where investors own more than half the housing stock.

The zip code 28512 has the highest concentration of investors in the county, with an ownership rate of 58.6%, followed closely by 28594 at 56.6%.

The top five zip codes by investor ownership all have rates above 51%, including 28520 (53.7%), 28511 (52.8%), and 28553 (51.3%), indicating these are prime rental submarkets.

The largest volume of investor properties is in 28594, with 2,536 homes, demonstrating that areas with high ownership counts also tend to have the highest ownership rates.

This geographic concentration suggests that investor strategy is heavily influenced by proximity to amenities like beaches and tourist attractions, creating rental-dominated neighborhoods within the broader county.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Landlords are aggressive net buyers, acquiring 10.3 properties for every 1 they sold in Q4 2025.
Detailed Findings

Investors in Carteret County, NC demonstrated strong confidence in the market, acting as aggressive net buyers throughout 2025.

In Q4 2025, the net buying activity intensified, with landlords purchasing 206 properties while selling only 20, resulting in a powerful 10.3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio and a net gain of 186 properties.

This pattern of accumulation was consistent across the entire year, with 820 properties purchased versus only 99 sold in 2025, for a net increase of 721 properties in landlord portfolios.

Transaction velocity remained robust and stable year-over-year, with 820 purchases in 2025 closely mirroring the 817 purchases made in 2024.

With no transaction data available for institutional investors, this accumulation is entirely driven by the small and mid-size landlords who dominate the local market.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords were involved in 44.4% of all Q4 2025 property transactions, totaling 206 acquisitions.
Detailed Findings

Landlords played a central role in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 206 of the 464 total transactions, which translates to a 44.4% share of all activity.

An inverse relationship between investor size and purchase price is evident, as single-property landlords (Tier 01) paid the highest average price at $625,591 across 181 transactions.

In stark contrast, larger and presumably more experienced investors paid far less, with average prices dropping to $382,500 for the 3-5 property tier and as low as $166,500 for one large landlord purchase.

Inter-landlord trading is not a major source of inventory, as only 9.9% of properties purchased by single-property landlords (18 out of 181) were acquired from another investor.

The overwhelming majority of Q4 transactions were driven by mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04), who were responsible for 204 of the 206 total landlord transactions, while institutional investors made zero.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Small Landlords Dominate Carteret County, Paying 39% Premiums for Coastal Properties Amid Buying Frenzy
Holdings
Investors own 11,558 single-family properties in Carteret County, NC, representing a significant 36.5% of the total market. The ownership is overwhelmingly skewed towards individuals, who hold 10,176 properties (88.0%) compared to 1,560 (13.5%) owned by companies.
Pricing
In Q4 2025, landlords paid an average of $679,655, a staggering 39.0% premium over traditional homeowners ($488,883). This amounts to investors paying an extra $190,772 per property, a gap that widened throughout the year.
Activity
Landlords were a dominant force in the Q4 2025 market, acquiring 132 properties, which accounts for 47.0% of all sales. Activity was driven by new entrants, with 179 new single-property landlord entities joining the market.
Market Share
The market is definitively controlled by small-scale operators, as mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) own 98.8% of all investor housing. In contrast, institutional investors (1,000+ properties) have a near-zero presence, controlling just 0.1% of the portfolio.
Ownership Type
While individual investors form the backbone of the market, a shift to corporate structures occurs as portfolios scale up. Companies become the majority owners in the 6-10 property tier, signaling a move toward professionalization.
Transactions
Investors are aggressive accumulators, acting as strong net buyers with a 10.3-to-1 buy-to-sell ratio in Q4 (206 buys vs. 20 sells). There was no recorded transaction activity for institutional investors, indicating this trend is driven by smaller landlords.
Market Narrative

The investor landscape in Carteret County, NC is a story of profound small-landlord dominance, a stark contrast to the national narrative of corporate consolidation. Investors own a substantial 11,558 single-family homes, representing 36.5% of the county's entire SFR market. This portfolio is overwhelmingly controlled by mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties), who hold a commanding 98.8% share, while institutional investors are virtually absent with a mere 0.1% stake. Ownership is primarily in the hands of individuals, who control 88.0% of the properties, underscoring a fragmented market driven by local capital.

Investor behavior in Carteret County defies conventional wisdom, particularly in pricing. In Q4 2025, landlords purchased nearly half (47.0%) of all homes sold and did so by paying an unprecedented 39.0% premium over traditional homeowners—an average of $190,772 more per property. This trend, coupled with the fact that new, single-property investors paid the highest prices, suggests fierce competition for high-value assets, likely vacation or coastal homes with high rental income potential. This aggressive acquisition strategy is confirmed by transaction data, which shows landlords are strong net buyers, acquiring over 10 properties for every one they sold in Q4.

The key takeaway from this data is that Carteret County is experiencing a small-investor boom, not a corporate takeover. The market dynamics are shaped by a rush of new, well-capitalized individuals targeting a premium segment of the housing market, likely for short-term or vacation rentals. This has created an environment where investors consistently outbid homeowners for the most desirable properties, particularly in hyper-concentrated zip codes where investor ownership already exceeds 58%. This intense, localized activity is fundamentally reshaping the county's housing stock into a rental-focused market controlled by thousands of individual operators.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 19, 2026 at 01:36 AM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyCarteret (NC)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4