Lincoln (MT) Investor Pulse Report (2025-Q4)

Real Estate comprehensive investment analysis of investor activity in the Lincoln (MT) single-family residential housing market. Discover ownership trends, transaction patterns, and market insights.

Market Overview

Total SFR Properties in Lincoln (MT)
2,482
Total Investors in Lincoln (MT)
878
Investor Owned SFR in Lincoln (MT)
639(25.7%)
Individual Landlords
Landlords
810
SFR Owned
573
Corporate Landlords
Landlords
68
SFR Owned
81
Understanding Property Counts

Distinct Count Methodology: The total 639 represents distinct properties — if 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides the most accurate representation of investor-owned SFR properties.

Why totals don't sum: When broken down by Individual vs Corporate ownership (or by tier), properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. For example, if a property is co-owned by an individual AND a corporate landlord, it appears in both counts. This is why Individual + Corporate totals may exceed the distinct total by 2-4%, and percentages may sum to 100-104%.

Market Visualization

Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section4 Distribution

Key Market Insights

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lincoln County's SFR Market, Driving 99.8% Ownership
Individual, mom-and-pop investors overwhelmingly control Lincoln County's 639 landlord-owned SFR properties, comprising 99.8% of the portfolio. In Q4 2025, landlords, exclusively mom-and-pops, secured a significant 21.6% discount compared to homeowners. Landlords remain strong net buyers, steadily expanding their local portfolios.
Landlord Owned Current Holdings
Individual investors own 89.7% of Lincoln County's 639 landlord-owned SFR properties.
A high 99.8% of these properties are rented, underscoring a strong rental market focus. Cash purchases (404 properties) significantly outnumber financed properties (235 properties) in landlord portfolios.
Landlord vs Traditional Homeowners
Lincoln County landlords secured a substantial 21.6% discount on Q4 SFR acquisitions vs. homeowners.
In Q4 2025, landlords paid $323,257, which was $88,848 less than traditional homeowners' average price of $412,105. The quarterly price gap shows significant volatility, with Q3 2025 seeing landlords pay a 43.5% premium, while Q2 2025 showed an 18.8% discount.
Current Quarter Purchases
Landlords captured 21.6% of Q4 SFR purchases in Lincoln County, with 100% from mom-and-pop investors.
All 8 landlord acquisitions in Q4 2025 were made by single-property investors (Tier 01), signaling new market entrants or small portfolio expansions. Institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no purchasing activity in the quarter.
Ownership by Tier
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.8% of Lincoln County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Single-property investors (Tier 01) alone dominate, holding 89.0% (574 properties) of the entire landlord-owned portfolio. Institutional investors (Tier 09) have no recorded ownership in the county's SFR market.
Ownership by Tier & Type
Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 90.7% of single-property portfolios in Lincoln County.
Individuals maintain majority ownership up to the 3-5 property tier, comprising 56.7% of those portfolios. No explicit crossover point where companies become majority owners is observed within the available tiers for Lincoln County.
Geographic Distribution
Zip code 59917 in Lincoln County leads with 44.1% investor-owned properties.
Zip code 59923 holds the highest number of investor-owned SFR properties at 238, while zip code 59917, with 222 properties, demonstrates the highest landlord penetration rate at 44.1%. This indicates concentrated investor activity in specific local areas.
Historical Transactions
Lincoln County landlords remain strong net buyers, with a 6.67x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
In 2025, landlords acquired 40 properties while selling only 6, reflecting consistent portfolio expansion. Institutional investors showed no net activity in Year 2024, with 1 buy and 1 sell, indicating their minimal market influence.
Current Quarter Transactions
Landlords drove 22.8% of Q4 transactions in Lincoln County, entirely from single-property investors.
All 13 landlord transactions in Q4 2025 were made by single-property investors (Tier 01) at an average purchase price of $323,257. No inter-landlord trading activity was reported, with 0 properties bought from other landlords (0.0%).

Want deeper insights tailored to your investment strategy?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Current Holdings Portfolio

Analysis of landlord property holdings by type, financing method, and owner category

Chart Section5 Holdings
Key Insight
Individual investors own 89.7% of Lincoln County's 639 landlord-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lincoln County currently own 639 Single Family Residential (SFR) properties, representing 25.7% of the total SFR market in the county, indicating a substantial investor presence.

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate the market, holding 573 properties (89.7%) of the landlord-owned SFR portfolio, compared to company-owned properties at 81 (12.7%). This highlights the strong 'mom-and-pop' nature of the local rental market.

A striking 99.8% (638 out of 639) of landlord-owned properties are rented, demonstrating a clear focus on rental income generation rather than other investment strategies. This figure underscores the critical role investors play in providing rental housing in the county.

The financing composition of landlord portfolios reveals a preference for cash acquisitions, with 404 properties purchased outright compared to 235 properties that are financed. This suggests a less leveraged approach to property acquisition by local investors.

The total landlord entity count stands at 878, with individual landlords comprising 810 entities, and company landlords making up 68. This further reinforces the dominance of individual owners, even when considering the number of active entities.

Acquisition Timing & Pricing

Comparison of acquisition prices between landlords and traditional homeowners

Key Insight
Lincoln County landlords secured a substantial 21.6% discount on Q4 SFR acquisitions vs. homeowners.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lincoln County achieved a significant acquisition advantage in Q4 2025, paying an average of $323,257 for SFR properties. This represents a substantial $88,848 discount, or 21.6% less, than the $412,105 paid by traditional homeowners.

The price differential between landlords and homeowners in Lincoln County has been highly volatile quarter-over-quarter. While Q4 saw a deep discount for landlords, Q3 2025 showed landlords paying a considerable $130,545 premium (43.5% higher) at $430,809 compared to homeowners' $300,264.

Looking back, landlords consistently secured discounts in Q2 and Q1 2025, albeit smaller ones than Q4. In Q2, they paid $275,863 (18.8% less than homeowners), and in Q1, $340,480 (4.6% less). This pattern suggests inconsistent market dynamics impacting investor pricing strategies.

Across longer timeframes, landlord acquisition prices have shown an upward trend, rising from an average of $259,506 during 2020-2023 to $361,529 in Year 2025, indicating a 39.3% appreciation over this period. However, Year 2024 saw lower average prices at $292,474.

The data for 2025-Q4 shows 8 distinct properties purchased by landlords, confirming recent activity. This contrasts with previous quarters in 2025 which showed 0 distinct properties purchased in the raw `section6-1.csv` table, suggesting data aggregation differences between purchase counts and pricing averages for some periods.

Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison

Current Quarter Purchase Summary

Analysis of Q4 2025 purchase activity by investor tier and type

Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Tiers
Key Insight
Landlords captured 21.6% of Q4 SFR purchases in Lincoln County, with 100% from mom-and-pop investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords accounted for 8 of the 37 total SFR purchases in Lincoln County during Q4 2025, securing a notable 21.6% share of the quarterly market activity. This indicates a significant continued interest from investors.

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) were exclusively responsible for all landlord purchases in Q4, acquiring 8 properties, which represents 100.0% of the quarter's investor activity. This highlights the foundational role of smaller investors in the local market.

Specifically, all 8 properties purchased by landlords in Q4 were acquired by single-property investors (Tier 01), involving 13 distinct entities. This suggests a strong influx of new or first-time landlords expanding into the market.

The complete absence of institutional investor (Tier 09) purchases in Q4 (0.0% of landlord purchases) reinforces that Lincoln County's SFR market is predominantly driven by individual and small-scale investors.

Ownership by Purchase Tier

Distribution of investor-owned properties across portfolio size tiers

Key Insight
Mom-and-pop landlords control 99.8% of Lincoln County's investor-owned SFR properties.
Detailed Findings

Mom-and-pop landlords (Tiers 01-04) overwhelmingly dominate the investor-owned SFR market in Lincoln County, controlling a staggering 99.8% of the 639 properties. This confirms the market is almost entirely composed of small-scale investors.

Single-property landlords (Tier 01) form the bedrock of this market, holding 574 properties, which accounts for 89.0% of all investor-owned SFR. This concentration indicates a highly accessible market for individual property owners.

The remaining 10.8% of the mom-and-pop portfolio is distributed among two-property (Tier 02) owners with 42 properties (6.5%), small landlords (Tier 03-05) with 26 properties (4.0%), and very small landlords (Tier 06-10) with 2 properties (0.3%).

The absence of any properties owned by institutional investors (Tier 09, 1000+ properties) at 0.0% further distinguishes Lincoln County as a market fundamentally different from those targeted by large corporate entities.

While acquisition prices by tier are not fully available across all timeframes, the overall distribution clearly signals a robust and healthy local investor ecosystem primarily driven by small, individual buyers.

Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison

Need custom portfolio analysis based on these tier insights?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Ownership by Tier & Owner Type

Breakdown of individual vs corporate ownership across portfolio tiers

Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Key Insight
Individual investors overwhelmingly lead, holding 90.7% of single-property portfolios in Lincoln County.
Detailed Findings

Individual investors overwhelmingly dominate ownership across all reported tiers in Lincoln County, particularly in the smallest portfolios. For single-property investors (Tier 01), individuals account for 529 properties (90.7%), compared to 54 properties (9.3%) owned by companies.

This individual investor dominance continues into slightly larger portfolios. In the two-property tier (Tier 02), individuals own 31 properties (73.8%), significantly outpacing companies with 11 properties (26.2%).

Even in the 3-5 property tier, individual investors maintain a majority, holding 17 properties (56.7%) compared to 13 properties (43.3%) owned by companies. This suggests that the local market primarily fosters individual, rather than corporate, portfolio growth.

Given these figures, a clear crossover point where company ownership surpasses individual ownership is not evident within the provided tier data for Lincoln County, reinforcing the local market's reliance on private investors.

Geographic Distribution

Regional breakdown of investor activity and ownership patterns

Key Insight
Zip code 59917 in Lincoln County leads with 44.1% investor-owned properties.
Detailed Findings

Within Lincoln County, MT, investor-owned SFR properties are highly concentrated in specific zip codes. The 59923 zip code leads by property count with 238 investor-owned properties, representing a 17.1% investor ownership rate.

However, the 59917 zip code shows the highest investor ownership rate at 44.1%, with 222 landlord-owned SFR properties. This signifies that nearly half of the SFR housing in this area is held by investors, indicating a deep market penetration.

The 59935 zip code also exhibits a significant investor presence, with 154 properties translating to a 34.9% ownership rate. This, alongside 59917, points to areas where rental housing supply is heavily influenced by investors.

Other areas like 59930 (23 properties, 26.4% rate) and 59918 (1 property, 2.9% rate) show varied levels of investor activity, ranging from moderate concentration to very minimal, suggesting localized investment strategies.

The strong correlation between zip codes leading by total investor-owned property count and those with high investor ownership percentages indicates that investor activity in Lincoln County is not evenly distributed but rather focused on specific, attractive sub-geographies.

Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Pct

Historical Transactions

Buy/sell transaction trends over time for all landlords and institutional investors

Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Key Insight
Lincoln County landlords remain strong net buyers, with a 6.67x buy/sell ratio in 2025.
Detailed Findings

All landlords in Lincoln County have demonstrated a consistent and strong net buyer position over the past two years, actively expanding their SFR portfolios. In Year 2025, landlords bought 40 properties and sold only 6, resulting in a robust 6.67x buy/sell ratio and a net gain of 34 properties.

This buying trend was even more pronounced in Year 2024, where landlords acquired 56 properties against just 5 sales, achieving an impressive 11.2x buy/sell ratio and a net increase of 51 properties. This consistent accumulation underscores a bullish outlook by local investors.

Quarterly data for 2025 also reflects this pattern: in Q3, landlords bought 15 properties and sold 3 (a 5x buy/sell ratio), and in Q2, they bought 7 properties and sold 1 (a 7x buy/sell ratio). These figures indicate sustained demand and growth by landlords.

In stark contrast to the overall landlord activity, institutional investors (1000+ tier) show negligible transaction activity. In Year 2024, they had 1 buy and 1 sell, resulting in no net change and reinforcing their minimal presence in Lincoln County's SFR market.

The average buy prices for all landlords have generally trended upwards from Q2 2025 ($275,863) to Q3 2025 ($430,809), with Q4 2025 at $323,257. The average sell prices are not directly comparable to buy prices in the provided `section11-1.csv` for margin analysis, though general transaction volume trends are clear.

Current Quarter Transactions

Q4 2025 transaction analysis by tier, price, and inter-landlord activity

Key Insight
Landlords drove 22.8% of Q4 transactions in Lincoln County, entirely from single-property investors.
Detailed Findings

Landlords in Lincoln County were actively involved in the Q4 2025 market, participating in 13 out of 57 total SFR transactions, which represents a substantial 22.8% of all activity. This demonstrates their continued engagement in property acquisition.

The entirety of landlord transaction volume in Q4 originated from single-property investors (Tier 01), who completed all 13 transactions. This highlights the ongoing vitality and influence of new or small-scale investors in the market.

These Tier 01 investors acquired properties at an average purchase price of $323,257 in Q4. This price point aligns with the overall landlord average from Section 6, indicating consistent valuation for smaller portfolios.

Notably, there was no reported inter-landlord trading activity in Q4, with 0 properties (0.0%) bought from other landlords. This suggests that landlords are primarily acquiring properties from non-investor sellers rather than circulating within the existing investor pool.

Consistent with ownership and purchasing trends, institutional investors (Tier 09) registered no transaction activity in Q4, further cementing the local market as a domain for individual and small-scale landlords.

Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Prices
Chart Section12 Prices Detail

Ready to leverage this data for your real estate investment decisions?

TALK TO AN EXPERT

Executive Summary

Mom-and-Pop Investors Dominate Lincoln County, Driving 99.8% Ownership and Strong Net Buying
Holdings
Landlords own 639 SFR properties in Lincoln County, Montana (25.7% of the total SFR market), with individual investors holding 573 properties (89.7%) and companies owning 81 properties (12.7%) of the landlord portfolio.
Pricing
Landlords paid an average of $323,257 in Q4 2025, securing a significant 21.6% discount ($88,848 difference) compared to traditional homeowners' average price of $412,105, despite prior quarterly volatility.
Activity
Q4 2025 saw landlords purchase 8 properties, representing 21.6% of all SFR sales, with all acquisitions made by new single-property landlords (Tier 01).
Market Share
Mom-and-pop landlords (1-10 properties) overwhelmingly control 99.8% of investor-owned SFR housing, while institutional investors (1000+ properties) hold no market share in Lincoln County.
Ownership Type
Individual investors dominate smaller portfolios, holding 90.7% of single-property assets, with no observed tier where companies become majority owners within Lincoln County's investor market.
Transactions
Landlords in Lincoln County are strong net buyers with a 6.67x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (40 buys vs. 6 sells), reflecting consistent portfolio expansion, while institutional investors showed no net activity for Year 2024 (1 buy vs. 1 sell).
Market Narrative

The real estate investor landscape in Lincoln County, Montana, is overwhelmingly dominated by individual, mom-and-pop landlords. These investors collectively own 639 SFR properties, accounting for a significant 25.7% of the total SFR market in Lincoln County. A striking 99.8% of these properties are controlled by landlords owning 1-10 properties, with single-property investors alone holding 89.0% of the entire investor-owned portfolio. This stark concentration highlights a market fundamentally driven by local, small-scale investment rather than large corporate entities.

Investor behavior in Lincoln County showcases consistent accumulation and strategic purchasing. In Q4 2025, landlords, exclusively comprising single-property investors, secured 21.6% of all SFR purchases and obtained a substantial 21.6% discount compared to traditional homeowners, paying $323,257 versus $412,105. This purchasing advantage, despite quarterly price volatility, signals a keen market acumen among local investors. Historically, landlords have maintained a strong net buyer position, with a 6.67x buy/sell ratio in 2025 (40 buys vs. 6 sells), indicating steady portfolio growth and long-term commitment to the market.

The data strongly suggests that Lincoln County's housing market is heavily influenced by a robust and expanding base of local, individual investors who primarily engage in cash acquisitions for rental purposes. The near absence of institutional activity and inter-landlord trading reinforces a direct, local investor-to-homeowner transaction flow. This dynamic points to a stable rental market supported by a distributed network of small landlords, rather than being subject to the large-scale investment strategies often seen in more institutionalized markets across Montana.

About This Report

Report Methodology

This report analyzes BatchData's Investor Pulse dataset, covering single-family residential (SFR) investor activity across the United States.

Data is extracted from 15 CSV files covering ownership, transactions, and pricing trends, then analyzed using AI-powered insights.

Property Counting Methodology:

Distinct Counts: All headline totals represent distinct properties. If 2+ landlords co-own the same property, it's counted only once. This provides accurate market representation.

Category Breakdowns: When analyzing by tier (01-09), owner type (Individual/Corporate), or occupancy status, properties with co-ownership across categories are counted once per category. This causes breakdowns to sum 2-4% higher than totals, and percentages may sum to 100-104%. This is expected and reflects co-ownership patterns.

TierPropertiesCategory
01-041-10Mom-and-Pop
05-0711-100Mid-Size
08101-1000Large
091000+Institutional
About BatchData

BatchData provides comprehensive real estate data and analytics, offering insights into property ownership, investor activity, and market trends across the United States.

The Investor Pulse dataset tracks single-family residential (SFR) investor behavior at national, state, county, and MSA levels.

For more information, visit batchdata.io or explore our API documentation.

Data Freshness
Report GeneratedMarch 17, 2026 at 05:18 PM
Data PeriodQ4 2025
Geography LevelCounty
GeographyLincoln (MT)
×
Chart Section2 Coverage
Chart Section2 Coverage
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
Chart Section3 Ownership Donut
×
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
Chart Section3 Ownership Bar
×
Chart Section4 Distribution
Chart Section4 Distribution
×
Chart Section5 Holdings
Chart Section5 Holdings
×
Chart Section6 Prices
Chart Section6 Prices
×
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
Chart Section6 Prices Alt
×
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section6 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section6 Trends
Chart Section6 Trends
×
Chart Section7 Purchases
Chart Section7 Purchases
×
Chart Section7 Tiers
Chart Section7 Tiers
×
Chart Section8 Distribution
Chart Section8 Distribution
×
Chart Section8 Prices
Chart Section8 Prices
×
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
Chart Section8 Prices Q4
×
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
Chart Section8 Prices 2020
×
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section8 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section9 Ownership
Chart Section9 Ownership
×
Chart Section9 Growth
Chart Section9 Growth
×
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
Chart Section9 Growth Q4
×
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
Chart Section9 Yoy Comparison
×
Chart Section10 Top Regions
Chart Section10 Top Regions
×
Chart Section10 Top Pct
Chart Section10 Top Pct
×
Chart Section11 Buysell
Chart Section11 Buysell
×
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
Chart Section11 Buysell Price
×
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
Chart Section11 Yoy All Landlords
×
Chart Section11 Institutional
Chart Section11 Institutional
×
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
Chart Section11 Institutional Price
×
Chart Section12 Transactions
Chart Section12 Transactions
×
Chart Section12 Prices